Background: Traditional education in neurosurgery primarily relies on observation, giving residents and interns limited opportunities for clinical practice. However, the development of 3D printing has the potential to improve this situation. Based on bibliometrics, we analyze the application of 3D printing technology in neurosurgery medical education and surgical training. Methods: We searched the publications in this field in Web of Science core collection database from September 2000 to September 2023. VOS viewer, Citespace and Microsoft Office Excel were used to visually analyze and draw knowledge graphs. Results: A total of 231 articles and reviews were included. The United States is the country with the largest volume of articles and Mayo Clinic is the leading organization in this field. Partnership between countries, authors and institutions is also presented. World Neurosurgery is the journal with the highest number of publications. The top three key words by occurrence rate are “3D printing”, “surgery” and “simulation”. Conclusions: In recent years, more and more attention has been paid to the research in this field. According to bibliometric analysis, “accuracy” and “surgery simulation” are the research focuses in this field, while “augment reality” is the potential research target.

1. Ballard, D. H., Mills, P., Duszak, R., et al. (2020). Medical 3D Printing Cost-Savings in Orthopedic and Maxillofacial Surgery: Cost Analysis of Operating Room Time Saved with 3D Printed Anatomic Models and Surgical Guides. Academic Radiology, 27(8), 1103–1113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2019.08.011
2. Blohm, J. E., Salinas, P. A., Avila, M. J., et al. (2022). Three-Dimensional Printing in Neurosurgery Residency Training: A Systematic Review of the Literature. World Neurosurgery, 161, 111–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2021.10.069
3. Brazdzionis, J., Savla, P., Podkovik, S., et al. (2022). Radiographic Predictors of Shunt Dependency in Intracranial Hemorrhage with Intraventricular Extension. Cureus. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.28409
4. Clifton, W., Damon, A., Nottmeier, E., et al. (2019). The importance of teaching clinical anatomy in surgical skills education: Spare the patient, use a sim! Clinical Anatomy, 33(1), 124–127. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.23485
5. Csámer, L., Csernátony, Z., Novák, L., et al. (2023). Custom-made 3D printing-based cranioplasty using a silicone mould and PMMA. Scientific Reports, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-38772-9
6. Dong, M., Chen, G., Qin, K., et al. (2018). Development of three-dimensional brain arteriovenous malformation model for patient communication and young neurosurgeon education. British Journal of Neurosurgery, 32(6), 646–649. https://doi.org/10.1080/02688697.2018.1424320
7. Ganguli, A., Pagan-Diaz, G. J., Grant, L., et al. (2018). 3D printing for preoperative planning and surgical training: A review. Biomedical Microdevices, 20(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10544-018-0301-9
8. Graffeo, C. S., Bhandarkar, A. R., Carlstrom, L. P., et al. (2023). That which is unseen: 3D printing for pediatric cerebrovascular education. Child’s Nervous System, 39(9), 2449–2457. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-023-05987-0
9. Joseph, F. J., Weber, S., Raabe, A., et al. (2020). Neurosurgical simulator for training aneurysm microsurgery—A user suitability study involving neurosurgeons and residents. Acta Neurochirurgica, 162(10), 2313–2321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-020-04522-3
10. Lai, M., Skyrman, S., Kor, F., et al. (2022). Development of a CT-Compatible, Anthropomorphic Skull and Brain Phantom for Neurosurgical Planning, Training, and Simulation. Bioengineering, 9(10), 537. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering9100537
11. Lan, Q., Zhu, Q., Xu, L., et al. (2020). Application of 3D-Printed Craniocerebral Model in Simulated Surgery for Complex Intracranial Lesions. World Neurosurgery, 134, e761–e770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2019.10.191
12. Li, H., Lu, L., Li, N., et al. (2022). Application of Three-Dimensional (3D) Printing in Neurosurgery. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, 2022, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/8015625
13. Lin, G. X., Kotheeranurak, V., Mahatthanatrakul, A., et al. (2020). Worldwide research productivity in the field of full-endoscopic spine surgery: a bibliometric study. European Spine Journal, 29(1), 153–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-019-06171-2
