Space is a product of society. Driven by industrialization, urbanization, informatization and government policies, China’s rural space is undergoing drastic reconstruction. As one of the core contents of international rural geography research, rural space research are multi-disciplinary, multi perspective, multi-dimensional and multi-method, forming a rich research field. In order to comprehensively grasp the progress of rural space research abroad, this study reviewed international rural space research literature in recent 40 years. The study found that foreign scholars described the connotation of rural space from the aspects of material, imagination and practice, emphasize the importance of daily life practice. It introduced living space to construct a more systematic research framework of rural space by establishing a “three-fold model of rural space”. With regard to the theoretical perspective, international research on rural space has experienced three stages: functionalism, political economics and social constructivism. In the evolution of time, it has realized the transformation from productivism to post-productivism; in the spatial dimension, it realizes the multiple superposition of settlement space, economic space, social space and cultural space. As a whole, international research on rural space has realized the transformation from material level to social representation, from objective space to subjective space, and from static one-dimensional space to dynamic multi-dimensional space, which enlightens us on the importance of interdisciplinary research and “social cultural” research on rural space. The construction of rural space in China needs to pay attention to the subject status of farmers and multifunction of rural space, respect the role of locality and difference of various places, and recover the function of production of meaning of rural space.

1. Long H, Zhang X. Progress in international rural geography research since the turn of the new millennium and some implications. Economic Geography 2012; 32(8): 1–7.

2. Zeng S, Zhou G, Xiao G, et al. A review of rural settlements from the perspective of geography. Human Geography 2011; 26(2): 68–73.

3. Li H, Zhang X. Spatial extension in the context of urban and rural development: Village recession and reconstruction. Reform 2012; 37(5): 591–600.

4. Mao D, Wang P. The evolution of western rural restructuring research. Sociological Studies 2014; 1: 194–217.

5. Zhang X. Study on rural spatial system and its revolution: A case study of south Jiangsu region. Nanjing, China: Nanjing Normal University Press; 1999.

6. Li H, Hu X, Zhang X, et al. On the analysis of rural space. Progress in Geography 2018; 37(5): 591–600.

7. Lin G, Xie X, Lv Z. Taobao practices, everyday life and emerging hybrid rurality in contemporary China. Journal of Rural Studies 2016; 47: 514–523.

8. Cloke P. Country backwater to virtual village? Rural studies and the “cultural” turn. Journal of Rural Studies 1997; 13(4): 367–375.

9. Woods M. Advocating rurality? The repositioning of rural local government. Journal of Rural Studies 1998; 14(1): 13–26.

10. Murdoch J, Pratt AC. Rural studies: Modernism, post-modernism and the “post-rural”? Journal of Rural Studies 1993; 9(4): 411–427.

11. Mitchell CJA. Entrepreneuralism, commodification and creative destruction: A model of post-modern community development. Journal of Rural Studies 1998; 14: 273–286.

12. Champion A. Studying counter urbanisation and the rural population turnaround. In: Boyle P, Halfacree K (editors). Migration into rural areas: Theories and issues. Chichester, UK: Wiley; 1998. p. 21–40.

13. Hugo G, Bell M. The hypothesis of welfare-led migration to rural areas: The Australian case. In: Boyle P, Halfacree K (editors). Migration into rural areas: Theories and issues. Chichester, UK: Wiley; 1998. p. 107–133.

14. Halfacree K. Rural space: Constructing a three-fold architecture. In: Cloke P, Marsden T, Mooney P (editors). Handbook of rural studies. London, UK: Sage; 2006. p. 44–62.

15. Hoggart K. Let’s do away with rural. Journal of Rural Studies 1990; 6(3): 245–257.

16. Cloke P. The country. In: Cloke P, Crang P, Goodwin M (editors). Introducing human geographies. London, UK: Edward Arnold; 1999. p. 256–267.

17. Mormont M. Who is rural? Or how to be rural: Towards a sociology of the rural. In: Marsden T, Lowe P, What-more S (editors). Rural restructuring: Global processes and their responses. London, UK: David Fulton Publishers; 1990. p. 21–44.

18. Copp J. Rural sociology and rural development. Rural Sociology 1972; 37: 515–533.

19. Jones O. Lay discourses of the rural: Developments and implications for rural studies. Journal of Rural Studies 1995; 11(1): 35–49.

20. Gottdiener M. The social production of urban space. Austin, USA: University of Texas Press; 1985.

21. Halfacree K. Landscapes of rurality: Rural others/other rurals. In: Roberston L, Richards P (editors). Studying cultural landscapes. London, UK: Arnold; 2003. p. 141–169.

22. Lefebvre H. The production of space. Oxford, USA: Blackwell; 1991.

23. Cloke P, Park C. Rural resource management. London, UK: Croom Helm; 1984.

24. Sauer M. Tordist modernization of German agriculture and the future of family farms. Sociologia Ruralis 1990; 30: 260–279.

