Overview of large scale map production with UAV based photogrammetric technique: A case study in Izmir-Cesme territory of Turkey
Vol 6, Issue 2, 2023
VIEWS - 462 (Abstract) 87 (PDF)
Abstract
UAVs, also known as unmanned aerial vehicles, have emerged as an efficient and flexible system for offering a rapid and cost-effective solution. In recent years, large-scale mapping using UAV photogrammetry has gained significant popularity and has been widely adopted in academia as well as the private sector. This study aims to investigate the technical aspects of this field, provide insights into the procedural steps involved, and present a case study conducted in Cesme, Izmir. The findings derived from the case study are thoroughly discussed, and the potential applications of UAV photogrammetry in large-scale mapping are examined. The study area is divided into 12 blocks. The flight plans and the distribution of ground control point (GCP) locations were determined based on these blocks. As a result of the data processing procedure, average GCP positional errors ranging from 1 to 18 cm have been obtained for the blocks.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
1. Ghilani CD, Wolf PR. Elementary Surveying: An İntroduction to Geomatics, 13th ed. Pearson College Div; 2012.
2. Wolf PR, Dewitt BA, Wilkinson BE. Elements of Photogrammetry with Applications in GIS, 4th ed. McGraw Hill Education; 2014.
3. Kumar NS, Ismail MAM, Sukor NSA, Cheang W. Geohazard reconnaissance mapping for potential rock boulder fall using low altitude UAV photogrammetry. IOP Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering 2018; 352(1): 012033. doi: 10. 1088/1757-899X/352/1/012033
4. Lato MJ, Hutchinson DJ, Gauthier D, et al. Comparison of airborne laser scanning, terrestrial laser scanning, and terrestrial photogrammetry for mapping differential slope change in mountainous terrain. Canadian Geotechnical Journal 2014; 52(2): 129–140. doi: 10.1139/cgj-2014-0051
5. Tang P, Vick S, Chen J, Paal SG. Chapter 2: Surveying, geomatics, and 3D reconstruction. In: Infrastructure Computer Vision. Elsevier; 2020. pp. 13–64.
6. James MR, Ilic S, Ruzic I. Measuring 3D coastal change with a digital camera. In: Proceedings of the Coastal Dynamics 2013; 24–28 June 2013; Bordeaux, France. pp. 893–904.
7. Sanchez‐Azofeifa A, Guzmán JA, Campos CA, et al. Twenty‐first century remote sensing technologies are revolutionizing the study of tropical forests. Biotropica 2017; 49(5): 604–619. doi: 10.1111/btp.12454
8. Ndehedehe C. Chapter 8: Remotely piloted aircraft system. In: Satellite Remote Sensing of Terrestrial Hydrology. Springer; 2022.
9. Goncalves JA, Henriques R. UAV photogrammetry for topographic monitoring of coastal areas. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 2015; 104: 101–111. doi: 10. 1016/j.isprs jprs. 2015.02.009
10. Westoby MJ, Brasington J, Glasser NF, et al. Structure-from-motion photogrammetry: A novel, low-cost tool for geomorphological applications. Geomorphology 2012; 179: 300–314. doi: 10.1016/j.geomo rph.2012.08.021
11. Javernick L, Brasington J, Caruso B. Modelling the topography of shallow braided rivers using structure-from-motion photogrammetry. Geomorphology 2014; 213: 166–182. doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2014.01.006
12. Brunier G, Fleury JT, Anthony E, et al. Closerange airborne structure-from-motion photogrammetry for high-resolution beach morphometric surveys: Examples from an embayed rotating beach. Geomorphology 2016; 261: 76–88. doi: 10.1016/j.geomo rph.2016.02.025
13. Deliry SI, Avdan U. Accuracy of unmanned aerial systems photogrammetry and structure from motion in surveying and mapping: A review. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing 2021; 49(7): 1997–2017. doi: 10.1007/s12524-021-01366-x
14. Barba S, Barbarella M, Benedetto AD, et al. Quality assessment of UAV photogrammetric archaeological survey. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences 2019; 42: 93–100. doi: 10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W9-93-2019
