Evolution of the (Energy and Atmosphere) credit category in the LEED green buildings rating system for (Building Design and Construction: New Construction), from version 4.0 to version 4.1
Vol 8, Issue 8, 2024
VIEWS - 159 (Abstract) 100 (PDF)
Abstract
LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) is a certification program for quantitatively assessing the qualifications of homes, non-residential buildings, or neighborhoods in terms of sustainability. LEED is supported by the U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC), a nonprofit membership-based organization. Worldwide, thousands of projects received one of the four levels of LEED certification. One of the five rating systems (or specialties) covered by LEED is the Building Design and Construction (BD + C), representing non-residential buildings. This rating system is further divided into eight adaptations. The adaptation (New Construction and Major Renovation) or NC applies to newly constructed projects as well as those going through a major renovation. The NC adaptation has six major credit categories, in addition to three minor ones. The nine credit categories together have a total of 110 attainable points. The Energy and Atmosphere (EA) credit category is the dominant one in the NC adaptation, with 33 attainable points under it. This important credit category addresses the topics of commissioning, energy consumption records, energy efficiency, use of refrigerants, utilization of onsite or offsite renewable energy, and real-time electric load management. This study aims to highlight some differences in the EA credit category for LEED BD + C:NC rating system as it evolved from version 4 (LEED v4, 2013) to version 4.1 (LEED v4.1, 2019). For example, the updated version 4.1 includes a metric for greenhouse gas reduction. Also, the updated version 4.1 no longer permits hydrochlorofluorocarbon (HFC) refrigerants in new heating, ventilating, air-conditioning, and refrigeration systems (HVAC & R). In addition, the updated version 4.1 classifies renewable energy into three tiers, differentiating between onsite, new-asset offsite, and old-asset offsite types.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Allehyani, A., Ajabnoor, A., & Alharbi, M. (2024). Demand response scheme for electric vehicles charging in smart power systems with 100% of renewable energy. Power Systems Operation with 100% Renewable Energy Sources, 247–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-443-15578-9.00016-9
Amiri, A., Ottelin, J., & Sorvari, J. (2019). Are LEED-Certified Buildings Energy-Efficient in Practice? Sustainability, 11(6), 1672. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11061672
Asaad, M., Farouk Hassan, G., Elshater, A., et al. (2024). Comparative study of green neighbourhood assessment tools for assessing existing urban form in MENA region. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 106, 107502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2024.107502
ASHRAE, American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers. (2019). User Manual-Appendix G (Compliance Forms-Performance Rating Method). Available online: https://www.ashrae.org/file%20library/technical%20resources/bookstore/supplemental%20files/performance-rating-method-compliance-form-2019.pdf (accessed on 18 May 2024).
Awadh, O. (2017). Sustainability and green building rating systems: LEED, BREEAM, GSAS and Estidama critical analysis. Journal of Building Engineering, 11, 25–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2017.03.010
Balabel, A., El-Askary, W., Alahmadi, A., et al. (2023). Development of a passive strategy for buildings’ sustainability using green roofs techniques in Taif City, Saudi Arabia. Journal of Umm Al-Qura University for Engineering and Architecture, 15(1), 31–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43995-023-00038-w
Banerjee, A., Das, P., & Fuerst, F. (2024). Are green and healthy building labels counterproductive in emerging markets? An examination of office rental contracts in India. Journal of Cleaner Production, 455, 141838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141838
Benhadid-Dib, S., & Benzaoui, A. (2012). Refrigerants and their Environmental Impact Substitution of Hydro Chlorofluorocarbon HCFC and HFC Hydro Fluorocarbon. Search for an Adequate Refrigerant. Energy Procedia, 18, 807–816. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2012.05.096
Chuang, J., Lien, H. L., Den, W., et al. (2018). The relationship between electricity emission factor and renewable energy certificate: The free rider and outsider effect. Sustainable Environment Research, 28(6), 422–429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.serj.2018.05.004
