This paper explores the integration of digital technologies and tools in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learning in Jordanian Higher Education through a qualitative open-ended online survey. It highlights the perceptions of 100 Jordanian EFL instructors, each with a minimum of five years of experience, on the digital transformation in the EFL learning process. The survey, consisting of ten open-ended questions, gathered in-depth insights on the benefits, challenges, and implications of this transformation. Thematic analysis was employed to analyze the qualitative data, revealing varied levels of experience, the use of diverse digital tools, and both technical and pedagogical challenges. Key findings include the positive impact of digital tools on teaching and learning experiences, enhanced student engagement, and opportunities for personalized learning and collaboration. The study concludes that leveraging digital resources can enhance EFL learner engagement and learning outcomes, inform future pedagogical practices, and shape the landscape of digital transformation in EFL Higher Education for years to come.

1. Abdul Samea Qoura, A. (2020). The Digital Teacher: Promises and Challenges. Sohag University International Journal of Educational Research, 2(2), 51–64. https://doi.org/10.21608/suijer.2020.97631
2. Ahmed, A. A. A., Keezhatta, M. S., Khair Amal, B., et al. (2022). The comparative effect of online instruction, flipped instruction, and traditional instruction on developing Iranian EFL learners’ vocabulary knowledge. Education Research International.
3. Ahmed, U., Ismail, A. I., Fati, M., et al. (2021). E-Learning during COVID-19: Understanding the Nexus between Instructional Innovation, E-Psychological Capital, and Online Behavioural Engagement. Management in Education, 089202062110531. https://doi.org/10.1177/08920206211053101
4. Akour, M., Alenezi, M., Sghaier, H. A., et al. (2021). The COVID-19 pandemic: When e-learning becomes mandatory not complementary. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 13(4), 429. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijtel.2021.118003
5. Alakrash, H. M., Razak, N. A., & Krish, P. (2022). The Application of Digital Platforms in Learning English Language. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 12(9), 899–904. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2022.12.9.1699
6. Alenezi, M. (2021). Deep Dive into Digital Transformation in Higher Education Institutions. Education Sciences, 11(12), 770. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11120770
7. Alenezi, M., & Akour, M. (2023). Digital Transformation Blueprint in Higher Education: A Case Study of PSU. Sustainability, 15(10), 8204. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15108204
8. Alenezi, M., Wardat, S., & Akour, M. (2023). The Need of Integrating Digital Education in Higher Education: Challenges and Opportunities. Sustainability, 15(6), 4782. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15064782
9. Alghamdi, S. A. A., & Alnajami, M. M. L. (2023). Challenges in the effective utilization of blended learning in English instruction within higher education. Arab Journal for Scientific Publishing (AJSP).
10. Al-Khasawneh, A. M., & Obeidallah, R. (2019). E-learning in the Hashemite University: Success factors for implementation in Jordan. In: Advanced Online Education and Training Technologies. IGI Global.
11. Asghar, M. Z., Afzaal, M. N., Iqbal, J., et al. (2022). Analyzing an Appropriate Blend of Face-to-Face, Offline and Online Learning Approaches for the In-Service Vocational Teacher’s Training Program. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(17), 10668. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191710668
12. Atmojo, A. E. P., & Nugroho, A. (2020). EFL Classes Must Go Online! Teaching Activities and Challenges during COVID-19 Pandemic in Indonesia. Register Journal, 13(1), 49–76. https://doi.org/10.18326/rgt.v13i1.49-76
13. Aziz, A. A., & Kashinathan, S. (2021). ESL learners’ challenges in speaking English in Malaysian classroom. Development, 10(2), 983–991. https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarped/v10-i2/10355
14. Bailey, D. R., & Lee, A. R. (2020). Learning from experience in the midst of COVID-19: Benefits, challenges, and strategies in online teaching. Computer-Assisted Language Learning Electronic Journal, 21(2), 178–198.
15. Baker, W., & Ishikawa, T. (2021). Transcultural communication through Global Englishes: An advanced textbook for students. Routledge.
16. Baldacchino, J. (2020). Education’s experience in an age of anti-politics: Reading John Dewey in the third decade of the 21st century. Sisyphus-Journal of Education, 8(3), 41–64.
