In this study, optical and microwave satellite observations are integrated to estimate soil moisture at the same spatial resolution as the optical sensors (5km here) and applied for drought analysis in the continental United States. A new refined model is proposed to include auxiliary data like soil texture, topography, surface types, accumulated precipitation, in addition to Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) and Land Surface Temperature (LST) used in the traditional universal triangle method. It is found the new proposed soil moisture model using accumulated precipitation demonstrated close agreements with the U.S. Drought Monitor (USDM) spatial patterns. Currently, the USDM is providing a weekly map. Recently, “flash” drought concept appears. To obtain drought map on daily basis, LST is derived from microwave observations and downscaled to the same resolution as the thermal infrared LST product and used to fill the gaps due to clouds in optical LST data. With the integrated daily LST available under nearly all weather conditions, daily soil moisture can be estimated at relatively higher spatial resolution than those traditionally derived from passive microwave sensors, thus drought maps based on soil moisture anomalies can be obtained on daily basis and made the flash drought analysis and monitoring become possible.

1. Kousky C. Informing climate adaptation: A review of the economic costs of natural disasters. Energy Economics 2014; 46: 576–592.

2. Wilhite DA, Glantz MH. Understanding: The drought phenomenon: the role of definitions. Water International 1985; 10(3): 111–120.

3. Svoboda M, LeComte D, Hayes M. The drought monitor. Bulletin American Meteorological Society 2002; 83(8): 1181–1190.

4. Mote PW. Climate-driven variability and trends in mountain snowpack in Western North America. Journal of Climate 2006; 19(23): 6209–6220.

5. Xia YL, Ek MB, Peters-Lidard CD. Application of USDM statistics in NLDAS-2: Optimal blended NLDAS drought index over the continental United States. Journal of Geophysical Research-Atmosphere 2014; 119(6): 2947–2965.

6. Bolten JD, Crow WT, Zhan XW, et al. Evaluating the utility of remotely sensed soil moisture retrievals for operational agricultural drought monitoring. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observation and Remote Sensing 2010; 3(1): 57–66.

7. Leese J, Jackson T, Pitman A, et al. Meeting summary: GEWEX/BAHC international workshop on soil moisture monitoring, analysis, and prediction for hydrometeorological and hydroclimatological applications. Bulletin of American Meteorological Society 2001; 82(7): 1423–1430.

8. Zhan X, Miller S, Chauhan N, et al. Soil moisture visible/infrared radiometer suite algorithm theoretical basis document. Lanham, MD: Raytheon Syst. Company; 2002.

9. Chauhan NS, Miller S, Ardanuy P. Spaceborne soil moisture estimation at high resolution: a microwave-optical/IR synergistic approach. International Journal of Remote Sensing 2003; 24(22): 4599–4622.

10. Merlin O, Walker JP, Chehbouni A, et al. Towards deterministic downscaling of SMOS soil moisture using MODIS derived soil evaporative efficiency. Remote Sensing Environment 2008; 112(10): 3935–3946.

11. Wan ZM, Dozier J. A generalized split-window algorithm for retrieving land-surface temperature from space. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 1996; 34(4): 892–905.

12. Huete A, Justice C, Van Leeuwen W. MODIS vegetation index (MOD13): Algorithm theoretical basis document. 1999.

13. Huffman GJ, Bolvin DT, Nelkin EJ, et al. The TRMM multisatellite precipitation analysis (TMPA): Quasi-global, multiyear, combined-sensor precipitation estimates at fine scales. Journal of Hydrometeorology 2007; 8 (1): 38–55.

14. Gesch D, Oimoen M, Greenlee S, et al. The national elevation dataset. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 2002; 68(1): 5–32.

15. Henkel M. 21st century homestead: Sustainable agriculture I. Lulu. com.; 2015. p. 98–103.

16. Batjes NH. A world dataset of derived soil properties by FAO–UNESCO soil unit for global modelling. Soil Use and Management 1997; 13(1): 9–16.

17. Jackson TJ. III. Measuring surface soil moisture using passive microwave remote sensing. Hydrological Processes 1993; 7(2): 139–152.

