Research progress and prospects of green development from the perspective of geography

Jiamin Ren, Yanji Ma

Article ID: 1307
Vol 3, Issue 1, 2020

VIEWS - 442 (Abstract) 305 (PDF)

Abstract


Influenced by global financial crisis in 2008, many countries around the world have realized the significance of sustainable development. And green development, as the most important pathway to sustainability, has been implemented by various countries. In this context, green development has drawn great attention from academic researchers both at home and abroad in recent years and has become an interdisciplinary-oriented research direction. As an applied basic research field for exploring the structural change of resources and environment as well as regional sustainable development, geography plays an essential role in the research of green development. Based on an intensive literature review, this article firstly summarized the connotation and analytical framework of green development. Secondly, it systematically outlined the progress of green development research from the perspective of geography and thus extracted seven themes, that is, the influencing factors of green development, assessment methods, spatial and temporal characteristics of green development, green development and industrial transformation, green transformation of resource-based cities, the effect of green development, and green development institutions and recommendations. Comments were made on the existing studies including their shortcomings. Finally, future research emphases were discussed, aiming to provide references for further study on green development from the perspective of geography in China.

Keywords


Green Development; Research Progress; Prospect; Perspective of Geography

Full Text:

PDF


References


1. He C, Zhou Y. Study on environmental economic geography. Beijing, China: Science Press; 2016. p. 3–9.

2. Lu D, Fan J. The rise and effects of regional sustainable development studies in China. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences 2012; 27(3): 290–300.

3. Zhang G. Promote ecological civilization and strive to build a beautiful China. Qiushi 2013; 24: 3–11.

4. Fu B. The integrated studies of geography: Coupling of patterns and process. Acta Geographica Sinica 2014; 69(8): 1052–1059.

5. Lu D. The value of geographical science and the feelings of geographers. Acta Geographica Sinica 2015; 70(10): 1539–1551.

6. Fu B, Leng S, Song C. The characteristics and tasks of geography in the new era. Scientia Geographica Sinica 2015; 35(8): 939–945.

7. Wang Y. Transforming economic development pattern through implementing green development. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences 2010; 25(2): 121–126.

8. UNDP. China human development Report 2002: Let the green development become a choice. Beijing, China: China Financial & Economic Publishing House; 2002.

9. UNESCAP. State of the environment in Asia and the Pacific 2005 synthesis: Economic growth and sustainability. New York, USA: UNESAP; 2005.

10. Liu Y. Preface to the special issue on Chinese man-land relationships in a new era. Geographical Research 2018; 37(8): 1477–1484.

11. Zhu D, Liu Q. Exploration on the academic frontier of sustainable development and green econo-my—Interviewing Professor Zhu Dajian. Academic Monthly 2013; 45(10): 170–176.

12. Zhang X. Theory of sustainable development: Concept evolution, dimension and prospect. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences 2018; 33(1): 10–19.

13. Xia G. New interpretation of green economic. Environmental Protection 2010; 7: 8–10.

14. UNEP. Global green new deal: Policy brief. Geneva, Switzerland: UNEP; 2009.

15. UNEP. Towards a green economy: Pathways to sustainable development and poverty eradication synthesis for policy makers. Geneva, Switzerland: UNEP; 2011.

16. World Bank. Inclusive green growth: The pathway to sustainable development. Washington D C, USA: World Bank; 2012.

17. Zhu D. New concept and trend of green economy emerging from Rio+20. China Population, Resources and Envi-ronment 2012; 22(9): 1–7.

18. OECD. Towards green growth: Monitoring progress OECD indicators [EB/OL]. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/environment/towards-green-growth-monitoring-progress/ the-oecd-approach_9789264111356-4-en. 2011 [2018-07-15].

19. Hu A. Innovating green development in China. Beijing, China: China Renmin University Press; 2012.

20. Feng C, Wang M, Liu G C, et al. Green development performance and its influencing factors: A global perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production 2017; 144: 323–333.

21. Mu X, Liu K, Ren J. Spatial differentiation and change of green production efficiency in China. Progress in Geography 2017; 36(8): 1006–1014.

22. Jin P, Peng C, Song M. Macroeconomic uncertainty, high-level innovation, and urban green development performance in China. China Economic Review 2019; 55: 1–18.