Conejo, A. J., Morales, J. M., & Baringo, L. (2010). Real-Time Demand Response Model. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 1(3), 236–242. https://doi.org/10.1109/tsg.2010.2078843
Danny Harvey, L. D. (1993). A guide to global warming potentials (GWPs). Energy Policy, 21(1), 24–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-4215(93)90205-T
De, D., Das, U., & Nandi, C. (2023). A comprehensive approach of evolving electric vehicles (EVs) to attribute “green self-generation”—A review. Energy Harvesting and Systems, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1515/ehs-2023-0023
de Rubeis, T., Ragnoli, M., Leoni, A., et al. (2024). A Proposal for A Human-in-the-Loop Daylight Control System—Preliminary Experimental Results. Energies, 17(3), 544. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17030544
Dhuoki, R., & Çağnan, Ç. (2021). Evaluating the Site of Avrocity as a High-Rise Residential Project in Duhok City According to LEED Sustainable Rating Criteria. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 10(1), 450. https://doi.org/10.14207/ejsd.2021.v10n1p450
Dincer, I. (2018). 2.15 Refrigerants. In: Comprehensive Energy Systems. Elsevier. pp. 435–474. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-809597-3.00232-7
Doan, D. T., Ghaffarianhoseini, A., Naismith, N., et al. (2017). A critical comparison of green building rating systems. Building and Environment, 123, 243–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.07.007
DOE, “U.S. Department of Energy.” (2024). LEED-Certified Homes. Available online: https://www.energy.gov/energysaver/leed-certified-homes (accessed on 17 May 2024).
Dubljević, S., Tepavčević, B., Stefanović, A., et al. (2024). BIM to BREEAM: A workflow for automated daylighting assessment of existing buildings. Energy and Buildings, 312, 114208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2024.114208
Duser, L. E. E. (2020). NC-v4 EAp2: Minimum Energy Performance. Available online: https://leeduser.buildinggreen.com/credit/NC-v4/EAp2 (accessed on 18 May 2024).
EEA, European Environment Agency. (2022). Building renovation: Where circular economy and climate meet. Available online: https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/building-renovation-where-circular-economy (accessed on 30 May 2023).
Eling, J. C., Barker, J., & Barna, S. (2024). Climate change for gastroenterologists: understanding the basics. Frontline Gastroenterology. https://doi.org/10.1136/flgastro-2023-102499
Freitas, I. A. S., & Zhang, X. (2018). Green building rating systems in Swedish market—A comparative analysis between LEED, BREEAM SE, GreenBuilding and Miljöbyggnad. Energy Procedia, 153, 402–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2018.10.066
Girish, G. P., Sashikala, P., Supra, B., & Acharya, A. (2015). Renewable Energy Certificate Trading through Power Exchanges in India. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 5(3), 805–808.
Goodarzi, M., & Shayesteh, A. (2024). Does LEED BD+C for New Construction Provide a Realistic and Practical Sustainability Evaluation System? Construction Research Congress 2024. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784485279.051
Hanafy, N. O. (2023). Using Biomimicry to Increase Daylighting Efficiency in Egyptian Office Buildings. Journal of Engineering Research, 7(6), 14.
Holt, E. A., & Wiser, R. H. (2007). The Treatment of Renewable Energy Certificates, Emissions Allowances, and Green Power Programs in State Renewables Portfolio Standards-Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), Report LBNL-62574. Available online: https://eta-publications.lbl.gov/sites/default/files/report-lbnl-62574.pdf (accessed on 2 Jun 2023).
IEA, International Energy Agency. (2022a). Buildings—Sectorial overview. Available online: https://www.iea.org/reports/buildings (accessed on 30 May 2023).
IEA, International Energy Agency. (2022b). Global energy and process emissions from buildings, including embodied emissions from new construction, 2021. Available online: https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics/charts/global-energy-and-process-emissions-from-buildings-including-embodied-emissions-from-new-construction-2021 (accessed on 30 May 2023).
IEA, International Energy Agency. (2023). Global CO2 emissions by sector, 2019–2022. Available online: https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics/charts/global-co2-emissions-by-sector-2019-2022 (accessed on 30 May 2023).
