Border cities face significant challenges due to political, environmental, and social issues. Strong urban governance can help resolve many of these problems, but it requires identifying practical factors specific to each city’s location. This study aimed to assess the state of urban governance in Paveh, a border city with a population of 25,771 people. The research used both primary data collection (through a questionnaire) and secondary data sources (local and national databases and documents). The study randomly selected 379 households from Paveh’s population and determined a reliability value of 0.913 using the Cochrane procedure. To assess Paveh’s urban governance, eight criteria were used: participatory, rule-of-law compliance, transparency, responsiveness, consensus-oriented, equitable and inclusive, effective and efficient, and accountability. The findings revealed that Paveh’s urban governance, particularly in the dimensions of transparency and participation, is in an unfavorable situation.

1. Barari O, Kazemian G, Sharifzadeh F, Ghorbanizadeh W. Processes and strategies for establishing good urban governance in Metropolises of the country (case study: Mashhad) (Persian). Urban Management Quarterly 2019; 18(56): 54–35.

2. Kamran JG, Musa KK, Sadegh GF. An investigation into urban development patterns with sprawl and other corresponding changes: A case study of Babol City. Journal of Urban Culture Research 2020; 20: 26–43. doi: 10.14456/JUCR.2020.2

3. Abdi K, Jafari Mehrabadi M, Safaei M, Allahyari S. Measuring citizens’ satisfaction with municipal performance with good urban governance approach (case study: Kiasar City) (Persian). Environmental Planning Quarterly 2019; 12(45): 166–139.

4. Beckley AL. Deterrence versus marginalization. Race and Justice

5. ; 5(3): 278–300. doi: 10.1177/2153368714568354

6. Finewood MH, Matsler AM, Zivkovich J. Green infrastructure and the hidden politics of urban stormwater governance in a postindustrial city. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 2009; 109(3): 909–925. doi: 10.1080/24694452.2018.1507813

7. Murphy M, Jordan H, Badland H, Giles-Corti B. Local food environments: Australian stakeholder perspectives on urban planning and governance to advance health and equity within cities. Cities & Health 2018; 2(1): 46–59. doi: 10.1080/23748834.2018.1514802

8. De Guimarães JCF, Severo EA, Júnior LAF, Da Costa WPLB, Salmoria FT. Governance and quality of life in smart cities: Towards sustainable development goals. Journal of Cleaner Production 2020; 253: 119926. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119926

9. Paschoal B, Wegrich K. Urban governance innovations in Rio de Janeiro: The political management of digital innovations. Journal of Urban Affairs 2019; 41(1): 117–134. doi: 10.1080/07352166.2017.1310561

10. Horak M. State rescaling in practice: Urban governance reform in Toronto. Urban Research & Practice 2013; 6(3): 311–328. doi: 10.1080/17535069.2013.846005

11. Ziervogel G, Waddell J, Smit W, Taylor A. Flooding in Cape Town’s informal settlements: Barriers to collaborative urban risk governance. South African Geographical Journal 2016; 98(1): 1–20. doi: 10.1080/03736245.2014.924867

12. Cento Bull A, Jones B. Governance and social capital in urban regeneration: A comparison between Bristol and Naples. Urban Studies 2006; 43(4): 767–786. doi:10.1080/00420980600597558

13. Korosteleva EA, Flockhart T. Resilience in EU and international institutions: Redefining local ownership in a new global governance agenda. Contemporary Security Policy 2020; 41(2): 153–175. doi:10.1080/13523260.2020.1723973

14. Pieterse E. Urban governance and spatial transformation ambitions in Johannesburg. Journal of Urban Affairs 2017; 41(1): 20–38. doi: 10.1080/07352166.2017.1305807

15. Lyall C, Tait J. Beyond the limits to governance: New rules of engagement for the tentative governance of the life sciences. Research Policy 2019; 48(5): 1128–1137. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2019.01.009

16. Sheng YK. Good urban governance in Southeast Asia. Environment and Urbanization Asia 2010; 1(2): 131–147. doi: 10.1177/097542531000100203