23. Sun C, Wang X, Wang S. Measurement and spatial effect analysis of China’s biased technology progress under environmental constraints. Economic Geography 2018; 38(9): 38–46.

24. Chen W, Shen Y, Wang Y. Evaluation of economic transformation and upgrading of resource-based cities in Shanxi Province based on an improved TOPSIS method. Sustainable Cities and Society 2018; 37: 232–240.

25. Yue S, Zou Y, Hu Y. The influence of industrial agglomeration on urban green development efficiency in China. Urban Problems 2015; 10: 49–54.

26. Wang X, Shao Q. Non-linear effects of heterogeneous environmental regulations on green growth in G20 countries: Evidence from panel threshold regression. Science of the Total Environment 2019; 660: 1346–1354.

27. Peng X, Li B. On green industrial transformation in China under different types of environmental regulation. Journal of Finance and Economics 2016; 42(7): 134–144.

28. Huang J, Lv H, Wang L. Mechanism of financial development influencing regional green development: Based on eco-efficiency and spatial econometrics. Geographical Research 2014; 33(3): 532–545.

29. He A, An M. Competition among local governments, environmental regulation and green development efficiency. China Population, Resources and Environment 2019; 29(3): 21–30.

30. Tu Z, Deng H, Gan T. The logic of public participation in environmental governance in China: Theory, practice and pattern. Journal of Central China Normal University (Humanities and Social Sciences) 2018; 57(3): 49–61.

31. Zhang J, Liu Y, Chang Y, et al. Industrial eco-efficiency in China: A provincial quantification using three-stage data envelopment analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production 2017; 143: 238–249.

32. Liu Z, Xin L. Has China’s Belt and Road initiative promoted its green total factor productivity? Evidence from primary provinces along the route. Energy Policy 2019; 129: 360–369.

33. Liu X, Yan L. Research on water resources utilization efficiency and factors in western China based on data en-velopment model. Water Resources Protection 2016; 32(6): 32–38.

34. Li R, Liu Y, Wang W, et al. Spatial-temporal evolution of green total factor productivity and identification of area problems in the Yangtze River Economic Belt. Scientia Geographica Sinica 2018; 38(9): 1475–1482.

35. Xie H, Chen Q, Lu F, et al. Spatial-temporal disparities and influencing factors of total-factor green use efficiency of industrial land in China. Journal of Cleaner Production 2019; 207: 1047–1058.

36. Yao X, Feng W, Zhang X, et al. Measurement and decomposition of industrial green total factor water efficiency in China. Journal of Cleaner Production 2018; 198: 1144–1156.

37. Wang W, Yu B, Yan X, et al. Estimation of innovation’s green performance: A range-adjusted measure approach to assess the unified efficiency of China’s manufacturing industry. Journal of Cleaner Production 2017; 149: 919–924.

38. Che L, Bai Y, Zhou L, et al. Spatial pattern and spillover effects of green development efficiency in China. Scien-tia Geographica Sinica 2018; 38(11): 1788–1798.

39. Chen L, Zhang X, He F, et al. Regional green development level and its spatial relationship under the constraints of haze in China. Journal of Cleaner Production 2019; 210: 376–387.

40. Lei M, Zhang X, Cao M. Accounting research of green GDP of resource-dependent cities: A case study of Yulin City in Shaanxi Province. Journal of Natural Resources 2009; 24(12): 2046–2055.

41. Zhang H, Huang M, Hu X. Green GDP calculation of Fujian Province based on energy analysis. Acta Geographica Sinica 2010; 65(11): 1421–1428.

42. Kunanuntakij K, Varabuntoonvit V, Vorayos N, et al. Thailand Green GDP assessment based on environmentally extended input-output model. Journal of Cleaner Production 2017; 167: 970–977.

43. OECD. Indicators to measure decoupling of environmental pressure from economic growth [EB/OL]. http://www.oecd.org/officialdocuments/publicdisplaydocumentpdf/?doclanguage=en&cote=sg/sd(2002)1/final. 2002 [2017-08-29].

