Map is the basic language of geography and an indispensable tool for spatial analysis. But for a long time, maps have been regarded as an objective and neutral scientific achievement. Inspired by critical geography, critical cartography/GIS came into being with the goal of clarifying the discourse embedded in cartographic practice. Power relationship challenges the untested assumption in map representation that is taken for granted. After more than 40 years of debate and running in, this research field has initially shown an outline, and critical cartography/GIS has roughly formed two research directions: the deconstruction path mainly starts from the identity of cartography subject and the process of map knowledge production, and analyzes the inseparable relationship between cartography and national governance and its internal power mechanism respectively; the construction path mainly relies on cooperative mapping and anti-mapping to realize the reproduction of map data. Domestic critical cartography/GIS research has just started, and it is necessary to continue to absorb the achievements of critical geography and carry out research in different historical periods. The deconstruction research of different types of maps also needs to strengthen the in-depth bridging between the construction path and the deconstruction path, and to be more open to the public. Impartial map application research, and actively apply the research results to social practice.

1. Harvey D. Cartographic identities: Geographical knowledges under globalization. Harvey D (translator). Spaces of capital: Towards a critical geography. New York, USA: Routledge; 2001. p. 208–233.

2. Crampton JW. Mapping: A critical introduction to cartography and GIS. Hoboken, USA: WileyBlackwell; 2010.

3. Taylor PJ. Politics in maps, maps in politics: A tribute to Brian Harley. Political Geography 1992; 11(2): 127–129.

4. Jones M, Jones R, Woods M. An introduction to political geography. Space, place and politics. London: Routledge; 2004.

5. Guan M. Beyond difference: From canonical geography to hybrid geographies. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 2004; 94(4): 756–763.

6. Wood D. The power of maps. Wang Z, Li G, Wei Q, et al. (translators). Beijing: China Social Science Publishing House; 2000.

7. Biggs M. Putting the state on the map: Cartography, territory, and European state formation. Comparative Studies in Society and History 1999; 41(2): 374–405.

8. Harley JB. Maps, knowledge, and power. In: Cosgrove DE, Daniels S (editors). The iconography of landscape: Essays on the symbolic representation, design and use of past environments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1988. p. 277–312.

9. Turnbull D. Masons, tricksters and cartographers: Comparative studies in the sociology of scientific and indigenous knowledge. Amsterdam, Netherland: Harwood Academic Publishers; 2000.

10. Crampton JW. The political mapping of cyberspace. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press; 2003.

11. Harley JB. The map and the development of the history of cartography. In: Harley JB, Woodward D (editors). The history of cartography. Vol. 1, Book 1: Cartography in prehistoric, ancient, and medieval Europe and the Mediterranean. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1987. p. 1–42.

12. Snow J. On the mode of communication of cholera. 2nd ed. London: John Churchill; 1855.

13. Crampton JW. The cartographic calculation of space: Race mapping and the Balkans at the Paris Peace Conference of 1919. Social and Cultural Geography 2006; 7(5): 731–752.

14. Robinson AH, Morrison JL, Muehrcke PC, et al. Elements of cartography. 6th ed. New York: Wiley; 1995.

15. Bunge W. Theoretical geography. 2nd ed. Lund: Royal University of Lund; 1966.

16. Openshaw S. A view on the GIS crisis in geography, or, using GIS to put Humpty-Dumpty together again. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 1991; 23(5): 621–628.

17. Spykman NJ. The geography of the peace. Liu Y (translator). Beijing: The Commercial Press; 1965.

18. Lacoste Y. An illustration of geographical warfare. Antipode 1973; 5: 1–13.

19. Peters A. The Europe-centered character of our geographic view of the world and its correction. Berlin: German Cartographical Society; 1794 Oct 30 [cited 2020 Feb 24]. Available from: http://www.heliheyn.de/Maps/Lect02_E.html.

20. Peters A. The new cartography. New York: Friendship Press; 1983.

21. Pickles J. Arguments, debates and dialogues: The GIS-social theory debate and concerns for alternatives. In: Longley P, Goodchild M, Maguire D, et al. (editors). Geographical information systems: Principles, techniques, management, and applications. New York: Wiley; 1999: 49–60.

22. Openshaw S. Further thoughts on geography and GIS—A reply. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 1992; 24(4): 463–466.