17. Koster M. Citizenship agendas, urban governance and social housing in the Netherlands: An assemblage approach. Citizenship Studies 2018; 19(2): 214–228. doi:10.1080/13621025.2015.1005951

18. Da Cruz NF, Rode P, McQuarrie M. New urban governance: A review of current themes and future priorities. Journal of Urban Affairs 2019; 41(1): 1–19. doi: 10.1080/07352166.2018.1499416

19. Ghalehteimouri KJ, Shamaei A, Ros FBC. Effectiveness of spatial justice in sustainable development and classification of sustainability in Tehran province. Regional Statistics 2021; 11(2). doi:10.15196/ RS110201

20. van der Heijden J. When opportunity backfires: Exploring the implementation of urban climate governance alternatives in three major US cities. Policy and Society 2021; 40(1): 116–135. doi: 10.1080/14494035.2021.1934984

21. Piñeira Mantiñán MJ, Lois Gonzalez RC, González Pérez JM. New models of urban governance in Spain during the post-crisis period: The fight against vulnerability on a local scale. Territory, Politics, Governance 2019; 7(3): 336–364. doi: 10.1080/21622671.2018.1485595

22. Ripp M, Rodwell D. The governance of urban heritage. The Historic Environment: Policy & Practice 2016; 7(1): 81-108. doi:10.1080/17567505.2016.1142699

23. Pieterse E, Parnell S, Haysom G. African dreams: Locating urban infrastructure in the 2030 sustainable developmental agenda. Area Development and Policy 2018; 3(2): 149–169. doi: 10.1080/23792949.2018.1428111

24. Washbourne CL, Culwick C, Acuto M, et al. Mobilising knowledge for urban governance: The case of the Gauteng City-region observatory. Urban Research & Practice 2019; 14(1): 27–49. doi: 10.1080/17535069.2019.1651899

25. Ghalehteimouri KJ, Kojouri MK. Evaluation of land consolidation and renovation processin the decayed textures: A case of study the Nezamabad neighborhood in Tehran. Resilience 2020; 4(2): 257–274. doi: 10.32569/resilience.682810

26. Young OR. Governing Complex Systems: Social Capital for the Anthropocene. MIT Press; 2017. doi: 10.7551/mitpress/9780262035934.001.0001

27. Sharifzadeh E, Sheikhi A, Ajza Shokouhi M. Assessment of good governance in the stability of urban neighborhoods of Piranshahr. Sustainable City 2018; 1(3): 109–128. doi: 10.22034/jsc.2018.89876

28. Wong Villanueva JL, Kidokoro T, Seta F. Cross-border integration, cooperation and governance: A systems approach for evaluating “good” governance in cross-border regions. Journal of Borderlands Studies 2018; 37(5): 1047-1070. doi: 10.1080/08865655.2020.1855227

29. Ghasemi F, Hataminejad H, Zayyari K, et al. Foresighting of governance of small border cities case study: Oraman Takht and Sarvabad cities. Journal of Border Studies 2020; 8(1): 19–34.

30. Hekmatnia H, Kamran J, Shamsoddini A. Comparative study of population aging trend in Iran and Poland. SocioEconomic Challenges 2021; 5(1): 102–116. doi: 10.21272/sec.5(1).102-116.2021

31. Tahvilzadeh N. Understanding participatory governance arrangements in urban politics: Idealist and cynical perspectives on the politics of citizen dialogues in Göteborg, Sweden. Urban Research & Practice 2015; 8(2): 238–254. doi: 10.1080/17535069.2015.1050210

32. Pierre J. Comparative urban governance: Uncovering complex causalities. Urban Affairs Review 2005; 40(4): 446–462. doi: 10.1177/1078087404273442

33. Deng F. Stakes, stakeholders and urban governance: A theoretical framework for the Chinese city. Eurasian Geography and Economics 2018; 59(3–4): 291–313. doi: 10.1080/15387216.2019.1570298

34. Rhodes RAW. Understanding Governance: Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexivity and Accountability. Open University; 1997.

