Reusable bags have been introduced as an alternative to single-use plastic bags (SUPB). While beneficial, this alternative is economically and environmentally viable only if utilized multiple times. This study aims to identify the determinants influencing the use of reusable bags (RB) over single-use plastic bags (SUPB) within the framework of ecological impact reduction, employing the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB). The focus is on understanding how attitudes (AT), subjective norms (SN), and perceived behavioral control (PBC) collectively guide consumers towards adopting reusable bags as a pro-environmental choice. The focus is on understanding how attitudes (AT), subjective norms (SN), and perceived behavioral control (PBC) collectively guide consumers towards the adoption of reusable bags as a pro-environmental choice. Data were collected through a survey administered to 814 consumers in Lahore, employing both regression analysis and Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) to assess the impact of AT, SN, and PBC on reusable bag consumption (RBC). The TPB framework underpins the hypothesis that these three psychological factors significantly influence the decision to use RBs. Both regression and SEM analyses demonstrated that AT, SN, and PBC positively affect RBC, with significant estimates indicating the strength of each predictor. Specifically, PBC emerged as the strongest predictor of RBC (PBC2, β = 0.533, p < 0.001), highlighting the paramount importance of control perceptions in influencing bag use. This was followed by AT (β = 0.211, p < 0.001) and SN (β = 0.173, p < 0.001), confirming the hypothesized positive relationships. The congruence of findings from both analytical approaches underlines the robustness of these techniques in validating the TPB within the context of sustainable consumer behaviors. The investigation corroborates the TPB’s applicability in predicting RBC, with a clear hierarchy of influence among the model’s constructs. PBC’s prominence underscores the necessity of enhancing consumers’ control over using RBs to foster sustainable consumption patterns. Practical implications include the development of policies and marketing strategies that target the identified determinants, especially emphasizing the critical role of PBC, to promote broader adoption of RBs and contribute to significant reductions in plastic waste.

Ahmad, S., Zulkurnain, N., & Khairushalimi, F. (2016). Assessing the validity and reliability of a measurement model in Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). British Journal of Mathematics & Computer Science, 15(3), 1–8.

Ahmad, W., Kim, W. G., Anwer, Z., et al. (2020). Schwartz personal values, theory of planned behavior and environmental consciousness: How tourists’ visiting intentions towards eco-friendly destinations are shaped? Journal of Business Research, 110, 228–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.01.040

Ajzen, I. (1985). From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior. In: Kuhl, J., Beckmann, J. (editors). Action Control. Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

Arias, C., & Trujillo, C. A. (2020). Perceived Consumer Effectiveness as A Trigger of Behavioral Spillover Effects: A path towards Recycling. Sustainability, 12(11), 4348. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114348

Arifani, V. M., & Haryanto, H. (2018). Purchase intention: implementation theory of planned behavior (Study on reusable shopping bags in Solo City, Indonesia). IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 200, 012019. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/200/1/012019

Asih, D., Setini, M., Soelton, M., et al. (2020). Predicting green product consumption using theory of planned behavior and reasoned action. Management Science Letters, 3367–3374. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2020.5.042

Atkinson, J. W. (1964). An introduction to motivation. Van Nostrand. D. van Nostrand Co. Ltd.

Badawi, A. N., Adelazim Ahmed, T. S., Alotaibi, E. K., et al. (2024). The Role of Awareness of Consequences in Predicting the Local Tourists’ Plastic Waste Reduction Behavioral Intention: The Extension of Planned Behavior Theory. Sustainability, 16(1), 436. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16010436

Bamberg, S. (2003). How does environmental concern influence specific environmentally related behaviors? A new answer to an old question. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23(1), 21–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(02)00078-6

Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588–606. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588

Boyd, A. D., Jardine, C. G., & Driedger, S. M. (2009). Canadian Media Representations of Mad Cow Disease. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part A, 72(17–18), 1096–1105. https://doi.org/10.1080/15287390903084629

Chang, S.-H., & Chou, C.-H. (2018). Consumer Intention toward Bringing Your Own Shopping Bags in Taiwan: An Application of Ethics Perspective and Theory of Planned Behavior. Sustainability, 10(6), 1815. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10061815

