Review of the quality assessment and effect tracking of after-school service courses of science and technology in primary schools
Article ID: 8331
Vol 7, Issue 7, 2024
Vol 7, Issue 7, 2024
VIEWS - 909 (Abstract)
Abstract
From the global perspective, the international science and technology competition is becoming increasingly fierce. In order to meet
the needs of the current social development, the after-school service of science and technology has developed in depth, but the potential problems have gradually emerged. The difference between the quality of after-school service of science and technology in primary schools and
the deviation between the effect and expectation of after-school service of science and technology have increasingly become a problem that
cannot be ignored in the after-school service of science and technology. This paper conducts a literature review on the quality assessment and
effect tracking of after-school service courses in primary schools, and finally reviews the existing studies.
the needs of the current social development, the after-school service of science and technology has developed in depth, but the potential problems have gradually emerged. The difference between the quality of after-school service of science and technology in primary schools and
the deviation between the effect and expectation of after-school service of science and technology have increasingly become a problem that
cannot be ignored in the after-school service of science and technology. This paper conducts a literature review on the quality assessment and
effect tracking of after-school service courses in primary schools, and finally reviews the existing studies.
Keywords
After-school Service; Science and Technology Education; Quality Evaluation and Effect Tracking
Full Text:
PDFReferences
[1] Wang Bu.(2017).Build a world science and technology education power .China Renmin University Press
[2] Radloffff, J., & Guzey, S.(2016).Investigating preservice STEM teacher conceptions of STEM education.Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(5).759–774.
[3] Ring, E.A., Dare, E.A., Crotty, E.A., & Roehrig, G.H.(2017).The evolution of teacher conceptions of STEM education throughout
an intensive professional development experience.Journal of Science Teacher Education, 5. 444–467.
[4] Capraro, M., & Jones, M.(2013).Interdisciplinary STEM project-based learning.In R.Capraro, M.Capraro, & J.Morgan (Eds.),.
STEM-project-based learning: an integrated science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) approach.8.51-58.
[5] Asghar, A., Ellington, R., Rice, E., Johnson, F., & Prime, G.(2012).Supporting STEM education in secondary science contexts.Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning.2.285– 125.
[6] Marshall, J.& Harron, J.(2016).Making learners: a framework for evaluating making in STEM education.Interdisciplinary .Journal
of Problem-Based Learning.(2).49.
[7] Johns, G., & Mentzer, N.(2016).STEM integration through design and inquiry.Technology an Engineering Teacher.13-17.
[8] Van Haneghan, J.P., Pruet, S.A., Neal-Waltman, R., & Harlan, J.M.(2015).Teacher beliefs about motivating and teaching students to
carry out engineering design challenges: some initial data.Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research.(5).1–9.
[9] Nadelson, L.S., Seifert, A., Moll, A.J., & Coats, B.(2012).i-stem summer institute: an integrated approach to teacher professional
development in stem.Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research. (2).69–83.
[10] Van Haneghan, J.P., Pruet, S.A., Neal-Waltman, R., & Harlan, J.M(2015).Teacher beliefs about motivating and teaching students
to carry out engineering design challenges: some initial data.Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research.(2).1–9.
[11] Bruce-Davis, M.N., Gubbins, E.J., Gilson, C.M., Villanueva, M., Foreman, J.L., & Rubenstein, L.D.(2014).STEM high school
administrators’, teachers’, and students ’ perceptions of curricular and instructional strategies and practices.urnal of Advanced Academics.
(25).272–306.
[12] Lesseig, K., Slavit, D., Nelson, T.H., & Seidel, R.A.(2016).Supporting middle school teachers’ implementation of STEM design
challenges.School Science and Mathematics.(4) .177– 188.
[13] Dare, E.A., Ellis, J.A., & Roehrig, G.H.(2014).Driven by beliefs: understanding challenges physical science teachers face when
integrating engineering and physics.Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research.(2). 47–61.
[14] Holstein, K.A.& Keene, K.A.(2013).The complexities and challenges associated with the implementation of a STEM curriculum.
Teacher Education and Practice.(4). 616–636.
[15] El-Deghaidy, H., Mansour, N., Alzaghibi, M.& Alhammad, K.(2017).Context of STEM integration in schools: views from in-service science teachers.EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science, and Technology Education.(6).14.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18686/ijmss.v7i7.8331
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.