The idea of a smart city has evolved in recent years from limiting the city’s physical growth to a comprehensive idea that includes physical, social, information, and knowledge infrastructure. As of right now, many studies indicate the potential advantages of smart cities in the fields of education, transportation, and entertainment to achieve more sustainability, efficiency, optimization, collaboration, and creativity. So, it is necessary to survey some technical knowledge and technology to establish the smart city and digitize its services. Traffic and transportation management, together with other subsystems, is one of the key components of creating a smart city. We specify this research by exploring digital twin (DT) technologies and 3D model information in the context of traffic management as well as the need to acquire them in the modern world. Despite the abundance of research in this field, the majority of them concentrate on the technical aspects of its design in diverse sectors. More details are required on the application of DTs in the creation of intelligent transportation systems. Results from the literature indicate that implementing the Internet of Things (IoT) to the scope of traffic addresses the traffic management issues in densely populated cities and somewhat affects the air pollution reduction caused by transportation systems. Leading countries are moving towards integrated systems and platforms using Building Information Modelling (BIM), IoT, and Spatial Data Infrastructure (SDI) to make cities smarter. There has been limited research on the application of digital twin technology in traffic control. One reason for this could be the complexity of the traffic system, which involves multiple variables and interactions between different components. Developing an accurate digital twin model for traffic control would require a significant amount of data collection and analysis, as well as advanced modeling techniques to account for the dynamic nature of traffic flow. We explore the requirements for the implementation of the digital twin in the traffic control industry and a proper architecture based on 6 main layers is investigated for the deployment of this system. In addition, an emphasis on the particular function of DT in simulating high traffic flow, keeping track of accidents, and choosing the optimal path for vehicles has been reviewed. Furthermore, incorporating user-generated content and volunteered geographic information (VGI), considering the idea of the human as a sensor, together with IoT can be a future direction to provide a more accurate and up-to-date representation of the physical environment, especially for traffic control, according to the literature review. The results show there are some limitations in digital twins for traffic control. The current digital twins are only a 3D representation of the real world. The difficulty of synchronizing real and virtual world information is another challenge. Eventually, in order to employ this technology as effectively as feasible in urban management, the researchers must address these drawbacks.

Digital Twin; Transportation; GIS; BIM; Route Finding; Data Sharing; System Architecture

1. Li YW, Cao K. Establishment and application of intelligent city building information model based on BP neural network model. Computer Communications 2020; 153: 382–389. doi: 10.1016/j.comcom.2020.02.013.

2. Kim TH, Ramos C, Mohammed S. Smart city and IoT. Future Generation Computer Systems 2017; 76: 159–162. doi: 10.1016/j.future.2017.03.034.

3. Visan M, Negrea SL, Mone F. Towards intelligent public transport systems in Smart Cities; Collaborative decisions to be made. Procedia Computer Science 2022; 199: 1221–1228. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2022.01.155.

4. Yencken D. Creative cities. In: Sykes H (editor). Space, place and culture. Australia: Future Leaders; 2013.

5. Nour El-Din M, Pereira PF, Poças Martins J, Ramos NM. Digital twins for construction assets using BIM standard specifications. Buildings 2022; 12(12): 2155. doi: 10.3390/buildings12122155.

6. Deng M, Menassa CC, Kamat VR. From BIM to digital twins: A systematic review of the evolution of intelligent building representations in the AEC-FM industry. Journal of Information Technology in Construction 2021; 26: 58–83. doi: 10.36680/j.itcon.2021.005.

7. Lu Q, Parlikad AK, Woodall P, et al. Developing a digital twin at building and city levels: Case study of West Cambridge campus. Journal of Management in Engineering 2020; 36(3): 05020004. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000763.

8. Segovia M, Garcia-Alfaro J. Design, modeling and implementation of digital twins. Sensors 2022; 22(14): 5396. doi: 10.3390/s22145396.

9. Korth B, Schwede C, Zajac M. Simulation-ready digital twin for realtime management of logistics systems. In: 2018 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data); 2018 Dec 10–13; Seattle. New York: IEEE; 2019. p. 4194–4201.

10. Grieves M, Vickers J. Digital twin: Mitigating unpredictable, undesirable emergent behavior in complex systems. In: Transdisciplinary perspectives on complex systems. Cham: Springer; 2017. p. 85–113.

11. Lafioune N, St-Jacques M. Towards the creation of a searchable 3D smart city model. Innovation & Management Review 2020; 17(3): 285–305. doi: 10.1108/INMR-03-2019-0033.

12. Yang C, Mao L. Analysis on risk factors of BIM application in construction project operation and maintenance phase. Journal of Service Science and Management 2021; 14(2): 213–277. doi: 10.4236/jssm.2021.142013.