Chen, Y., Awasthi, A. K., Wei, F., et al. (2021). Single-use plastics: Production, usage, disposal, and adverse impacts. Science of The Total Environment, 752, 141772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141772

Durak, S. G. (2016). Investigation and Evaluation of the Effect to Environmental Pollution of Plastic Shopping Bags. Turkish Journal of Scientific Reviews, 9(2), 20–24. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/418008

Ekasari, A., Rahayu, F., & Diamanta, A. (2021). Understanding Attitude towards Reusable Bag: Its Antecedents and Consequences. International Journal of Science and Society, 3(3), 186–197. https://doi.org/10.54783/ijsoc.v3i3.364

Ekasari, A. (2020). Campaigning Reusable Bag: The Role of Retailers to Achieve Sustainable Consumption. Proceedings of the International Conference on Management, Accounting, and Economy (ICMAE 2020). https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.200915.047

Ekasari, A., & Zaini, S. M. (2020). Moral Norm and Theory of Planned Behavior: The Intention to Use Eco-Friendly Reusable Bag. Indonesian Journal of Sustainability Accounting and Management, 4(1), 56. https://doi.org/10.28992/ijsam.v4i1.94

Eraslan Yalcin, M., & Kutlu, B. (2019). Examination of students’ acceptance of and intention to use learning management systems using extended TAM. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(5), 2414–2432. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12798

Ertz, M., Huang, R., Jo, M.-S., et al. (2017). From single-use to multi-use: Study of consumers’ behavior toward consumption of reusable containers. Journal of Environmental Management, 193, 334–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.01.060

Excell, C., Salcedo-La Viña, C., Worker, J., & Moses, E. (2018). Legal limits on single-use plastics and microplastics: A global review of national laws and regulations. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) in partnership with the World Resources Institute (WRI).

Feng, A. L., Wesely, N. C., Hoehle, L. P., et al. (2017). A validated model for the 22‐item Sino‐Nasal Outcome Test subdomain structure in chronic rhinosinusitis. International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology, 7(12), 1140–1148. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1002/alr.22025

Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1977). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.

Gamerman, E. (2008). An Inconvenient Bag. The Wall Street Journal.

Hagger, M. S., & Hamilton, K. (2024). Longitudinal tests of the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analysis. European Review of Social Psychology, 35(1), 198–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2023.2225897

Hasan, S. N. M. S., Harun, R., & Hock, L. K. (2015). Application of Theory of Planned Behavior in Measuring the Behavior to Reduce Plastic Consumption Among Students at Universiti Putra Malaysia, Malaysia. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 30, 195–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2015.10.035

Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118

Ishak, M. F., Mahbob, N. N., & Hasim, M. A. (2023). Determinants of Using Reusable Eco-Friendly Shopping Bags among Gen-Y. Information Management and Business Review, 15(3(I)), 115-123.

Jager, W. (2000). Modelling consumer behaviour. University Library Groningen.

Karmarkar, U. R., & Bollinger, B. (2015). BYOB: How Bringing Your Own Shopping Bags Leads to Treating Yourself and the Environment. Journal of Marketing, 79(4), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.13.0228

Kline, R. B. (2011). Convergence of Structural Equation Modeling and Multilevel Modeling. In: The SAGE Handbook of Innovation in Social Research Methods. SAGE Publications Ltd.

Lebreton, L., & Andrady, A. (2019). Future scenarios of global plastic waste generation and disposal. Palgrave Communications, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-018-0212-7

Lehmann, S. (2011). Optimizing Urban Material Flows and Waste Streams in Urban Development through Principles of Zero Waste and Sustainable Consumption. Sustainability, 3(1), 155–183. https://doi.org/10.3390/su3010155

Lohmöller, J.-B. (1989). Latent Variable Path Modeling with Partial Least Squares. Physica-Verlag HD. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-52512-4

Muposhi, A., Mpinganjira, M., & Wait, M. (2021). Factors influencing the use of non-plastic reusable shopping bags: A cognitive-normative-habitual approach. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 37(3), 306–325. https://doi.org/10.1017/aee.2021.9