25. Halfacree K. Locality and social representation: Space, discourse and alternative definitions of the rural. Journal of Rural Studies 1993; 9(1): 23–37.

26. Cloke P, Little J. Contested countryside cultures. London, UK: Routledge; 1997.

27. Holmes J. Impulses towards a multi-functional transition in rural Australia: Gaps in the research agenda. Journal of Rural Studies 2006; 22(2): 142–160.

28. Wilson GA. From productivism to post-productivism and back again? Exploring the (un)changed natural and mental landscapes of European agriculture. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 2001; 26(1): 77–102.

29. Marsden T, Murdoch J, Lowe P, et al. Constructing the Countryside. London, UK: UCL Press; 1993.

30. Newby H. Country life. London, UK: Weidenfeld and Nicolson; 1987.

31. Drummond I, Campbell H, Lawrence G, et al. Contingent and structural crisis in British agriculture. Sociologia Ruralis 2000; 40: 111–127.

32. Cloke P, Goodwin M. Conceptualizing countryside change: From post-Fordism to rural structured coherence. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 1992; 17(3): 321–336.

33. Harvey G. The killing of the countryside. London, UK: Jonathan Cape; 1997.

34. Simmons M. Landscapes of poverty. London, UK: Lemos and Crane; 1997.

35. Seymour S, Lowe P, Ward N, et al. Environmental “others” and “elites”: Rural pollution and changing power relations in the countryside. In: Milbourne P (editor). Revealing rural “others”. London, UK: Pinter; 1997. p. 57–74.

36. Veal A. Planning for leisure: Past, present and future. In: Glyptis S (editor). Leisure and the environment. London, UK: Belhaven; 1993. p. 53–67.

37. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. 2003. Welcome to the England rural development programme [DB/OL]. 2003-06-18. [2018-12-12]. http://www.defra.gov.uk/erdp/.

38. Ilbery B, Bowler I. From agricultural productivism to post-productivism. In: Ilbery B (editor). The geography of rural change. Harlow, UK: Longman; 1998. p. 57–84.

39. Ward N. The agricultural treadmill and the rural environment in the post-productivist era. Sociologia Ruralis 1993; 27: 21–37.

40. Marsden T. Rural futures: The consumption countryside and its regulation. Sociologia Ruralis 1999; 39(4): 501–526.

41. Phillips M. The restructuring of social imaginations in rural geography. Journal of Rural Studies 1998; 14(2): 121–153.

42. Hopkins J. Signs of the post-rural: Marketing myths of a symbolic countryside. Geografiska Annaler (Series B): Human Geography 1998; 80(2): 65–81.

43. Rigg J, Ritchie M. Production, consumption and imagination in rural Thailand. Journal of Rural Studies 2002; 18(4): 359–371.

44. Woods M. Performing rurality and practicing rural geography. Progress in Human Geography 2010; 34(6): 835–846.

45. Woods M. Researching rural conflicts: Hunting, local politics and actor-networks. Journal of Rural Studies 1998; 14(3): 321–340.

46. Marsden T. Economic perspectives. In: Ilbery B. The geography of rural change. Harlow, UK: Longman; 1998. p. 17–18.

47. Schwarz W, Schwarz D. Living lightly: Travels in post-consumer society. Charlbury, UK: Jon Carpenter; 1998.

48. Li H, Zhang X. A review and trend on rural settlement geography abroad. Human Geography 2012; 27(4): 103–108.

49. McGrath B. The sustainability of a car dependent settlement pattern: An evaluation of new rural settlement in Ireland. The Environmentalist 1998; 19(2): 99–107.

50. Zhang X, Sheng M. The reorientation of rural geography in China. Human Geography 2002; 17(1): 81–84.

51. Hall DR. Rural development, migration and uncertainty. GeoJournal 1996; 38(2): 185–189.

52. Woods M. Discourses of power and rurality: Local politics in somerset in the 20th century. Political Geography 1997; 16(6): 453–478.

53. Whatmore S. Sustainable rural geographies. Progress in Human Geography 1993; 17(4): 538–547.

54. Kiss E. Rural restructuring in Hungary in the period of socio-economic transition. GeoJournal 2000; 51(3): 221–233.

55. Burholt A, Naylor D. The relationship between rural community type and attachment to place for older people living in North Wales, UK. European. Journal of Ageing 2005; 2(2): 109–119.

56. Pini B. Feminist methodology and rural research: Reflections on a study of an Australian agricultural organization. Sociologia Ruralis 2003; 43: 418–433.

57. Marsden T. The condition of rural sustainability. Assen, Netherlands: Royal Van Gorcum; 2003.

58. Stockdale A, Findlay A, Short D. The repopulation of rural Scotland: Opportunity and threat. Journal of Rural Studies 2000; 16(2): 243–257.

