The effects of climate change are already being felt, including the failure to harvest several agricultural products. On the other hand, peatland requires good management because it is a high carbon store and is vulnerable as a contributor to high emissions if it catches fire. This study aims to determine the potential for livelihood options through land management with an agroforestry pattern in peatlands. The methods used are field observation and in-depth interviews. The research location is in Kuburaya Regency, West Kalimantan, Indonesia. Several land use scenarios are presented using additional secondary data. The results show that agroforestry provides more livelihood options than monoculture farming or wood. The economic contribution is very important so that people reduce slash-and-burn activities that can increase carbon emissions and threaten the sustainability of peatland.

1. Adamo N, Al-Ansari N, Sissakian V. Review of climate change impacts on human environment: Past, present and future projections. Engineering 2021; 13(11): 605–630. doi: 10.4236/eng.2021.1311044.

2. Mimura N. Overview of climate change impacts. Climate change and global sustainability. New York: United Nations; 2013. pp. 46–57.

3. Oaks SD, Kates RW, Ausubel JH, Berberian M. Review of climate impact assessment: Studies of the interaction of climate and society. The Jour-nal of Interdisciplinary History 1986; 18(1): 127. doi: 10.2307/204731.

4. Harenda KM, Lamentowicz M, Samson M, Cho-jnicki BH. The role of peatlands and their carbon storage function in the context of climate change. In: Zielinski T, Sagan I, Surosz W (editors). Inter-disciplinary approaches for sustainable develop-ment goals. Cham: Springer, Cham; 2018. p. 169–187.

5. Peat and Mangrove Restoration Agency of Indo-nesia. Holds media briefing, BRGM invites all parties to successfully accelerate mangrove reha-bilitation and peat restoration (Indonesian) [In-ternet]. Available from: https://Brgm.Go.Id/Siaranpers/Gelar-Media-Briefing-Brgm-Ajak-Semua-Pihak-Sukseskan-Percepatan-Rehabilitasi-Mangrove-Dan-Restorasi-Gambut/.

6. Mubekti M. Territorialization study for sustaina-ble peatland management in Riau province (In-donesian). Jurnal Sains Dan Teknologi Indonesia 2013; 13(2). doi: 10.29122/jsti.v13i2.883.

7. Osaki M, Nursyamsi D, Noor M, et al. Peatland in Indonesia. In: Osaki M, Tsuji N (editors). Tropical peatland ecosystems. Pune: Springer; 2016. p. 49–58.

8. Melano RKS. This is the target of peatland resto-ration in West Kalimantan (Indonesian) [Internet]. 2017. Available from: http://Pontianak.Tribunnews.Com/2017/01/12/Inilah-Target-Restorasi-Lahan-Gambut-Di-Kalbar.

9. Qodriyatun SN. Forest and land fire handling policy (Indonesian) [Internet]. Available from: https://berkas.dpr.go.id/puslit/files/info_singkat/Info%20Singkat-VI-6-II-P3DI-Maret-2014-19.pdf.

10. Badan Pusat Statistik. Size of large plantation crops by crop type 2019–2021 (Indonesian) [In-ternet]. Jakarta: Badan Pusat Statistik. Available from: https://www.bps.go.id/indicator/54/1847/1/luas-tana-man-perkebunan-besar-menurut-jenis-tanaman.html.

11. Martin E, Winarno B. The role of stakeholders in peat land utilization: Case study in Ogan Ko-mering Ilir Regency, South Sumatra (Indonesian). Jurnal Analisis Kebijakan Kehutanan 2010; 7(2): 81–95.

12. Wibisono ITC, Siboro L, Suryadiputra INN. Guide to rehabilitation and silviculture tech-niques on peatlands (Indonesian) [Internet]. Available from: https://indonesia.wetlands.org/id/publikasi/panduan-rehabilitasi-dan-teknik-silvikultur-di-lahan-gambut/.

13. Juergenliemk A, Biancalani R, Salvatore M, et al. Towards climate-responsible peatlands manage-ment. Rome: FAO; 2014.

14. Tata HL, Susmianto A. Paludiculture prospects in Indonesia’s peatland ecosystem (Indonesian) [In-ternet]. Available from: https://indonesia.wetlands.org/id/publikasi/prospek-paludikultur-di-ekositem-gambut-indonesia/.