13. Jovanović D, Milovanov S, Ruskovski I, et al. Building virtual 3D city model for smart cities applications: A case study on campus area of the University of Novi Sad. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 2020; 9(8): 476. doi: 10.3390/ijgi9080476.

14. Ma Z, Ren Y. Integrated application of BIM and GIS: An overview. Procedia Engineering 2017; 196: 1072–1079. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.08.064.

15. Muthuramalingam S, Bharathi A, Gayathri N, et al. IoT based intelligent transportation system (IoT-ITS) for global perspective: A case study. In: Internet of Things and big data analytics for smart generation. Cham: Springer; 2019. p. 279–300.

16. Elsagheer Mohamed SA, AlShalfan KA. Intelligent traffic management system based on the Internet of Vehicles (IoV). Journal of Advanced Transportation 2021; 2021: 4037533. doi: 10.1155/2021/4037533.

17. Wu J, Wang X, Dang Y, Lv Z. Digital twins and artificial intelligence in transportation infrastructure: Classification, application, and future research directions. Computers and Electrical Engineering 2022; 101: 107983. doi: 10.1016/j.compeleceng.2022.107983.

18. Kumar DM, Arthi R, Aravindhan C, et al. Traffic congestion control synchronizing and rerouting using LoRa. Microprocessors and Microsystems 2021; 104048. doi: 10.1016/j.micpro.2021.104048.

19. Vaidya RB, Kulkarni S, Didore V. Intelligent transportation system using IOT: A review. International Journal for Research Trends and Innovation 2021; 6(9): 80–87.

20. Wang J, Hou L, Chong HY, et al. A cooperative system of GIS and BIM for traffic planning: A high-rise building case study. In: Luo Y (editor). Cooperative design, visualization, and engineering. In: The 11th International Conference on Cooperative Design, Visualization and Engineering; 2014 Sept 14–17; Seattle. Berlin: Springer; 2014. p. 143–150. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-10831-5_20.

21. Schrotter G, Hürzeler C. The digital twin of the city of Zurich for urban planning. PFG–Journal of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Geoinformation Science 2020; 88(1): 99–112. doi: 10.1007/s41064-020-00092-2.

22. Dou S, Zhang H, Zhao Y, et al. Research on construction of spatio-temporal data visualization platform for GIS and BIM fusion. The International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences 2020; XLII-3-W10: 555–563. doi: 10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-3-W10-555-2020.

23. Wang Z, Gupta R, Han K, et al. Mobility digital twin: Concept, architecture, case study, and future challenges. IEEE Internet of Things Journal 2022; 9(18): 17452–17467. doi: 10.1109/JIOT.2022.3156028.

24. Mashaly M. Connecting the twins: A review on digital twin technology & its networking requirements. Procedia Computer Science 2021; 184: 299–305. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2021.03.039.

25. Liu M, Fang S, Dong H, Xu C. Review of digital twin about concepts, technologies, and industrial applications. Journal of Manufacturing Systems 2021; 58(Part B): 346–361. doi: 10.1016/j.jmsy.2020.06.017.

26. Erol T, Mendi AF, Doğan D. Digital transformation revolution with digital twin technology. In: 2020 4th International Symposium on Multidisciplinary Studies and Innovative Technologies (ISMSIT); 2020 Oct 22–24; Istanbul. New York: IEEE; 2020. p. 1–7.

27. Panetta K. Gartner’s top 10 strategic technology trends for 2017 [Internet]. Stamford: Gartner; 2016 [updated 2016 Oct 18]. Available from: https://www.gartner.com/smarterwithgartner/gartners-top-10-technology-trends-2017.

28. Panetta K. Gartner’s top 10 strategic technology trends for 2018 [Internet]. Stamford: Gartner; 2017 [updated 2017 Oct 3]. Available from: https://www.gartner. com/smarterwithgartner/gartners-top-10-technology-trends-2018.

29. Panetta K. Gartner’s top 10 strategic technology trends for 2019 [Internet]. Stamford: Gartner; 2018 [updated 2018 Oct 15]. Available from: https://www.gartner.com/smarterwithgartner/gartner-top-10-strategic-technology-trends-for-2019.

30. Ferré-Bigorra J, Casals M, Gangolells M. The adoption of urban digital twins. Cities 2022; 131: 103905. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2022.103905.

31. Del Giudice M, Osello A (editors). Handbook of research on developing smart cities based on digital twins. Hershey: IGI Global; 2021.