44. Lu Q, Wu Q, Zhou Y, et al. Industry green development evaluation index system and its application to the regional assessment of Guangdong province in China. Ecology and Environmental Sciences 2013; 22(3): 528–534.

45. Zhao R, Zhang S, Huang X, et al. Spatial variation of carbon budget and carbon balance zoning of Central Plains Economic Region at county-level. Acta Geographica Sinica 2014; 69(10): 1425–1437.

46. Wang X, Lu F, Qin Y, et al. Spatial and temporal changes of carbon sources and sinks in Henan province. Progress in Geography 2016; 35(8): 941–951.

47. Hou C, Ren J, Cheng Y, et al. Spatial evolution and driving mechanism of China’s greenization process. Scientia Geographica Sinica 2018; 38(10): 1589–1596.

48. Kim SE, Kim H, Chae Y. A new approach to measuring green growth: Application to the OECD and Korea. Futures 2014; 63: 37–48.

49. Sun C, Tong Y, Liu W. Measurement of green development level and its dynamic evolution rule in China. Eco-nomic Geography 2017; 37(2): 15–22.

50. Guo F, Hou A, Tong L, et al. Spatio-temporal pattern and influencing factors of green development in the North-east Restricted Development Zone since the revitalization of the Northeast China. Economic Geography 2018; 38(8): 58–66.

51. Gai M, Kong X, Qu B. Evolution analysis of traditional economic efficiency and green space-time efficiency between China’s inter-provincial. Resource Development & Market 2016; 32(7): 780–787.

52. Sun C, Ma Q, Zha L. Temporal and spatial evolution of green efficiency of water resources in China and its convergence analysis. Progress in Geography 2018; 37(7): 901–911.

53. Hu B, Li J, Kuang B. Evolution characteristics and influencing factors of urban land use efficiency difference under the concept of green development. Economic Geography 2018; 38(12): 183–189.

54. Kumar S. Environmentally sensitive productivity growth: A global analysis using Malmquist-Luenberger index. Ecological Economics 2006; 56: 280–293.

55. Lin E, Chen P, Chen C. Measuring green productivity of country: A generalized metafrontier Malmquist productivity index approach. Energy 2013; 55: 340–353.

56. Ahmed EM. Green TFP intensity impact on sustainable East Asian productivity growth. Economic Analysis & Policy 2012; 42(1): 67–78.

57. Moutinho V, Fuinhas JA, Marques AC, et al. Assessing eco-efficiency through the DEA analysis and decoupling index in the Latin America countries. Journal of Cleaner Production 2018; 205: 512–524.

58. Mahlberg B, Luptacik M, Sahoo BK. Examining the drivers of total factor productivity change with an illustrative example of 14 EU countries. Ecological Economics 2011; 72: 60–69.

59. Apergis N, Aye GC, Barros CP, et al. Energy efficiency of selected OECD countries: A slacks based model with undesirable outputs. Energy Economics 2015; 51: 45–53.

60. Chiu YH, Shyu MK, Lee JH, et al. Undesirable output in efficiency and productivity: Example of the G20 countries. Energy Sources Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy 2016; 11(3): 237–243.

61. Sun C, Tong Y, Zou W. The evolution and a temporal-spatial difference analysis of green development in China. Sustainable Cities and Society 2018; 41: 52–61.

62. Li J, Wang X, Miao C. Comparison of development efficiency evaluation in resource-based cities based on DEA model. Economic Geography 2017; 37(4): 99–106.

63. Guo Y. The research on the green development levels and models of limited developing ecological zone in Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region. Yinchuan, China: Ningxia University; 2015.

64. Liu Y, Yang J, Liang Y. The green development efficiency and equilibrium features of urban agglomerations in China. Economic Geography 2019; 39(2): 110–117.

65. Li L, Liu Y. Industrial green spatial pattern evolution of Yangtze River Economic Belt in China. Chinese Geo-graphical Sciences 2017; 27(4): 660–672.

66. Ren J, Ma Y. Green development level and the obstacle factors of old industrial base in Northeast China. Scientia Geographica Sinica 2018; 38(7): 1042–1050.

67. Yang Y, Guo H, Chen L, et al. Regional analysis of the green development level differences in Chinese mineral resource-based cities. Resources Policy 2019; 61: 261–272.