23. Taylor PJ. Editorial comment: Gks. Political Geography Quarterly 1990; 9(3): 211–212.

24. Pickles J. Ground truth: The social implications of geographic information systems. New York: Guilford; 1995.

25. Sheppard E. GIS and society: Towards a research agenda. Cartography and Geographic Information Systems 1995; 22(1): 5–16.

26. Elwood S. Beyond cooptation or resistance: Urban spatial politics, community organizations, and GIS-based spatial narratives. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 2006, 96(2): 323–341.

27. Guan M. Feminist visualization: Re-envisioning GIS as a method in feminist geographic research. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 2002; 92(4): 645–661.

28. Martin KS, Wing J. The discourse and discipline of GIS. Cartographica: The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization 2007; 42(3): 235–248.

29. Schuurman N. Trouble in the heartland: GIS and its critics in the 1990s. Progress in Human Geography 2000; 24(4): 569–590.

30. Schuurman N, Pratt G. Care of the subject: Feminism and critiques of GIS. Gender, Place and Culture 2002; 9(3): 291–299.

31. Schuurman N. Formalization matters: Critical GIS and ontology research. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 2006; 96(4): 726–739.

32. Rundstrom RA. GIS, indigenous peoples, and epistemological diversity. Cartography and Geographic Information Systems 1995; 22(1): 45–57.

33. Castree N. From spaces of antagonism to spaces of engagement. In: Brown A, Fleetwood S, Roberts JM (editors). Critical realism and Marxism. London: Routledge; 2002. p. 187–214.

34. Harvey D. Between space and time: Reflections on the geographical imagination. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 1990; 80(3): 418–434.

35. Sheppard E. Automated geography: What kind of geography for what kind of society? The Professional Geographer 1993; 45(4): 457–460.

36. Sheppard E. Knowledge production through critical GIS: Genealogy and prospects. Cartographica: The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization 2005; 40(4): 5–21.

37. Harley JB. Deconstructing the Map. Cartographica: The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization 1989; 26(2): 1–20.

38. Monmonier M. How to lie with maps. Huang Y (translator). Beijing: The Commercial Press; 2012.

39. Sheppard E. Quantitative geography: Representation, practices and possibilities. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 2001; 19(5): 535–554.

40. Pavlovskaya ME. Theorizing with GIS: A tool for critical geographies? Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 2006; 38(11): 2003–2020.

41. Sheppard E. Thinking geographically: Globalizing capitalism and beyond. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 2015; 105(6): 1113–1134.

42. Tang M, Huang Z. Can empirical research be translated into Chinese Shizheng Yanjiu? With a classification of academic research. Geographical Research 2020; 39(12): 2855–2860.

43. Pickles J. Arguments, debates, and dialogues: The GIS social theory debate and the concern for alternatives. In: Longley PA, Goodchild MF, Maguire DJ, et al. (editors). Geographical Information Systems, Vol. 1. New York: John Wiley; 1999. p. 49–60.

44. Kitchin R, Gleeson J, Dodge M. Unfolding mapping practices: A new epistemology for cartography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 2013; 38(3): 480–496.

45. Brown MP, Colton M. Dying epistemologies: An analysis of home death and its critique. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 2001; 33(5): 799–821.

46. Pickles J. A history of spaces. Cartographic reason, mapping and the geo-coded world. London: Routledge; 2004.

47. Strandsbjerg J. The cartographic production of territorial space: Mapping and state formation in early modern Denmark. Geopolitics 2008; 13(2): 335–358.

48. Rose-Redwood RS. Governmentality, geography, and the geo-coded world. Progress in Human Geography 2006; 30(4): 469–486.

49. Tyner JA. War, violence, and population: Making the body count. New York: Guilford Press; 2009.

50. Branch J. The cartographic state: Maps, territory and the origins of sovereignty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2014.

51. Winichakul T. Siam mapped: A history of the geo-body of a nation. Yuan J (translator). Nanjing: Yilin Press; 2016.

52. Martin KS. Toward a cartography of the commons: Constituting the political and economic possibilities of place. The Professional Geographer 2009; 61(4): 493–507.

53. Hannah MG. Governmentality and the mastery of territory in nineteenth-century America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2000.

54. Crampton JW. GIS and geographic governance: Reconstructing the choropleth map. Cartographica: The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization 2004; 39(1): 41–53.