32. Tao F, Cheng J, Qi Q, et al. Digital twin-driven product design, manufacturing and service with big data. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 2018; 94: 3563–3576. doi: 10.1007/s00170-017-0233-1.

33. Schleich B, Anwer N, Mathieu L, Wartzack S. Shaping the digital twin for design and production engineering. CIRP Annals 2017; 66(1): 141–144. doi: 10.1016/j.cirp.2017.04.040.

34. Guo H, Chen M, Mohamed K, et al. A digital twin-based flexible cellular manufacturing for optimization of air conditioner line. Journal of Manufacturing Systems 2021; 58(Part B): 65–78. doi: 10.1016/j.jmsy.2020.07.012.

35. Khajavi SH, Motlagh NH, Jaribion A, et al. Digital twin: Vision, benefits, boundaries, and creation for buildings. IEEE Access 2019; 7: 147406–147419. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2946515.

36. Qi Q, Tao F, Hu T, et al. Enabling technologies and tools for digital twin. Journal of Manufacturing Systems 2021; 58(Part B): 3–21. doi: 10.1016/j.jmsy.2019.10.001.

37. Semeraro C, Lezoche M, Panetto H, Dassisti M. Digital twin paradigm: A systematic literature review. Computers in Industry 2021; 130: 103469. doi: 10.1016/j.compind.2021.103469.

38. Park KT, Lee D, Noh SD. Operation procedures of a work-center-level digital twin for sustainable and smart manufacturing. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology 2020; 7: 791–814. doi: 10.1007/s40684-020-00227-1.

39. Banafaa M, Shayea I, Din J, et al. 6G mobile communication technology: Requirements, targets, applications, challenges, advantages, and opportunities. Alexandria Engineering Journal 2023; 64: 245–274. doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2022.08.017.

40. Hu W, Zhang T, Deng X, et al. Digital twin: A state-of-the-art review of its enabling technologies, applications and challenges. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing and Special Equipment 2021; 2(1): 1–34. doi: 10.1108/JIMSE-12-2020-010.

41. Mohammadi N, Taylor J. Knowledge discovery in smart city digital twins. In: Proceedings of the 53rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences; 2020 Jan 7–10; Maui. Honolulu: ScholarSpace; 2020.

42. Austin M, Delgoshaei P, Coelho M, Heidarinejad M. Architecting smart city digital twins: Combined semantic model and machine learning approach. Journal of Management in Engineering 2020; 36(4): 04020026. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000774.

43. Li X, Liu H, Wang W, et al. Big data analysis of the Internet of things in the digital twins of smart city based on deep learning. Future Generation Computer Systems 2022; 128: 167–177. doi: 10.1016/j.future.2021.10.006.

44. Li D, Yu W, Shao Z. Smart city based on digital twins. Computational Urban Science 2021; 1: 1–11. doi: 10.1007/s43762-021-00005-y.

45. Taylor JE, Bennett G, Mohammadi N. Engineering smarter cities with smart city digital twins. Journal of Management in Engineering 2021; 37(6): 02021001. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000974.

46. Mylonas G, Kalogeras A, Kalogeras G, et al. Digital twins from smart manufacturing to smart cities: A survey. IEEE Access 2021; 9: 143222–143249. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3120843.

47. Qian C, Liu X, Ripley C, et al. Digital twin—Cyber replica of physical things: Architecture, applications and future research directions. Future Internet 2022; 14(2): 64. doi: 10.3390/fi14020064.

48. Rafsanjani HN, Nabizadeh AH. Towards digital architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC) industry through virtual design and construction (VDC) and digital twin. Energy and Built Environment 2021; 4(2): 169–178. doi: 10.1016/j.enbenv.2021.10.004.

49. Thelen A, Zhang X, Fink O, et al. A comprehensive review of digital twin—Part 1: Modeling and twinning enabling technologies. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 2022; 65(12): 1–55. doi: 10.1007/s00158-022-03425-4.

50. Kukushkin K, Ryabov Y, Borovkov A. Digital twins: A systematic literature review based on data analysis and topic modeling. Data 2022; 7(12): 173. doi: 10.3390/data7120173.

51. Lin T, Jia Z, Yang C, et al. Evolutionary digital twin: A new approach for intelligent industrial product development. Advanced Engineering Informatics 2021; 47: 101209. doi: 10.1016/j.aei.2020.101209.

52. Warke V, Kumar S, Bongale A, Kotecha K. Sustainable development of smart manufacturing driven by the digital twin framework: A statistical analysis. Sustainability 2021; 13(18): 10139. doi: 10.3390/su131810139.

53. Coelho F, Relvas S, Barbosa-Póvoa AP. Simulation-based decision support tool for in-house logistics: The basis for a digital twin. Computers & Industrial Engineering 2021; 153: 107094. doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2020.107094.

