Despite Cameroon’s immense sand reserves, several enterprises continue to import standardized sands to investigate the properties of concretes and mortars and to guarantee the durability of built structures. The present work not only falls within the scope of import substitution but also aims to characterize and improve the properties of local sand (Sanaga) and compare them with those of imported standardized sand widely used in laboratories. Sanaga sand was treated with HCl and then characterized in the laboratory. The constituent minerals of Sanaga sand are quartz, albite, biotite, and kaolinite. The silica content (SiO₂) of this untreated sand is 93.48 wt.%. After treatment, it rose 97.5 wt.% for 0.5 M and 97.3 wt.% for 1 M HCl concentration. The sand is clean (ES, 97.67%–98.87%), with fineness moduli of 2.45, 2.48, and 2.63 for untreated sand and sand treated with HCl concentrations of 0.5 and 1 M respectively. The mechanical strengths (39.59–42.4 MPa) obtained on mortars made with untreated Sanaga sand are unsatisfactory compared with those obtained on mortars made with standardized sand and with the expected strengths. The HCl treatment used in this study significantly improved these strengths (41.12–52.36 MPa), resulting in strength deficiencies of less than 10% after 28 curing days compared with expected values. Thus, the treatment of Sanaga sand with a 0.5 M HCl concentration offers better results for use as standardized sand.

1. Aytekin B, Mardani-Aghabaglou A. Sustainable Materials: A Review of Recycled Concrete Aggregate Utilization as Pavement Material. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board. 2021; 2676(3): 468-491. doi: 10.1177/03611981211052026

2. Tam VWY, Soomro M, Evangelista ACJ. A review of recycled aggregate in concrete applications (2000–2017). Construction and Building Materials. 2018; 172: 272-292. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.03.240

3. Pascal P. Sand, rarer than one thinks. Environmental Development. 2014; 11: 208-218. doi: 10.1016/j.envdev.2014.04.001

4. Dybas C. Sand: A Resource That’s Washing Away. Oceanography. 2020; 33(1): 8-10. doi: 10.5670/oceanog.2020.108

5. Sabih G, Tarefder RA, Jamil SM. Optimization of Gradation and Fineness Modulus of Naturally Fine Sands for Improved Performance as Fine Aggregate in Concrete. Procedia Engineering. 2016; 145: 66-73. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.04.016

6. Tientcheu WH, Ekengoue CM, Lele RF, et al. Socioeconomic impacts of sand harvesting along the Sanaga River in Nkol’Ossananga locality (Yaoundé-Cameroon): a vision toward a mechanized operation for sustainable exploitation. Environnement, Ingénierie & Développement. 2021; 85: 34-39.

7. Elenga RG. Properties of sand used in construction in the Congo and formulation of a local standardized sand. Sciences Appliquées et de l’Ingénieur. 2019; 3(1): 7-13.

8. Debreuil P, Guiscafre J, Nouvelot JF, Olivry JC. The Sanaga river basin (French). OSTORM; 1975.

9. NF P 94-050. Soils: reconnaissance and testing - Determination of water content by weight of materials-Steaming method. (French). AFNOR; 1995.

10. NF P 94-056. Particle size analysis. Dry sieving method after washing (French). AFNOR; 1996.

11. NF P 18-540. Aggregates, definition, specification compliance (French). AFNOR; 1997.

12. NF P 18-598. Sand equivalent (French). AFNOR; 1991.

13. NF EN 1097-3. Tests For Determining the Mechanical and Physical Characteristics of Aggregates-Part 3: Method for Determining Bulk Density and Intergranular Porosity (French). AFNOR; 1998.

14. NF P 94-054. Soils: reconnaissance and testing-Determination of the density of solid particles in soils-Water pycnometer method (French). AFNOR; 1991;

15. EN 196-1. Methods of testing cements-Part 1: Determination of strengths (French). AFNOR; 2006

16. NF EN 12390-3. Tests for hardened concrete-Part 3: compressive strength of the specimens (French). AFNOR; 2012.

17. NF P 94-422. Rocks: Determination of tensile strength-Indirect method-Brazilian test (French). AFNOR; 2001.

18. KoiralaM P, Joshi EBR. Construction sand, Quality and supply management in infrastructure project. International Journal of Advances in Engineering & Scientific Research. 2017; 4: 01-15.

19. Hasdemir S, Tuğrul A, Yilmaz M. Evaluation of alkali reactivity of natural sands. Construction and Building Materials. 2012; 29: 378-385. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.10.029

20. Pialy P. Study of some clay materials from the Lembo site (Cameroon): mineralogy, sintering behaviour and analysis of elasticity properties (French) [PhD thesis]. Université de Limoges; 2009.