18. Zhan X, Liu J, Zhao L, et al. Soil moisture operational product system (SMOPS): Algorithm theoretical basis document. 2011.

19. Ek MB, Mitchell KE, Lin Y, et al. Implementation of Noah land surface model advances in the National Centers for Environmental Prediction operational mesoscale Eta model. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 2003; 108(D22): 8851.

20. Koster RD, Suarez MJ. The influence of land surface moisture retention on precipitation statistics. Journal of Climate 1996; 9(10): 2551–2567.

21. Liang X, Wood EF, Lettenmaier DP. Surface soil moisture parameterization of the VIC-2L model: Evaluation and modification. Global and Planetary Change 1996; 13(1-4): 195–206.

22. Xia Y, Mocko D, Huang M, et al. Comparison and assessment of three advanced LSMs in simulating terrestrial water storage components over the U.S. Journal of Hydrometeorology 2017; 18: 625–649.

23. Keys RG. Cubic convolution interpolation for digital image processing. IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing1981; 29(6): 1153–1160.

24. Carlson TN, Gillies RR, Perry EM. A method to make use of thermal infrared temperature and NDVI measurements to infer surface soil water content and fractional vegetation cover. Remote Sensing Reviews 1994; 9(1-2): 161–173.

25. Sun DL, Kafatos M. Note on the NDVI-LST relationship and the use of temperature-related drought indices over North America. Geophysical Research Letters 2007; 34(24).

26. Cleveland WS. Robust locally weighted regression and smoothing scatterplots. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1979; 74(368): 829–836.

27. Reichle RH, Koster RD. Global assimilation of satellite surface soil moisture retrievals into the NASA Catchment land surface model. Geophysical Research Letters 2005; 32(2): L02404.

28. Anderson MC, Hain C, Otkin J, et al. An intercomparison of drought indicators based on thermal remote sensing and NLDAS-2 simulations with US Drought Monitor classifications. Journal of Hydrometeorology 2013; 14(4): 1035–1056.

29. Anderson MC, Hain C, Wardlow B, et al. Evaluation of drought indices based on thermal remote sensing of evapotranspiration over the continental United States. Journal of Climate 2011; 24(8): 2025–2044.

30. Anderson MC, Norman JM, Mecikalski JR, et al. A climatological study of evapotranspiration and moisture stress across the continental United States based on thermal remote sensing: 1. Model formulation. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 2007; 112(D10).

31. Anderson MC, Norman JM, Mecikalski JR, et al. A climatological study of evapotranspiration and moisture stress across the continental United States based on thermal remote sensing: 2. Surface moisture climatology. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 2007; 112(D11).

32. Norman JM, Kustas WP, Humes KS. Source approach for estimating soil and vegetation energy fluxes in observations of directional radiometric surface temperature. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 1995; 77(3): 263–293.

33. Kogan FN. Global drought watch from space. Bulletin American Meteorological Society 1997; 78(4): 621–636.

34. Kogan FN. Application of vegetation index and brightness temperature for drought detection. Advanced Space Research 1995; 11: 91–100.

35. Wang P, Li X, Gong J, Song C. Vegetation temperature condition index and its application for drought monitoring. In Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium 2001; 1: 141–143.

36. Lorenz DJ, Otkin JA, Svoboda M, et al. Predicting the US Drought Monitor (USDM) using precipitation, soil moisture, and evapotranspiration anomalies. Part II: Intraseasonal drought intensification forecasts. Journal of Hydrometeorology 2017; 18: 1963–1982.

37. Grigg NS. The 2011–2012 drought in the United States: new lessons from a record event. International Journal of Water Resources Development 2014; 30(2): 183–199.

38. Otkin JA, Anderson MC, Hain C, et al. Assessing the evolution of soil moisture and vegetation conditions during the 2012 United States flash drought. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 2016; 218: 230–242.

39. Hoerling M, Eischeid J, Kumar A, et al. Causes and predictability of the 2012 Great Plains drought. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 2014; 95(2): 269–282.

40. Sun D, Li Y, Zhan X, et al. Land surface temperature derivation under all sky conditions through integrating AMSR-E/AMSR-2 and MODIS/GOES observations. Remote Sensing 2019; 11(14): 1704.