Critical success factors frameworks, and models for risk assessment of eGovernment projects: A systematic literature review
Vol 8, Issue 8, 2024
VIEWS - 1372 (Abstract)
Abstract
eGovernment projects are capital intensive and have high probability of failure because of the dynamic and technological laden environment in which they operate. The number of skilled labour and technicalities required are often not available in quantity needed to sustain such project. There is always the need to have in place adequate risk assessment framework to guide the execution and monitoring of eGovernment projects. Several studies have been conducted on the critical success factors relating to risk assessment of eGovernment projects to understand the reasons for the high rate of failure. Therefore, there is need to review these articles and categorize them into different research domain in project risk assessment so as to reveal domain with more or less research and those that need to understand the future research directions in risk assessment for eGovernment projects. Using the positivism paradigm, this study utilized the Systematic Literature Review methodology to collect 147 articles from the following academic databases namely IEEE, Preprints, WorldCat Discovery, ArXiv. Ohio-state University databases, Science Direct, Scopus, ACM, NWU digital library, Usenix, Jise database, Sagepub, MDPI Academia published between 2013 to 2023. Different inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied pruning to 48 articles that were used for the study. The results show the classification of articles in risk assessment for eGovernment projects into those that discusses project analysis, review, framework, maturity and model tools, implementation, and integration, applied methodology and evaluation with the percentage of articles published in each domain with the past 10 years. The various critical success factors that should be considered in the development of a robust risk assessment framework were discussed and future research directions in eGovernment risk assessment were given based on the reviews.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
- Abdallah, S., & Fan, I. S. (2012). Framework for e-government assessment in developing countries: case study from Sudan. Electronic Government, an International Journal, 9(2), 158. https://doi.org/10.1504/eg.2012.046267
- Aladwani, A. M. (2016). Corruption as a source of e-Government projects failure in developing countries: A theoretical exposition. International Journal of Information Management, 36(1), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2015.10.005
- Al-Kaabi, R., (2010). Critical success factors of egovernment: A proposal model for e-Government implementation in Kingdom of Bahrain. In: Proceeding of the 6th International Conference one-Government (ICEG); Cape Peninsula University of Technology, Cape Town, South Africa. pp. 1–9.
- Al-Khouri, A. M., Nasser, Al-Mazrouie, M., & Mohan, B. (2010). A Strategy Framework for the Risk Assessment and Mitigation for Large E-Government Projects. Available online: https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=99c87dc70cc1b9089cdfbd4db8a915cc1de1580b (accessed on 5 January 2024).
- Alrubaiq, A., & Alharbi, T. (2021). Developing a Cybersecurity Framework for e-Government Project in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Journal of Cybersecurity and Privacy, 1(2), 302–318. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcp1020017
- Altameem, T., Zairi, M., & Alshawi, S. (2006). Critical Success Factors of E-Government: A Proposed Model for E-Government Implementation. In: Proceedings of the 2006 Innovations in Information Technology; Dubai, United Arab Emirates. pp. 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/INNOVATIONS.2006.301974
- Alzahrani, L., Al-Karaghouli, W., & Weerakkody, V. (2017). Analysing the critical factors influencing trust in e-government adoption from citizens’ perspective: A systematic review and a conceptual framework. International Business Review, 26(1), 164–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2016.06.004
- Ambira, C. M., Kemoni, H. N., & Ngulube, P. (2019). A framework for electronic records management in support of e-government in Kenya. Records Management Journal, 29(3), 305–319. https://doi.org/10.1108/rmj-03-2018-0006
- Anand, A., & Vaidya, S. (2019). Role of Trust in E-Government Projects. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3371734
