Critical success factors frameworks, and models for risk assessment of eGovernment projects: A systematic literature review

Bukohwo Michael Esiefarienrhe, Thapelo Monageng

Article ID: 4503
Vol 8, Issue 8, 2024

VIEWS - 1372 (Abstract)

Abstract


eGovernment projects are capital intensive and have high probability of failure because of the dynamic and technological laden environment in which they operate. The number of skilled labour and technicalities required are often not available in quantity needed to sustain such project. There is always the need to have in place adequate risk assessment framework to guide the execution and monitoring of eGovernment projects. Several studies have been conducted on the critical success factors relating to risk assessment of eGovernment projects to understand the reasons for the high rate of failure. Therefore, there is need to review these articles and categorize them into different research domain in project risk assessment so as to reveal domain with more or less research and those that need to understand the future research directions in risk assessment for eGovernment projects. Using the positivism paradigm, this study utilized the Systematic Literature Review methodology to collect 147 articles from the following academic databases namely IEEE, Preprints, WorldCat Discovery, ArXiv. Ohio-state University databases, Science Direct, Scopus, ACM, NWU digital library, Usenix, Jise database, Sagepub, MDPI Academia published between 2013 to 2023. Different inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied pruning to 48 articles that were used for the study. The results show the classification of articles in risk assessment for eGovernment projects into those that discusses project analysis, review, framework, maturity and model tools, implementation, and integration, applied methodology and evaluation with the percentage of articles published in each domain with the past 10 years. The various critical success factors that should be considered in the development of a robust risk assessment framework were discussed and future research directions in eGovernment risk assessment were given based on the reviews.


Keywords


e-Government; risk assessment framework; project developing risk; critical success factors in project management

Full Text:

PDF


References

  1. Abdallah, S., & Fan, I. S. (2012). Framework for e-government assessment in developing countries: case study from Sudan. Electronic Government, an International Journal, 9(2), 158. https://doi.org/10.1504/eg.2012.046267
  2. Aladwani, A. M. (2016). Corruption as a source of e-Government projects failure in developing countries: A theoretical exposition. International Journal of Information Management, 36(1), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2015.10.005
  3. Al-Kaabi, R., (2010). Critical success factors of egovernment: A proposal model for e-Government implementation in Kingdom of Bahrain. In: Proceeding of the 6th International Conference one-Government (ICEG); Cape Peninsula University of Technology, Cape Town, South Africa. pp. 1–9.
  4. Al-Khouri, A. M., Nasser, Al-Mazrouie, M., & Mohan, B. (2010). A Strategy Framework for the Risk Assessment and Mitigation for Large E-Government Projects. Available online: https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=99c87dc70cc1b9089cdfbd4db8a915cc1de1580b (accessed on 5 January 2024).
  5. Alrubaiq, A., & Alharbi, T. (2021). Developing a Cybersecurity Framework for e-Government Project in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Journal of Cybersecurity and Privacy, 1(2), 302–318. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcp1020017
  6. Altameem, T., Zairi, M., & Alshawi, S. (2006). Critical Success Factors of E-Government: A Proposed Model for E-Government Implementation. In: Proceedings of the 2006 Innovations in Information Technology; Dubai, United Arab Emirates. pp. 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/INNOVATIONS.2006.301974
  7. Alzahrani, L., Al-Karaghouli, W., & Weerakkody, V. (2017). Analysing the critical factors influencing trust in e-government adoption from citizens’ perspective: A systematic review and a conceptual framework. International Business Review, 26(1), 164–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2016.06.004
  8. Ambira, C. M., Kemoni, H. N., & Ngulube, P. (2019). A framework for electronic records management in support of e-government in Kenya. Records Management Journal, 29(3), 305–319. https://doi.org/10.1108/rmj-03-2018-0006
  9. Anand, A., & Vaidya, S. (2019). Role of Trust in E-Government Projects. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3371734
  10. Anthopoulos, L., Reddick, C. G., Giannakidou, I., et al. (2016). Why e-government projects fail? An analysis of the Healthcare.gov website. Government Information Quarterly, 33(1), 161–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.07.003
  11. Chandrachooodan, G., Rajendran, R., & Rajendran, R. P. (2022). Conceptual Framework for Project Management for E-Governance Service Development. International Journal of Professional Business Review, 7(4), e0754. https://doi.org/10.26668/businessreview/2022.v7i4.e754
  12. Choudhari, R. D., Banwet, D. K., & Gupta, M. P. (2011). Assessment of risk in e-governance projects: an application of product moment correlation and cluster analysis techniques. Electronic Government, an International Journal, 8(1), 85. https://doi.org/10.1504/eg.2011.037699
  13. Davidavičienė, V., Aleliūnas, I., & Sabaitytė, J. (2018). Eurosai Itwg model adoption for new IT audit framework: e-government cases. Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu, 2, 114–122. https://doi.org/10.29202/nvngu/2018-2/14
  14. Elbanna, A., Dwivedi, Y. K., Bunker, D., & Wastell, D. (2019). Smart Working, Living and Organising. In: IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04315-5
  15. El Khatib, M., Nakand, L., Almarzooqi, S., et al. (2020). E-Governance in Project Management: Impact and Risks of Implementation. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 10(12), 1785–1811. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajibm.2020.1012111
  16. Elmeziane, K., Chuanmin, S., & Elmeziane, M. (2011). Notice of Retraction: Critical success factors of enterprise resource planning implementation in China: Case study in Shanghai city, China. In: Proceedings of the 2011 International Conference on E-Business and E-Government (ICEE). https://doi.org/10.1109/icebeg.2011.5881487
  17. Fitsilis, P., Anthopoulos, L., & Gerogiannis, V. C. (2016). An Evaluation Framework for E-Government Projects. Citizens and E-Government, 69–90. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-61520-931-6.ch005
  18. Glyptis, L., Christofi, M., Vrontis, D., et al. (2020). E-Government implementation challenges in small countries: The project manager’s perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 152, 119880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119880
  19. Gunawong, P., & Gao, P. (2017). Understanding e-government failure in the developing country context: a process-oriented study. Information Technology for Development, 23(1), 153–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2016.1269713
  20. Hatsu, S., & Ngassam, E. K. (2017). An integrated framework for benchmarking e-government projects. In: Proceedings of the 2017 IST-Africa Week Conference (IST-Africa). https://doi.org/10.23919/istafrica.2017.8102412
  21. Heeks, R. (2003). Most eGovernment-for-Development Projects Fail: How Can Risks be Reduced? SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3540052
  22. Heeks, R. (2008). ICT4D 2.0: The Next Phase of Applying ICT for International Development. Computer, 41(6), 26–33. https://doi.org/10.1109/mc.2008.192
  23. Huggins, C., & Frosina, N. (2016). ICT-driven projects for land governance in Kenya: disruption and e-government frameworks. GeoJournal, 82(4), 643–663. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-016-9710-6
  24. Ifinedo, P. (2008). Moving Towards E-Government in a Developing Society. In: Electronic Government. IGI Global. pp. 1953–1969. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59904-947-2.ch148
  25. Jaffar, A., & Manoj, T. (2011). A Holistic Framework to Evaluate E-government Systems. Available online: https://aisel.aisnet.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1066&context=amcis2011_submissions (accessed on 5 January 2024).