15. Pereira P, Baptista P, Cunha T, et al. Estimation of the nearshore bathymetry from high temporal resolution sentinel-1A C-band SAR data—A case study. Remote Sensing Environment 2019; 223: 166–178. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2019.01.003
16. Baloloy AB, Lanco AC, Anaa RRCS, Nadaoka K. Development and application of a new mangrove vegetation index (MVI) for rapid and accurate mangrove mapping. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 2020; 166(3): 95–117. doi: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2020.06.001
17. Manajitprasert S, Tripathi NK, Arunplod S. Three-dimensional (3D) modeling of cultural heritage site using UAV imagery: A case study of the pagodas in wat Maha that, Thailand. Applied Sciences 2019; 9(18): 3640. doi: 10.3390/app9183640
18. Elkhrachy I. Accuracy assessment of low-cost unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) photogrammetry. Alexandria Engineering Journal 2021; 60(6): 5579–5590. doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2021.04.011
19. Erenoglu RC, Erenoglu O, Arslan N. Accuracy assessment of low cost UAV based city modelling for urban planning. Tehnicki Vjesnik 2018; 25(6): 1708–1714. doi: 10.17559/TV-20170904202055
20. Jiménez-Jiménez SI, Ojeda-Bustamante W, Marcial-Pablo MDJ, Enciso J. Digital terrain models generated with low-cost UAV photogrammetry: Methodology and accuracy. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 2021; 10(5): 285. doi: 10.3390/ijgi10050285
21. Mission Planner 2023. Available online: https://ardupilot.org/planner/index.html (accessed on 22 May 2023).
22. He J, Li Y, Zhang K. Research of UAV flight planning parameters. Positioning 2012; 3(4): 43–45. doi: 10.4236/pos.2012.34006
23. Nex F, Remondino F. UAV for 3D mapping applications: A review. Applied Geomatics 2014; 6(1): 1–15. doi: 10.1007/s12518-013-0120-x
24. Brown DC. Close-range camera calibration. Photogrammetric Engineering 1971; 37: 855–866.
25. Elhadary A, Rabah M, Ghanim E, et al. The influence of flight height and overlap on UAV imagery over featureless surfaces and constructing formulas predicting the geometrical accuracy. NRIAG Journal of Astronomy and Geophysics 2022; 11(1): 210–223. doi: 10.1080/20909977.2022.2057148
26. Haddad RA, Akansu AN. A class of fast gaussian binomial filters for speech and image processing. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 1991; 39(3): 723–727. doi: 10.1109/78.80892
27. Triggs B, McLauchlan PF, Hartley RI, Fitzgibbon AW. Bundle adjustment—A modern synthesis. In: Triggs B, Zisserman A, Szeliski R (edıtors). Vision Algorithms: Theory and Practice. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg; 2022. Volume 1883. pp. 298–372.
28. Available online: https://www.3dsourced.com/3d-software/best-photogrammetry-software/ (accessed on 22 May 2023).
29. Available online: https://support.pix4d.com/hc/en-us/articles/204272989-Offline-Getting-Started-and-Manual-pdf (accessed on 21 August 2023).
30. Agisoft photoscan user manual. Available online: https://www.agisoft.com/pdf/photoscan-pro_1_4_en.pdf (accessed on 21 August 2023).
31. Giuseppina VACCA. WEB open drone map (WebODM) a software open source to photogrammetry process. In: Proceedings of the FIG Working Week 2020—CANCELLED—Smart Surveyors for Land and Water Management; 10–14 May 2020; Amsterdam, Netherlands.
32. Morgan JA, Brogan DJ. How to VisualSFM. Available online: https://www.engr.colostate.edu/~jamorgan/How_to_VisualSFM.pdf (accessed on 21 August 2023).
33. Image composite editor. Available online: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/project/image-composite-editor/ (accessed on 22 May 2023).
34. SenseFly. Available online: https://www.paksoyteknik.com.tr/paksoy-topcon/iha/SenseFly-ebee-plus.SenseFly (accessed on 1 May 2023).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24294/jgc.v6i2.2164
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Yalçın Yılmaz, Mert Gürtürk, Barış Süleymanoğlu, Arzu Soycan, Metin Soycan
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.