- Anthopoulos, L., Reddick, C. G., Giannakidou, I., et al. (2016). Why e-government projects fail? An analysis of the Healthcare.gov website. Government Information Quarterly, 33(1), 161–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.07.003
- Chandrachooodan, G., Rajendran, R., & Rajendran, R. P. (2022). Conceptual Framework for Project Management for E-Governance Service Development. International Journal of Professional Business Review, 7(4), e0754. https://doi.org/10.26668/businessreview/2022.v7i4.e754
- Choudhari, R. D., Banwet, D. K., & Gupta, M. P. (2011). Assessment of risk in e-governance projects: an application of product moment correlation and cluster analysis techniques. Electronic Government, an International Journal, 8(1), 85. https://doi.org/10.1504/eg.2011.037699
- Davidavičienė, V., Aleliūnas, I., & Sabaitytė, J. (2018). Eurosai Itwg model adoption for new IT audit framework: e-government cases. Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu, 2, 114–122. https://doi.org/10.29202/nvngu/2018-2/14
- Elbanna, A., Dwivedi, Y. K., Bunker, D., & Wastell, D. (2019). Smart Working, Living and Organising. In: IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04315-5
- El Khatib, M., Nakand, L., Almarzooqi, S., et al. (2020). E-Governance in Project Management: Impact and Risks of Implementation. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 10(12), 1785–1811. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajibm.2020.1012111
- Elmeziane, K., Chuanmin, S., & Elmeziane, M. (2011). Notice of Retraction: Critical success factors of enterprise resource planning implementation in China: Case study in Shanghai city, China. In: Proceedings of the 2011 International Conference on E-Business and E-Government (ICEE). https://doi.org/10.1109/icebeg.2011.5881487
- Fitsilis, P., Anthopoulos, L., & Gerogiannis, V. C. (2016). An Evaluation Framework for E-Government Projects. Citizens and E-Government, 69–90. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-61520-931-6.ch005
- Glyptis, L., Christofi, M., Vrontis, D., et al. (2020). E-Government implementation challenges in small countries: The project manager’s perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 152, 119880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119880
- Gunawong, P., & Gao, P. (2017). Understanding e-government failure in the developing country context: a process-oriented study. Information Technology for Development, 23(1), 153–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2016.1269713
- Hatsu, S., & Ngassam, E. K. (2017). An integrated framework for benchmarking e-government projects. In: Proceedings of the 2017 IST-Africa Week Conference (IST-Africa). https://doi.org/10.23919/istafrica.2017.8102412
- Heeks, R. (2003). Most eGovernment-for-Development Projects Fail: How Can Risks be Reduced? SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3540052
- Heeks, R. (2008). ICT4D 2.0: The Next Phase of Applying ICT for International Development. Computer, 41(6), 26–33. https://doi.org/10.1109/mc.2008.192
- Huggins, C., & Frosina, N. (2016). ICT-driven projects for land governance in Kenya: disruption and e-government frameworks. GeoJournal, 82(4), 643–663. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-016-9710-6
- Ifinedo, P. (2008). Moving Towards E-Government in a Developing Society. In: Electronic Government. IGI Global. pp. 1953–1969. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59904-947-2.ch148
- Jaffar, A., & Manoj, T. (2011). A Holistic Framework to Evaluate E-government Systems. Available online: https://aisel.aisnet.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1066&context=amcis2011_submissions (accessed on 5 January 2024).
- Joshi, P., & Islam, S. (2018). E-Government Maturity Model for Sustainable E-Government Services from the Perspective of Developing Countries. Sustainability, 10(6), 1882. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10061882
- Joshi, P., Islam, S., & Islam, S. (2017). A Framework for Cloud Based E-Government from the Perspective of Developing Countries. Future Internet, 9(4), 80. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi9040080
- Kalamatianou, M. A. & Malamateniou, F. (2017). An Extended UTAUT2 Model for e-Government Project Evaluation. In: ICDS 2017—The Eleventh International Conference on Digital Society and eGovernments; France. pp. 48–54.
