Adult obesity is a significant health problem, with nearly a quarter of Hungarian citizens aged 15 years and older being obese in 2019 (KSH, 2019a). The use of mobile devices for health purposes is increasing, and many m-health apps target weight-related behaviours. This study uniquely examines the effectiveness and user satisfaction of health-oriented apps among Hungarian adults, with a focus on health improvement. Using a mixed-methods approach, the study identifies six key determinants of health improvement and refines measurement tools by modifying existing parameters and introducing new constructs. The principal objective was to develop a measurement instrument for the usability of nutrition, relaxation and health promotion applications. The research comprised three phases: (1) qualitative content analysis of 13 app reviews conducted in June 2022; (2) focus group interviews involving 32 students from the fields of business, economics and health management; and (3) an online survey (n = 348 users) conducted in December 2023 that included Strava (105 users), Yazio (109 users) and Calm (134 users). Six factors were identified as determinants of health improvement: physical activity, diet, weight loss, general well-being, progress, and body knowledge. The LAUQ (Lifestyle Application Usability Questionnaire) scale was validated, including ‘ease of use’ (5 items), ‘interface and satisfaction’ (7 items) and ‘modified usefulness and effectiveness’ (9 items), with modifications based on qualitative findings. This research offers valuable insights into the factors influencing health improvement and user satisfaction with healthy lifestyle-oriented applications. It also contributes to the refinement of measurement tools such as the LAUQ, which will inform future studies in health psychology, digital health, and behavioural economics.

1. Baretta, D., Perski, O., Steca, P. (2019). Exploring Users’ Experiences of the Uptake and Adoption of Physical Activity Apps: Longitudinal Qualitative Study. JMIR MhealthUhealth, 7(2), 11636. https://doi.org/10.2196/11636
2. Bavota, G., Linares-Vasquez, M., Bernal-Cardenas, C. E., et al. (2015). The Impact of Api Change-and Fault-Proneness on the User Ratings of Android Apps. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 41(4), 384–407. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSE.2014.2367027
3. Bertolini, M., Bevilacqua, M. (2010). Fuzzy Cognitive Maps for Human Reliability Analysis in Production Systems. In: Kahraman, C., Yavuz, M. (editors). Production Engineering and Management under Fuzziness. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing. Volume 252. pp. 381–415. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12052-7_16
4. Braun, V., Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
5. Brewer, L. C., Hayes, S. N., Caron, A. R., et al. (2019). Promoting cardiovascular health and wellness among African-Americans: Community participatory approach to design an innovative mobile-health intervention. PLoS ONE, 14(8), 0218724. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218724
6. Briggs, T., Quick, V., Hallman, W. K. (2021). Feature Availability Comparison in Free and Paid Versions of Popular Smartphone Weight Management Applications. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 53(9), 732–741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2021.05.010
7. Ceasar, J. N., Claudel, S. E., Andrews, M. R., et al. (2019). Community Engagement in the Development of an mHealth-Enabled Physical Activity and Cardiovascular Health Intervention (Step It Up): Pilot Focus Group Study. JMIR Form Res. 3(1), 10944. https://doi.org/10.2196/10944
8. Chumkasian, W., Fernandez, R., Win, K. T., et al. (2021). Adaptation of the MAUQ and usability evaluation of a mobile phone-based system to promote eye donation. Int J Med Inform, 151, 104462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2021.104462
9. Cook, E. J., Randhawa, G., Sharp, C., et al. (2016). Exploring the factors that influence the decision to adopt and engage with an integrated assistive telehealth and telecare service in Cambridgeshire, UK: A nested qualitative study of patient ‘users’ and ‘non-users’. BMC Health Services Research, 16(137). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1379-5
10. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage Publications.
11. Degroote, L., Dyck, D. V., Bourdeaudhuij, I. D., et al. (2020). Acceptability and feasibility of the mHealth intervention ‘MyDayPlan’ to increase physical activity in a general adult population. BMC Public Health, 20(1), 1032. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09148-9
12. Eurostat. (2023). Life expectancy at birth. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database (accessed on 25 June 2024).