35. Lemos MC, Agrawal A. Environmental governance. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 2006; 31: 297–325. doi: 10.1146/annurev.energy.31.042605.135621

36. Schultz L, Folke C, Österblom H, Olsson P. Adaptive governance, ecosystem management, and natural capital. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2015; 112(24): 7369–7374. doi:10.1073/pnas.1406493112

37. Hendriks F. Understanding Good Urban Governance. Urban Affairs Review 2013; 50(4): 553–576. doi: 10.1177/1078087413511782

38. Fuseini I. Decentralisation, entrepreneurialism and democratization processes in urban governance in Tamale, Ghana. Area Development and Policy 2021; 6(2): 223–242.doi: 10.1080/23792949.2020.1750303

39. Yin RK. Case study research: Design and methods, 4th ed. SAGE Publications, Inc; 2009.

40. Chen F, White JT. Urban design governance in three Chinese ‘pioneer cities’. International Planning Studies 2021; 26(2): 130–148. doi: 10.1080/13563475.2020.1752160

41. Grindle MS. Good enough governance revisited. Development Policy Review 2011; 29(S1): 199–221. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7679.2011.00526.x

42. Blanco I, Salazar Y, Bianchi I. Urban governance and political change under a radical left government: The case of Barcelona. Journal of Urban Affairs 2020; 42(1): 18–38. doi:10.1080/07352166.2018.1559648

43. Franz T. Why ‘good governance’ fails: Lessons from regional economic development in Colombia. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 2019; 43(4): 776–785. doi: 10.1111/1468-2427.12742

44. Broccardo L, Culasso F, Mauro SG. Smart city governance: Exploring the institutional work of multiple actors towards collaboration. International Journal of Public Sector Management 2019; 32(4): 367–387. doi: 10.1108/IJPSM-05-2018-0126

45. Smith B. Good Governance and Development. Bloomsbury Publishing; 2007. doi: 10.1007/978-1-137-06218-5

46. Cousins JJ. Structuring hydrosocial relations in urban water governance. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 2017; 107(5): 1144–1161.doi: 10.1080/24694452.2017.1293501

47. Baek Y, Zhang Y. Collaborative approaches to urban governance model of historic districts: A case study of the Yu’er Hutong project in Beijing. International Journal of Urban Sciences 2022; 26(2): 332–350. doi: 10.1080/12265934.2021.1879663

48. Ali M. Governance and good governance: A conceptual perspective. Dialogue (Pakistan) 2015; 10(1).

49. Kim PS, Halligan J, Cho N, et al. Toward participatory and transparent governance: Report on the sixth global forum on reinventing government. Public Administration Review 2005; 65(6): 646–654. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00494.x

50. Moghaddam SNM, Rafieian M. From the kingdom lash to participation: The tale of urban planning in Iran. Social Sciences & Humanities Open 2020; 2(1): 100022.

51. Rezapour Z, Renani M, Amiri H. Management of common resources: market, government, or neither? A review of water resources management studies in Iran (with an emphasis on Ostrom’s view) (Persian). Iranian Journal of Economic Research 2021; 26(88), 89–127. doi: 10.22054/IJER.2021.47477.814

52. Janparvar M, Ghalehteimouri KJ, Mazandrani D, Mousavi M. Investigating impact of weaknesses and strengtheners local and national factors in border cities’ development: Case of study Javanrood city, Iran. Available online: https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-2344069/v1/523859a5-0fa6-455e-ba76-0b9ad1b53c26.pdf?c=1670552076 (accessed on 3 March 2023).

53. Statistical Center of Iran. Kermanshah Province Statistical Yearbook. Statistical Center of Iran; 2019.

54. Karami H, Sayahnia R, Mahmoudi H, et al. Spatial analysis of resources and environmental carrying capacity in Iran. Natural Resources Forum 2023; 47(1): 60–86. doi: 10.1111/1477-8947.12270

55. Javdan M, Ghalehteimouri KJ, Ghasemi M, Riazi A. A novel framework for social life cycle assessment to achieve sustainable cultural tourism destinations. Turyzm/Tourism 2023; 33(2): 7–18. doi: 10.18778/0867-5856.33.2.01