This study analyzes in a comparative way the psychological meanings that social science and basic science researchers assign to the term “research”. Using the Natural Semantic Networks technique with 127 participants from a Colombian public university, we sought to unravel the distinctive epistemological and methodological positions between these disciplines. The findings reveal that, although both groups closely associate research with knowledge, they differ in the lexical network and associated terms, reflecting their different epistemological approaches. Basic science researchers emphasize terms such as “innovation” and “experimentation,” while social science researchers lean toward “solving” and “learning.” Despite the variability in the associated words, “knowledge” remains the common core, suggesting a shared basis in the perception of research. These results show the importance of considering disciplinary differences in research training and knowledge generation. The study concludes that research contributes significantly to both the advancement of individual disciplines and social welfare, urging future research to explore these dynamics in broader contexts to enrich interdisciplinary understanding and foster cooperation in knowledge generation.

Antosz, P., Bharwani, S., Borit, M., et al. (2022). An introduction to the themed section on ‘Using agent-based simulation for integrating qualitative and quantitative evidence.’ International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 25(4), 511–515. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2022.2052651

Ballesteros-Alfonso, A. L., & Gómez-Velasco, N. Y. (2022). Inequality of Saber-11 test scores before and during the covid-19 pandemic (2014–2021) (Spanish). Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales, Niñez y Juventud, 20(3), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.11600/rlcsnj.20.3.5189

Botella, A., & Stuart, K. (2009). Corpus linguistics, network analysis and co-occurrence matrices. International Journal of English Studies, 9(3), 1–20.

Bruner, J. (2012). What psychology should study. International Journal of Educational Psychology, 1(1), 5–13. https://doi.org/10.4471/ijep.2012.01

Carnicero, J. A. C., Ormrod, J. E., Sanz, A. J. E., & Soria, M. O. (2005). Human learning (Spanish). Madrid, Spain: Pearson Educación.

Christensen, A. P., & Kenett, Y. N. (2023). Semantic network analysis (SemNA): A tutorial on preprocessing, estimating, and analyzing semantic networks. Psychological Methods, 28(4), 860–879. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000463

Comte, A., & Martineau, H. (2008). The Positive Philosophy of Auguste Comte. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511701450

Czarnocka, M. (2019). How Is Science Universal? Dialogue and Universalism, 29(2), 217–238. https://doi.org/10.5840/du201929230

De Albuquerque, F. J. B., Noriega, J. Á. V., & Pimentel, C. E. (2005). Semantic networks: Theoretical, technical, methodologic and analytical aspects. Ra Ximhai, 3(1), 439–451.

Duffy, A., Grealy, M., Hay, L., et al. (2017). Towards a shared ontology: A generic classification of cognitive processes in conceptual design. Design Science, 3. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsj.2017.6

Eslava, S., Gómez Velasco, N. Y., & Nieto Súa, D. L. (2016). Psychological meaning of the concept of “research” in researchers: Psychological meaning of the concept of “research” in researchers (Spanish). Diversitas: Perspectivas en Psicología, 12(1), 109–121.http://doi.org/10.15332/s1794-9998.2016.0001.08

Figueroa Esteva, M. (1980). Principles of language organization (Spanish). La Habana: Editorial Academia.

Figueroa, J. G., González, E. G., & Solís, V. M. (1976). An approach to the problem of meaning: Semantic networks. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 5, 107–115.

Fireman, G., Stefanescu, D., Swenson, L., & Zinoviev, D. (2016). Semantic networks of interests in online non-suicidal self-injury communities. Digital Health, 2, 2055207616642118. https://doi.org/10.1177/2055207616642118

González-Palacios, A., García-Campos, T., Soltero-Avelar, R., et al. (2018). A Methodological Reflection on the Importance-Frequency Method and Natural Semantic Networks in the Study of Social Representations. Available online: http://www.cucs.udg.mx/revistas/edu_desarrollo//anteriores/46/46_Palacios.pdf (accessed on 4 January 2024).

Gergen, K. (2018). The Social Construction of Reality. Social Constructivism as Paradigm? Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429467714-17

Galeano-Higuita, C., Gomez Vargas, M., & Jaramillo Munoz, D. A. (2015). The state of the art: a research methodology. Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Sociales, 6(2), 423–442. http://doi.org/10.21501/issn.2216-1201

González-Sala, F., & Osca-Lluch, J. (2017). Scientific networks and research groups development. Educational Psychology case in Spain during the five-year periods 2004–2008 and 2009–2013. Available online: http://hdl.handle.net/10201/72584 (accessed on 4 January 2024).