13. Franco, R. Z., Fallaize, R., Lovegrove, J. A., et al. (2016). Popular Nutrition-Related Mobile Apps: A Feature Assessment. JMIR MhealthUhealth, 4(3), e85. https://doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.5846
14. Fu, B., Lin, J., Li, L., et al. (2013). Why people hate your app: Making sense of user feedback in a mobile app store. In: Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining (KDD 2013); 11–14 August 2013; New York, NY, USA. pp. 1276–1284.
15. Gilson, N. D., Pavey, T. G., Wright, O. R., et al. (2017). The impact of an m-Health financial incentives program on the physical activity and diet of Australian truck drivers. BMC Public Health, 17(1), 467. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4380-y
16. Guest, G., MacQueen, K. M., Namey, E. E. (2012). Applied thematic analysis. Sage Publications.
17. Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., et al. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
18. Hajesmaeel-Gohari, S., Khordastan, F., Fatehi, F., et al. (2022). The most used questionnaires for evaluating satisfaction, usability, acceptance, and quality outcomes of mobile health. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 22(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-022-01764-2
19. Happ, É. (2013). Innovative marketing communication solutions in tourism-possibilities of smartphone applications (Hungarian) [PhD thesis]. Széchenyi István University, Gyor.
20. Happ, É., Keller, V. (2020). Marketing communication in tourism (Hungarian). National Széchényi Library-Digital Library.
21. Jaana, M., Sherrard, H., Paré, G. (2019). A prospective evaluation of telemonitoring use by seniors with chronic heart failure: adoption, self-care, and empowerment. Health Informatics Journal, 25(4), 1800–1814. https://doi.org/10.1177/1460458218799458
22. Jacob, C., Sezgin, E., Sanchez-Vazquez, A., et al. (2022). Sociotechnical Factors Affecting Patients’ Adoption of Mobile Health Tools: Systematic Literature Review and Narrative Synthesis. JMIR m-health Uhealth, 10(5), 36284. https://doi.org/10.2196/36284
23. König, L. M., Sproesser, G., Schupp, H. T., et al. (2018). Describing the Process of Adopting Nutrition and Fitness Apps: Behavior Stage Model Approach. JMIR MhealthUhealth, 6(3), 55. https://doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.8261
24. Krebs, P., Duncan, D. T. (2015). Health App Use Among US Mobile Phone Owners: A National Survey. JMIR MhealthUhealth, 3(4), 101. https://doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.4924
25. KSH. (2019a). Health picture (Hungarian). Available online: https://www.ksh.hu/docs/hun/xftp/idoszaki/pdf/egeszsegugyi_helyzetkep_2019.pdf (accessed on: 15 June 2024).
26. KSH. (2019b). Lifestyle and nutritional habits among the adult Hungarian population (Hungarian). Available online: https://www.ksh.hu/docs/hun/xftp/idoszaki/elef/te_2019/index.html (accessed on 25 June 2024).
27. Lehdonvirta, V., Oksanen, A., Räsänen, P., et al. (2021). Social media, web, and panel surveys: using non-probability samples in social and policy research. Policy and Internet, 13(1), 134–155. https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.238
28. Lewis, J. R. (2018). The system usability scale: past, present, and future. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 34(7), 577–590. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2018.1455307
29. Lieffers, J. R. L., Arocha, J. F., Grindrod, K., et al. (2018). Experiences and Perceptions of Adults Accessing Publicly Available Nutrition Behavior-Change Mobile Apps for Weight Management. J AcadNutr Diet, 118(2), 229–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jand.2017.04.015
30. Lincoln, Y. S., Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications.
31. Lindqvist, A., Rutberg, S., Söderström, E., et al. (2020). User Perception of a Smartphone App to Promote Physical Activity Through Active Transportation: Inductive Qualitative Content Analysis Within the Smart City Active Mobile Phone Intervention (SCAMPI) Study. JMIR MhealthUhealth, 8(8), 19380. https://doi.org/10.2196/19380
32. McKay, F. H., Wright, A., Shill, J., et al. (2019). Using Health and Well-Being Apps for Behavior Change: A Systematic Search and Rating of Apps. JMIR MhealthUhealth, 7(7), 11926. https://doi.org10.2196/11926
33. Mendiola, M. F., Kalnicki, M., Lindenauer, S. (2015). Valuable Features in Mobile Health Apps for Patients and Consumers: Content Analysis of Apps and User Ratings. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 3(2), 40. https://doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.4283
34. Meskó, B., Drobni, Z. S., Bényei, E., et al. (2017). Digital health is a cultural transformation of traditional healthcare. MHealth Journal, 3(38). https://doi.org/10.21037/mhealth.2017.08.07
35. Muro-Culebras, A., Escriche-Escuder, A., Martin-Martin, J., et al. (2021). Tools for Evaluating the Content, Efficacy, and Usability of Mobile Health Apps According to the Consensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments: Systematic Review. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth, 9(12), 15433. https://doi.org/10.2196/15433
36. Mustafa, N., Safii, N. S., Jaffar, A., et al. (2021). Malay version of the mHealth app usability questionnaire (MMAUQ): translation, adaptation, and validation study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth, 9(2), 24457.