59. Giddens A. The consequences of modernity. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press; 1990.

60. Harrison LE, Huntington SP. Culture matters: How values shape human progress. New York, USA: Basic Books; 2000.

61. Buller H, Hokkart K. The social integration of British homeowners into French rural communities. Journal of Rural Studies 1994; 10(2): 197–210.

62. Luloff AE, Swanson LE. American rural communities. Bouider, USA: Westview Press; 1990.

63. Terluin IJ. Differences in economic development in rural regions of advanced countries: An overview and critical analysis of theories. Journal of Rural Studies 2003; 19(3): 327–344.

64. Zeckeri AA, Wilkinson KP, Humphrey CR. Past activeness, solidarity, and local development efforts. Rural Sociology 1994; 59(2): 216–235.

65. Piore MJ, Sabel C. The second industrial divide: Possibilities for prosperity. New York, USA: Basic Books; 1984.

66. Lindsay S. Culture, mental models, and national prosperity. In: Harrison LE, Huntington SP (editors). Culture matters: How values shape human progress. New York, USA: Basic Books; 2000. p. 285.

67. Freudenburg WR. Addictive economies: Extractive industries and vulnerable localities in a changing world economy. Rural Sociology 1992; 57(3): 305–332.

68. Marini MB, Mooney PH. Rural economic. In: Cloke P, Marsden T, Mooney P (editors). Handbook of rural studies. London, UK: Sage; 2006. p. 44–62.

69. Bergman T. Change processes in farming and political consciousness and attitudes of peasants and worker-peasants. Sociologia Ruralis 1975; 15: 73–89.

70. Bolton N, Chalkley B. The rural population turnround: A case study of North Devon. Journal of Rural Studies 1990; 6: 29–43.

71. Richling B. “You’d never starve here”: Return migration to rural Newfoundland. Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology 1985; 22(2): 236–249.

72. Saunders P, Newby H, Bell C,et al. Rural community and rural community power. In: Newby H (editor). International Perspectives in Rural Sociology. London, UK: Wiley; 1978.

73. Newby H. The deferential worker: A study of farm workers in East Anglia. London, UK: Allen Lane; 1977.

74. Dempsey K. A man’s town: Inequality between women and men in rural Australia. Melbourne, Australia: Oxford University Press; 1992.

75. Cloke P, Thrift N. Class and change in rural Britain. In: Marsden T, Lowe P, Whatmore S (editors). Rural restructuring. London, UK: David Fulton; 1990. p. 165–181.

76. Tonts M. The exclusive brethren and an Australian rural community. Journal of Rural Studies 2001; 17(3): 309–322.

77. Mertig AG, Dunlop RE. Environmentalism, new social movements, and the new class: A cross-national investigation. Rural Sociology 2001; 66(1): 113–136.

78. Feng L. Understanding space: Transitions of spatial concepts in the 20th century. Beijing, China: Central Compilation & Translation Press; 2017.

79. Gregson N. Reclaiming “the social” in social and cultural geography. In: Anderson K, Domosh M, Pile S, et al. (editors). Handbook of cultural geography. London, UK: Sage; 2003. p. 43–57.

80. Mitchell D. There’s no such thing as culture: Towards a reconceptualization of the idea of culture in geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 1995; 20(1): 102–116.

81. Murdoch J. Towards a geography of heterogeneous associates. Progress in Human Geography 1997; 21: 321–337.

82. Whatmore S. Hybrid geographies: Natures, cultures, spaces. London, UK: Sage; 2002.

83. Wylie J. Landscape, performance and dwelling: A Glastonbury case study. In: Cloke P (editor). Country visions. Harlow, UK: Pearson; 2003.

84. Latour B. Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor network-theory. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2005.

85. Smith DP, Phillips DA. Socio-cultural representations of green trified pennine rurality. Journal of Rural Studies 2001; 17(4): 457–469.

86. Murdoch J. Co-constructing the countryside: Hybrid networks and the extensive self. In: Cloke P (editor). Country visions. Harlow, UK: Pearson Education; 2003. p. 263–282.

87. Marsden T. New rural territories: Regulating the differentiated rural spaces. Journal of Rural Studies 1998; 14(1): 107–119.

88. Chen P, Zhang M. From beautiful village to urban residents’ consumption space: Actor network theory and the social space reconstruction of Dashiao Village. Geographical Research 2015; 34(8): 1435–1446.

89. Yang R, Liu YS, Long HL, et al. Spatial distribution characteristics and optimized reconstructing analysis of rural settlement in China. Scientia Geographica Sinica 2016; 36(2): 170–179.

90. Wu Q, Gong Y, Chen Q. Development features of beautiful countryside in Hangzhou based on production of urban consumption space: A comparative study on three villages. Urban Planning, 2016; (8): 105–112.

91. Liu Z, Liu C. The post-productivist countryside: A theoretical perspective of rural revitalization. China Rural Survey 2018; 39(5): 2–13.

92. Lyv Z, Lin G. Hybridity: Rethinking rurality. Geographical Research2017; 36(10): 1873–1885.