Cartography includes two major tasks: map making and map application, which is inextricably linked to artificial intelligence technology. The cartographic expert system experienced the intelligent expression of symbolism. After the spatial optimization decision of behaviorism intelligent expression, cartography faces the combination of deep learning under connectionism to improve the intelligent level of cartography. This paper discusses three problems about the proposition of “deep learning + cartography”. One is the consistency between the deep learning method and the map space problem solving strategy, based on gradient descent, local correlation, feature reduction and non-linear nature that answer the feasibility of the combination of “deep learning + cartography”; the second is to analyze the challenges faced by the combination of cartography from its unique disciplinary characteristics and technical environment, involving the non-standard organization of map data, professional requirements for sample establishment, the integration of geometric and geographical features, as well as the inherent spatial scale of the map; thirdly, the entry points and specific methods for integrating map making and map application into deep learning are discussed respectively.

1. Lu S. Cartography can be regarded as an implemental science (in Chinese). Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica 1992; 21(4): 307–311.

2. Gao J. Cartographic tetrahedron: Explanation of cartography in the digital era (in Chinese). Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica 2004; 33(1): 6–11.

3. Guo R, Ying S. The rejuvenation of cartography in ICT era (in Chinese). Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica 2017; 46(10): 1274–1283.

4. Lu G, Yu Z, Yuan L, et al. Is the future of cartography the scenario science (in Chinese)?. Journal of Geo-Information Science 2018; 20(1): 1–6.

5. Yu Z, Lu G, Zhang X, et al. Paninformation-based high precision navigation map: Concept and theoretical model. Journal of Geo-Information Science 2020; 22(4): 760–771.

6. Weibel R, Keller S, Reichenbacher T (editors). Overcoming the knowledge acquisition bottleneck in map generalization: The role of interactive systems and computational intelligence. Proceedings of 1995 International Conference on Spatial Information Theory. Semmering: Springer; 1995. p.139–156.

7. Ai T. Maps adaptable to represent spatial cognition (in Chinese). Journal of Remote Sensing 2008; 12(2): 347–354.

8. Zhou Z. Machine learning (in Chinese). Beijing: Tsinghua University Press; 2016.

9. Sun Q. Expert system and its application in cartography (in Chinese). Journal of Institute of Surveying and Mapping 1992: (1): 67–73.

10. Hua Y. Determine the map symbol type of map element with expert system technology (in Chinese). Journal of Institute of Surveying and Mapping 1991; (3): 43–47, 55.

11. Zhang W, Su B, Li H, et al. An integrated expert system tool-GEST (in Chinese). Journal of Wuhan Technical University of Surveying and Mapping 1992; 17(3): 1–8.

12. Sester M. Knowledge acquisition for the automatic interpretation of spatial data. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 2000; 14(1): 1–24.

13. Sester M. Optimization approaches for generalization and data abstraction. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 2005; 19(8–9): 871–897.

14. Qian H, Wu F, Wang J. Study of automated cartographic generalization and intelligentized generalization process control. Beijing: Surveying and Mapping Press; 2012.

15. Gao S. A review of recent researches and reflections on geospatial artificial intelligence (in Chinese). Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University 2020; 45(12): 1865–1874.

16. Touya G, Zhang X, Lokhat I. Is deep learning the new agent for map generalization? International Journal of Cartography 2019; 5(2–3): 142–157.

17. Lei Y, Ai T, Zhang X, et al. A parallel annotation placement method for dense point of interest labels using hexagonal grid. Cartography and Geographic Information Science 2021; 48(2): 95–104.

18. Lecun Y, Bengio Y, Hinton G. Deep learning. Nature 2015; 521(7553): 436–444.

19. Lecun Y, Bottou L, Bengio Y, et al. Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE 1998; 86(11): 2278–2324.

20. Reichstein M, Camps-Valls G, Stevens B, et al. Deep learning and process understanding for data-driven. Earth system science. Nature 2019; 566(7743): 195–204.

21. Zhu D, Liu Y (editors). Modelling spatial patterns using graph convolutional networks (short paper). Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Geographic Information Science. Dagstuhl: Schloss Dagstuhl-Leibniz- Zentrum fuer Informatik; 2018. p. 1–7.

22. Jenny B, Heitzler M, Singh D, et al. Cartographic relief shading with neural networks. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 2021; 27(2): 1225–1235.