17. Bui, T. H. (2022). English teachers’ integration of digital technologies in the classroom. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 3, 100204.
18. Bulle, N. (2021). Vygotsky versus Dewey on mental causation: The core of two divergent conceptions of human thought. New Ideas in Psychology, 63, 100898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2021.100898
19. Castleberry, A., & Nolen, A. (2018). Thematic analysis of qualitative research data: Is it as easy as it sounds? Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 10(6), 807–815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2018.03.019
20. Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2016). Thematic analysis. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 12(3), 297–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2016.1262613
21. Daraghmeh, A., Mead, H., & Copeland, K. (2021). English K-12 Teacher Experiences in Saudi Arabia in the Pandemic Era: A Follow-up Study of One Khbrat University Program. Arab World English Journal, 1, 3–20. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/covid.1
22. Denscombe, M. (2007). The Length of Responses to Open-Ended Questions. Social Science Computer Review, 26(3), 359–368. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439307309671
23. Drobot, L. (2012). Qualitative research in social sciences and education-basic paradigms and research methods. Research in Pedagogy, 2(2), 11–20.
24. Eden, R., Burton-Jones, A., Casey, V., et al. (2019). Digital Transformation Requires Workforce Transformation. MIS Quarterly Executive, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.17705/2msqe.00005
25. Fatimah, S., Rosidin, D. N., & Hidayat, A. (2022). Student-based Learning in The Perspective of Constructivism Theory and Maieutics Method. International Journal of Social Science and Human Research, 5(5), 1632–1637. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v5-i5-10
26. Guest, G., MacQueen, K. M., & Namey, E. E. (2011). Applied thematic analysis. Sage Publications.
27. Hashim, H., Rafiqah M. Rafiq, K., & Md. Yunus, M. (2019). Improving ESL Learners’ Grammar with Gamified-Learning. Arab World English Journal, 5, 41–50. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/call5.4
28. Hickman, L. A., Neubert, S., & Reich, K. (2020). John Dewey between pragmatism and constructivism. Fordham University Press.
29. Huseinović, L. (2023). The Effects of Gamification on Student Motivation and Achievement in Learning English as A Foreign Language in Higher Education. MAP Education and Humanities, 4(1), 10–36. https://doi.org/10.53880/2744-2373.2023.4.10
30. Kiger, M. E., & Varpio, L. (2020). Thematic analysis of qualitative data: AMEE Guide No. 131. Medical Teacher, 42(8), 846–854. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159x.2020.1755030
31. Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2016). Handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (tpack) for educators. Routledge.
32. Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., Kereluik, K., et al. (2014). The technological pedagogical content knowledge framework. In: Handbook of research on educational communications and technology. Springer.
33. Koh, J. H. L., Chai, C. S., & Lee, M. H. (2015). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) for Pedagogical Improvement: Editorial for Special Issue on TPACK. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 24(3), 459–462. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-015-0241-6
34. Kozhukhova, N. V., Agaphonov, I. A., & Korobkova, Y. Y. (2021). Competencies of the future: transforming education in the digital economy. In: International Scientific Conference “Digital Transformation of the Economy: Challenges, Trends, New Opportunities”. Springer International Publishing.
35. Kumar, T. (2020). Assessing language need and proficiency of English graduates of Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University for designing pre-placement training and workshops. Asian ESP Journal, 16(4), 153–168.
36. Lukas, B. A., & Yunus, M. M. (2021). ESL Teachers’ Challenges in Implementing E-learning during COVID-19. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 20(2), 330–348. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.20.2.18
37. Mhlanga, D., Denhere, V., & Moloi, T. (2022). COVID-19 and the Key Digital Transformation Lessons for Higher Education Institutions in South Africa. Education Sciences, 12(7), 464. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12070464
38. Miller, D. (2023). Embracing the Technological Metamorphosis: Envisioning Higher Education for Generation Alpha in a Shifting Educational Landscape. International Journal Software Engineering and Computer Science (IJSECS), 3(2), 88–96. https://doi.org/10.35870/ijsecs.v3i2.1492
39. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
40. Mohamed Haggag, H., & Bakr, E. M. E. (2022). Digitizing English as a Foreign Language (EFL) Curricula in the Light of Digital Transformation and COVID-19 Pandemic. Journal of Research in Education and Psychology, 37(1), 801–840.