55. Painter J. Regional biopolitics. Regional Studies 2013; 47(8): 1235–1248.

56. Brown M, Knopp L. Places or polygons? Governmentality, scale, and the census in the Gay and Lesbian Atlas. Population, Space and Place 2006; 12(4): 223–242.

57. Walker KE. Negotiating GIS and social theory in population geography. Geography Compass 2010; 4(6): 616–629.

58. Forest B. Information sovereignty and GIS: The evolution of “communities of interest” in political redistricting. Political Geography 2004; 23(4): 425–451.

59. Chapin M, Lamb Z, Threlkeld B. Mapping indigenous lands. Annual Review of Anthropology 2005; 34(1): 619–638.

60. Caquard S. Cartography II: Collective cartographies in the social media era. Progress in Human Geography 2014; 38(1): 141–150.

61. Perkins C. Community mapping. The Cartographic Journal 2007; 44(2): 127–137.

62. Dunn CE. Participatory GIS: A people’s GIS? Progress in Human Geography 2007; 31(5): 616–637.

63. Stefanidis A, Crooks A, Radzikowski J. Harvesting ambient geospatial information from social media feeds. GeoJournal 2013; 78(2): 319–338.

64. Haklay M, Singleton A, Parker C. Web mapping 2.0: The neogeography of the GeoWeb. Geography Compass 2008; 2(6): 2011–2039.

65. Dodge M, Kitchin R. Crowdsourced cartography: Mapping experience and knowledge. Environmental and Planning A: Economy and Space 2013; 45(1): 19–36.

66. Goodchild MF. Citizens as sensors: The world of volunteered geography. GeoJournal 2007; 69(4): 211–221.

67. Fischer F. VGI as big data: A new but delicate geographic data-source. GeoInformatics 2012; 15(3): 46–47.

68. Miller CC. A beast in the field: The Google Maps mashup as GIS/2. Cartographica: The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization 2006; 41(3): 187–199.

69. Leszczynski A. Situating the geoweb in political economy. Progress in Human Geography 2012; 36(1): 72–89.

70. Elwood S, Goodchild MF, Sui DZ. Researching volunteered geographic information: Spatial data, geographic research, and new social practice. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 2012; 102(3): 571–590.

71. Wilson MW. “Training the eye”: Formation of the geocoding subject. Social and Cultural Geography 2011; 12(4): 357–376.

72. Pyne S, Taylor DRF. Mapping indigenous perspectives in the making of the cybercartographic atlas of the Lake Huron Treaty relationship process: A performative approach in a reconciliation context. Cartographica: The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization 2012; 47(2): 92–104.

73. Ritzer G, Jurgenson N. Production, consumption, prosumption the nature of capitalism in the age of the digital “prosumer”. Journal of Consumer Culture 2010; 10(1): 13–36.

74. Haklay M. “Nobody wants to do council estates”: Digital divide, spatial justice and outliers [Internet]. 2012 [cited 2020 Feb 24]. Available from: https://povesham.wordpress.com/2012/03/05/nobody-wants-todo-council-estates-digital-divide-spatial-justice-and-outliers-aag-2012/.

75. Hodgson DL, Schroeder RA. Dilemmas of counter-mapping in community resources in Tanzania. Development and Change 2002; 33(1): 79–100.

76. Caquard S. Cartography III: A post-representational perspective on cognitive cartography. Progress in Human Geography 2015; 39(2): 225–235.

77. Ben-Ze’ev E. Mental maps and spatial perceptions: The fragmentation of Israel Palestine. In: Roberts L (editor). Mapping cultures: Place, practice, performance. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2012. p. 237–259.

78. Gieseking JJ. Where we go from here: The mental sketch mapping method and its analytic components. Qualitative Inquiry 2013; 19(9): 712–724.

79. Hirt I. Mapping dreams/dreaming Maps: Bridging indigenous and western geographical knowledge. Cartographica: The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization 201; 47(2): 105–120.

80. Sletto BI. Cartographies of remembrance and becoming in the Sierra de Perijá, Venezuela. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 2014; 39(3): 360–372.

81. Mekdjian S. Urban artivism and migrations: Disrupting spatial and political segregation of migrants in European cities. Cities 2018; 77(5): 39–48.