Irfan, M. (2021). Integration between electricity and renewable energy certificate (REC) markets: Factors influencing the solar and non-solar REC in India. Renewable Energy, 179, 65–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.07.020
Ismaeil, E. M. H. (2024). Sustainability-Based Value Engineering Management as an Integrated Approach to Construction Projects. Buildings, 14(4), 903. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14040903
Kalefa, H., & Gado, S. (2024). Enhancing Hotel Sustainability Through Ecological and Technological Integration. JES. Journal of Engineering Sciences, 52(1), 145–174. https://doi.org/10.21608/jesaun.2024.251412.1290
Khan, M. R., Haider, Z. M., Malik, F. H., et al. (2024). A Comprehensive Review of Microgrid Energy Management Strategies Considering Electric Vehicles, Energy Storage Systems, and AI Techniques. Processes, 12(2), 270. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12020270
Kuczyński, W., & Chliszcz, K. (2024). Experimental investigations into the condensation process of new environmentally friendly f-gas substitutes in mini-channels. Energy, 295, 130883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2024.130883
Kwak, I. H., Lee, E. H., Kim, J. B., et al. (2024). Hydrolysis of HFC-134a using a red mud catalyst to reuse an industrial waste. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2024.02.013
Ladke, P. A., & Choudhari, C. S. (2016). Perspective of Environmental Friendly Refrigerant Propane (R290). International Journal Innovative Research in Science and Engineering, 2(3), 748–753.
Lage, M., Castro, R., Manzolini, G., et al. (2024). Techno-economic analysis of self-consumption schemes and energy communities in Italy and Portugal. Solar Energy, 270, 112407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2024.112407
Lai, S. Y. T., Lai, J. H. K., Wong, P. Y. L., et al. (2024). Building Energy Governance: Statutes and Guides on Retro-Commissioning in China and the United States. Buildings, 14(3), 585. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14030585
Lee, J., & Xydis, G. (2023). Floating offshore wind projects development in South Korea without government subsidies. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 26(5), 1587–1602. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-023-02564-6
Lessard, Y., Anand, C., Blanchet, P., et al. (2017). LEED v4: Where Are We Now? Critical Assessment through the LCA of an Office Building Using a Low Impact Energy Consumption Mix. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 22(5), 1105–1116. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12647
Liao, W., Xiao, F., Li, Y., et al. (2024). A comparative study of demand-side energy management strategies for building integrated photovoltaics-battery and electric vehicles (EVs) in diversified building communities. Applied Energy, 361, 122881. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.122881
Maqbool, R., Thompson, C., & Ashfaq, S. (2023). LEED and BREEAM Green Building Certification Systems as Possible Game Changers in Attaining Low-Cost Energy-Efficient Urban Housing Projects. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 149(3). https://doi.org/10.1061/jupddm.upeng-4292
Marzouk, O. A. (2021). Assessment of global warming in Al Buraimi, sultanate of Oman based on statistical analysis of NASA POWER data over 39 years, and testing the reliability of NASA POWER against meteorological measurements. Heliyon, 7(3), e06625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06625
Marzouk, O. A. (2021). Lookup Tables for Power Generation Performance of Photovoltaic Systems Covering 40 Geographic Locations (Wilayats) in the Sultanate of Oman, with and without Solar Tracking, and General Perspectives about Solar Irradiation. Sustainability, 13(23), 13209. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132313209
Marzouk, O. A. (2022a). Compilation of Smart Cities Attributes and Quantitative Identification of Mismatch in Rankings. Journal of Engineering, 2022, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5981551
Marzouk, O. A. (2022b). Land-Use competitiveness of photovoltaic and concentrated solar power technologies near the Tropic of Cancer. Solar Energy, 243, 103–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2022.07.051
Marzouk, O. A. (2022c). Tilt sensitivity for a scalable one-hectare photovoltaic power plant composed of parallel racks in Muscat. Cogent Engineering, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2022.2029243
Marzouk, O. A. (2022d). Urban air mobility and flying cars: Overview, examples, prospects, drawbacks, and solutions. Open Engineering, 12(1), 662–679. https://doi.org/10.1515/eng-2022-0379
Marzouk, O. A. (2023). Zero Carbon Ready Metrics for a Single-Family Home in the Sultanate of Oman Based on EDGE Certification System for Green Buildings. Sustainability, 15(18), 13856. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151813856
