Urban morphologies in the global south are shaped by a complex interplay of historical imprints, from colonial legacies and ethnic tensions to waves of modernization and decolonization efforts. This study delves into the urban morphology of Hangzhou during the late 19th and early 20th centuries, unraveling its transformative patterns steered by a convergence of spatial politics, economic forces, and cultural dynamics. Drawing upon a unique blend of historical map restoration techniques, we unearth pivotal morphological nuances that bridge Hangzhou’s transition from its pre-modern fabric to its modern-day urban layout. We uncover key shifts such as the movement from intricate street layouts to systematic grids, the strategic integration of public spaces like West Lakeside Park, and the city’s evolving urban epicenter mirroring its broader socio-political and economic narratives. These insights not only spotlight Hangzhou’s distinct urban journey in the context of ethnic conflicts, Western influences, and decolonization drives but also underscore the value of context-sensitive urban morphological research in the global south. Our findings emphasize the criticality of synergizing varied methodologies and theoretical perspectives to deepen our comprehension of urban transitions, sculpt place identities, and invigorate public imagination in global urban planning.

1. Wendel DDB. Introduction: Toward a spatial epistemology of politics. Spatializing Politics: Essays on Power and Place 2015.

2. Lara FL. New (sub) urbanism and old inequalities in Brazilian gated communities. Journal of Urban Design 2011; 16(3): 369–380. doi: 10.1080/13574809.2011.571160

3. Gururani S, Kennedy L. The co-production of space, politics and subjectivities in India’s urban peripheries. South Asia Multidisciplinary Academic Journal 2021; 26. doi: 10.4000/samaj.7365

4. Noizet H. Fabrique urbaine: A new concept in urban history and morphology. Urban Morphology 2009; 13(1): 55–66. doi: 10.51347/jum.v13i1.3947

5. Minner J. Revealing synergies, tensions, and silences between preservation and planning. Journal of the American Planning Association 2016; 82(2): 72–87. doi: 10.1080/01944363.2016.1147976

6. Alonso W. The historic and the structural theories of urban form: Their implications for urban renewal. Land Economics 1964; 40(2): 227–231. doi: 10.2307/3144355

7. Rowe C, Slutzky R. Transparency: Literal and phenomenal. Perspecta 1963; 8: 45–54. doi: 10.2307/1566901

8. Rapoport A. Human Aspects of Urban form: Towards a Man—Environment Approach to Urban form and Design. Pergamon Press; 1977.

9. Bandauko E, Arku G, Nyantakyi-Frimpong H. A systematic review of gated communities and the challenge of urban transformation in African cities. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 2021; 37(1): 339–368. doi: 10.1007/s10901-021-09840-1

10. Kusno A. The post-colonial unconscious: Observing mega-imagistic urban projects in Asia. In: Bharne V (editor). The Emerging Asian City. Routledge; 2012. pp. 168–178.

11. Blau E. Urban intermedia: City, archive, narrative. In: Kurgan L, Brawley D (editors). Ways of knowing cities. Columbia University Press; 2019. pp. 207–239.

12. Rajagopal B. Locating the Third World in cultural geography. In: Third World Legal Study. The Official publication of the International Third World Legal Studies Association; 1999. pp. 1–20.

13. Bloyce D. Research is a messy process: A case study of a figurational sociology approach to conventional issues in social science research methods. Graduate Journal of Social Science 2004; 1(1): 144–166.

14. Carolini GY. Valuing possibility: South-south cooperation and participatory budgeting in maputo, mozambique. In: Silva CN (editor). Urban Planning in Sub-Saharan Africa: Colonial and Postcolonial Planning Cultures. Routledge; 2015.

15. Pietrostefani E, Holman N. The politics of conservation planning: A comparative study of urban heritage making in the Global North and the Global South. Progress in Planning 2021; 152: 100505. doi: 10.1016/j.progress.2020.100505

16. Arribas-Bel D, Fleischmann M. Spatial Signatures—Understanding (urban) spaces through form and function. Habitat International 2022; 128: 102641. doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2022.102641

17. Batra L. A Review of Urbanisation and Urban Policy in Post-Independent India. Centre for the Study of Law and Governance; 2007.