  26. Joshi, P., & Islam, S. (2018). E-Government Maturity Model for Sustainable E-Government Services from the Perspective of Developing Countries. Sustainability, 10(6), 1882. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10061882
  27. Joshi, P., Islam, S., & Islam, S. (2017). A Framework for Cloud Based E-Government from the Perspective of Developing Countries. Future Internet, 9(4), 80. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi9040080
  28. Kalamatianou, M. A. & Malamateniou, F. (2017). An Extended UTAUT2 Model for e-Government Project Evaluation. In: ICDS 2017—The Eleventh International Conference on Digital Society and eGovernments; France. pp. 48–54.
  29. Kefallinos, D., Lambrou, M. A., & Sykas, E. (2009). An Extended Risk Assessment Model for Secure E-Government Projects. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 5(2), 72–92. https://doi.org/10.4018/jegr.2009040105
  30. Kefallinos, D., Lambrou, M. A., & Sykas, E. D. (2011). A Multi-level Relational Risk Assessment Model for Secure E-Government Projects. Applied Technology Integration in Governmental Organizations, 153–181. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60960-162-1.ch010
  31. Kumarwad, L. L., & Kumbhar, D. R. (2018). Technical Issues in E-Governance Initiatives in Satara District in Maharashtra State (India). International Journal of Information Engineering and Electronic Business, 10(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.5815/ijieeb.2018.01.01
  32. Lessa, L., Negash, S., & Belachew, M. (2015). Steering E-Government Projects from Failure to Success. In: Emerging Issues and Prospects in African E-Government. IGI Global. pp. 143–156. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-6296-4.ch011
  33. Lowry, J. (2013). Correlations between ICT and records policy integration and court case management system functionality. Records Management Journal, 23(1), 51–60. https://doi.org/10.1108/09565691311325022
  34. Management Association. (2013). User-Driven Healthcare: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications. IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-2770-3
  35. Management Association. (2016). International Business: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications. IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-9814-7
  36. Mates, P., Lechner, T., Rieger, P., & Pěkná, J. (2013). Towards E-Government Project Assessment: European Approach. University of Rijeka, Faculty of Economics and Business, 31(1), 103–125.
  37. Meiyanti, R., Utomo, B., Sensuse, D. I., et al. (2018). e-Government Challenges in Developing Countries: A Literature Review. In: Proceedings of the 2018 6th International Conference on Cyber and IT Service Management (CITSM). https://doi.org/10.1109/citsm.2018.8674245
  38. Mohamed, M. A., Galal-Edeen, G. H., Hassan, H. A., et al. (2012). An evaluation of enterprise architecture frameworks for e-government. In: Proceedings of the 2012 Seventh International Conference on Computer Engineering & Systems (ICCES). https://doi.org/10.1109/icces.2012.6408524
  39. Molefhi, H. N. E., Molale, E. (2012). Botswana e-Govenment Strategy 2011–2016. Available online: https://www.researchictafrica.net/countries/botswana/Nationa_e-Government_Strategy_2011-2016.pdf (accessed 19 January 2024).
  40. Munyoka, W., & Manzira, M. F. (2013). Assessing the Impact of e-Government Projects: The Case of Limpopo Province in South Africa. Olitical Science, Computer Science.
  41. Napitupulu, D. (2014). The Critical Success Factors Study for e-Government Implementation. International Journal of Computer Applications, 89(16), 23–32. https://doi.org/10.5120/15716-4588
  42. Reddick, C. (2010). Citizens and E-Government: Evaluating Policy and Management. IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-61520-931-6
  43. Sheoran, S., & Vij, S. (2022). A Review of E-Government Assessment Frameworks: E-Readiness, Adoption, Citizen Engagement and Quality. JeDEM—EJournal of EDemocracy and Open Government, 14(2), 197–213. https://doi.org/10.29379/jedem.v14i2.717
  44. Singh, H., Grover, P., Kar, A. K., et al. (2020). Review of performance assessment frameworks of e-government projects. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 14(1), 31–64. https://doi.org/10.1108/tg-02-2019-0011
  45. Sodhi, I. S. (2015). Emerging Issues and Prospects in African E-Government. IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-6296-4
  46. Sundberg, L. (2019). Electronic government: Towards e-democracy or democracy at risk? Safety Science, 118, 22–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2019.04.030
  47. Sundberg, L., & Larsson, A. (2017). The Impact of Formal Decision Processes on e-Government Projects. Administrative Sciences, 7(2), 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci7020014
  48. Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., Chan, F. K. Y., et al. (2016). Managing Citizens’ Uncertainty in E-Government Services: The Mediating and Moderating Roles of Transparency and Trust. Information Systems Research, 27(1), 87–111. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2015.0612
  49. Wang, H. (2010). Review of studies on online consumer trust. In: Proceedings of the 2010 Second International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Natural Computing. https://doi.org/10.1109/cinc.2010.5643778
  50. Waheduzzaman, W., & Miah, S. J. (2015). Readiness assessment of e-government: a developing country perspective. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 9(4), 498–516. https://doi.org/10.1108/tg-05-2014-0018
  51. Weerakkody, V. (2011). Applied Technology Integration in Governmental Organizations: New E-Government Research. IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60960-162-1


DOI: https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i8.4503

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Bukohwo Michael Esiefarienrhe, Thapelo Monageng

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.