37. Nouri, R., Kalhori, S. R. N., Saeedi, M. G., et al. (2018). Criteria for assessing the quality of mHealth apps: A systematic review. J Am Med Inform, 25(8), 1089–1098.
38. Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., et al. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940691773384
39. Pagano, D., Maalej, W. (2013). User feedback in the app store: An empirical study. In: Proceedings of the 21st IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE 2013); 15–19 July 2013; Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. pp. 125–134.
40. Régnier, F., Dugré, M., Darcel, N., et al. (2018). Providing a Smart Healthy Diet for the Low-Income Population: Qualitative Study on the Usage and Perception of a Designed Cooking App. JMIR mHealthuHealth, 6(11), 11176. https://doi.org/10.2196/11176
41. Roberts, K., Dowell, A., Nie, J. B. (2019). Attempting rigour and replicability in thematic analysis of qualitative research data; a case study of codebook development. BMC medical research methodology, 19(1–8). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0707-y
42. Ross, E. L, Jamison, R. N, Nicholls, L., et al. (2020). Clinical integration of a smartphone app for patients with chronic pain: retrospective analysis of predictors of benefits and patient engagement between clinic visits. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(4), 16939. https://doi.org/10.2196/16939
43. Shabir, H., D’Costa, M., Mohiaddin, Z., et al. (2022). The Barriers and Facilitators to the Use of Lifestyle Apps: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies. Eur. J Investig. Health Psychol, 12(2), 144–165. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe12020012
44. Simblett, S., Greer, B., Matcham, F., et al. (2018). Barriers to and Facilitators of Engagement with Remote Measurement Technology for Managing Health: Systematic Review and Content Analysis of Findings. J Med. Internet Res, 20(7), 10480. https://doi.org/10.2196/10480
45. Statista. (2024a). Smartphone users in Europe 2020, by country. Available online: https://www.statista.com/forecasts/1168910/smartphone-users-in-europe-by-country (accessed on 20 July 2024).
46. Statista. (2024b). Digital Fitness and Well-Being Apps. Available online: https://www.statista.com/outlook/dmo/digital-health/digital-fitness-well-being/digital-fitness-well-being-apps/worldwide (accessed on 20 July 2024).
47. Stoyanov, S. R., Hides, L., Kavanagh, D. J., et al. (2016). Development and validation of the user version of the Mobile Application Rating Scale (uMARS). JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 4(2), 72. https://doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.5849
48. Tang, J., Abraham, C., Stamp, E., et al. (2015). How can weight-loss app designers’ best engage and support users? A qualitative investigation. Br. J Health Psychol, 20(1), 151–171. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.12114
49. Villinger, K., Wahl, D. R., Boeing, H., et al. (2019). The effectiveness of app‐based mobile interventions on nutrition behaviours and nutrition‐related health outcomes: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Obesity reviews, 20(10), 1465–1484. https://doi.org/0.1111/obr.12903
50. Zhang, X., Xu, X. (2020). Continuous use of fitness apps and shaping factors among college students: A mixed-method investigation. Int J Nurs Sci, 7(1), 580–587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnss.2020.07.009
51. Zhao, S. Q., Cao, Y. J., Cao, H., et al. (2022). A Chinese Version of the mHealth App Usability Questionnaire: Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation. Front Psychol, 13, 813309. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.813309
52. Zhou, L., Bao, J., Setiawan, I. M. A., et al. (2019). The mHealth app usability questionnaire (MAUQ): development and validation study. JMIR MhealthUhealth. 7(4), 11500. https://doi.org/10.2196/11500