Characterization of soil suitability in the province of Catamarca using geographic information systems

Florencia Cecilia Trabichet

doi:10.24294/jgc.v5i1.1766

Characterization of soil suitability in the province of Catamarca using geographic information systems

Florencia Cecilia Trabichet

Article ID: 1766
Vol 5, Issue 1, 2022

VIEWS - 1513 (Abstract) 1543 (PDF)

Abstract

Land suitability analysis using geographic information systems (GIS) is one of the most widely used method today. In this type of studies, GIS and geo-spatial statistical tools are used to evaluate land units and present the results in suitability maps. The present work aims to characterize the suitability of soils in the province of Catamarca for pecan nut production according to the variables: rockiness, salinity, risk of water-logging, depth, texture and drainage described in the Soil Map of Argentina at a scale of 1:500,000 published by the National Institute of Agricultural Technology. A classification of the suitability of the soil cartographic units was made according to crop requirements, applying the methodology proposed by FAO. The standardization of variables made by omega score and the calculation of the spatial classification score were carried out as a result of the synthesis of the spatial distribution of soil suitability. The applied methodology allowed obtaining the soil suitability map resulting in a total of 60,662 km² suitable for pecan nut production, which accounts for 59.8% of the total area of the province.

Keywords

Carya Illinoiniensis; Land Evaluation; Geographic Information Systems

Full Text:

PDF

References

1. Zolekar RB, Bhagat VS. Multicriteria land suitability analysis for agriculture in hilly zone: Remote sensing and GIS approach. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 2015; 118: 300–321. doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2015.09.016.

2. Akıncı H, Özalp AY, Turgut B. Agricultural land use suitability analysis using GIS and AHP technique. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 2013; 97: 71–82. doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2013.07.006.

3. El Baroudy AA. Mapping and evaluating land suitability using a GIS-based model. CATENA 2016; 140: 96–104. doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2015.12.010.

4. Walke N, Obi Reddy GP, Maji AK, et al. GIS-based multicriteria overlay analysis in soil-suitability evaluation for cotton (Gossypium spp.): A case study in the black soil region of Central India. Computers & Geosciences 2012; 41: 108–118. doi: 10.1016/j.cageo.2011.08.020.

5. FAO. A framework for land evaluation. Soils Bulletin 32; 1976.

6. Romano G, Dal Sasso P, Trisorio Liuzzi G, et al. Multicriteria decision analysis for land suitability mapping in a rural area of Southern Italy. Land Use Policy 2015; 48: 131–143. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.05.013.

7. Malczewski J. Ordered weighted averaging with fuzzy quantifiers: GIS-based multicriteria evaluation for land-use suitability analysis. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation 8(4): 270–277. doi: 10.1016/j.jag.2006.01.003.

8. Buzai GD, Baxendale CA. Sociospatial analysis with geographic information systems. Scientific perspective (in Spanish). 1st ed. Buenos Aires. 2011.

9. Buzai G. Multi-criteria evaluation methodology in the spatial analysis of health (in Spanish). Toluca de Lerdo: Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México; 2014. p. 90–97.

10. Mendas A, Delali A. Integration of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis in GIS to develop land suitability for agriculture: Application to durum wheat cultivation in the region of Mleta in Algeria. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 2012; 83: 117–126. doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2012.02.003.

11. Li B, Zhang F, Zhang LW, et al. Comprehensive suitability evaluation of tea crops using GIS and a modified land ecological suitability evaluation model. Pedosphere 2012; 22(1): 122–130. doi: 10.1016/S10020160(11)60198-7.

12. Zabihi H, Ahmad A, Vogeler I, et al. Land suitability procedure for sustainable citrus planning using the application of the analytical network process approach and GIS. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 2015; 117: 114–126. doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2015.07.014.

13. Bunruamkaew K, Murayam Y. Site suitability evaluation for ecotourism using GIS & AHP: A case study of Surat Thani Province, Thailand. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 2011; 21: 269–278. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.07.024.

14. Lanzelotti S, Buzai G. Spatial suitability models for pre-Hispanic and present-day agriculture in the Santa María valley, Catamarca (in Spanish). Estudios Socioterritoriales. Revista de Geografia 2015; 18: 139–150.

15. Buzai GD, Principi N. Identification of areas of potential conflict between land uses in the Luján River basin (Argentina) (in Spanish). Revista Geográfica de América Central 2017; 59: 91–124.

16. Zhang R, Peng F, Li Y. Pecan production in China. Scientia Horticulturae 2015; 197: 719–727. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2015.10.035.

17. PROSAP-UCAR. Competitive improvement plan. Pecan nut cluster (in Spanish) [Internet]. Available from: https://clusterdelanuezpecan.net/plan-demejora-competitiva/.

18. Gomez LA, Cruzate GA. Suitability of Argentine soils for pecan (in Spanish). In: Produccion de pecán en Argentina. 2007. p. 1–9.

19. SAGyP-INTA. Soil Atlas of the Argentine Republic (in Spanish). 1st ed. Buenos Aires: SAGPyA-INTA; 1990.

20. Herrera E. Selecting soil and site for a pecan orchard. Las Cruces: New Mexico State University; 1999.

21. Nuñez Aguilar FA, Alvarez de Toledo JM. Irrigation in the Province of Catamarca (in Spanish).

22. Cabrera AL. Phytogeography of the Argentine Republic (in Spanish). Boletín de La Sociedad Argen-tina de Botánica 1971; 14: 1–42.

23. IGN. Provinces (in Spanish). 2018 [cited 2019 Apr 15]. Available from: http://ign.gob.ar/NuestrasActividades/InformacionGeoespacial/CapasSIG.

24. Morales Poclava C, Sobral R, Nakama V, et al. Land evaluation using parametric methods (in Spanish). 2004.

25. Panigatti L. Argentina, 200 years, 200 soils (in Spanish). 2010. Available from: https://inta.gob.ar/sites/ de-fault/files/script-tmp-inta-200-suelos.pdf.

26. USDA. Keys to soil taxonomy natural resources conservation service. 2014. Available from: https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nrcs142p2_051546.pdf.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24294/jgc.v5i1.1766