54. Wang T, Li J, Kong Z, et al. Digital twin improved via visual question answering for vision-language interactive mode in human-machine collaboration. Journal of Manufacturing Systems 2021; 58(Part B): 261–269. doi: 10.1016/j.jmsy.2020.07.011.

55. Haag S, Anderl R. Automated generation of as-manufactured geometric representations for digital twins using STEP. Procedia CIRP 2019; 84: 1082–1087. doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2019.04.305.

56. Xia H, Liu Z, Efremochkina M, et al. Study on city digital twin technologies for sustainable smart city design: A review and bibliometric analysis of geographic information system and building information modeling integration. Sustainable Cities and Society 2022; 84: 104009. doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2022.104009.

57. Jiang F, Ma L, Broyd T, et al. Underpass clearance checking in highway widening projects using digital twins. Automation in Construction 2022; 141: 104406. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104406.

58. Lu Y, Liu Z, Min Q. A digital twin-enabled value stream mapping approach for production process reengineering in SMEs. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing 2021; 34(7–8): 764–782. doi: 10.1080/0951192X.2021.1872099.

59. Pregnolato M, Gunner S, Voyagaki E, et al. Towards civil engineering 4.0: Concept, workflow and application of digital twins for existing infrastructure. Automation in Construction 2022; 141: 104421. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104421.

60. Minerva R, Lee GM, Crespi N. Digital twin in the IoT context: A survey on technical features, scenarios, and architectural models. Proceedings of the IEEE 2020; 108(10): 1785–1824. doi: 10.1109/JPROC.2020.2998530.

61. Ambra T, Macharis C. Agent-based digital twins (ABM-DT) in synchromodal transport and logistics: The fusion of virtual and pysical spaces. In: 2020 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC); 2020 Dec 14–18; Orlando. New York: IEEE; 2021. p. 159–169.

62. Kosacka-Olejnik M, Kostrzewski M, Marczewska M, et al. How digital twin concept supports internal transport systems?—Literature review. Energies 2021; 14(16): 4919. doi: 10.3390/en14164919.

63. Guo J, Bilal M, Qiu Y, et al. Survey on digital twins for Internet of vehicles: Fundamentals, challenges, and opportunities. Digital Communications and Networks 2022. doi: 10.1016/j.dcan.2022.05.023.

64. Alexandru M, Dragoș C, Bălă-Constantin Z. Digital twin for automated guided vehicles fleet management. Procedia Computer Science 2022; 199: 1363–1369. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2022.01.172.

65. Rudskoy A, Ilin I, Prokhorov A. Digital twins in the intelligent transport systems. Transportation Research Procedia 2021; 54: 927–935. doi: 10.1016/j.trpro.2021.02.152.

66. Jiang F, Ma L, Broyd T, et al. Digital twin enabled sustainable urban road planning. Sustainable Cities and Society 2022; 78: 103645. doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103645.

67. Lv Z, Guo J, Singh AK, Lv H. Digital twins based VR simulation for accident prevention of intelligent vehicle. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology 2022; 71(4): 3414–3428. doi: 10.1109/TVT.2022.3152597.

68. Rosen R, Von Wichert G, Lo G, Bettenhausen KD. About the importance of autonomy and digital twins for the future of manufacturing. IFAC-PapersOnline 2015; 48(3): 567–572. doi: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2015.06.141.

69. Hofmann W, Branding F. Implementation of an IoT- and cloud-based digital twin for real-time decision support in port operations. IFAC-PapersOnLine 2019; 52(13): 2104–2109. doi: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2019.11.516.

70. Liu J, Zhou H, Liu X, et al. Dynamic evaluation method of machining process planning based on digital twin. IEEE Access 2019; 7: 19312–19323. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2893309.

71. Okita T, Kawabata T, Murayama H, et al. A new concept of digital twin of artifact systems: Synthesizing monitoring/inspections, physical/numerical models, and social system models. Procedia CIRP 2019; 79: 667–672. doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2019.02.048.

72. Kumar SAP, Madhumathi R, Chelliah PR, et al. A novel digital twin-centric approach for driver intention prediction and traffic congestion avoidance. Journal of Reliable Intelligent Environments 2018; 4: 199–209. doi: 10.1007/s40860-018-0069-y.

73. Ali WA, Roccotelli M, Fanti MP. Digital twin in intelligent transportation systems: A review. In: 2022 8th International Conference on Control, Decision and Information Technologies (CoDIT); 2022 May 17–20; Istanbul. New York: IEEE; 2022. p. 576­–581.

