psychological meaning; research; semantic networks; social sciences; basic sciences

Antosz, P., Bharwani, S., Borit, M., et al. (2022). An introduction to the themed section on ‘Using agent-based simulation for integrating qualitative and quantitative evidence.’ International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 25(4), 511–515. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2022.2052651 Ballesteros-Alfonso, A. L., & Gómez-Velasco, N. Y. (2022). Inequality of Saber-11 test scores before and during the covid-19 pandemic (2014–2021) (Spanish). Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales, Niñez y Juventud, 20(3), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.11600/rlcsnj.20.3.5189 Botella, A., & Stuart, K. (2009). Corpus linguistics, network analysis and co-occurrence matrices. International Journal of English Studies, 9(3), 1–20. Bruner, J. (2012). What psychology should study. International Journal of Educational Psychology, 1(1), 5–13. https://doi.org/10.4471/ijep.2012.01 Carnicero, J. A. C., Ormrod, J. E., Sanz, A. J. E., & Soria, M. O. (2005). Human learning (Spanish). Madrid, Spain: Pearson Educación. Christensen, A. P., & Kenett, Y. N. (2023). Semantic network analysis (SemNA): A tutorial on preprocessing, estimating, and analyzing semantic networks. Psychological Methods, 28(4), 860–879. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000463 Comte, A., & Martineau, H. (2008). The Positive Philosophy of Auguste Comte. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511701450 Czarnocka, M. (2019). How Is Science Universal? Dialogue and Universalism, 29(2), 217–238. https://doi.org/10.5840/du201929230 De Albuquerque, F. J. B., Noriega, J. Á. V., & Pimentel, C. E. (2005). Semantic networks: Theoretical, technical, methodologic and analytical aspects. Ra Ximhai, 3(1), 439–451. Duffy, A., Grealy, M., Hay, L., et al. (2017). Towards a shared ontology: A generic classification of cognitive processes in conceptual design. Design Science, 3. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsj.2017.6 Eslava, S., Gómez Velasco, N. Y., & Nieto Súa, D. L. (2016). Psychological meaning of the concept of “research” in researchers: Psychological meaning of the concept of “research” in researchers (Spanish). Diversitas: Perspectivas en Psicología, 12(1), 109–121.http://doi.org/10.15332/s1794-9998.2016.0001.08 Figueroa Esteva, M. (1980). Principles of language organization (Spanish). La Habana: Editorial Academia. Figueroa, J. G., González, E. G., & Solís, V. M. (1976). An approach to the problem of meaning: Semantic networks. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 5, 107–115. Fireman, G., Stefanescu, D., Swenson, L., & Zinoviev, D. (2016). Semantic networks of interests in online non-suicidal self-injury communities. Digital Health, 2, 2055207616642118. https://doi.org/10.1177/2055207616642118 González-Palacios, A., García-Campos, T., Soltero-Avelar, R., et al. (2018). A Methodological Reflection on the Importance-Frequency Method and Natural Semantic Networks in the Study of Social Representations. Available online: http://www.cucs.udg.mx/revistas/edu_desarrollo//anteriores/46/46_Palacios.pdf (accessed on 4 January 2024). Gergen, K. (2018). The Social Construction of Reality. Social Constructivism as Paradigm? Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429467714-17 Galeano-Higuita, C., Gomez Vargas, M., & Jaramillo Munoz, D. A. (2015). The state of the art: a research methodology. Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Sociales, 6(2), 423–442. http://doi.org/10.21501/issn.2216-1201 González-Sala, F., & Osca-Lluch, J. (2017). Scientific networks and research groups development. Educational Psychology case in Spain during the five-year periods 2004–2008 and 2009–2013. Available online: http://hdl.handle.net/10201/72584 (accessed on 4 January 2024). Goldberg, Y. (2015). A Primer on Neural Network Models for Natural Language Processing. JAIR, 57. https://doi.org/10.1613/jair.4992 Gómez-Velasco, N. Y., Soto Arango, D. E., & Jardilino, J. R. L. (2018). Science and technology policies and measurement in Colombian universities 1992–2014 (Spanish). Pedagogical and Technological University of Colombia. https://doi.org/10.19053/9789586602990.9789586604314 Gutiérrez, J. K. R., Herrera-Martínez, Y., & Velasco, N. Y. G. (2017). Bibliometric techniques in dynamics of scientific production in research groups. Case study: Biology-UPTC (Spanish). Revista Lasallista de Investigacion/Revista Lasallista de InvestigacióN, 14(2), 73–82. https://doi.org/10.22507/rli.v14n2a7 Heinz, J., & Maasen, S. (2020). Co-producing the European higher education area: the (somewhat overlooked) role of the Social Sciences. Studies in Higher Education, 45, 1758–1770. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1617684 Hills, T., Maouene, M., Maouene, J., et al. (2009). Longitudinal Analysis of Early Semantic Networks. Psychological Science, 20, 729–739. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02365.x Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Mexico: Fondo de Cultura Económica. Krenn, M., & Zeilinger, A. (2019). Predicting research trends with semantic and neural networks with an application in quantum physics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(4), 1910–1916. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1914370116 Moon, K., & Blackman, D. (2014). A Guide to Understanding Social Science Research for Natural Scientists. Conservation Biology, 28(5), 1167–1177. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12326 Martínez, C. S. (2012). Psychological meaning of family, mom and dad in adolescents (Spanish). Psicología Iberoamericana, 20(1), 18–28. https://doi.org/10.48102/pi.v20i1.216 Milfont, T. L. (2010). The psychological meaning of preservation and utilization attitudes: A study using the natural semantic network technique. Psyecology, 1(1), 123–136. https://doi.org/10.1174/217119710790709559 OECD. (2018), Frascati Manual 2015: Guide for the collection and reporting of information on research and experimental development. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264310681-es Omodan, B. (2022). A Model for Selecting Theoretical Framework through Epistemology of Research Paradigms. African Journal of Inter/Multidisciplinary Studies, 4(1), 275–285. https://doi.org/10.51415/ajims.v4i1.1022 Pliushch, A. N. (2023). Understanding Identity in the Context of Cultural-Historical Psychology (Russian). Psychology. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 20(2), 338–353. https://doi.org/10.17323/1813-8918-2023-2-338-353 RAE-Real Academia Española. (2023). Dictionary of the Spanish language (Spanish). Available online: https://dle.rae.es (accessed on 30 January 2023). Rips, L. J., Shoben, E. J., & Smith, E. E. (1973). Semantic distance and the verification of semantic relations. Journal of verbal learning and verbal behavior, 12(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(73)80056-8 Roll-Hansen, N. (2017). A Historical Perspective on the Distinction Between Basic and Applied Science. Journal for General Philosophy of Science, 48(4), 535–551. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10838-017-9362-3 Shull, J. M., & Saken, J. M. (1995). Noncoeval star formation, starbursts, and the growth of supershells in OB associations. The Astrophysical Journal, 444, 663. https://doi.org/10.1086/175638 Simonton, D. K. (2009). Varieties of (Scientific) Creativity: A Hierarchical Model of Domain-Specific Disposition, Development, and Achievement. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4(5), 441–452. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01152.x Strohecker, C. (2018). Reshaping the Discourse about Higher Education. Leonardo, 52, 2–2. https://doi.org/10.1162/LEON_A_01695 Terniievska, Y. (2022). Process of conceptualization as an aspect of human cognitive activity. Advanced Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.20535/2617-5339.2022.9.258879 United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization [UNESCO]. (1979). Report of the Director-General on the activities of the organization 1977–1978. Paris: UNESCO. Valdez, M. J. L. (2002). Natural semantic networks, uses and applications in social psychology. Universidad Autónoma del estado de México. Walach, H. (2020). Inner Experience—Direct Access to Reality: A Complementarist Ontology and Dual Aspect Monism Support a Broader Epistemology. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00640