The psychosocial factors of blood donation during the pandemic: Strategies for sustainable blood supply

Junaidah Yusof, Annette d’Arqom, Endang Retno Surjaningrum, Siti Aisyah Panatik, Sabariah Mohd Noor, Nurul Iman Abdul Jalil, Mohd Ferdaus Harun, Halimaton Hakimi

Article ID: 9677
Vol 9, Issue 1, 2025

(Abstract)

Abstract


Objectives: The unprecedented COVID-19 pandemic has intensified the stress on blood banks and deprived the blood sources due to the containment measures that restrict the movement and travel limitations among blood donors. During this time, Malaysia had a significant 40% reduction in blood supply. Blood centers and hospitals faced a huge challenge balancing blood demand and collection. The health care systems need a proactive plan to withstand the uncertain situation such as the COVID-19 pandemic. This study investigates the psychosocial factors that affect blood donation behavior during a pandemic and aims to propose evidence-based strategies for a sustainable blood supply. Study design: Qualitative design using focus group discussion (FGD) was employed. Methods: Data were acquired from the two FGDs that group from transfusion medicine specialists (N = 8) and donors (N = 10). The FGD interview protocol was developed based on the UTM Research Ethics Committee’s approval. Then, the data was analyzed using Nvivo based on the General Inductive Approach (GIA). Results: Analysis of the text data found that the psychology of blood donation during the pandemic in Malaysia can be classified into four main themes: (i) reduced donation; (ii) motivation of donating blood; (iii) trends of donation; and (iv) challenges faced by the one-off, occasional, and non-donors. Conclusions: Based on the emerging themes from the FGDs, this study proposes four psycho-contextual strategies for relevant authorities to manage sustainable blood accumulation during the pandemic: (1) develop standard operating procedure for blood donors; (2) organize awareness campaigns; (3) create a centralized integrated blood donors database; and (4) provide innovative Blood Donation Facilities.


Keywords


psychosocial factor; blood donation; pandemic; strategy; blood supply; standard operating procedure; blood bank

Full Text:

PDF


References


Al-Riyami AZ, Abdella YE, Badawi MA, Panchatcharam SM, Ghaleb Y, Maghsudlu M, et al. The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on blood supplies and transfusion services in Eastern Mediterranean Region. Transfusion Clinique et Biologique. 2021; 28:16-24. doi: 10.1016/j.tracli.2020.11.002.

Avau B, De Buck E, Vandekerckhove P, Compernolle V, Importance of information provision in the acceptance of blood donation criteria by the general public in Belgium. Blood Transfus. 2018; 16: 475-481. doi: 10.2450/2017.0151-17.

Cai X, Ren M, Chen F, Li L, Lei H, Wang X, Blood transfusion during the COVID-19 outbreak. Blood Transfus. 2020; 18:79-82. doi: 10.2450/2020.0076-20.

Chiem C, Alghamdi K, Nguyen T, Han JH, Huo H, The impact of COVID-19 on blood transfusion services: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Transfus Med Hemother. 2021; 30: 1-12. doi: 10.1159/000519245.

Garcia-Lopez j, Delgadillo J, Vilarrodona A, Querol S, Ovejo J, Coll R, et al. SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 pandemic: first wave, impact, response and lessons learnt in a fully integrated regional blood and tissue bank: a narrative report. Blood Transfus. 2020; 19:158-167. doi: 10.2450/2021.0259-20.

Hakimi, H., Kamalrudin, M., & Abdullah, R. S. (2023). Software Security Readiness Model For Remote Working In Malaysian Public Sectors: Conceptual FRAMEWORK. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 101(8).

Hatim B, Munday J. Translation: An Advanced Resource Book for Students. London: Routledge; 2019.

Kiely P, Hoad VC, Seed CR, Gosbell IB, Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2: implications for blood safety and sufficiency. Vox Sang. 2021; 116:1 55-166. doi: 10.1111/vox.13009.

Kracalik I, Mowla S, Katz L, Cumming M, Sapiano MRP, Basavaraju SV, Impact of the early COVID-19 pandemic on blood utilization in the United States: a time-series analysis of data reported to the National Healthcare Safety Network Hemovigilance Module. Transfusion. 2021; 61: 36-43. doi: 10.1111/trf.16451.

Ministry of Health Malaysia, Current situation of COVID-19 in Malaysia. Available from: https://kpkesihatan.com/2020/10/05/kenyataan-akhbar-kpk-5-oktober-2020-situasi-semasa-jangkitan-penyakit-coronavirus-2019-covid-19-di-malaysia/. Accessed on 8/11/2022.

Miskeen E, Yahia AIO, Eljack TB, Karar HK, The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on blood transfusion services: a perspective from health professionals and donors. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2021; 14: 3063-3071. doi: 10.2147%2FJMDH.S337039.

Ngo A, Masel D, Cahill C, Blumberg N, Refaai MA, Blood banking and transfusion medicine challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic. Clin Lab Med. 2020; 40: 587-601. doi:10.1016/j.cll.2020.08.013.

Pagano MB, Hess JR, Tsang HC, Staley E, Gernsheimer T, Sen N, et al. Prepare to adapt: Blood supply and transfusion support during the first 2 weeks of the 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic affecting Washington State. Transfusion. 2020; 60: 908-919. doi: 10.1111/trf.15789.

Raturi M, Kusum A. The blood supply management amid the COVID-19 outbreak. Transfusion Clinique et Biologique. 2020; 27: 147-151. doi: 10.1016/j.tracli.2020.04.002.

Sharma B, Ramkumar M, Subramanian N, Malhotra B, Dynamic temporary blood facility location-allocation during and post-disaster periods. Ann Oper Res. 2019; 283:705-736. doi: 10.1007/s10479-017-2680-3.

Shi L, Wang J, Liu Z, Stevens L, Sadler A, Ness P, Shan H, Blood donor management in China. Transfus Med Hemother. 2014;41,273-282. doi: 10.1159/000365425.

Stanworth SJ, New HV, Apelseth TO, Brunskill S, Cardigan R, Doree C, et al. Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on supply and use of blood for transfusion. Lancet Haematol. 2020; 7: 756-764. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(20)30186-1.

Syeldy Langi Sasongko P, van den Hurk K, Thijssen-Timmer DC, Blood supply milestones in the Netherlands in the first weeks of COVID-19. ISBT Science Series. 2020; 15:393-394. doi: 10.1111/voxs.12562.

Tan PP, Chang CT, Abdul Rahman J, Mohd Noor S, Development and validation of a Malaysian blood donor’s satisfaction questionnaire. Malays J Med Sci. 2021; 28: 86-96. doi: 10.21315%2Fmjms2021.28.3.8.

Thomas DR, A general inductive approach for analysisng qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation. 2006; 27: 237-246. doi: 10.1177%2F1098214005283748.

Uludag, k. (2022). Coronary blindness: desensitization after excessive exposure to coronavirus-related information. Health Policy and Technology, 11(3), 100625.

Wooi SK, Overcoming blood supply challenges in multi-ethnic donor and patient populations: the Malaysia experience. ISBT Sci Ser. 2017; 12: 4-10. doi: 10.1111/voxs.12329.

Xiang Y, Validity of the principle of dynamic equivalence. Journal of Language Teaching and Research. 2012; 3: 200-204. doi: 10.4304/jltr.3.1.200-204.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd9677

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Junaidah Yusof, Annette d’Arqom, Endang Retno Surjaningrum, Siti Aisyah Panatik, Sabariah Mohd Noor, Nurul Iman Abdul Jalil, Mohd Ferdaus Harun, Halimaton Hakimi

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.