urban transitions; causal mechanism; SMMR; urban mobility; QCA

Abulibdeh, A. (2018). Implementing congestion pricing policies in a MENA Region City: Analysis of the impact on travel behaviour and equity. Cities, 74, 196–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.12.003 Aina, Y. A. (2017). Achieving smart sustainable cities with GeoICT support: The Saudi evolving smart cities. Cities, 71, 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.07.007 Álamos-Concha, P., Pattyn, V., Rihoux, B., et al. (2021). Conservative solutions for progress: on solution types when combining QCA with in-depth Process-Tracing. Quality & Quantity, 56(4), 1965–1997. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-021-01191-x Aljoufie, M., Zuidgeest, M., Brussel, M., et al. (2013). Spatial–temporal analysis of urban growth and transportation in Jeddah City, Saudi Arabia. Cities, 31, 57–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2012.04.008 Apajalahti, E.-L., & Kungl, G. (2022). Path dependence and path break-out in the electricity sector. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 43, 220–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2022.03.010 Beach, D. (2018). Achieving Methodological Alignment When Combining QCA and Process Tracing in Practice. Sociological Methods & Research, 47(1), 64-99. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124117701475 Beach, D. (2019). Multi-Method Research in the Social Sciences: A Review of Recent Frameworks and a Way Forward. Government and Opposition, 55(1), 163–182. https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2018.53 Beach, D., & Rohlfing, I. (2018). Integrating Cross-case Analyses and Process Tracing in Set-Theoretic Research. Sociological Methods & Research, 47(1), 3–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124115613780 Cecere, G., Corrocher, N., Gossart, C., et al. (2014). Lock-in and path dependence: an evolutionary approach to eco-innovations. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 24(5), 1037–1065. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-014-0381-5 Chamseddine, Z., & Ait Boubkr, A. (2020). Exploring the place of social impacts in urban transport planning: the case of Casablanca City. Urban, Planning and Transport Research, 8(1), 138–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/21650020.2020.1752793 Chang, R. A., & Gerrits, L. (2022). What spatially stabilises temporary use? A qualitative comparative analysis of 40 temporary use cases along synchronised trajectories of stabilisation. Cities, 130, 103868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.103868 Costales, E. (2022). Identifying sources of innovation: Building a conceptual framework of the Smart City through a social innovation perspective. Cities, 120, 103459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2021.103459 Crespo, N. F., & Crespo, C. F. (2016). Global innovation index: Moving beyond the absolute value of ranking with a fuzzy-set analysis. Journal of Business Research, 69(11), 5265–5271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.123 Csukás, M. S., & Szabó, R. Z. (2021). The many faces of the smart city: Differing value propositions in the activity portfolios of nine cities. Cities, 112, 103116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2021.103116 Currie, P. K., Musango, J. K., & May, N. D. (2017). Urban metabolism: A review with reference to Cape Town. Cities, 70, 91–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.06.005 De Oliveira, L. G. S., Subtil Lacerda, J., & Negro, S. O. (2020). A mechanism-based explanation for blocking mechanisms in technological innovation systems. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 37, 18–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2020.07.006 Deloitte. (2021). Urban Future With a Purpose. 12 trends shaping the future of cities by 2030. Di Giulio, G. M., Bedran-Martins, A. M. B., Vasconcellos, M. da P., et al. (2018). Mainstreaming climate adaptation in the megacity of São Paulo, Brazil. Cities, 72, 237–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.09.001 Eitan, A., & Hekkert, M. P. (2023). Locked in transition? Towards a conceptualization of path-dependence lock-ins in the renewable energy landscape. Energy Research & Social Science, 106, 103316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2023.103316 El Hilali, S., & Azougagh, A. (2021). A netnographic research on citizen’s perception of a future smart city. Cities, 115, 103233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2021.103233 Frantzeskaki, N., & Loorbach, D. (2010). Towards governing infrasystem transitions. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 77(8), 1292–1301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2010.05.004 Geel, F. W. (2018). Disruption and low-carbon system transformation: Progress and new challenges in socio-technical transitions research and the Multi-Level Perspective. Energy Research & Social Science, 37, 224-231. Geels, F. W. (2007). Feelings of Discontent and the Promise of Middle Range Theory for STS. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 32(6), 627–651. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243907303597 Geels, F. W. (2011). The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: Responses to seven criticisms. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 1(1), 24–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2011.02.002 Geels, F. W. (2014). Regime Resistance against Low-Carbon Transitions: Introducing Politics and Power into the Multi-Level Perspective. Theory, Culture & Society, 31(5), 21–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276414531627 Geels, F. W. (2019). Socio-technical transitions to sustainability: a review of criticisms and elaborations of the Multi-Level Perspective. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 39, 187–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2019.06.009 Geels, F. W. (2021). From leadership to followership: A suggestion for interdisciplinary theorising of mainstream actor reorientation in sustainability transitions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 41, 45–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2021.10.021 Geels, F. W. (2022). Causality and explanation in socio-technical transitions research: Mobilising epistemological insights from the wider social sciences. Research Policy, 51(6), 104537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2022.104537 Geels, F. W., & Schot, J. (2007). Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways. Research Policy, 36(3), 399–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.003 Geels, F. W., Kern, F., Fuchs, G., et al. (2016). The enactment of socio-technical transition pathways: A reformulated typology and a comparative multi-level analysis of the German and UK low-carbon electricity transitions (1990–2014). Research Policy, 45(4), 896–913. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.01.015 Gorissen, L., Spira, F., Meynaerts, E., et al. (2018). Moving towards systemic change? Investigating acceleration dynamics of urban sustainability transitions in the Belgian City of Genk. Journal of Cleaner Production, 173, 171–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.052 Grainger-Brown, J., Malekpour, S., Raven, R., et al. (2022). Exploring urban transformation to inform the implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals. Cities, 131, 103928. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.103928 Haesebrouck, T., & Thomann, E. (2021). Introduction: Causation, inferences, and solution types in configurational comparative methods. Quality & Quantity, 56(4), 1867–1888. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-021-01209-4 Hajek, P., Youssef, A., & Hajkova, V. (2022). Recent developments in smart city assessment: A bibliometric and content analysis-based literature review. Cities, 126, 103709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.103709 Hedström, P., & Swedberg, R. (1998). Social Mechanisms. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511663901 Hedström, P., & Wennberg, K. (2016). Causal mechanisms in organization and innovation studies. Innovation, 19(1), 91–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2016.1256779 Heiberg, J., & Truffer, B. (2022). The emergence of a global innovation system – A case study from the urban water sector. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 43, 270–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2022.04.007 Irvine, S., & Bai, X. (2019). Positive inertia and proactive influencing towards sustainability: systems analysis of a frontrunner city. Urban Transformations, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s42854-019-0001-7 Jain, M., & Rohracher, H. (2022). Assessing transformative change of infrastructures in urban area redevelopments. Cities, 124, 103573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.103573 Jiang, H. (2021). Smart urban governance in the ‘smart’ era: Why is it urgently needed? Cities, 111, 103004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.103004 Jørgensen, U. (2012). Mapping and navigating transitions—The multi-level perspective compared with arenas of development. Research Policy, 41(6), 996–1010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.03.001 Kaidesoja, T. (2018). A dynamic and multifunctional account of middle‐range theories. The British Journal of Sociology, 70(4), 1469–1489. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12621 Kanger, L. (2021). Rethinking the Multi-level Perspective for energy transitions: From regime life-cycle to explanatory typology of transition pathways. Energy Research & Social Science, 71, 101829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101829 Keller, M., Sahakian, M., & Hirt, L. F. (2022). Connecting the multi-level-perspective and social practice approach for sustainable transitions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 44, 14–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2022.05.004 Kim, J. (2022). Smart city trends: A focus on 5 countries and 15 companies. Cities, 123, 103551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2021.103551 Klitkou, A., Bolwig, S., Hansen, T., et al. (2015). The role of lock-in mechanisms in transition processes: The case of energy for road transport. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 16, 22–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2015.07.005 Köhler, J., Geels, F. W., Kern, F., et al. (2019). An agenda for sustainability transitions research: State of the art and future directions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 31, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2019.01.004 Krupnik, S., & Koniewski, M. (2022). Choosing a qualitative comparative analysis solution in multi-method impact evaluation. Evaluation, 28(2), 192–209. https://doi.org/10.1177/13563890221088015 Kuokkanen, A., Nurmi, A., Mikkilä, M., et al. (2018). Agency in regime destabilization through the selection environment: The Finnish food system’s sustainability transition. Research Policy, 47(8), 1513–1522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.05.006 Loorbach, D., Wittmayer, J., Avelino, F., et al. (2020). Transformative innovation and translocal diffusion. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 35, 251–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2020.01.009 Mandeli, K. (2019). Public space and the challenge of urban transformation in cities of emerging economies: Jeddah case study. Cities, 95, 102409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.102409 Marchesani, F., Masciarelli, F., & Doan, H. Q. (2022). Innovation in cities a driving force for knowledge flows: Exploring the relationship between high-tech firms, student mobility, and the role of youth entrepreneurship. Cities, 130, 103852. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.103852 Medina-Molina, C., Pérez-Macías, N., & Coronado-Vaca, M. (2024). Searching for complexity. Application of the set-theory to the analysis of urban mobility readiness index. Discover Sustainability, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-024-00187-5 Mejía-Dorantes, L., & Soto Villagrán, P. (2020). A review on the influence of barriers on gender equality to access the city: A synthesis approach of Mexico City and its Metropolitan Area. Cities, 96, 102439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.102439 Mello, P. A. (2022). Qualitative Comparative Analysis. Routledge Handbook of Foreign Policy Analysis Methods, 385–402. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003139850-29 Méndez-Ortega, C., Micek, G., & Malochleb, K. (2022). How do coworking spaces coagglomerate with service industries? The tale of three European cities. Cities, 130, 103875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.103875 Menendez, M., & Ambühl, L. (2022). Implementing Design and Operational Measures for Sustainable Mobility: Lessons from Zurich. Sustainability, 14(2), 625. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14020625 Mikkelsen, K. S. (2015). Negative Case Selection: Justifications and Consequences for Set-Theoretic MMR. Sociological Methods & Research, 46(4), 739–771. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124115591015 Mirzadeh Phirouzabadi, A., Blackmore, K., Savage, D., et al. (2022). Modelling and simulating a multi-modal and multi-dimensional technology interaction framework: The case of vehicle powertrain technologies in the US market. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 175, 121412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121412 Morley, I. (2018). Manila. Cities, 72, 17–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.07.022 Nathansohn, R., & Lahat, L. (2022). From urban vitality to urban vitalisation: Trust, distrust, and citizenship regimes in a Smart City initiative. Cities, 131, 103969. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.103969 Oana, I.-E., & Schneider, C., Q. (2018). SetMethods: an Add-on R Package for Advanced QCA. The R Journal, 10(1), 507. https://doi.org/10.32614/rj-2018-031 Oana, I.-E., Schneider, C. Q., & Thomann, E. (2021). Qualitative Comparative Analysis Using R. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009006781 Oliver Wyman Forum. (2022). Available online: https://www.oliverwymanforum.com/mobility/urban-mobility-readiness-index/rankings.html (accessed on 13 June 2022). Panori, A., Kostopoulos, I., Karampinis, E., et al. (2022). New path creation in energy transition: Exploring the interplay between resource formation and social acceptance of biomass adoption in Europe. Energy Research & Social Science, 86, 102400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.102400 Papachristos, G. (2018). A mechanism based transition research methodology: Bridging analytical approaches. Futures, 98, 57–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2018.02.006 Pinhate, T. B., Parsons, M., Fisher, K., et al. (2020). A crack in the automobility regime? Exploring the transition of São Paulo to sustainable urban mobility. Cities, 107, 102914. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.102914 Post, C., Sarala, R., Gatrell, C., et al. (2020). Advancing Theory with Review Articles. Journal of Management Studies, 57(2), 351–376. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12549 Rahman, S. M., Ratrout, N., Assi, K., et al. (2021). Transformation of urban mobility during COVID-19 pandemic – Lessons for transportation planning. Journal of Transport & Health, 23, 101257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2021.101257 Rohlfing, I., & Schneider, C. Q. (2016). A Unifying Framework for Causal Analysis in Set-Theoretic Multimethod Research. Sociological Methods & Research, 47(1), 37–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124115626170 Rubinson, C., Gerrits, L., Rutten, R., & Greckhamer, T. (2019). Avoiding common errors in QCA: A short guide for new practitioners. Sociology, 9, 397-418. Rutten, R. (2020). Applying and Assessing Large-N QCA: Causality and Robustness From a Critical Realist Perspective. Sociological Methods & Research, 51(3), 1211–1243. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124120914955 Sá, T. H. de, Edwards, P., Pereira, R. H. M., & Monteiro, C. A. (2019). Right to the city and human mobility transition: The case of São Paulo. Cities, 87, 60–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2018.12.024 Saeidizand, P., Fransen, K., & Boussauw, K. (2022). Revisiting car dependency: A worldwide analysis of car travel in global metropolitan areas. Cities, 120, 103467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2021.103467 Schneider, C. Q. (2023). Set-Theoretic Multi-Method Research. A Guide to Combining QCA and Case Studies. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009307154 Schneider, C. Q., & Rohlfing, I. (2019). Set‐theoretic Multimethod Research: The Role of Test Corridors and Conjunctions for Case Selection. Swiss Political Science Review, 25(3), 253–275. https://doi.org/10.1111/spsr.12382 Shamsuzzoha, A., Nieminen, J., Piya, S., et al. (2021). Smart city for sustainable environment: A comparison of participatory strategies from Helsinki, Singapore and London. Cities, 114, 103194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2021.103194 Simoens, M. C., Fuenfschilling, L., & Leipold, S. (2022). Discursive dynamics and lock-ins in socio-technical systems: an overview and a way forward. Sustainability Science, 17(5), 1841–1853. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-022-01110-5 Simoens, M. C., Leipold, S., & Fuenfschilling, L. (2022). Locked in unsustainability: Understanding lock-ins and their interactions using the case of food packaging. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 45, 14–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2022.08.005 Smith, A., Stirling, A., & Berkhout, F. (2005). The governance of sustainable socio-technical transitions. Research Policy, 34(10), 1491–1510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.07.005 Sultan, B., Katar, I. M., & Al-Atroush, M. E. (2021). Towards sustainable pedestrian mobility in Riyadh city, Saudi Arabia: A case study. Sustainable Cities and Society, 69, 102831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.102831 Thaler, T., & Penning‐Rowsell, E. C. (2023). Policy experimentation within flood risk management: Transition pathways in Austria. The Geographical Journal, 189(4), 701–714. https://doi.org/10.1111/geoj.12528 Thomann, E., & Maggetti, M. (2017). Designing Research With Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA): Approaches, Challenges, and Tools. Sociological Methods & Research, 49(2), 356–386. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124117729700 Tongur, S., & Engwall, M. (2017). Exploring window of opportunity dynamics in infrastructure transformation. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 25, 82–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2016.12.003 Trencher, G., & Wesseling, J. (2022). Roadblocks to fuel-cell electric vehicle diffusion: Evidence from Germany, Japan and California. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 112, 103458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2022.103458 van Rijnsoever, F. J., & Leendertse, J. (2020). A practical tool for analyzing socio-technical transitions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 37, 225–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2020.08.004 Verbong, G. P. J., & Geels, F. W. (2010). Exploring sustainability transitions in the electricity sector with socio-technical pathways. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 77(8), 1214–1221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2010.04.008 Wang, Y., & Wong, Y. D. (2020). Repositioning urban heritage for active mobility: Indications from news coverage in Singapore. Cities, 98, 102525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.102525 Williams, T., & Gemperle, S. M. (2016). Sequence will tell! Integrating temporality into set-theoretic multi-method research combining comparative process tracing and qualitative comparative analysis. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 20(2), 121–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2016.1149316 Yu, T. H.-K., & Huarng, K.-H. (2023). Configural analysis of GII’s internal structure. Journal of Business Research, 154, 113323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113323 Yu, T. H.-K., & Huarng, K.-H. (2024). Causal analysis of SDG achievements. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 198, 122977. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122977