68. Yun Y, Zhao J. Spatial pattern of vegetation carbon sinks based on MODIS-NDVI data: A case study in Shiyang River Basin, China. Mountain Research 2018; 36(4): 644–653.

69. Liu J, Gao J, Wang W, et al. Delimiting important carbon sequestration areas for typical terrestrial ecosystems in China. Research of Environmental Sciences 2016; 29(12): 1782–1789.

70. UNIDO. UNIDO Green Industry: Policies for supporting green industry. Vienna, Austria: UNIDO; 2011.

71. Ma L. Analysis on the assessment of greenery transformation-upgrading of industry in Guangdong. Geographical Research 2018; 37(8): 1587–1598.

72. Wang J, Li X. The effect of sector decoupling between China’s industrial economic growth and carbon dioxide emissions. Economic Geography 2015; 35(5): 105–110.

73. Fujii H, Managi S. Which industry is greener? An empirical study of nine industries in OECD countries. Energy Policy 2013; 57: 381–388.

74. Liu H, Liu Y, Xu X. Optimization of industrial structure and layout in Chengdu-Chongqing economic zone based on environmental efficiency evaluation. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze River 2012; 21(9): 1058–1066.

75. Song T, Dong G, Tang Z, et al. Industrial structure optimization of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei under the triple restriction of energy, environment and employment. Geographical Research 2017; 36(11): 2184–2196.

76. Zhu Y, Wang Z. Projection of China’s industrial structure change and carbon emission trends. Progress in Geography 2014; 33(12): 1579–1596.

77. Xi G, Zhen F. The development strategy for green industry of the region along the great canal in the north of Jiangsu. Human Geography 2009; 24(5): 87–91.

78. Yan X, Zhen F, Xi G. Study on selection and layout of the green industry in ecologically fragile of alpine city: The example of the Lhasa City. Economic Geography 2011; 31(7): 1139–1145.

79. Shapira P, Gök A, Klochikhin E, et al. Probing “green” industry enterprises in the UK: A new identification ap-proach. Technological Forecasting & Social Change 2014; 85: 93–104.

80. Park JI, Lee S. Examining the spatial patterns of green industries and the role of government policies in South Korea: Application of a panel regression model (2006-2012). Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2017; 78: 614–623.

81. Yi H, Liu Y. Green economy in China: Regional variations and policy drivers. Global Environmental Change 2015; 31: 11–19.

82. Hammer S, Kamal-Chaoui L, Robert A, et al. Cities and green growth: A conceptual framework. Paris, France: OECD; 2011.

83. Zhang M, Li Z, Huang B, et al. Generation and evolution of the green city idea and the comparative analysis of its connotation and features. Ecological Economy 2016; 32(5): 205–210.

84. Li J, Tang Z. An analysis of industrial structure increase of regenerative resource-based cities: A case of Tangshan City. Geographical Research 2017; 36(4): 707–718.

85. Hospers GJ. Restructuring Europe’s rustbelt: The case of the German Ruhrgebiet. Intereconomics 2004; 39(3):147–156.

86. Yang Z. An analysis of Japan’s restructuring policies for Kyushu old industrial base. Contemporary Economy of Japan 2006; 6: 14–17.

87. Sun Y, Jing P. A study on green transition mode and transition path of resource-based regions. China Soft Science 2012; 12: 152–161.

88. Liu C, Zhang C. Theoretical discussion on the connotation of green transformation of resource-based cities. China Population, Resources and Environment 2009; 19(5): 6–10.

89. Zhu A, Zeng J, Tang C, et al. Measuring the potentiality of regulation on the life-cycle of resource-based city. Human Geography 2013; 28(5): 69–75.

90. Sun Y. Study on theory and practice of green transition of resource-based regions Changchun, China: Northeast Normal University; 2012.

91. Zhang C, Liu C. The cost analysis and timing choice of green transformation of resource-based cities. Ecological Economy 2009; 25(6): 33–40.

92. Li Z, Wang L, Yu M. Study on west resources cities industrial transformation and upgrading development under the new normal: Take Liupanshui as an example. Resource Development & Market 2016; 32(5): 567–572.

