Hydrological dynamics and road infrastructure resilience: A case study of river Nile state, Sudan
Vol 8, Issue 1, 2025
VIEWS - 12 (Abstract)
Abstract
This study investigates the relationship between hydrological processes, watershed management, and road infrastructure resilience, focusing on the impact of flooding on roads intersecting with streams in River Nile State, Sudan. Situated between 16.5° N to 18.5° N latitude and 33° E to 34° E longitude, this region faces significant flooding challenges that threaten its ecological and economic stability. Using precise Digital Elevation Models (DEMs) and advanced hydrological modeling, the research aims to identify optimal flood mitigation solutions, such as overpass bridges. The study quantifies the total road length in the area at 3572.279 km, with stream orders distributed as follows: First Order at 2276.79 km (50.7%), Second Order at 521.48 km (11.6%), Third Order at 331.26 km (7.4%), and Fourth Order at 1359.92 km (30.3%). Approximately 27% (12 out of 45) of the identified road flooding points were situated within third- and fourth-order streams, mainly along the Atbara-Shendi Road and near Al-Abidiya and Merowe. Blockages varied in distance, with the longest at 256 m in Al-Abidiya, and included additional measurements of 88, 49, 112, 106, 66, 500, and 142 m. Some locations experienced partial flood damage despite having water culverts at 7 of these points, indicating possible design flaws or insufficient hydrological analysis during construction. The findings suggest that enhanced scrutiny, potentially using high-resolution DEMs, is essential for better vulnerability assessment and management. The study proposes tailored solutions to protect infrastructure, promoting sustainability and environmental stewardship.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
1. Horton RE. Erosional development of streams and their drainage basins; hydrophysical approach to quantitative morphology. Geological Society of America Bulletin. 1945; 56(3): 275-370. doi: 10.1130/0016-7606(1945)56[275:EDOSAT]2.0.CO;2
2. Krishnan A, Ramasamy J. Morphometric assessment and prioritization of the South India Moyar river basin sub-watersheds using a geo-computational approach. Geology, Ecology, and Landscapes. 2022; 8(2): 129-139. doi: 10.1080/24749508.2022.2109819
3. Strahler AN. Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology. Transactions of the American Geophysical Union. 1957; 38(6): 913-920. doi: 10.1029/TR038i006p00913
4. D’Ambrosio JL, Williams LR, Witter JD, et al. Effects of geomorphology, habitat, and spatial location on fish assemblages in a watershed in Ohio, USA. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 2008; 148(1-4): 325-341. doi: 10.1007/s10661-008-0163-3
5. Johnson K, Jankowski KJ, Carey JC, et al. Climate, Hydrology, and Nutrients Control the Seasonality of Si Concentrations in Rivers. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences. 2024; 129(9). doi: 10.1029/2024jg008141
6. Leopold LB, Wolman MG, Miller JP, et al. Fluvial processes in geomorphology. Courier Dover Publications; 2020.
7. Dingman SL. Physical hydrology. Waveland press; 2015.
8. Forman RTT, Alexander LE. Roads and their major ecological effects. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. 1998; 29(1): 207-231. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.29.1.207
9. Montgomery DR. Road surface drainage, channel initiation, and slope instability. Water Resources Research. 1994; 30(6): 1925-1932. doi: 10.1029/94wr00538
10. Berges SA. Ecosystem services of riparian areas: stream bank stability and avian habitat [Master thesis]. Iowa State University; 2009.
11. Brun SE, and Band LE. Simulating runoff behavior in an urbanizing watershed. Computers, environment and urban systems. 2000; 24(1): 5-22. doi:10.1016/S0198-9715(99)00040-X
12. Wemple BC, Jones JA, Grant GE. Channel network extension by logging roads in two basins, western cascades, oregon1. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association. 1996; 32(6): 1195-1207. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-1688.1996.tb03490.x