Goldberg, Y. (2015). A Primer on Neural Network Models for Natural Language Processing. JAIR, 57. https://doi.org/10.1613/jair.4992

Gómez-Velasco, N. Y., Soto Arango, D. E., & Jardilino, J. R. L. (2018). Science and technology policies and measurement in Colombian universities 1992–2014 (Spanish). Pedagogical and Technological University of Colombia. https://doi.org/10.19053/9789586602990.9789586604314

Gutiérrez, J. K. R., Herrera-Martínez, Y., & Velasco, N. Y. G. (2017). Bibliometric techniques in dynamics of scientific production in research groups. Case study: Biology-UPTC (Spanish). Revista Lasallista de Investigacion/Revista Lasallista de InvestigacióN, 14(2), 73–82. https://doi.org/10.22507/rli.v14n2a7

Heinz, J., & Maasen, S. (2020). Co-producing the European higher education area: the (somewhat overlooked) role of the Social Sciences. Studies in Higher Education, 45, 1758–1770. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1617684

Hills, T., Maouene, M., Maouene, J., et al. (2009). Longitudinal Analysis of Early Semantic Networks. Psychological Science, 20, 729–739. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02365.x

Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Mexico: Fondo de Cultura Económica.

Krenn, M., & Zeilinger, A. (2019). Predicting research trends with semantic and neural networks with an application in quantum physics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(4), 1910–1916. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1914370116

Moon, K., & Blackman, D. (2014). A Guide to Understanding Social Science Research for Natural Scientists. Conservation Biology, 28(5), 1167–1177. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12326

Martínez, C. S. (2012). Psychological meaning of family, mom and dad in adolescents (Spanish). Psicología Iberoamericana, 20(1), 18–28. https://doi.org/10.48102/pi.v20i1.216

Milfont, T. L. (2010). The psychological meaning of preservation and utilization attitudes: A study using the natural semantic network technique. Psyecology, 1(1), 123–136. https://doi.org/10.1174/217119710790709559

OECD. (2018), Frascati Manual 2015: Guide for the collection and reporting of information on research and experimental development. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264310681-es

Omodan, B. (2022). A Model for Selecting Theoretical Framework through Epistemology of Research Paradigms. African Journal of Inter/Multidisciplinary Studies, 4(1), 275–285. https://doi.org/10.51415/ajims.v4i1.1022

Pliushch, A. N. (2023). Understanding Identity in the Context of Cultural-Historical Psychology (Russian). Psychology. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 20(2), 338–353. https://doi.org/10.17323/1813-8918-2023-2-338-353

RAE-Real Academia Española. (2023). Dictionary of the Spanish language (Spanish). Available online: https://dle.rae.es (accessed on 30 January 2023).

Rips, L. J., Shoben, E. J., & Smith, E. E. (1973). Semantic distance and the verification of semantic relations. Journal of verbal learning and verbal behavior, 12(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(73)80056-8

Roll-Hansen, N. (2017). A Historical Perspective on the Distinction Between Basic and Applied Science. Journal for General Philosophy of Science, 48(4), 535–551. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10838-017-9362-3

Shull, J. M., & Saken, J. M. (1995). Noncoeval star formation, starbursts, and the growth of supershells in OB associations. The Astrophysical Journal, 444, 663. https://doi.org/10.1086/175638

Simonton, D. K. (2009). Varieties of (Scientific) Creativity: A Hierarchical Model of Domain-Specific Disposition, Development, and Achievement. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4(5), 441–452. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01152.x

Strohecker, C. (2018). Reshaping the Discourse about Higher Education. Leonardo, 52, 2–2. https://doi.org/10.1162/LEON_A_01695

Terniievska, Y. (2022). Process of conceptualization as an aspect of human cognitive activity. Advanced Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.20535/2617-5339.2022.9.258879

United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization [UNESCO]. (1979). Report of the Director-General on the activities of the organization 1977–1978. Paris: UNESCO.

Valdez, M. J. L. (2002). Natural semantic networks, uses and applications in social psychology. Universidad Autónoma del estado de México.

Walach, H. (2020). Inner Experience—Direct Access to Reality: A Complementarist Ontology and Dual Aspect Monism Support a Broader Epistemology. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00640