Tomato is one of the major solanaceous vegetables, which has a unique place in the global vegetable market. Instead of being a high-value crop, there is still a need to do improvement in its potential against various biotic and abiotic stressors that adequately demolish its real yield. Alternaria solani (causing early blight disease) is designated as one of the fatal organisms that may reduce tomato crop yield by up to 80%. There were lots of methods, viz., chemical, cultural and biological suggested to overcome it. However, chemical strategies are much in vogue, but they have several negative consequences for human health and the ecosystem. Enlightening this issue, the efficacy of various treatments, viz., chemical fungicides (Amistar Top^®, Nativo^®, and Contaf^®), biochar and fungal bioagent (Trichoderma viride) was assessed under both in vivo and in vitro conditions. Induced resistance is mediated by several regulating pathways, like salicylic acid and jasmonic acid. These mediating pathways manipulate different physiological processes like growth and development, stress tolerance, and defence mechanisms of the plant. The assessment of results revealed that among all treatments biochar at 3.25% by weight consistently displayed remarkable effectiveness against the early blight infection by triggering resistance and improving the overall performance of tomato plants. This result is attributed to improved soil health, fastening mineralization as well as absorption processes, and boosting the plant’s immunity with the use of a higher concentration of biochar. Hence, it could be recommended for the overall improvement of tomato crop and its sustainability.

1. Bauchet G, Causse M. Genetic diversity in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) and its wild relatives. In: Caliskan M (editor). Genetic Diversity in Plants. Books on Demand; 2012. pp. 134–162.

2. Malherbe S, Marais D. Economics, yield and ecology: A case study from the South African tomato industry. Outlook on Agriculture 2015; 44(1): 37–47. doi: 10.5367/oa.2015.0195

3. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). World Food and Agriculture—Statistical Yearbook. FAO; 2021. doi: 10.4060/cb4477en

4. Nuwamanya AM, Runo S, Mwangi M. Farmers’ perceptions on tomato early blight, fungicide use factors and awareness of fungicide resistance: Insights from a field survey in Kenya. PLOS ONE 2023; 18(1): e0269035. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269035

5. Zhang LP, Khan A, Nino-Liu D, Foolad MR. A molecular linkage map of tomato displaying chromosomal locations of resistance gene analogs based on a Lycopersicon esculentum × Lycopersicon hirsutum cross. Genome 2002; 45(1): 133–146. doi: 10.1139/g01-124

6. Manda RR, Addanki VA, Srivastava S. Bacterial wilt of solanaceous crops. International Journal of Chemical Studies 2020; 8(6): 1048–1057. doi: 10.22271/chemi.2020.v8.i6o.10903

7. Ellis JB, Martin GB. Macrosporium solani E&M. American Naturalist 1982; 16: 1003.

8. Datar VV, Mayee CD. Assessment of losses in tomato yield due to early blight. Indian Phytopathology 1981; 34: 191–195.

9. Jones JP, Jones JP, Stall RE, Zitter TA. Compendium of Tomato Diseases. The American Phytopathological Society (APS) Press; 1991.

10. Kemmitt G. Early blight of potato and tomato. The Plant Health Instructor 2002. doi: 10.1094/PHI-I-2002-0809-01

11. Sherf AF, Macnab AA. Vegetable Diseases and Their Control. John Wiley & Sons; 1986.

12. Sinden SL, Obrien MJ, Goth RW. Effect of potato alkaloids on growth of Alternaria solani. American Potato Journal 1972; 49: 367.

13. Rotem J. The Genus Alternaria: Biology, Epidemiology, and Pathogenicity. The American Phtyopathological Society (APS) Press; 1994.