Muralidharan, S., & Sheehan, K. (2016). “Tax” and “Fee” Message Frames as Inhibitors of Plastic Bag Usage Among Shoppers. Social Marketing Quarterly, 22(3), 200–217. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524500416631522

Nasution, M. I., Fahmi, M., Jufrizen, Muslih, & Prayogi, M. A. (2020). The Quality of Small and Medium Enterprises Performance Using the Structural Equation Model-Part Least Square (SEM-PLS). Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1477(5), 052052. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1477/5/052052

Patel, K. R. (2023). Harmonizing sustainability, functionality, and cost: Navigating responsible packaging innovations in modern supply chains. American Journal of Economic and Management Business (AJEMB), 2(8), 287–300.

Sengupta, S. (2023). Sustainable products from natural fibers/biomass as a substitute for single-use plastics: Indian context. In: Novel sustainable raw material alternatives for the textiles and fashion industry. Springer.

Staff, E. (2022). Fact Sheet: Single Use Plastics. EARTHDAY.ORG.

Stafford, W., Russo, V., & Nahman, A. (2022). A comparative cradle-to-grave life cycle assessment of single-use plastic shopping bags and various alternatives available in South Africa. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 27(9–11), 1213–1227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-022-02085-2

Suleman, R., Amjad, A., Ismail, A., et al. (2022). Impact of plastic bags usage in food commodities: an irreversible loss to environment. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(33), 49483–49489. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-21091-3

Taber, K. S. (2018). The Use of Cronbach’s Alpha When Developing and Reporting Research Instruments in Science Education. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2

Teo, T. (2008). Pre-service teachers’ attitudes towards computer use: A Singapore survey. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24(4). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1201

Timyan, A., & Sadachar, A. (2020). Reusable shopping bags: insights on psychological factors leading to consumers’ (sustainable) practices. International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education, 13(2), 190–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/17543266.2020.1762248

Ujeh, K. C. (2021). The negative environmental effects of plastic shopping bags. Available online: https://www.ibanet.org/article/76F8D2A9-1A1D-4A2F-8A6F-0A70149FD4D5 (accessed on 2 January 2024).

Volva, L., & Djamaludin, M. D. (2018). Shopping Bag Usage Behavior of Non-working Housewives in the Perspective of Theory of Planned Behavior (Indonesian). Jurnal Ilmu Keluarga Dan Konsumen, 11(1), 49–59. https://doi.org/10.24156/jikk.2018.11.49

Wang, B., & Li, Y. (2022). Consumers’ Intention to Bring a Reusable Bag for Shopping in China: Extending the Theory of Planned Behavior. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(6), 3638. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19063638

Wang, B., Liu, B., & Li, Y. (2023). A dark side of trust: examining the influence of environmental risk perception on citizens’ plastic-avoiding behavior. IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems.

Warner, B. M. (2009). Sacking the culture of convenience: Regulating plastic shopping bags to prevent further environmental harm. University of Memphis Law Review, 40, 645.

Westgate, P. M. (2016). Intra‐cluster correlation selection for cluster randomized trials. Statistics in Medicine, 35(19), 3272–3284. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.6922

Wikipedia. (2023). List of towns in Lahore. Available online: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List-of-towns-in-Lahore (accessed on 2 January 2024).

Yadav, R., & Pathak, G. S. (2016). Young consumers’ intention towards buying green products in a developing nation: Extending the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Cleaner Production, 135, 732–739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.120

Yan, D., Cai, X., Xie, M., et al. (2022). Why is reusable bag consumption easier to say than do? Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.956998

Zainudin, N., Qi, W. Y., Lau, J. L., et al. (2021). Determinants of Using Alternative to Single-Use Plastic Bags. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 11(11). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v11-i11/11659

Zaman, K., Iftikhar, U., Rehmani, M., et al. (2023). Embracing biodegradable bags: effects of ethical self-identity on consumer buying behavior. Social Responsibility Journal, 19(3), 474–485. https://doi.org/10.1108/srj-03-2021-0099