41. Nguyen, Q. (2022). Teachers’ Scaffolding Strategies in Internet-based ELT Classes. Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language—TESL-EJ, 26(101). https://doi.org/10.55593/ej.26101a1
42. Nugroho, A., & Atmojo, A. E. P. (2022). Digital Learning of English Beyond Classroom: EFL Learners’ Perception and Teaching Activities. JEELS (Journal of English Education and Linguistics Studies), 7(2), 219–243. https://doi.org/10.30762/jeels.v7i2.213
43. Nugroho, A., & Mutiaraningrum, I. (2020). EFL teachers’ beliefs and practices about digital learning of English. EduLite: Journal of English Education, Literature and Culture, 5(2), 304. https://doi.org/10.30659/e.5.2.304-321
44. Orellana, V., Cevallos, Y., Tello-Oquendo, L., et al. (2019). Quality Evaluation Processes and its Impulse to Digital Transformation in Ecuadorian Universities. In: Proceedings of the 2019 Sixth International Conference on EDemocracy & EGovernment (ICEDEG).
45. Padmadewi, N. N., Artini, L. P., Ratminingsih, N. M., et al. (2022). Needs Analysis of Literacy Assessment Using Blended Learning for Beginner EFL Learners. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 13(2), 441–452. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1302.27
46. Pratiwi, D. I., & Waluyo, B. (2023). Autonomous learning and the use of digital technologies in online English classrooms in higher education. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(2), ep423. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13094
47. Rahmani, E. F. (2020). The Benefits of Gamification in the English Learning Context. IJEE (Indonesian Journal of English Education), 7(1), 32–47. https://doi.org/10.15408/ijee.v7i1.17054
48. Rao, P. S. (2019). The role of English as a global language. Research Journal of English, 4(1), 65–79.
49. Redjeki, I. S., & Muhajir, R. (2021). Gamification in EFL classroom to support teaching and learning in 21st century. JEES (Journal of English Educators Society), 6(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.21070/jees.v6i1.882
50. Saputra, D. B., Ayudhia, H. Y., & Muswari, R. (2022). Teachers’ perceptions of challenges in online learning: Voices from secondary EFL teachers. JOALL (Journal of Applied Linguistics and Literature), 7(1), 104–119. https://doi.org/10.33369/joall.v7i1.18855
51. Schmidt, K., Gummer, T., & Roßmann, J. (2020). Effects of respondent and survey characteristics on the response quality of an open-ended attitude question in Web surveys. Methods, Data, Analyses, 14(1), 32.
52. Tanjung, F. Z. (2020). Teachers’ views on the integration of technology in EFL classroom. IJIET (International Journal of Indonesian Education and Teaching), 4(2), 208–215. https://doi.org/10.24071/ijiet.v4i2.2344
53. Tuzahra, F., Sofendi, S., & Vianty, M. (2021). Technology Integration of the In-Service EFL Teachers: A Study at a Teacher Profession Education Program. Indonesian Journal of EFL and Linguistics, 6(1), 317. https://doi.org/10.21462/ijefl.v6i1.396
54. Umida, K., Farida, A., Dilnoza, B., & Lenie, X. (2022). Development stages of the concept to constructivism. Available online: https://johuns.net/index.php/publishing/394.pdf (accessed on 21 June 2024).
55. Valdés, K. N., y Alpera, S. Q., & Cerdá Suárez, L. M. (2021). An Institutional Perspective for Evaluating Digital Transformation in Higher Education: Insights from the Chilean Case. Sustainability, 13(17), 9850. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13179850
56. Vanderstraeten, R., & Biesta, G. (1998). Constructivism, Educational Research, and John Dewey. In: Proceedings of the Paideia Archive: Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy.
57. Wallace, D., Cesar, G., & Hedberg, E. C. (2018). The Effect of Survey Mode on Socially Undesirable Responses to Open-ended Questions. Field Methods, 30(2), 105–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822x18766284
58. Zajda, J. (2021). Globalisation and Education Reforms. In: Globalisation, Comparative Education and Policy Research. Springer International Publishing.
59. Zhang, S., & Hasim, Z. (2023). Gamification in EFL/ESL instruction: A systematic review of empirical research. Frontiers in psychology, 13, 1030790. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1030790