Research on the distribution of educational resources from the perspective of public service equalization in China—Based on government responsibility and fiscal input
Vol 8, Issue 8, 2024
VIEWS - 156 (Abstract) 116 (PDF)
Abstract
This paper explores the distribution of educational resources from the perspective of public service equalization in China, with a particular focus on government responsibility and fiscal input. Initially, the paper reviews the theoretical foundations and empirical studies concerning the distribution of educational resources, analyzing the role of government in educational equity and the impact of fiscal expenditure. By employing quantitative analysis methods, this study utilizes data on provincial education expenditures over several years to examine the relationship between government fiscal input and the equalization of educational resources. Empirical results indicate that increasing educational fiscal input and optimizing the allocation mechanism significantly enhance the level of equalization in educational resources. Furthermore, through case analyses of several local governments, effective policy recommendations are proposed to promote the fair distribution and optimization of educational resources. Lastly, the paper discusses potential obstacles in policy implementation and suggests corresponding strategies.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Bano, H., Akhter, N., & Anjum, N. (2013). Analysis of educational facilities and opportunities for students with special needs at University of the Punjab. Journal of Educational Research, 16(1), 1.
Chen, T., Wang, Y., Luo, X., et al. (2018). Inter-provincial inequality of public health services in China: the perspective of local officials’ behavior. International Journal for Equity in Health, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-018-0827-8
Coleman, J. S. (1966). Equality of Educational Opportunity (Coleman). Available online: http://68.77.48.18/RandD/Other/Coleman%20Report.pdf (accessed on 9 March 2024).
Coleman, J. S. (1966). Equality of Educational Opportunity. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Dai, F., Liu, H., Zhang, X., et al. (2022). Does the Equalization of Public Services Effect Regional Disparities in the Ratio of Investment to Consumption? Evidence From Provincial Level in China. SAGE Open, 12(1), 215824402210850. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221085007
Han, T., Fan, J., Guo, R., et al. (2023). Spatial Equity of Basic Education Resources and Coordinated Regional Development in Xinjiang, China. Chinese Geographical Science, 33(3), 441–457. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-023-1352-2
Hanushek, E. A., & Woessmann, L. (2011). The Economics of International Differences in Educational Achievement. In: Handbook of the Economics of Education. Amsterdam: North Holland. pp. 89–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-444-53429-3.00002-8
Hu, Y., Zhang, J., & Chen, Y. (2010). Equalization of urban and rural basic public facilities based on GIS: A case study of educational facilities in Changzhou. In: Proceedings of the 2010 18th International Conference on Geoinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1109/geoinformatics.2010.5567689
Huang, Q., Cui, X., & Ma, L. (2023). The Equity of Basic Educational Facilities from the Perspective of Space. Sustainability, 15(15), 12031.
Li, B., Li, T., Yu, M., et al. (2017). Can equalization of public services narrow the regional disparities in China? A spatial econometrics approach. China Economic Review, 44, 67–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2017.03.010
Martinez-Vazquez, J., Qiao, B., & Zhang, L. (2008). The role of provincial policies in fiscal equalization outcomes in China. China Review, 135-167.
Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Shan, J., Geng, Y., Fu, J., & Yu, B. (2021). Public service provision in China: towards a more equal access system. In: Urban Inequality and Segregation in Europe and China: Towards a New Dialogue. Springer, Cham. pp. 153–179.
Shen, C., Zhao, X., & Zou, H. F. (2014). Fiscal decentralization and public services provision in China. Annals of Economics and Finance, 15(1), 135–160.
Voyer, D., & Voyer, S. D. (2014). Gender differences in scholastic achievement: a meta-analysis. Psychological bulletin, 140(4), 1174.
Wang, Y., Huang, X., Zhang, T., et al. (2024). Impact of fiscal decentralization and local government competition on the supply of basic public services: Based on the empirical evidence of prefecture-level cities in China. Heliyon, 10(4), e26511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26511
Yin, L. (2023). Equalization of Basic Public Services: Theory, Current Situation, and Policies. In: Handbook of Chinese Management. Springer, Singapore. p. 445.
Yuan, Z. (2016). Educational equity and public policy: Comparing results from 16 countries. Educational Research Journal, 31(4), 56–72.
Yuan, Z. (2016). Regional Educational Equity in China: Disparities and Solutions. Education Economics, 24(1), 45–59.
Zhang, J., & Wang B. (2022). Research Review on Accessibility and Equalization of Public Cultural Services in Chinese Rural Areas. Pacific International Journal, 5(2), 111–115. https://doi.org/10.55014/pij.v5i2.165
Zhang, S., Wang, L., & Wu, X. (2022). Population Shrinkage, Public Service Levels, and Heterogeneity in Resource-Based Cities: Case Study of 112 Cities in China. Sustainability, 14(23), 15910. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142315910
Zhao, Y., & Gleckman, H. (2013). Education reform in South Korea: A case study of policy implementation. Journal of Education Policy, 28(6), 834–853.
Zhao, Z. J. (2009). Fiscal Decentralization and Provincial-Level Fiscal Disparities in China: A Sino-U.S. Comparative Perspective. Public Administration Review, 69(s1). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2009.02091.x
Zhao, Z., & Gleckman, H. (2013). South Korea’s Educational Policies: Lessons for Developing Countries. Journal of International Education Research, 9(4), 363–372.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i8.6396
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Tao Yang
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.