15. Sabarnurdin S, Budiadi SP. Agroforestry for In-donesia: Forest conservation and prosperity strategy. Jawa Barat: Cakrawala Media; 2011.

16. Dohong A, Aziz AA, Dargusch P. A review of the drivers of tropical peatland degradation in South-East Asia. Land Use Policy 2017; 69: 349–360. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.09.035.

17. Bappeda Kabupaten Kubu Raya. Kubu Raya Re-gency in 2015 figures (Indonesian). Sungai Raya: BPS Kabupaten Kubu Raya; 2015.

18. Sanudin, Fauziyah E, Widyaningsih TS, et al. Role of actors in promoting sustainable peatland management in Kubu Raya Regency, West Kali-mantan, Indonesia. Open Agriculture 2023; 8: 1. doi: 10.1515/opag-2022-0198/.

19. Tim Sintesis Kebijakan. Utilization and conser-vation of peatland ecosystems in Kalimantan (Indonesian). Pengembangan Inovasi Pertanian 2008; 1(2): 149–156.

20. Balai Penelitian dan Pengembangan Teknologi Agroforestry. Paludiculture implementation and agroforestry. Jawa Barat: Balai Penelitian dan Pengembangan Teknologi Agroforestry; 2017; Unpublished work.

21. Setiadi D. The source of tengkawang (Shorea spp.) seeds for conservation and the surrounding forest community’s commodity (Indonesian) [Internet]. Available from: https://proceedings.ums.ac.id/index.php/snpbs/article/view/724.

22. Harahap BR, Ardian, Yoseva S. Sago palm culti-vation studies (Metroxylon Spp.) people in Tebing Tinggi Subdistrict West Meranti Islands district. JOM Faperta 2017; 4(1): 1–14.

23. Tresniawati C, Izzah NK, Wicaksono INA, et al. Plant characters determinant that influence the yield of candlenut [Aleurites moluccana (L.) Willd.] (Indonesian). Jurnal Tanaman Industri Dan Penyegar 2019; 6(3): 127. doi: 10.21082/jtidp.v6n3.2019.p127-134.

24. Hayata H, Nursanti I, Kriswibowo P. Effect of dif-ferent planting distances on the growth and pro-duction of oil palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq) (In-donesian). Jurnal Media Pertanian 2020; 5(1): 22. doi: 10.33087/jagro.v5i1.92.

25. Sahuri. Improving planting pattern of rubber (Hevea brasiliensis Muell. Arg.) for long-term in-tercropping. Jurnal Ilmu Pertanian Indonesia 2017; 22(1): 46–51. doi: 10.18343/jipi.22.1.46.

26. Wahyudi S. Growth of Jelutung rawa (Diera lowii) at the Peat Swamp Land in Pulang Pisau District, Cetral Kalimantan. Jurnal Hutan Tropika (Tropi-cal Forest Journal) 2019; 14(2): 99–107.

27. Vebri O, Dibah F, Yani A. Associations and dis-tribution patterns of Tengkawang (Shorea Spp) in Tembawang forest, Nan-gayen Village, Hulu Gurung District, Kapuas Hulu Regency (Indone-sian). Jurnal Hutan Lestari 2014; 5: 704–713.

28. Hadiyan Y, Muslimin I, Sofyan A, et al. Initiation of gelam (Melaleuca cajuputy subsp. cumingiana) genetic resources conservation in South Sumatra. Pros Sem Nas Masy Biodiv Indon 2019; 5(2). doi: 10.13057/psnmbi/m0502xx.

29. Sofiani IH, Ulfiah K, Fitriyanie L. Rubber tree (Hevea brasiliensis) cultivation in Indonesia and its economic study (Indonesian) [Internet]. Available from: https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/90336.html.

30. Badan Pusat Statistik. Size of large plantation crops by crop type 2019–2021 (Indonesian) [In-ternet]. Jakarta: Badan Pusat Statistik. Available from: https://www.bps.go.id/indicator/54/1847/1/luas-tana-man-perkebunan-besar-menurut-jenis-tanaman.html.