Marzouk, O. A. (2024). Expectations for the Role of Hydrogen and Its Derivatives in Different Sectors through Analysis of the Four Energy Scenarios: IEA-STEPS, IEA-NZE, IRENA-PES, and IRENA-1.5 °C. Energies, 17(3), 646. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17030646
Meng, W., Song, D., Huang, L., et al. (2024). A Bi-level optimization strategy for electric vehicle retailers based on robust pricing and hybrid demand response. Energy, 289, 129913. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2023.129913
Mitrakusuma, W. H., Rosulindo, P. P., Sofah, M., et al. (2024). The Use of Dimethyl Ether (DME) as a Substitute for R134a. Journal of Advanced Research in Fluid Mechanics and Thermal Sciences, 115(2), 222–232. https://doi.org/10.37934/arfmts.115.2.222232
Motta, V. N., Anjos, M. F., & Gendreau, M. (2024). Survey of optimization models for power system operation and expansion planning with demand response. European Journal of Operational Research, 312(2), 401–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2023.01.019
Nandagopal, N. S. (2024). Refrigeration Systems. HVACR Principles and Applications. Springer Nature Switzerland. pp. 267–304. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-45267-3
Narula, K. (2013). Renewable Energy Certificates (RECs) in India—A performance analysis and future outlook. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 27, 654–663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.07.040
O’Connell, N., Pinson, P., Madsen, H., et al. (2014). Benefits and challenges of electrical demand response: A critical review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 39, 686–699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.098
Owens, B., Macken, C., Rohloff, A., & Rosenber, H. (2013). LEED v4 Impact Category and Point Allocation Process Overview. Available online: https://storage.pardot.com/413862/153000/LEED_v4_Impact_Category_and_Point_Allocation_Process_Overviewpdf.pdf (accessed on 31 May 2023).
Park, B., Horowitz, S., & Roberts, D. (2024). The role of above-code labeling programs in reducing CO2e emissions in residential buildings. Energy and Buildings, 309, 114069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2024.114069
Purba, A., & Latief, Y. (2024). Analysis of The Application of Life Cycle Cost Method of Green Retrofit of Mosque Building Based on GBCI and EDGE Benchmarks to Improve Investment Performance. Journal Indonesia Society Technology, 5(4), 1385–1399. https://doi.org/10.59141/jist.v5i4.884
Pushkar, S., & Verbitsky, O. (2018). Leed-NCV3 Silver and Gold Certified Projects in the US: An Observational Study. Journal of Green Building, 13(2), 67–83. https://doi.org/10.3992/1943-4618.13.2.67
Rani, P., & Chopra, R. (n.d.). Green Libraries: A Way Towards Sustainability. Russian Law Journal, 12(1), 931–940.
Rosenberg, M. I., & Hart, P. R. (2016). Developing Performance Cost Index Targets for ASHRAE Standard 90.1 Appendix G—Performance Rating Method—Rev.1. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI). https://doi.org/10.2172/1260870
Roy, N. B., & Das, D. (2024). Stochastic power allocation of distributed tri-generation plants and energy storage units in a zero bus microgrid with electric vehicles and demand response. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 191, 114170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2023.114170
Sawhney, A. (2024). Tradeable Renewable Energy Credit Markets: Lessons from India. In: Large-Scale Development of Renewables in the ASEAN. Springer Nature Singapore. pp. 79–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-8239-4_4
Seatle, M., & McPherson, M. (2024). Residential demand response program modelling to compliment grid composition and changes in energy efficiency. Energy, 290, 130173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2023.130173
Sgarbossa, A., Boschiero, M., Pierobon, F., et al. (2020). Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Bioenergy Production from Different Wood Pellet Supply Chains. Forests, 11(11), 1127. https://doi.org/10.3390/f11111127
Shen, J., Kumar, A., Wahiduzzaman, M., et al. (2024). Engineered Nanoporous Frameworks for Adsorption Cooling Applications. Chemical Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.3c00450
Slingo, J. M., & Slingo, M. E. (2024). The science of climate change and the effect of anaesthetic gas emissions. Anaesthesia, 79(3), 252–260. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.16189
Stefkovics, Á., & Zenovitz, L. (2023). Global warming vs. climate change frames: revisiting framing effects based on new experimental evidence collected in 30 European countries. Climatic Change, 176(12). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-023-03633-x
Suzer, O. (2019). Analyzing the compliance and correlation of LEED and BREEAM by conducting a criteria-based comparative analysis and evaluating dual-certified projects. Building and Environment, 147, 158–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.09.001
Thompson, E. (2022). LEED 101: Answers to your questions. Available online: https://www.usgbc.org/articles/leed-101-answers-your-questions (accessed on 17 May 2024).
