Understanding the factors of accessibility to the neighborhood green spaces that contribute to social cohesion: A systematic literature review
Vol 8, Issue 8, 2024
VIEWS - 306 (Abstract) 152 (PDF)
Abstract
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Berdejo-Espinola, V., Zahnow, R., Suárez-Castro, A. F., et al. (2022). Changes in Green Space Use During a COVID-19 Lockdown Are Associated With Both Individual and Green Space Characteristics. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2022.804443
Błaszczyk, M., Suchocka, M., Wojnowska-Heciak, M., et al. (2020). Quality of urban parks in the perception of city residents with mobility difficulties. PeerJ, 8, e10570. Portico. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.10570
Cerin, E., Conway, T. L., Adams, M. A., et al. (2018). Objectively-assessed neighbourhood destination accessibility and physical activity in adults from 10 countries: An analysis of moderators and perceptions as mediators. Social Science & Medicine, 211, 282–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.06.034
Chen, Q., Wang, C., Lou, G., et al. (2019). Measurement of Urban Park Accessibility from the Quasi-Public Goods Perspective. Sustainability, 11(17), 4573. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11174573
Chen, Y., Yue, W., & La Rosa, D. (2020). Which communities have better accessibility to green space? An investigation into environmental inequality using big data. Landscape and Urban Planning, 204, 103919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103919
Fasihi, H. (2019). Urban Parks and Their Accessibility in Tehran, Iran. Environmental Justice, 12(6), 242–249. https://doi.org/10.1089/env.2019.0014
Firdaus, M. K., Sumabrata, J., Tampi, D. M., et al. (2019). Public Open Space in Realizing Sustainable Urban Development (Study: Environmental Park in East Jakarta, Indonesia). IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 264, 012005. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/264/1/012005
Guo, M., Liu, B., Tian, Y., et al. (2020). Equity to Urban Parks for Elderly Residents: Perspectives of Balance between Supply and Demand. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(22), 8506. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17228506
Halkos, G., Leonti, A., & Sardianou, E. (2021). Activities, motivations and satisfaction of urban parks visitors: A structural equation modeling analysis. Economic Analysis and Policy, 70, 502–513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2021.04.005
He, H., Lin, X., Yang, Y., et al. (2020). Association of street greenery and physical activity in older adults: A novel study using pedestrian-centered photographs. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 55, 126789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126789
Heo, S., Nori-Sarma, A., Kim, S., et al. (2021). Do persons with low socioeconomic status have less access to greenspace? Application of accessibility index to urban parks in Seoul, South Korea. Environmental Research Letters, 16(8), 084027. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac12f1
Jennings, V., & Bamkole, O. (2019). The Relationship between Social Cohesion and Urban Green Space: An Avenue for Health Promotion. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(3), 452. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16030452
Karuppannan, S., & Sivam, A. (2012). Comparative analysis of utilisation of open space at neighbourhood level in three Asian cities: Singapore, Delhi and Kuala Lumpur. URBAN DESIGN International, 18(2), 145–164. https://doi.org/10.1057/udi.2012.34
Kaźmierczak, A. (2013). The contribution of local parks to neighbourhood social ties. Landscape and Urban Planning, 109(1), 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.05.007
Ki, D., & Lee, S. (2021). Analyzing the effects of Green View Index of neighborhood streets on walking time using Google Street View and deep learning. Landscape and Urban Planning, 205, 103920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103920
Kothencz, G., Kolcsár, R., Cabrera-Barona, P., et al. (2017). Urban Green Space Perception and Its Contribution to Well-Being. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14(7), 766. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14070766
Krzywnicka, I., & Jankowska, P. (2021). accessibility of public urban green space. A case study of Białystok city. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Administratio Locorum, 20(3), 203–214. https://doi.org/10.31648/aspal.6794
Lak, A., Aghamolaei, R., Baradaran, H. R., et al. (2020). A Framework for Elder-Friendly Public Open Spaces from the Iranian Older Adults’ perspectives: A Mixed-Method Study. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 56, 126857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126857
Liang, X., Tian, H., Li, X., et al. (2021). Modeling the dynamics and walking accessibility of urban open spaces under various policy scenarios. Landscape and Urban Planning, 207, 103993. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103993
Lin, Y., Zhou, Y., Lin, M., et al. (2021). Exploring the disparities in park accessibility through mobile phone data: Evidence from Fuzhou of China. Journal of Environmental Management, 281, 111849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111849
Liu, S., & Wang, X. (2021). Reexamine the value of urban pocket parks under the impact of the COVID-19. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 64, 127294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127294
Liu, Z., Kemperman, A., & Timmermans, H. (2021). Correlates of frequency of outdoor activities of older adults: Empirical evidence from Dalian, China. Travel Behaviour and Society, 22, 108–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2020.09.003
Malek, N. A., Mariapan, M., & Shariff, M. K. M. (2012). The Making of a Quality Neighbourhood Park: A Path Model Approach. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 49, 202–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.07.019
Mohammadi Tahroodi, F., & Ujang, N. (2021). Engaging in social interaction: relationships between the accessibility of path structure and intensity of passive social interaction in urban parks. Archnet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research, 16(1), 112–133. https://doi.org/10.1108/arch-04-2021-0100
Moulay, A., Ujang, N., & Said, I. (2017). Legibility of neighborhood parks as a predicator for enhanced social interaction towards social sustainability. Cities, 61, 58–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2016.11.007
