Effects of interplanting native species of Eucalyptus on stand growth and soil physicochemical properties under different interplanting intensities

Muyi Huang, Yanfang Liang, Fucong Su, Yuanli Zhu, Zhihui Li, Liling Liu, Suya Zhao, Yingyun Gong

Article ID: 1620
Vol 5, Issue 1, 2022

VIEWS - 341 (Abstract) 222 (PDF)

Abstract


Objective: To study the growth, accumulation and soil nutrient content of each overseeded species under different interharvesting intensity treatments of Eucalyptus, and to explore the best re-cultivation method suitable for mixed overseeded species after Eucalyptus interharvesting. Methods: In Guangxi state-owned Qipo forest, Eucalyptus tailorii with different planting densities (DH32-29) were mixed with Castanopsis hystrix, Mytilaria laosensis and Michelia macclurei, and four different treatments (CK, LT, MT and HT) were established for re-cultivation of Eucalyptus near-mature forests with different logging intensities, and the differences in growth conditions and soil physicochemical properties of each species were analyzed. Results: (1) As the proportion of Eucalyptus allocation decreased, the growth of Eucalyptus diameter at breast height, tree height and individual wood volume could be promoted; the growth of the three parameters of HT and MT Eucalyptus were significantly different from LT and CK. (2) The average wood volume per plant of the set species in the CK and LT treatments was Mytilaria laosensis > Michelia macclurei > Castanopsis hystrix, while in the MT and HT treatments it was Mytilaria laosensis > Castanopsis hystrix > Michelia macclurei. (3) The differences in soil aeration, total saturated water holding capacity, capillary water holding capacity, and field water holding capacity in soil layers of different depth varied. In the same soil layer, soil aeration, total porosity and capillary porosity were HT > CK > LT > MT; saturated water holding capacity and capillary water holding capacity were HT > CK > LT > MT, while field water holding capacity was CK > HT > LT > MT. (4) Organic matter, pH, total nitrogen, total phosphorus, total potassium, fast-acting nitrogen, fast-acting phosphorus, and fast-acting potassium changed with varying soil depth in each treatment.


Keywords


Eucalyptus urophylla×E. grandis DH32-29; Interplanting Setts; Stand Growth; Stand Structure; Soil Physicochemical Properties

Full Text:

PDF


References


1. Xie Y. The real Eucalyptus. Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House; 2015.

2. Wen Y, Liu S, Chen F. Effects of continuous cropping on understory species diversity in Eucalyptus plantations. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology 2005; 16(9): 1667–1671.

3. Wang Z, Duan C, Qi L, et al. A preliminary investigation of ecological issues arising in the man-made forest of Eucalyptus in China. Chinese Journal of Ecology 1998; 17(6): 65–69.

4. Yu F, Huang X, Wang K, et al. An overview of ecological degradation and restoration of Eucalyptus plantation. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture 2009; 17(2): 393–398.

5. Jurskis V. Eucalypt decline in Australia, and a general concept of tree decline and dieback. Forest Ecology and Management 2005; 215(1/2/3): 1–20.

6. Robinson N, Harper RJ, Smettem KRJ. Soil water depletion by Eucalyptus spp. Integrated into dryland agricultural systems. Plant and Soil 2006; 286(1/2): 141–151.

7. Santos FM, Chaer GM, Diniz AR, et al. Nutrient cycling over five years of mixed-species plantations of Eucalyptus and Acacia on a sandy tropical soil. Forest Ecology and Management 2017; 384: 110–121.

8. Le Maire G, Nouvellon Y, Christina M, et al. Tree and stand light use efficiencies over a full rotation of single- and mixed- species Eucalyptus grandis and Acacia mangium plantations. Forest Ecology and Management 2013; 288: 31–42.

9. Bristow M, Vanclay JK, Brooks L, et al. Growth and species interactions of Eucalyptus pellita in a mixed and monoculture plantation in the humid tropics of north Queensland. Forest Ecology and Management 2006; 233(2/3): 285–294.