23. Liu J, Zhan J, Guo C, et al. Data logic structure and key technologies on intelligent high-precision map (in Chinese). Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica 2019; 48(8): 939–953.

24. Mcculloch WS, Pitts W. A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity. The Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics 1943; 5(4): 115–133.

25. Rumelhart DE, Hinton GE, Williams RJ. Learning representations by back-propagating errors. Nature 1986; 323(6088): 533–536.

26. O’Callachan JF, Mark DM. The extraction of drainage networks from digital elevation data. Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing 1984; 28(3): 323–344.

27. Niepert M, Ahmed M, Kutzkov K (editors). Learning convolutional neural networks for graphs. Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Machine Learning. New York: Curran Associates; Inc.; 2016. p. 2014–2023.

28. Kipf TN, Welling M (editors). Semi-supervised classification with graph convolutional networks. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Learning Representations. Toulon: ICLR; 2017.

29. Tobler WR. A computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit region. Economic Geography 1970; 46 (S1): 234–240.

30. Anselin L. Local indicators of spatial association: LISA. Geographical Analysis 1995; 27(2): 93–115.

31. Ai T. Development of cartography driven by big data (in Chinese). Journal of Geomatics 2016; 41(2): 1–7.

32. Rrn S, He K, Girshick R, et al. Faster RCNN: Towards real-time object detection with region proposal networks. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 2017; 39 (6): 1137–1149.

33. He K, Gkioxari G, Doll RP, et al. (editors). Mask RCNN. Proceedings of 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. Venice: IEEE; 2017. p. 2980–2988.

34. Yu B, Yin H, Zhu Z (editors). Spatio-temporal graph convolutional neural network: A deep learning framework for traffic forecasting. Proceedings of the 27th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence Main Track. Stockholm: IJCAI; 2018. p. 3634–3640.

35. Xin H, Meng Y. Integrating landscape metrics and socioeconomic features for urban functional region classification. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 2018; 72: 134–145.

36. Cao R, Tu W, Yang C, et al. Deep learning-based remote and social sensing data fusion for urban region function recognition. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 2020; 163: 82–97.

37. Li Z Wang J, Tan S, et al. Scale in geo-information science: An overview of thirty-year development (in Chinese). Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University 2018; 43(12): 2233–2242.

38. Plazanet C, Bigolin NM, Ruas A. Experiments with learning techniques for spatial model enrichment and line generalization. Geo Informatica 1998; 2(4): 315–333.

39. Ruas A, Duchene C. A prototype generalisation system based on the multi-agent system paradigm. In: Mackaness WA, Ruas A, Sarjakoski LT (editors). Generalisation of Geographic Information. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2007. p. 269–284.

40. Sester M, Feng Y, Thiemann F (editors). Building generalization using deep learning. Proceedings of the International Archives of the Photogrammetry. Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences; 2018. p. 565–572.

41. Yan X, Ai T, Yang M, et al. Graph convolutional autoencoder model for the shape coding and cognition of buildings in maps. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 2021; 35(3): 490–512.

42. Yan X, Ai T, Yang M, et al. A graph convolutional neural network for classification of building patterns using spatial vector data. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 2019; 150: 259–273.

43. Lee J, Jang H, Yang J, et al. Machine learning classification of buildings for map generalization. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 2017; 6(10): 309–324.

44. Gatys L A, Ecker A S, Bethge M (editors). Image style transfer using convolutional neural networks. Proceedings of 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition; Las Vegas; IEEE; 2016: 2414–2423.

45. Goodfellos I J, Pouget-Abadie J, Mirza M, et al (editors). Generative adversarial networks. Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems: vol. 2. Cambridge: MIT Press; 2014. p. 2672–2680.

46. Schnuere R, Sieber R, Schmid-Lanter J, et al. Detection of pictorial map objects with convolutional neural networks. The Cartographic Journal 2020.

47. Ren J Liu W, Li Z, et al. Intelligent detection of “Problematic Map” using convolutional neural network. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University 2021; 46(4): 570–577.

48. Wang M Ai T, Yan X, et al. Grid pattern recognition in road networks based on graph convolution network model (in Chinese). Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University 2020; 45(12): 1960–1969.

49. He H, Qian H, Xie L, et al. Interchange recognition method based on CNN. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica 2018; 47(3): 385–395.

50. Hu S, Gao S, Wu L, et al. Urban function classification at road segment level using taxi trajectory data: A graph convolutional neural network approach. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 2021; 87: 101619.