14. Foolad MR, Merk HL, Ashrafi H. Genetics, genomics and breeding of late blight and early blight resistance in tomato. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 2008; 27: 75–107. doi: 10.1080/07352680802147353

15. Chaerani R, Voorrips RE. Tomato early blight (Alternaria solani): The pathogen, genetics, and breeding for resistance. Journal of General Plant Pathology 2006; 72: 335–347. doi: 10.1007/s10327-006-0299-3

16. Adhikari P, Oh Y, Panthee DR. Current status of early blight resistance in tomato: An update. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2017; 18(10): 2019. doi: 10.3390/ijms18102019

17. Shahbazi H, Aminian H, Sahebani N, Halterman D. Effect of Alternaria solani exudates on resistance and susceptible potato cultivars from two different pathogen isolates. The Plant Pathology Journal 2011; 27(1): 14–19. doi: 10.5423/PPJ.2011.27.1.014

18. Chandrasekaran M, Chandrasekar R, Sa T, Sathiyabama M. Serine protease identification (in vitro) and molecular structure predictions (in silico) from a phytopathogenic fungus, Alternaria solani. Journal of Basic Microbiology 2014; 54(S1): S210–S218. doi: 10.1002/jobm.201300433

19. Chandrasekaran M, Thangavelu B, Chun SC, Sathiyabama M. Proteases from phytopathogenic fungi and their importance in phytopathogenicity. Journal of General Plant Pathology 2016; 82: 233–239. doi: 10.1007/s10327-016-0672-9

20. Kasahara K, Miyamoto T, Fujimoto T, et al. Solanapyrone synthase, a possible Diels-Alderase and iterative type I polyketide synthase encoded in a biosynthetic gene cluster from Alternaria solani. ChemBioChem 2010; 11(9): 1245–1252. doi: 10.1002/cbic.201000173

21. Holm AL, Rivera VV, Secor GA, Gudmestad NC. Temporal sensitivity of Alternaria solani to foliar fungicides. American Journal of Potato Research 2003; 80: 33–40. doi: 10.1007/BF02854554

22. Gondal AS, Ijaz M, Riaz K, Khan AR. Effect of different doses of fungicide (Mancozeb) against Alternaria leaf blight of tomato in Tunnel. Journal of Plant Pathology & Microbiology 2012; 3(3). doi: 10.4172/2157-7471.1000125

23. Pasche JS, Piche LM, Gudmestad NC. Effect of the F129L mutation in Alternaria solani on fungicides affecting mitochondrial respiration. Plant Disease 2005; 89(3): 269–278. doi: 10.1094/PD-89-0269

24. Mallik I, Arabiat S, Pasche JS, et al. Molecular characterization and detection of mutations associated with resistance to succinate dehydrogenase-inhibiting fungicides in Alternaria solani. Phytopathology 2014; 104(1): 40–49. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-02-13-0041-R

25. Singh N, Kumar A. A review on bio-char: A byproduct of bio-wastes. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 2020; 11: 1678–1691.

26. Elad Y, David DR, Harel YM, et al. Induction of systemic resistance in plants by bio-char, a soil-applied carbon sequestering agent. Phytopathology 2010; 100(9): 913–921. doi: 10.1094/phyto-100-9-0913

27. Elad Y, Cytryn E, Harel YM, et al. The biochar effect: Plant resistance to biotic stresses. Phytopathologia Mediterranea 2011; 50(3): 335–349.

28. Bonanomi G, Ippolito F, Scala F. A “black” future for plant pathology? Bio-char as a new soil amendment for controlling plant diseases. Journal of Plant Pathology 2015; 97(2): 223–234. doi: 10.4454/jpp.v97i2.3381

29. Anand T, Chandrasekaran A, Kuttalam S, Samiyappan R. Evaluation of azoxystrobin (Amistar 25 SC) against early leaf blight and leaf spot diseases of tomato. Journal of Agricultural Technology 2010; 6(3): 469–485.

30. Aslam HMU, Ikram A, Raza MM, et al. Efficacy of fungicides, botanicals and vitamins against early blight disease of tomato. International Journal of Biosciences 2018; 13(2): 138–146. doi: 10.12692/ijb/13.2.138-146

31. Dhaka S, Choudhary A. Efficacy of different fungicide against Alternaria solani caused early blight disease of tomato under in vitro condition. International Journal of Agriculture, Environment and Biotechnology 2022; 15(1): 61–65. doi: 10.30954/0974-1712.01.2022.7

32. Ivors KL, Louws FJ. North Carolina Agricultural Chemicals Manual. North Carolina State University; 2013.

33. Samuels GJ. Trichoderma: Systematics, the sexual state, and ecology. Phytopathology 2006; 96(2): 195–206. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-96-0195

34. Chet I. Trichoderma: Application, mode of action, and potential as a biocontrol agent of soilborne plant pathogenic fungi. In: Chet I (editor). Innovative Approaches to Plant Disease Control, 99th ed. Wiley-Interscience; 1987.