93. Kuai P, Li W, Cheng R, et al. An application of system dynamics for evaluating planning alternatives to guide a green industrial transformation in a resource-based city. Journal of Cleaner Production 2015; 104: 403–412.

94. Li B, Dewan H. Efficiency differences among China’s resource-based cities and their determinants. Resource Policy 2017; 51: 31–38.

95. Zeng X, Duan C. Performance evaluation and differential analysis on green transformation of coal resource-exhausted cities in China. China Population, Resources and environment 2018; 28(7): 127–135.

96. Guo S, Guo J. The establishment of “Comprehensive Reform Zone”, industrial diversification and high-quality development of resource-based regions. Industrial Economic Research 2019; 1: 87–98.

97. Research group of Institute of Industrial Economics CASS. A study on the green transformation of Chinese industry. China Industrial Economics 2011; 4: 5–14.

98. Feng C, Wang M, Huang J. The impact of the transformation of development pattern on environment and economy: Estimation based on non-parametric methods. Science of Science and Management of S.&.T 2017; 38(2): 31–43.

99. Hall CR, Hodges AW, Haydu JJ. The economic impact of the green industry in the United States. Hort Technolo-gy 2006; 16(2): 345–353.

100. Yi H. Clean energy policies and green jobs: An evaluation of green jobs in U.S. metropolitan areas. Energy Policy 2013; 56: 644–652.

101. Lehr U, Lutz C, Edler D. Green jobs? Economic impacts of renewable energy in Germany. Energy Policy 2012; 47: 358–364.

102. Musango JK, Brent AC, Bassi AM. Modelling the transition towards a green economy in South Africa. Technological Forecasting & Social Change 2014; 87: 257–273.

103. Zhou X, Xu Z, Xi Y. The system dynamic model and policy optimized stimulation of energy conservation and emission reduction in China. Systems Engineering—Theory & Practice 2018; 38(6): 1422–1444.

104. Rivera GL, Reynès F, Cortes II, et al. Towards a low carbon growth in Mexico: Is a double dividend possible? A dynamic general equilibrium assessment. Energy Policy 2016; 96: 314–327.

105. She Y, Liu Y. Historical context and enlightenment of domestic and foreign green development regime. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze River 2018; 27(7): 1490–1500.

106. Brand U. Green economy: The next oxymoron? No lessons learned from failures of implementing sustainable development. GAIA: Ecological Perspectives for Science & Society 2012; 21(1): 28–32.

107. Pitkänen K, Antikainen R, Droste N, et al. What can be learned from practical cases of green economy? Studies from five European countries. Journal of Cleaner Production 2016; 139: 666–676.

108. Zhen L, Du B, Liu J, et al. The International experience of green development and implications to western China: An overall review of policy and practice. China Population, Resources and Environment 2013; 23(10): 8–16.

109. Swainson L, Mahanty S. Green economy meets political economy: Lessons from the “Aceh Green” initiative, Indonesia. Global Environmental Change 2018; 53: 286–295.

110. Mathews JA. Green growth strategies: Korean initiatives. Futures 2012; 44: 761–769.

111. Ringel M, Schlomann B, Krail M, et al. Towards a green economy in Germany? The role of energy efficiency policies. Applied Energy 2016; 179: 1293–1303.

112. Dulal HB, Dulal R, Yadav PK. Delivering green economy in Asia: The role of fiscal instruments. Futures 2015; 73: 61–77.

113. Wiseema W, Dellink R. AGE analysis of the impact of a carbon energy tax on the Irish economy. Ecological Economics 2007; 61: 671–683.

114. Van der Ploeg R, Withagen C. Green growth, green paradox and the global economic crisis. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 2013; 6: 116–119.

115. Cao D, Zhao X, Yang W. Development mechanism and policy innovation of China’s green economy. China Population. Resources and Environment 2012; 22(5): 48–54.

116. Yang J. The transformation of contemporary China’s developing path and its propulsion: The legalization of the concept of green development. Nanjing Journal of Social Sciences 2016; 10: 88–95.

117. Zhou K, Jin M. Analysis on the legal protection of China’s green economy from the perspective of ecological civilization. Environmental Protection 2016; 44(11): 24–27.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24294/jgc.v3i1.1307

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Jiamin Ren, Yanji Ma

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.