10. Important progress and results achieved in 2018 of the National Key R & D Program “Research on Efficient Cultivation Technology of Eucalyptus”. Eucalypt Science & Technology 2018; 35(4): 33–60.

11. Lu D, Cai H, Zhang X, et al. Growth and economic evaluation of Eucalyptus clones plantation. Journal of Zhejiang A & F University 2008; 25(1): 65–68.

12. Li Z, Li B, Qi C, et al. Studies on the importance of valuable wood species resources and its development strategy. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology 2012; 32(11): 1–8.

13. Wang T, Wan X, Cheng L, et al. Effects of broadleaf tree species on soil microbial stoichiometry in a reforested Cunninghamia lanceolata woodland. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology 2020; 31(8): 1–9.

14. Pang S, Zhang P, Jia H, et al. Effects of different afforestation modes on diversity of undergrowth plants in Eucalyptus plantation. Journal of Northwest A & F University (Natural Science Edition) 2020; 48(9): 44–52.

15. Jiang Q, Li Q, Zhong C. The cultivation and comprehensive utilization of Michelia macclurei Dandy. Forest Science and Technology 2017; 63(8): 3–7.

16. Lu R. Methods for agricultural chemical analysis of soil. Beijing: China Agricultural Science and Technology Press; 2000.

17. Mo X, Yu X, Zhu C, et al. Theory and method of Eucalyptus plantation cultivation. Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House; 2005.

18. Liu Q. Chinese standing timber volume table. Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House; 2017.

19. Jiang J. Study on the effect of mixed afforestation of Castanopsis hystrix and Cunninghamia lanceolata. Journal of Forest and Environment 2002; 43(4): 329–333.

20. Wang Z. The research on monitoring and evaluation of ecological benefit of national non-commercial forest in Hunan Province [PhD thesis]. Changsha: Central South University of Forestry & Technology; 2013.

21. Chen J. The understory fern Dicranopteris dichotoma facilitates the overstory Eucalyptus trees in subtropical plantations. Ecosphere 2014; 5(5): 1–12.

22. Farooq T, Wu W, Tigabu M, et al. Growth, biomass production and root development of Chinese fir in relation to initial planting density. Forests 2019; 10(3): 1–15.

23. Sarto MVM, Borges WLB, Sarto JRW, et al. Root and shoot interactions in a tropical integrated crop-livestock-forest system. Agricultural Systems 2020; 181(6): 2–11.

24. Sudmeyer RA, Speijers J, Nicholas BD. Root distribution of Pinus pinaster, P. Radiata, Eucalyptus globulus and E. Kochii and associated soil chemistry in agricultural land adjacent to tree lines. Tree Physiology 2004; 24(12): 1333–1346.

25. Lin W, Zhan C, Chen H. Effects of allelopathy among tree species. World Forestry Research 2011; 24(5): 13–17.

26. Ping X, Wang T. Ecological significance of plant allelopathy and progress in allelopathy research in grassland ecosystems. Acta Prataculturae Sinica 2018; 27(8): 175–184.

27. Wu W. Plant diversity, soil microbial diversity and ecosystem multifunction in pure and mixed plantations [PhD thesis]. Nanning: Guangxi University; 2019.

28. Liu E, Wang H, Liu S. Characteristics of carbon storage and sequestration in different age beech (Castanopsis hystrix) plantations in south subtropical area of China. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology 2012; 23(2): 335–340.

29. Zhu C. Soil fertility comprehensive evaluation of five broad-leaved trees plantations [PhD thesis]. Nanning: Guangxi University; 2015.

30. Huang H. Study on soil physical and chemical properties and enzyme activities of different species plantation in southwest Guangxi [PhD thesis]. Nanning: Guangxi University; 2017.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24294/sf.v5i1.1620

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Muyi Huang, Yanfang Liang, Fucong Su, Yuanli Zhu, Zhihui Li, Liling Liu, Suya Zhao, Yingyun Gong

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.