82. Fischer F, Houbey L, Moreau M, et al. Crossing maps, cartographies traverses [Internet]. AntiAtlas des Frontières. 2013 Sep 20 [cited 2020 Feb 24]. Available from: http://www.antiatlas.net/fischer-houbeymoreau-mekdjian-amilhat-szary-crossing-maps-cartographies-traverses.

83. Pearce M, Louis R. Mapping indigenous depth of place. American Indian Culture and Research Journal 2008; 32(3): 107–126.

84. Pearce MW, Hermann MJ. Mapping Champlain’s travels: Restorative techniques for historical cartography. Cartographica: The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization 2010; 45(1): 32–46.

85. Knigge LD, Cope M. Grounded visualization: Integrating the analysis of qualitative and quantitative data through grounded theory and visualization. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 2006; 38(11): 2021–2037.

86. Guan M. From oral histories to visual narratives: Representing the post-September 11 experiences of the Muslim women in the United States. Social and Cultural Geography 2008; 9(6): 653–669.

87. Guan M, Ding G. Geo-narrative: Extending geographic information systems for narrative analysis in qualitative and mixed-method research. The Professional Geographer 2008; 60(4): 443–465.

88. Hawthorne T, Krygier J, Guan MP. Mapping ambivalence: Exploring the geographies of community change and rails-to-trails development using photobased Q method and PPGIS. Geoforum 2008; 2(2): 1058–1078.

89. Pavlovskaya ME. Mapping urban change and changing GIS: Other views of economic restructuring. Gender, Place and Culture: A Journal of Feminist Geography 2002; 9(3): 281–289.

90. Kim AM. Critical cartography 2.0: From “participatory mapping” to authored visualizations of power and people. Landscape and Urban Planning 2015; 142: 215–225.

91. Gao PC, Zhang H, Wu Z W, et al. Visualising the expansion and spread of coronavirus disease 2019 by cartograms. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 2020; 52(4): 698–701.

92. Eicher CL, Brewer CA. Dasymetric mapping and areal interpolation: Implementation and evaluation. Cartography and Geographic Information Science 2001; 28(2): 125–138.

93. Hamza M, Thubaiti A, Dhieb M, et al. Dasymetric mapping as a tool to assess the spatial distribution of population in Jeddah City (Kingdom of Saudi Arabia). Current Urban Studies 2016; 4(3): 329–342.

94. Zhao P, Guan M, Zhou S. The uncertain geographic context problem in the analysis of the relationships between obesity and the built environment in Guangzhou. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2018; 15(2): 308. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15020308.

95. An C, Li T. The power operation mechanism of map representations: Constructed knowledge discourse. Geographical Research 2019; 38(8): 2099–2112.

96. Gregory D. Geographical imaginations. Oxford: Blackwell; 1994: 72–73.

97. Zhang J, Shi W, Xiu C. Urban research using points of interest data in China. Scientia Geographica Sinica 2021; 41(1): 140–148.

98. Guan M. Beyond binaries: Reflections on hybrid geographies. Progress in Geography 2013; 32(9): 1307–1315.

99. Ye C, Ta N. Rebuild place: The thoughts of place in human geography and their connections with GIS. Progress in Geography 2020; 39(8): 1249–1259.

100. He G, Song X. Map projection and global geopolitical analysis: A perspective of spatial cognition. Human Geography 2014; 29(2): 113–122.

101. He Guangqiang. The transition of U.S. geostrategic space concept during WWII: From the perspective of map projection. Scientia Geographica Sinica 2019; 39(5): 714–725.

102. Tan Y, Chai Y, Guan M. The impact of the uncertain geographic context on the spacetime behavior analysis: A case study of Xi’ning, China. Acta Geographica Sinica 2017; 72(4): 657–670.

103. Liu Y, Su H. A review of social atlas research. Progress in Geography 2015; 34(7): 800–808.

104. Thatcher J. From volunteered geographic information to volunteered geographic services. In: Sui DZ, Elwood S, Goodchild M (editors). Crowdsourcing geographic knowledge: Volunteered geographic information (VGI) in theory and practice. Dordrecht: Springer; 2013: 161–

105.

106. Meier PP. Ushahidi: From Croudsourcing to Crowdfeeding. IRevolutions. 2009 Mar 27 [cited 2020 Feb 24]. Available from: https://irevolutions.org/2009/03/27/ushahidi-from-croudsourcing-to-crowdfeeding/.6.