35. Chowdappa P, Kumar SPM, Lakshmi MJ, Upreti KK. Growth stimulation and induction of systemic resistance in tomato against early and late blight by Bacillus subtilis OTPB1 or Trichoderma harzianum OTPB3. Biological Control 2013; 65(1): 109–117. doi: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2012.11.009

36. Sarkar S, Beura SK, Nandi A, et al. Management of early blight of tomato (Alternaria solani Ellis and Martin) by chemicals and biocontrol agents under field condition. Journal of Mycopathological Research 2016; 54: 81–84.

37. Sreenivasulu R, Reddy MSP, Tomar DS, et al. Managing of early blight of tomato caused by Alternaria solani through fungicides and bioagents. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 2019; 8(6): 1442–1452. doi: 10.20546/ijcmas.2019.806.175

38. Bordenstein SR, Theis KR. Host biology in light of the microbiome: Ten principles of Holobionts and Hologenomes. PLoS Biology 2015; 13(8): e1002226. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002226

39. Vandenkoornhuyse P, Quaiser A, Duhamel M, et al. The importance of the microbiome of the plant holobiont. New Phytologist 2015; 206(4): 1196–1206. doi: 10.1111/nph.13312

40. Berg G, Rybakova D, Grube M, Köberl M. The plant microbiome explored: Implications for experimental botany. Journal of Experimental Botany 2016; 67(4): 995–1002. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erv466

41. Hjeljord L, Tronsmo A. Trichoderma and Gliocladium in biological control: An overview. In: Harman G, Kubicek C (editors). Trichoderma and Gliocladium: Enzymes, Biological Control and Commercial Application. CRC Press; 1998. Volume 2.

42. Bailey BA, Lumsden RD. Direct effects of Trichoderma and Gliocladium on plant growth and resistance to pathogens. In: Harman G, Kubicek C (editors). Trichoderma and Gliocladium: Enzymes, Biological Control and Commercial Application. CRC Press; 1998. Volume 2.

43. Van Loon LC, Bakker PAHM, Pieterse CMJ. Systemic resistance induced by rhizosphere bacteria. Annual Review of Phytopathology 1998; 36: 453–483. doi: 10.1146/annurev.phyto.36.1.453

44. Pieterse CMJ, Zamioudis C, Berendsen RL, et al. Induced systemic resistance by benefcial microbes. Annual Review of Phytopathology 2014; 52: 347–375. doi: 10.1146/annurev-phyto-082712-102340

45. Vlot AC, Dempsey DA, Klessig DF. Salicylic acid, a multifaceted hormone to combat disease. Annual Review of Phytopathology 2009; 47: 177–206. doi: 10.1146/annurev.phyto.050908.135202

46. Fu ZQ, Dong XN. Systemic acquired resistance: Turning local infection into global defense. Annual Review of Plant Biology 2013; 64: 839–863. doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-042811-105606

47. Walters DR, Ratsep J, Havis ND. Controlling crop diseases using induced resistance: Challenges for the future. Journal of Experimental Botany 2013; 64(5): 1263–1280. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ert026

48. Rangaswamy G, Mahadevan A. Diseases of vegetables. In: Rangaswamy G, Mahadevan A (editors). Disease of Crop Plants in India, 4th ed. Prentice Hall of India Pvt. Ltd.; 1998. pp. 286–334.