Tong, X., Zhan, L., Zhang, Y., et al. (2024). Enhanced degradation of fluorinated refrigerants and resourceful conversion under external physical and chemical fields: Principle, technology and perspective. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 205, 107616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2024.107616
USGBC, “U.S. Green Building Council.” (2013). LEED v4 LEED v4.1 Credit Changes (Building Design + Construction). Available online: https://www.usgbc.org/sites/default/files/CreditMappingBDC.pdf (accessed on 26 April 2023).
USGBC, “U.S. Green Building Council.” (2014). Checklist: LEED v4 for Homes Design and Construction. Available online: https://www.usgbc.org/resources/leed-v4-homes-design-and-construction-checklist (accessed on 18 May 2024).
USGBC, “U.S. Green Building Council.” (2022). LEED rating system selection. Available online: https://support.usgbc.org/hc/en-us/articles/4417278321555-LEED-rating-system-selection (accessed on 30 May 2023).
USGBC, “U.S. Green Building Council.” (2023a). Discover LEED. Available online: https://www.usgbc.org/discoverleed (accessed on 31 May 2023).
USGBC, “U.S. Green Building Council.” (2023b). Innovation Credit in LEED New Construction v4. Available online: https://www.usgbc.org/credits/new-construction-core-and-shell-schools-new-construction-retail-new-construction-healthca-33?return=/credits/New%20Construction/v4 (accessed on 2 June 2023).
USGBC, “U.S. Green Building Council.” (2023c). Innovation Credit in LEED New Construction v4.1. Available online: https://www.usgbc.org/credits/new-construction-core-and-shell-schools-new-construction-retail-new-construction-healthc-182?return=/credits/New%20Construction/v4.1 (accessed on 2 June 2023).
USGBC, “U.S. Green Building Council.” (2023d). Project Checklist-LEED v4 for BD+C: New Construction and Major Renovation. Available online: https://storage.pardot.com/413862/152746/LEED_v4_for_Building_Design_and_Construction__1_PAGE.xlsx (accessed on 26 April 2023).
USGBC, “U.S. Green Building Council.” (2023e). Project Checklist-LEED v4.1 BD+C. Available online: https://storage.pardot.com/413862/1620063369yrzKyKyq/LEED_v4.1_for_Building_Design_and_Construction_Checklist_Updated_4.26.xlsx (accessed on 26 April 2023).
USGBC, “U.S. Green Building Council.” (2023f). Renewable Energy Calculator-LEED v4.1 EA Credit Renewable Energy. Available online: https://www.usgbc.org/sites/default/files/2023-04/v4%201_Renewable%20Energy%20Calculator_v02_april%2018%202023.xlsx (accessed on 26 April 2023).
USGBC, “U.S. Green Building Council.” (2024a). LEED credit library. Available online: https://www.usgbc.org/credits (accessed on 17 May 2024).
USGBC, “U.S. Green Building Council.” (2024b). LEED v4: Reference Guide for Homes Design and Construction Additional Content. Available online: https://www.usgbc.org/guide/homes (accessed on 18 May 2024).
Yang, C., Wu, Z., Li, X., et al. (2024). Risk-constrained stochastic scheduling for energy hub: Integrating renewables, demand response, and electric vehicles. Energy, 288, 129680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2023.129680
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i8.5306
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Osama A. Marzouk
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.