21. Nekous M. Elaboration of silicon from dune sand.Memoire de magister (French). Univ Mohamed BOUDIAF; 2013. p. 100.

22. Dupain R, Lanchon R, Saint-Arronan JC. Aggregates, soils, cements and concretes: Characterization of civil engineering materials using laboratory tests (French). Journal of Sedimentary Petrology. 2009; 27: 3-26.

23. Ben Abdelghani F, Maherezi W, Boutouil M. Geotechnical characterization of marine dredged sediments with a view to their use in road construction (French). Environnement, Ingénierie & Développement. 2014; N°66-mars 2014. doi: 10.4267/dechets-sciences-techniques.269

24. Goltermann P, Johansen V, Palbøl L. Packing of Aggregates: An Alternative Tool to Determine the Optimal Aggregate Mix. ACI Materials Journal. 1997; 94(5). doi: 10.14359/328

25. Makhloufi Z, Bederina M, Bouhicha M, et al. Effect of Mineral Admixtures on Resistance to Sulfuric Acid Solution of Mortars with Quaternary Binders. Physics Procedia. 2014; 55: 329-335. doi: 10.1016/j.phpro.2014.07.048

26. Sujatha T, Kannapiran K, Nagan S. Strength assessment of heat cured geopolymer concrete slender column. Asian Journal of Civil Engineering. 2012; 13: 635-646.

27. ASTM C. Standard Specification for Concrete Aggregates. Available online: https://www.astm.org/d2419-14.html (accessed on 2 March 2024).

28. ASTM. (2002). Standard test methods for sand equivalent value of soils and fine aggregate. Available online: https://www.astm.org/d2419-14.html (accessed on 2 March 2024).

29. EBCS. Ethiopian building codes of standard, EBXCS. EBCS; 2009.

30. ISO. Geotechnical Investigation and Testing-Identification and Classification of Soil-Part 2: Principles for a Classification. Available online: https://www.iso.org/standard/66346.html (accessed on 2 March 2024).

31. Dundulis K, Gadeikis S, Gadeikyté S, et al. Problems of usage of soil classification system for sand soils of Lithuania. In: Modern building materials, structures and techniques, The10th International conference; 19-21 May 2010; Vilnius, Lithuania.

32. Kumar DP, Sashidhar CC. Effect of fineness modulus of manufactured sand on fresh properties of self-compacting concrete. The Indian Concrete Journal. 2018; 92(1): 77-81.

33. Normes NF EN 933-1. Tests for determining the geometric properties of aggregates - Part 1: Determination of grain size - Sieve size analysis (French). AFNOR; 1997.

34. Hasdemir S. Effect of methylene blue test results on concrete compressive strengths. Beton; 2004.

35. Eryurtlu D, Isık M, Öztekin E. Investigation of the effect of sand equivalence test on concrete performance (Turkish). Beton; 2004.

36. Kamga DT, Bishweka BC, Kamdo G, Ngapgue F. Physical characterization of river sands to improve their use in concrete production (French). International Journal of Innovation and Scientific Research. 2016; 25(2): 517-527.

37. Astm C. Standard Test Method for Surface Moisture in Fine Aggregates. Available online: https://www.astm.org/c0070-20.html (accessed on 2 March 2024).

38. Aashto T. Standard method of test for total evaporable moisture content of aggregate by drying. ASTM International; 2000.

39. American Society for Testing Materials. Test method for density, relative density (Specific Gravity) and absorption of coarse aggregate. ASTM C-127; 2001.

40. Aslam F, Zaid O, Althoey F, et al. Evaluating the influence of fly ash and waste glass on the characteristics of coconut fibers reinforced concrete. Structural Concrete. 2022; 24(2): 2440-2459. doi: 10.1002/suco.202200183

41. Monosi S, Sani D, Tittarelli F. Used Foundry Sand in Cement Mortars and Concrete Production. The Open Waste Management Journal. 2010; 3(1): 18-25. doi: 10.2174/1876400201003010018

42. Pancharathi RK, Sangoju B, Chaudhary S, et al. Advances in Sustainable Construction Materials. Springer Singapore; 2020. doi: 10.1007/978-981-15-3361-7

43. Vázquez-Rodriguez FJ, Valadez-Ramos J, Puente-Ornelas R, et al. Nonferrous waste foundry sand and milling fly ash as alternative low mechanical strength materials for construction industry: Effect on mortars at early ages. Revista Română de Materiale Romanian Journal of Materials. 2018; 48 (3):338–345.