13. Ellis JB. Managing Urban Runoff. Handbook of Catchment Management; 2009. pp. 155-182.
14. Parkinson J, Mark O. Urban stormwater management in developing countries. IWA publishing; 2005.
15. Ayalew AD, Wagner PD, Tigabu TB, et al. Hydrological responses to land use and land cover change and climate dynamics in the Rift Valley Lakes Basin, Ethiopia. Journal of Water and Climate Change. 2023; 14(8): 2788-2807. doi: 10.2166/wcc.2023.138
16. Fallon K, Wheelock SJ, Sadegh M, et al. Post-fire hydrologic analysis: a tale of two severities. Hydrological Sciences Journal. 2023; 69(1): 139-148. doi: 10.1080/02626667.2023.2284306
17. Sattari MT, Rezazadeh-Joudi A, Kusiak A. Assessment of different methods for estimation of missing data in precipitation studies. Hydrology Research. 2016; 48(4): 1032-1044. doi: 10.2166/nh.2016.364
18. Vaze J, Chiew FHS, Perraud JM, et al. Rainfall-Runoff Modelling Across Southeast Australia: Datasets, Models and Results. Australasian Journal of Water Resources. 2011; 14(2): 101-116. doi: 10.1080/13241583.2011.11465379
19. Guillet G, Bolch T. Probabilistic estimation of glacier surface elevation changes from DEM differentiation: a Bayesian method for outlier filtering, gap filling and uncertainty estimation with examples from High Mountain Asia; 2022.
20. Tarboton DG. A new method for the determination of flow directions and upslope areas in grid digital elevation models. Water Resources Research. 1997; 33(2): 309-319. doi: 10.1029/96wr03137
21. Folton N. Using spot flow measurements in a regionalized hydrological model to improve the low flow statistical estimations of rivers: The case of Réunion Island. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies. 2024; 52: 101730. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrh.2024.101730
22. Tarboton D. Terrain analysis using digital elevation models in hydrology. In: Proceedings of the 23rd ESRI international users conference; 2003; San Diego, California.
23. Gao H, Sabo JL, Chen X, et al. Landscape heterogeneity and hydrological processes: a review of landscape-based hydrological models. Landscape Ecology. 2018; 33(9): 1461-1480. doi: 10.1007/s10980-018-0690-4
24. Godsey SE, Kirchner JW. Dynamic, discontinuous stream networks: hydrologically driven variations in active drainage density, flowing channels and stream order. Hydrological Processes. 2014; 28(23): 5791-5803. doi: 10.1002/hyp.10310
25. Pradeep K. Rawat, P.C. Tiwari, and Charu C. Pant. Morphometric analysis of third order river basins using high resolution satellite imagery and GIS technology: special reference to natural hazard vulnerability assessment. E-Int Sci Res J. 2011; 3(2): 70-87.
26. Datta S, Karmakar S, Mezbahuddin S, et al. The limits of watershed delineation: implications of different DEMs, DEM resolutions, and area threshold values. Hydrology Research. 2022; 53(8): 1047-1062.
27. Gonzales-Inca C, Calle M, Croghan D, et al. Geospatial Artificial Intelligence (GeoAI) in the Integrated Hydrological and Fluvial Systems Modeling: Review of Current Applications and Trends. Water. 2022; 14(14): 2211. doi: 10.3390/w14142211
28. Mikaeili O, Shourian M. Assessment of the Analytic and Hydrologic Methods in Separation of Watershed Response to Climate and Land Use Changes. Water Resources Management. 2022; 37(6-7): 2575-2591. doi: 10.1007/s11269-022-03324-9
29. Abdissa AG, Chuko FW. Climate change and watershed hydrology: assessing variability in water balance components and groundwater flow patterns. Journal of Water and Climate Change. 2024; 15(9): 4389-4404. doi: 10.2166/wcc.2024.080
30. Erikson CM, Renshaw CE, Magilligan FJ. Spatial variation in drainage area—Runoff relationships and implications for bankfull geometry scaling. Geomorphology. 2024; 446: 108998. doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2023.108998
31. Chen H, Huang S, Xu Y, et al. Using Baseflow Ensembles for Hydrologic Hysteresis Characterization in Humid Basins of Southeastern China. Water Resources Research. 2024; 60(4). doi: 10.1029/2023wr036195
32. Osman HA, Elhag A, Hassan A. GIS Applications in Land Management: Enhancing Flood Risk Assessment and Village Replanning. Journal of Karary University for Engineering and Science. 2024; 3(2). doi: 10.54388/jkues.v3i2.259
33. Najafi MR, Zhang Y, Martyn N. A flood risk assessment framework for interdependent infrastructure systems in coastal environments. Sustainable Cities and Society. 2021; 64: 102516. doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102516
34. Noi LVT, Cooper RT, Trang DTT, et al. Climate change risk assessment and adaptation for loss and damage of urban transportation infrastructure in Southeast Asia. APN Science Bulletin. 2021; 11(1). doi: 10.30852/sb.2021.1436
35. Bertilsson L, Wiklund K, de Moura Tebaldi I, et al. Urban flood resilience—A multi-criteria index to integrate flood resilience into urban planning. Journal of Hydrology. 2019; 573: 970-982. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.06.052
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24294/jgc8785
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2025 Hossam Aldeen Anwer, Abubakr Hassan
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.