18. Laycock SD, Brown PG, Laycock RG, Day AM. Aligning archive maps and extracting footprints for analysis of historic urban environments. Computers & Graphics 2011; 35(2): 242–249. doi: 10.1016/j.cag.2011.01.002

19. Osterhammel J. Semi-colonialism and informal empire in twentieth-century China: Towards a framework of analysis. In: Wolfgang J (editor). Imperialism and After: Continuities and Discontinuities. Allen & Unwin; 1986. pp. 290–314.

20. Wang Y. Modernism and its discontent in Shanghai: The dubious agency of the semi-colonized in 1929. In: Goodman B, Goodman D (editors). Twentieth Century Colonialism and China. Routledge; 2012. pp. 167–179.

21. Padua M. Hybrid Modernity: The Public Park in Late 20th Century China. Routledge; 2020.

22. Whitehand JWR. Conzenian urban morphology and urban landscapes. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Space Syntax Symposium; 12–15 June 2007; Istanbul, Turkey. pp. 12–15.

23. de Oliveira VMA. Urban Morphology. Springer International Publishing; 2022.

24. Caniggia G, Maffei GL. Architectural Composition and Building Typology: Interpreting Basic Building. Alinea Editrice; 2002.

25. Gu K. Urban morphology of China in the post-socialist age: Towards a framework for analysis. Urban Design International 2001; 6: 125–142.

26. Widodo J. Historical morphology of coastal cities in Southeast Asia. In: Padawangi R (editor). Routledge Handbook of Urbanization in Southeast Asia. Routledge; 2018. pp. 391–399.

27. Kalia R. Modernism, modernization and post‐colonial India: a reflective essay. Planning Perspectives 2006; 21(2): 133–156.

28. Duque JC, Lozano-Gracia N, Patino JE, Restrepo P. Urban form and productivity: What shapes are Latin-American cities? Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science 2021; 49(1): 131–150. doi: 10.1177/2399808321999309

29. Fleischmann M, Ombretta R, Sergio P. Measuring urban form: Overcoming terminological inconsistencies for a quantitative and comprehensive morphologic analysis of cities. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science 2021; 48(8): 2133–2150.

30. Sridhar KS. Urbanization in the Global South: Perspectives and Challenges. Routledge India; 2021.

31. Peimani N, Kamalipour H. Assembling transit urban design in the global south: Urban morphology in relation to forms of urbanity and informality in the public space surrounding transit stations. Urban Science 2022; 6(1): 18. doi: 10.3390/urbansci6010018

32. de Andrés EÁ, Güell JMF, Smith H. Instruments for analysing urban conflicts in the global south: The case of urban transformation processes in Dakar. Habitat International 2015; 49: 187–196. doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.05.021

33. Myers G. Urbanisation in the global south. In: Shackleton CM, Cilliers SS, Davoren E, du Toit MJ (editors). Urban Ecology in the Global South. Springer Cham; 2022. pp. 27–49.

34. Larbi M, Kellett J, Palazzo E. Urban sustainability transitions in the global south: A case study of Curitiba and Accra. Urban Forum 2022; 33(2): 223–244. doi: 10.1007/s12132-021-09438-4

35. Harley JB. Deconstructing the map. Reprinted from Cartographica 1989; 26(2): 1–20. doi: 10.3138/E635-7827-1757-9T53

36. Edney MH. Mapping an Empire: The Geographical Construction of British India, 1765–1843. University of Chicago Press; 1997.

37. Black J. Maps and Politics. University of Chicago Press; 2000.

38. Akerman JR, Karrow RW. Maps: Finding Our Place in the World. University of Chicago Press; 2007.

39. Hardt J, Nadav N, Brigitta S. Combining historical maps, travel itineraries and least-cost path modelling to reconstruct pre-modern travel routes and locations in Northern Tigray (Ethiopia). The Cartographic Journal 2023; 1–17.