49. Barnett HL, Hunter BB. Illustrated Genera of Imperfect Fungi, 3rd ed. Burgess Publishing Company; 1972.

50. Sivakumar T, Ravikumar M. A Manual of Marine and Mangrove Fungi, 1st ed. Darshan Publishers; 2021.

51. Herman R, Perl-Treves R. Characterization and inheritance of a new source of resistance to Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. melonis race 1.2 in Cucumis melo. Plant Disease 2007; 91(9): 1180–1186. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-91-9-1180

52. Karimi R, Owuoche JO, Silim SN. Inheritance of fusarium wilt resistance in pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millspaugh]. Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding 2010; 70(3): 271–276.

53. Sharma RL, Ahir RR, Sharma A, et al. Management of Alternaria blight (Alternaria alternata) of tomato through novel combined formulations of fungicides. Research Square 2022. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-2079637/v1

54. Nene YL, Thapliyal PN. Fungicides in Plant Disease Control, 2nd ed. Oxford & IBH Publishing Company; 1979.

55. Morton DT, Stroube NH. Antagonistic and stimulatory effects of microorganisms upon Sclerotium rolfsci. Phytopathology 1955; 45: 419–420.

56. Hossain MT, Hossain SMM, Bakr MK, et al. Survey on major diseases of vegetable and fruit crops in Chittagong region. Bangladesh Journal of Agricultural Research 2010; 35(3): 423−429. doi: 10.3329/bjar.v35i3.6449

57. American Public Health Association (APHA). Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 23rd ed. American Water Works Association; 2017.

58. Carter MR, Gregorich EG. Soil Sampling and Methods of Analysis, 2nd ed. CRC Press; 2007.

59. Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall R. Protein measurement with the folin phenol reagent. Journal of Biology and Chemistry 1951; 193(1): 265–275. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)52451-6

60. Bray HG, Thorpe WV. Analysis of phenolic compounds of interest in metabolism. In: Glick D (editor). Methods of Biochemical Analysis. Interscience Publishers Inc.; 1954. Volume 1. pp. 27–52. doi: 10.1002/9780470110171.ch2

61. Rasool M, Akhter A, Soja G, Haider MS. Role of biochar, compost and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria in the management of tomato early blight disease. Scientific Reports 2021; 11: 6092. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-85633-4

62. Luigi M, Ariana Manglli A, Dragone I, et al. Effects of biochar on the growth and development of tomato seedlings and on the response of tomato plants to the infection of systemic viral agents. Frontiers in Microbiology 2022; 13: 862075. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.862075

63. Harel YM, Elad Y, Rav-David D, et al. Biochar mediates systemic response of strawberry to foliar fungal pathogens. Plant and Soil 2012; 357: 245–257. doi: 10.1007/s11104-012-1129-3

64. Bonanomi G, Lorito M, Vinale F, Woo SL. Organic amendments, beneficial microbes, and soil microbiota: Toward a unified framework for disease suppression. Annual Review of Phytopathology 2018; 56: 1–20. doi: 10.1146/annurev-phyto-080615-100046

65. Guo X, Liu H, Zhang J. The role of biochar in organic waste composting and soil improvement: A review. Waste Management 2020: 102: 884–899. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2019.12.003

66. Ali MH, Khan MI, Bashir S, et al. Biochar and Bacillus sp. MN54 assisted phytoremediation of diesel and plant growth promotion of maize in hydrocarbons contaminated soil. Agronomy 2021; 11(9): 1795. doi: 10.3390/agronomy11091795

67. Ud Din MM, Khan MI, Azam M, et al. Effect of biochar and compost addition on mitigating salinity stress and improving fruit quality of tomato. Agronomy 2023; 13(9): 2197. doi: 10.3390/agronomy13092197

68. Cao Y, Gao Y, Li J, Tian Y. Straw composts, gypsum and their mixtures enhance tomato yields under continuous saline water irrigation. Agricultural Water Management 2019; 223: 105721. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2019.105721

69. Hameeda, Gul S, Bano G, et al. Biochar and manure influences tomato fruit yield, heavy metal accumulation and concentration of soil nutrients under wastewater irrigation in arid climatic conditions. Cogent Food and Agriculture 2019; 5(1): 1576406. doi: 10.1080/23311932.2019.1576406