A Study on the Nature of Subjects in Generative Grammar
Vol 7, Issue 9, 2024
VIEWS - 2 (Abstract) 4 (PDF)
Abstract
to clarify the distinct manifestations and functions of subjects at the syntactic, semantic, and pragmatic levels. This paper points out that the
grammatical subject as defined by Lyons, being a pivotal element in the surface syntactic structure, maintains a morphological agreement
with the predicate verb, serving as the central focus of syntactic analysis. In contrast, the logical subject originates from the external argument
in the underlying structure, assuming the role of the agent and possessing explicit semantic attributes, thereby underscoring the significance
of subjects at the semantic level. Furthermore, the paper explores the concept of thematic subjects, emphasizing their centrality at the pragmatic level, which is directly tied to the progression of discourse and the transmission of information, transcending the syntactic framework
of “subjects” and highlighting the autonomy of pragmatic analysis. The article offers a novel perspective and pathway for a deeper understanding of the nature of subjects within the framework of generative grammar theory.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
1. [1] Beavers, John. Scalar complexity and the structure of events. In J. Dolling and T. Hey de Zybatow (eds.) Event Structures in Linguistic Form and Interpretation . Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter, 2008: 245–265.
2. [2] Bliss, Heather. Morpholexical Transparency and the Argument Structure of Verbs of Cutting and Breaking [J], Cognitive Linguistics, 2007(18-2): 153-177.
3. [3] Chao, Yuen Ren. A Grammar of Spoken Chinese [M]. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1968: 69.
4. [4] Folli, Rafaella and Heidi Harley. Teleology and animacy in external arguments’, Lingua [J], 2008(1321): 1-14.
5. [5] Hawkins, R. Second Language Syntax: a generative introduction [M]. Oxford: Blackwell, 2001.
6. [6] Halliday, M.A.K. An Introduction to Functional Grammar [M].London：Edward Arnold，1975.
7. [7] Keenan, E.L.Towards a universal definition of subject . In C. N. Li（ed.）Subject and Topic . New York: Academic Press, 1976:
8. 303-334.
9. [8] Levin, Beth. Semantic Roles. In M. Aronoff,(ed.) Oxford Bibliographies in Linguistics. New York: Oxford University Press, 2014:
10. 132-151.
11. [9] Levin, Beth. Verb Classes Within and Across Languages. In B. Comrie and A. Malchukov. (eds.) Valency Classes: A Comparative
12. Handbook . Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter, 2015: 1-37.
13. [10]Levin, Beth. Semantics and Pragmatics of Argument Alternations, Annual Review of Linguistic s 1 [J]. (URL), 2015: 1-22.
14. [11] Lyons, J. Semantics [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1977.
15. [12] Quirk, R. A Grammar of Contemporary English [M]. London: Longman, 1972: 58-88.
16. [13] Li, C.N.& S.A.Thompson. Subject and Topic: A New Typology of Language. In C. N. Li（ed.）Subject and Topic . New York:
17. Academic Press, 1976: 457-489.
18. [14] Pylkkanen, Liina. Introducing Arguments [M]. Cambridge, A: MIT Press, 2008.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18686/ijmss.v7i9.9721
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.