40. Harari M. Cities in bad shape: Urban geometry in India. American Economic Review 2021; 110(8): 2377–2421.

41. DeBats DA, Gregory IN. Introduction: Historical GIS and the study of urban history. Social Science History 2011; 35(4): 455–463. doi:10.1215/01455532-1381814

42. Vaughan L. Mapping Society: The Spatial Dimensions of Social Cartography. UCL Press; 2019.

43. Hargett JM. Song dynasty local gazetteers and their place in the history of Difangzhi writing. Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 1996; 56(2): 405–442. doi: 10.2307/2719404

44. Haw SG. Marco polo: From Hangzhou to Quanzhou. Asiatische Studien-Études Asiatiques 2021; 74(3): 485–512. doi: 10.1515/asia-2020-0010

45. Zhang R, Taylor K. Cultural landscape meanings. The case of West Lake, Hangzhou, China. Landscape Research 2020; 45(2): 164–178. doi: 10.1080/01426397.2019.1589438

46. Bickers R, Jackson I. Introduction: Law, land and power: Treaty ports and concessions in modern China. In: Bickers R, Jackson I (editors). Treaty Ports in Modern China. Routledge; 2016. pp. 1–22.

47. Fu S. Shan-shui myth and history: The locally planned process of combining the ancient city and West Lake in Hangzhou, 1896–1927. Planning Perspectives 2016; 31(3): 363–390. doi: 10.1080/02665433.2015.1079795

48. Smith RJ. The Qing Dynasty and Traditional Chinese Culture. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers; 2015.

49. Elliott MC. Ethnicity in the qing eight banners. In: Crossley PK, Siu HF, Sutton DS (editors). Empire at the Margins: Culture, Ethnicity, and Frontier in Early Modern China. University of California Press; 2006. pp. 27–57.

50. Meyer-Fong T. Building Culture in Early Qing Yangzhou. Stanford University Press; 2003.

51. Hosie A. Manchuria: Its People, Resources and Recent History. Forgotten Books; 2018.

52. Chapin FS. Activity systems and urban structure: A working schema. Journal of the American Institute of Planners 1968; 34(1): 11–18. doi: 10.1080/01944366808977214

53. Duara P. Nationalists among transnationals: Overseas Chinese and the idea of China, 1900–1911. In: Ong A, Nonini DM (editors). Ungrounded Empires. Routledge; 1996. pp. 49–60.

54. Tachibana M. The 1911 Revolution and “Mongolia”: Independence, constitutional monarchy, or Republic. Journal of Contemporary East Asia Studies 2014; 3(1): 69–90. doi: 10.1080/24761028.2014.11869071

55. Fung ESK. The Military Dimension of the Chinese Revolution: The New Army and Its Role in the Revolution of 1911. Australian National University Press; 1980.

56. Shulan F, Nishimura Y. Formation of city-lake integrated urban morphology in Hangzhou: A study on the related history starting from the new market plan of the lakefront district in early modern times. China City Planning Review 2015; 24(2): 64–73.

57. Bright C, Ho JW. War and Occupation in China: The Letters of an American Missionary from Hangzhou, 1937–1938.‎ Lehigh University Press; 2017.

58. Sadeghian MM, Vardanyan Z. A brief review on urban park history, classification and function. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research 2015; 4(11): 120–124.

59. Zhao C. From shikumen to new-style: A rereading of lilong housing in modern Shanghai. The Journal of Architecture 2004; 9(1): 49–76. doi: 10.1080/1360236042000197853

60. Baur N, Ernst S. Towards a process-oriented methodology: Modern social science research methods and Norbert Elias’s figurational sociology. The Sociological Review 2011; 59(s1): 117–139. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-954X.2011.01981.x