- Kefallinos, D., Lambrou, M. A., & Sykas, E. (2009). An Extended Risk Assessment Model for Secure E-Government Projects. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 5(2), 72–92. https://doi.org/10.4018/jegr.2009040105
- Kefallinos, D., Lambrou, M. A., & Sykas, E. D. (2011). A Multi-level Relational Risk Assessment Model for Secure E-Government Projects. Applied Technology Integration in Governmental Organizations, 153–181. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60960-162-1.ch010
- Kumarwad, L. L., & Kumbhar, D. R. (2018). Technical Issues in E-Governance Initiatives in Satara District in Maharashtra State (India). International Journal of Information Engineering and Electronic Business, 10(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.5815/ijieeb.2018.01.01
- Lessa, L., Negash, S., & Belachew, M. (2015). Steering E-Government Projects from Failure to Success. In: Emerging Issues and Prospects in African E-Government. IGI Global. pp. 143–156. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-6296-4.ch011
- Lowry, J. (2013). Correlations between ICT and records policy integration and court case management system functionality. Records Management Journal, 23(1), 51–60. https://doi.org/10.1108/09565691311325022
- Management Association. (2013). User-Driven Healthcare: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications. IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-2770-3
- Management Association. (2016). International Business: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications. IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-9814-7
- Mates, P., Lechner, T., Rieger, P., & Pěkná, J. (2013). Towards E-Government Project Assessment: European Approach. University of Rijeka, Faculty of Economics and Business, 31(1), 103–125.
- Meiyanti, R., Utomo, B., Sensuse, D. I., et al. (2018). e-Government Challenges in Developing Countries: A Literature Review. In: Proceedings of the 2018 6th International Conference on Cyber and IT Service Management (CITSM). https://doi.org/10.1109/citsm.2018.8674245
- Mohamed, M. A., Galal-Edeen, G. H., Hassan, H. A., et al. (2012). An evaluation of enterprise architecture frameworks for e-government. In: Proceedings of the 2012 Seventh International Conference on Computer Engineering & Systems (ICCES). https://doi.org/10.1109/icces.2012.6408524
- Molefhi, H. N. E., Molale, E. (2012). Botswana e-Govenment Strategy 2011–2016. Available online: https://www.researchictafrica.net/countries/botswana/Nationa_e-Government_Strategy_2011-2016.pdf (accessed 19 January 2024).
- Munyoka, W., & Manzira, M. F. (2013). Assessing the Impact of e-Government Projects: The Case of Limpopo Province in South Africa. Olitical Science, Computer Science.
- Napitupulu, D. (2014). The Critical Success Factors Study for e-Government Implementation. International Journal of Computer Applications, 89(16), 23–32. https://doi.org/10.5120/15716-4588
- Reddick, C. (2010). Citizens and E-Government: Evaluating Policy and Management. IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-61520-931-6
- Sheoran, S., & Vij, S. (2022). A Review of E-Government Assessment Frameworks: E-Readiness, Adoption, Citizen Engagement and Quality. JeDEM—EJournal of EDemocracy and Open Government, 14(2), 197–213. https://doi.org/10.29379/jedem.v14i2.717
- Singh, H., Grover, P., Kar, A. K., et al. (2020). Review of performance assessment frameworks of e-government projects. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 14(1), 31–64. https://doi.org/10.1108/tg-02-2019-0011
- Sodhi, I. S. (2015). Emerging Issues and Prospects in African E-Government. IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-6296-4
- Sundberg, L. (2019). Electronic government: Towards e-democracy or democracy at risk? Safety Science, 118, 22–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2019.04.030
- Sundberg, L., & Larsson, A. (2017). The Impact of Formal Decision Processes on e-Government Projects. Administrative Sciences, 7(2), 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci7020014
- Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., Chan, F. K. Y., et al. (2016). Managing Citizens’ Uncertainty in E-Government Services: The Mediating and Moderating Roles of Transparency and Trust. Information Systems Research, 27(1), 87–111. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2015.0612
- Wang, H. (2010). Review of studies on online consumer trust. In: Proceedings of the 2010 Second International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Natural Computing. https://doi.org/10.1109/cinc.2010.5643778
- Waheduzzaman, W., & Miah, S. J. (2015). Readiness assessment of e-government: a developing country perspective. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 9(4), 498–516. https://doi.org/10.1108/tg-05-2014-0018
- Weerakkody, V. (2011). Applied Technology Integration in Governmental Organizations: New E-Government Research. IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60960-162-1
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i8.4503
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Bukohwo Michael Esiefarienrhe, Thapelo Monageng
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.