74. Dasgupta S, Rahman M, Lidbe AD, et al. A transportation digital-twin approach for adaptive traffic control systems. ArXiv 2021; abs/2109.10863. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2109.10863.

75. Wágner T, Ormándi T, Tettamanti T, Varga I. SPaT/MAP V2X communication between traffic light and vehicles and a realization with digital twin. Computers and Electrical Engineering 2023; 106: 108560. doi: 10.1016/j.compeleceng.2022.108560.

76. Kušić K, Schumann R, Ivanjko E. A digital twin in transportation: Real-time synergy of traffic data streams and simulation for virtualizing motorway dynamics. Advanced Engineering Informatics 2023; 55: 101858. doi: 10.1016/j.aei.2022.101858.

77. Xia H, Liu Z, Efremochkina M, et al. Study on city digital twin technologies for sustainable smart city design: A review and bibliometric analysis of geographic information system and building information modeling integration. Sustainable Cities and Society 2022; 84: 104009. doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2022.104009.

78. Wang S, Zhang F, Qin T. Research on the construction of highway traffic digital twin system based on 3D GIS technology. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 2021; 1802(4): 042045. doi: 10.708/1742-6596/1802/4/042045.

79. Chandana KK, Sundaram SM, D’sa C, et al. A smart traffic management system for congestion control and warnings using Internet of things (IoT). Saudi Journal of Engineering and Technology 2017; 2(5): 192–196. doi:10.21276/sjeat.

80. Masum AKM, Chy MKA, Rahman I, et al. An Internet of things (IoT) based smart traffic management system: A context of Bangladesh. In: 2018 International Conference on Innovations in Science, Engineering and Technology (ICISET); 2018 Oct 27–28; Chittagong. New York: IEEE; 2019. p. 418–422.

81. Sarrab M, Pulparambil S, Awadalla M. Development of an IoT based real-time traffic monitoring system for city governance. Global Transitions 2020; 2: 230–245. doi: 10.1016/j.glt.2020.09.004.

82. Katzorke N, Vinçon C, Kolar P, Lasi H. Fields of interest and demands for a digital proving ground twin. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives 2023; 18: 100782. doi: 10.1016/j.trip.2023.100782.

83. Vaidya RB, Kulkarni S, Didore V. Intelligent transportation system using IOT: A review. International Journal for Research Trends and Innovation 2021; 6(9): 80–87.

84. Bao L, Wang Q, Jiang Y. Review of digital twin for intelligent transportation system. In: 2021 International Conference on Information Control, Electrical Engineering and Rail Transit (ICEERT); 2021 Oct 30–Nov 1; Lanzhou. New York: IEEE; 2022. p. 309–315.

85. Abdellah AR, Mahmood OAK, Paramonov A, Koucheryavy A. IoT traffic prediction using multi-step ahead prediction with neural network. In: 2019 11th International Congress on Ultra Modern Telecommunications and Control Systems and Workshops (ICUMT); 2019 Oct 28–30; Dublin. New York: IEEE; 2020. p. 1–4.

86. Burhan M, Rehman RA, Khan B, Kim BS. IoT elements, layered architectures and security issues: A comprehensive survey. Sensors 2018; 18(9): 2796. doi: 10.3390/s18092796.

87. Petrova-Antonova D, Ilieva S. Methodological framework for digital transition and performance assessment of smart cities. In: 2019 4th International Conference on Smart and Sustainable Technologies (SpliTech); 2019 Jun 18–21; Split. New York: IEEE; 2019. p. 1–6.

88. Demiyanushko IV. The virtual digital proving ground for carrying out tests of road arrangement elements at arrivals of vehicles. In: 2021 Intelligent Technologies and Electronic Devices in Vehicle and Road Transport Complex (TIRVED); 2021 Nov 11–12; Moscow. New York: IEEE; 2021. p. 1–6.

89. Al-Ali AR, Gupta R, Zaman Batool T, et al. Digital twin conceptual model within the context of internet of things. Future Internet 2020; 12(10): 163. doi: 10.3390/fi12100163.

90. White G, Zink A, Codecá L, Clarke S. A digital twin smart city for citizen feedback. Cities 2021; 110: 103064. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2020.103064.

91. Vahidnia MH, Hosseinali F, Shafiei M. Crowdsource mapping of target buildings in hazard: The utilization of smartphone technologies and geographic services. Applied Geomatics 2020; 12: 3–14. doi: 10.1007/s12518-019-00280-9.

92. Vahidnia MH. Citizen participation through volunteered geographic information as equipment for a smart city to monitor urban decay. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 2023; 195(1): 181. doi: 10.1007/s10661-022-10796-0.