Corporate carbon intensity and GDP contribution comparison across 4 countries

Bence Lukács, Árpád Tóth

Article ID: 10615
Vol 9, Issue 1, 2025

VIEWS - 391 (Abstract)

Abstract


The paper analyzes the corporate carbon emissions and GDP contributions of the top ten companies by turnover for 2020–2023 in Germany, South Korea, China and the United Kingdom. Focusing on Scope 1, 2, and 3, the study explores the contribution of these companies to carbon intensity across different sectors and economies. The analysis shows that there are significant gaps in carbon efficiency, with the UK’s and Germany’s firms emitting the lowest emissions per unit of GDP contribution, followed by China and South Korea. Additionally, the study further examines the impact of Economic Policy Uncertainty on both firm carbon intensity and economic productivity. While EPU is positively associated with GDP contributions, its impact on emissions is nuanced. Firms apparently respond to policy uncertainty by increasing energy efficiency in direct (Scope 1) and energy-related (Scope 2) emissions but find it more difficult to manage supply chain emissions (Scope 3) in that case. The results point out the critical role of comprehensive ESG reporting frameworks in enhancing transparency and addressing Scope 3 emissions, which remain the largest and most volatile component of corporate carbon footprints. The paper then emphasizes the importance of standardized ESG reporting and bespoke policy intervention for promoting sustainability, especially in carbon-intensive industries. This research contributes to the understanding of how industrial and policy frameworks affect carbon efficiency and economic growth in different national contexts.


Keywords


corporate carbon emissions; GDP contribution; economic policy uncertainty; ESG reporting; sustainability

Full Text:

PDF


References


Ahsan, T., & Qureshi, M. A. (2021). The nexus between policy uncertainty, sustainability disclosure and firm performance. Applied Economics, 53(4), 441-453. Alandejani, M., & Al-Shaer, H. (2023). Macro uncertainty impacts on ESG performance and carbon emission reduction targets. Sustainability, 15(5), 4249. Albitar, K., Hussainey, K., Kolade, N., & Gerged, A. M. (2020). ESG disclosure and firm performance before and after IR: The moderating role of governance mechanisms. International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, 28(3), 429-444. Al-Thaqeb, S. A., & Algharabali, B. G. (2019). Economic policy uncertainty: A literature review. The Journal of Economic Asymmetries, 20, e00133. Anser, M. K., Apergis, N., & Syed, Q. R. (2021). Impact of economic policy uncertainty on CO 2 emissions: evidence from top ten carbon emitter countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 29369-29378. Baker, S. R., Bloom, N., & Davis, S. J. (2016). Measuring economic policy uncertainty. The quarterly journal of economics, 131(4), 1593-1636. Berg, F., Koelbel, J. F., & Rigobon, R. (2022). Aggregate confusion: The divergence of ESG ratings. Review of Finance, 26(6), 1315-1344. Buallay, A. (2019). Is sustainability reporting (ESG) associated with performance? Evidence from the European banking sector. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 30(1), 98-115. Carnini Pulino, S., Ciaburri, M., Magnanelli, B. S., & Nasta, L. (2022). Does ESG disclosure influence firm performance?. Sustainability, 14(13), 7595. Christensen, D. M., Serafeim, G., & Sikochi, A. (2022). Why is corporate virtue in the eye of the beholder? The case of ESG ratings. The Accounting Review, 97(1), 147-175. Cormier, D., & Magnan, M. (2015). The economic relevance of environmental disclosure and its impact on corporate legitimacy: An empirical investigation. Business Strategy and the Environment, 24(6), 431-450. Drobetz, W., El Ghoul, S., Guedhami, O., & Janzen, M. (2018). Policy uncertainty, investment, and the cost of capital. Journal of Financial Stability, 39, 28-45. Fatemi, A., Glaum, M., & Kaiser, S. (2018). ESG performance and firm value: The moderating role of disclosure. Global finance journal, 38, 45-64. Ferrero-Ferrero, I., Fernández-Izquierdo, M. Á., & Muñoz-Torres, M. J. (2016). The effect of environmental, social and governance consistency on economic results. Sustainability, 8(10), 1005. Jang, G. Y., Kang, H. G., Lee, J. Y., & Bae, K. (2020). ESG scores and the credit market. Sustainability, 12(8), 3456. Jiang, Y., Zhou, Z., & Liu, C. (2019). Does economic policy uncertainty matter for carbon emission? Evidence from US sector level data. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26, 24380-24394. Liu, M. (2022). Quantitative ESG disclosure and divergence of ESG ratings. Frontiers in psychology, 13, 936798. Porter, M. E., & Linde, C. V. D. (1995). Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. Journal of economic perspectives, 9(4), 97-118. Saini, N., & Singhania, M. (2019). Performance relevance of environmental and social disclosures: The role of foreign ownership. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 26(6), 1845-1873. Tajaddini, R., & Gholipour, H. F. (2021). Economic policy uncertainty, R&D expenditures and innovation outputs. Journal of Economic Studies, 48(2), 413-427. Vural‐Yavaş, Ç. (2021). Economic policy uncertainty, stakeholder engagement, and environmental, social, and governance practices: The moderating effect of competition. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(1), 82-102. Zhang, D., & Liu, L. (2022). Does ESG performance enhance financial flexibility? Evidence from China. Sustainability, 14(18), 11324. Zhang, K., Liu, X., & Wang, J. (2023). Exploring the relationship between corporate ESG information disclosure and audit fees: evidence from non-financial A-share listed companies in China. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 11, 1196728. Zhang, Y., Zhang, Y., & Sun, Z. (2023). The impact of carbon emission trading policy on enterprise ESG performance: evidence from China. Sustainability, 15(10), 8279.



DOI: https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd10615

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Author(s)

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.