Nam, J., & Kim, H. (2014). The Correlation Between Spatial Characteristics and Utilization of City Parks: A Focus on Neighborhood Parks in Seoul, Korea. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 13(2), 515–522. https://doi.org/10.3130/jaabe.13.515
Peters, K., Elands, B., & Buijs, A. (2010). Social interactions in urban parks: Stimulating social cohesion? Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 9(2), 93–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2009.11.003
Pietilä, M. (2017). Do Visitor Experiences Differ Across Recreation Settings? Using Geographical Information Systems to Study the Setting-Experience Relationship. Visitor Studies, 20(2), 187–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/10645578.2017.1404350
Priess, J., Pinto, L. V., Misiune, I., et al. (2021). Ecosystem Service Use and the Motivations for Use in Central Parks in Three European Cities. Land, 10(2), 154. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10020154
Rahimi, A., Tarashkar, M., & Jahantab, B. (2021). Contribution of Design Indicators in Perception of Social Capital, and Interference of Socio-Demographic Information in the Process. Sustainability, 13(7), 3589. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13073589
Rasidi, M. H., Jamirsah, N., & Said, I. (2012). Urban Green Space Design Affects Urban Residents’ Social Interaction. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 68, 464–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.12.242
Rigolon, A., Browning, M. H. E. M., McAnirlin, O., et al. (Violet). (2021). Green Space and Health Equity: A Systematic Review on the Potential of Green Space to Reduce Health Disparities. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(5), 2563. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18052563
Sanesi, G., & Chiarello, F. (2006). Residents and urban green spaces: The case of Bari. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 4(3–4), 125–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2005.12.001
Schipperijn, J., Bentsen, P., Troelsen, J., et al. (2013). Associations between physical activity and characteristics of urban green space. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 12(1), 109–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2012.12.002
Skaržauskienė, A., & Mačiulienė, M. (2019). Assessment of Digital Co-Creation for Public Open Spaces: Methodological Guidelines. Informatics, 6(3), 39. https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics6030039
Sreetheran, M. (2017). Exploring the urban park use, preference and behaviours among the residents of Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 25, 85–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2017.05.003
Sundevall, E. P., & Jansson, M. (2020). Inclusive Parks across Ages: Multifunction and Urban Open Space Management for Children, Adolescents, and the Elderly. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(24), 9357. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17249357
Talal, M. L., & Santelmann, M. V. (2021). Visitor access, use, and desired improvements in urban parks. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 63, 127216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127216
Tian, Y., Jim, C., & Liu, Y. (2017). Using a Spatial Interaction Model to Assess the Accessibility of District Parks in Hong Kong. Sustainability, 9(11), 1924. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9111924
Turna, N., & Bhandari, H. (2022). Role of Parks as Recreational Spaces at Neighborhood Level in Indian Cities. ECS Transactions, 107(1), 8685–8694. https://doi.org/10.1149/10701.8685ecst
Uchiyama, Y., & Kohsaka, R. (2020). Access and Use of Green Areas during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Green Infrastructure Management in the “New Normal.” Sustainability, 12(23), 9842. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12239842
Ujang, N., Kozlowski, M., & Maulan, S. (2018). Linking place attachment and social interaction: towards meaningful public places. Journal of Place Management and Development, 11(1), 115–129. https://doi.org/10.1108/jpmd-01-2017-0012
Vallée, J., Shareck, M., Le Roux, G., et al. (2020). Is accessibility in the eye of the beholder? Social inequalities in spatial accessibility to health-related resources in Montréal, Canada. Social Science & Medicine, 245, 112702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112702
Wan, C., Shen, G. Q., & Choi, S. (2021). Underlying relationships between public urban green spaces and social cohesion: A systematic literature review. City, Culture and Society, 24, 100383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccs.2021.100383
Wang, P., Zhou, B., Han, L., et al. (2021). The motivation and factors influencing visits to small urban parks in Shanghai, China. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 60, 127086. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127086
Wood, L., Hooper, P., Foster, S., et al. (2017). Public green spaces and positive mental health – investigating the relationship between access, quantity and types of parks and mental wellbeing. Health & Place, 48, 63–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2017.09.002
Zhai, Y., Li, D., Wu, C., et al. (2021). Urban park facility use and intensity of seniors’ physical activity – An examination combining accelerometer and GPS tracking. Landscape and Urban Planning, 205, 103950. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103950
Zhang, J., Cheng, Y., & Zhao, B. (2021). How to accurately identify the underserved areas of peri-urban parks? An integrated accessibility indicator. Ecological Indicators, 122, 107263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.107263
Zhang, Y., Mavoa, S., Zhao, J., et al. (2020). The Association between Green Space and Adolescents’ Mental Well-Being: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(18), 6640. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186640
Zohrevandian, K., Bastami, A., Naderloo, H., et al. (2017). The Role of Environmental Features of Parks in Activation of Recreational Activities in Leisure Time. Annals of Applied Sport Science, 5(1), 89–95. https://doi.org/10.18869/acadpub.aassjournal.5.1.89
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i8.4383
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Shanta Pragyan Dash, Adhesh Shenoy, Sheethal G. Prabhu
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.