14. Lin, G. X., Nan, J. N., Chen, K. T., et al. (2022). Bibliometric analysis and visualization of research trends on oblique lumbar interbody fusion surgery. International Orthopaedics, 46(7), 1597–1608. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-022-05316-1
15. Lin, G. X., Chen, C. M., Rui, G., et al. (2023). Research relating to three-dimensional (3D) printing in spine surgery: a bibliometric analysis. European Spine Journal, 32(2), 395–407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-022-07376-8
16. Lin, Q. S., Lin, Y. X., Wu, X. Y., et al. (2018). Utility of 3-Dimensional–Printed Models in Enhancing the Learning Curve of Surgery of Tuberculum Sellae Meningioma. World Neurosurgery, 113, e222–e231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.01.215
17. Martín-Noguerol, T., Paulano-Godino, F., Riascos, R. F., et al. (2019). Hybrid computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging 3D printed models for neurosurgery planning. Annals of Translational Medicine, 7(22), 684–684. https://doi.org/10.21037/atm.2019.10.109
18. Mashiko, T., Otani, K., Kawano, R., et al. (2015). Development of Three-Dimensional Hollow Elastic Model for Cerebral Aneurysm Clipping Simulation Enabling Rapid and Low Cost Prototyping. World Neurosurgery, 83(3), 351–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2013.10.032
19. Mian, S. Y., Jayasangaran, S., Qureshi, A., et al. (2022). Exploring the Impact of Using Patient-Specific 3D Prints during Consent for Skull Base Neurosurgery. Journal of Neurological Surgery Part B: Skull Base, 84(05), 463–469. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1885-1111
20. Morris, J. M., Wentworth, A., Houdek, M. T., et al. (2023). The Role of 3D Printing in Treatment Planning of Spine and Sacral Tumors. Neuroimaging Clinics of North America, 33(3), 507–529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nic.2023.05.001
21. Naftulin, J. S., Kimchi, E. Y., & Cash, S. S. (2015). Streamlined, Inexpensive 3D Printing of the Brain and Skull. PLOS ONE, 10(8), e0136198. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0136198
22. Ozgıray, E., Husemoglu, B., Cınar, C., et al. (2024). The Effect of Preoperative Three Dimensional Modeling and Simulation on Outcome of Intracranial Aneursym Surgery. Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society, 67(2), 166–176. https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2023.0035
23. Ploch, C. C., Mansi, C. S. S. A., Jayamohan, J., et al. (2016). Using 3D Printing to Create Personalized Brain Models for Neurosurgical Training and Preoperative Planning. World Neurosurgery, 90, 668–674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2016.02.081
24. Pucci, J. U., Christophe, B. R., Sisti, J. A., et al. (2017). Three-dimensional printing: technologies, applications, and limitations in neurosurgery. Biotechnology Advances, 35(5), 521–529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2017.05.007
25. Ryan, J. R., Almefty, K. K., Nakaji, P., et al. (2016). Cerebral Aneurysm Clipping Surgery Simulation Using Patient-Specific 3D Printing and Silicone Casting. World Neurosurgery, 88, 175–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2015.12.102
26. Sakaeyama, Y., Sugo, N. (2024). Surgical Simulation Using a Three-Dimensional Printer. No Shinkei Geka, 52(2), 254–262. https://doi.org/10.11477/mf.1436204909
27. Shi, J., Cavagnaro, M. J., Xu, S., et al. (2022). The Application of Three-Dimensional Technologies in the Improvement of Orthopedic Surgery Training and Medical Education Quality: A Comparative Bibliometrics Analysis. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.852608
28. Suri, A., Patra, D., & Meena, R. (2016). Simulation in neurosurgery: Past, present, and future. Neurology India, 64(3), 387. https://doi.org/10.4103/0028-3886.181556
29. Taritsa, I. C., Lee, D., Foppiani, J., et al. (2024). Three-Dimensional Printing in Surgical Education: An Updated Systematic Review of the Literature. Journal of Surgical Research, 300, 425–431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2024.04.077
30. Waran, V., Narayanan, V., Karuppiah, R., et al. (2014). Utility of multimaterial 3D printers in creating models with pathological entities to enhance the training experience of neurosurgeons. Journal of Neurosurgery, 120(2), 489–492. https://doi.org/10.3171/2013.11.jns131066
31. Yi, Z., He, B., Liu, Y., et al. (2019). Development and evaluation of a craniocerebral model with tactile-realistic feature and intracranial pressure for neurosurgical training. Journal of Neuro Interventional Surgery, 12(1), 94–97. https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-015008