31. Fitra SJ, Prijono S, Maswar M. Effect of peatland fertilization on soil characteristics, CO2 emissions, and rubber plant productivity (Indonesian). Jurnal Tanah Dan Sumberdaya Lahan 2019; 6(1): 1145–1156. doi: 10.21776/ub.jtsl.2019.006.1.13.

32. Nugraha IS, Alamsyah A. Factors influencing income levels of rubber farmers in Sako Suban village, Batang Hari Leko sub-district, South Sumatra (Indonesian). Jurnal Ilmu Pertanian In-donesia 2019; 24(2): 93–100. doi: 10.18343/jipi.24.2.93.

33. Hamid M. Sago development strategy in Meranti regency (Indonesian). Jurnal Industri Dan Perkotaan 2022; 18(2): 54–62. doi: 10.31258/jeep.18.2.54-62.

34. Afentina A, Yanarita Y, Indrayanti L, et al. The potential of agroforestry in supporting food secu-rity for peatland community—A case study in the Kalampangan village, central Kalimantan. Jour-nal of Ecological Engineering 2021; 22(8): 123–130. doi: 10.12911/22998993/140260.

35. Harun MK. Jelutung sap as a leading non-timber forest product in peatlands (Indonesian). Jurnal Penelitian Sosial Dan Ekonomi Kehutanan 2015; 12(1): 291–321.

36. Tata HL. Genetic diversity in peatland restoration: A case of Jelutung. In: Mizuno K, Kozan O, Gunawan H (editors). Vulnerability and transfor-mation of Indonesian peatlands. Pune: Springer; 2023. p. 185–195.

37. Aminah A, Supriyanto, Siregar IZ, Suryani A. Genetic diversity of Pongamia pinnata (Millettia pinnata, aka. Malapari) populations in Java Is-land, Indonesia. Biodiversitas 2017; 18(2): 677–681. doi: 10.13057/biodiv/d180233.

38. Leksono B, Hakim L. Diversity of vegetable fat content of Tengkawang-producing Shorea spe-cies from several provenances and land races (Indonesian). Jurnal Ilmu Kehutanan 2018; 12(2): 212–222. doi: 10.22146/jik.40155.

39. Maharani RH. Tengkawang tree species identifi-cation guide (Indonesian). Samarinda: Balai Be-sar Peneltian Dipterokarpa; 2013.

40. Directorate General of Plantations. National leading plantation statistics 2019–2021 (Indone-sian) [Internet]. Available from: https://repository.polteklpp.ac.id/id/eprint/4076/.

41. Nasrul B, Hamzah A, Nedi S. Sustainable oil palm plantation management model on peatland in Riau province (Indonesian). Jurnal Agroteknolo-gi Tropika 2012; 1(1): 8–13.

42. Purnamayani R, Dariah A, Syahbuddin H, et al. Best practices for water management of oil palm plantations on peatland (Indonesian). Jurnal Sumberdaya Lahan 2022; 16(1): 9–21. doi: 10.21082/jsdl.v16n1.2022.9-21.

43. Yuniati D, Nurrochmat DR, Anwar S, Darwo D. Determining rehabilitation patterns for recovery of Sungai Bram Itam Peatland protected forest ecosystem functions Tanjung Jabung Barat dis-trict, Jambi province (Indonesian). Jurnal Penelitian Hutan Tanaman 2018; 15(2): 67–85. doi: 10.20886/jpht.2018.15.2.67-85.

44. Hairani A, Noor M. Water management on peat-land for food crop and horticulture production: Research review in Kalimantan. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 2020; 499(1): 012006. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/499/1/012006.

45. Umami M, Sari ENN. The importance of Palu-diculture-based agroforestry in peatlands (Indo-nesian) [Internet]. 2021. Available from: https://Wri-Indonesia.Org/En/Insights/Importance-Paludiculture-Based-Agroforestry-Peatlands.

46. Rotinsulu J, Afentina A, Yanarita Y, et al. Finding strategies for peatland rehabilitation; agroforestry systems on various types of peat depth in three villages in central Kalimantan. Journal of Eco-logical Engineering 2022; 23(2): 150–158. doi: 10.12911/22998993/144422.

47. Jaya A, Sosilawaty, Antang EU, et al. Agroforest-ry farming system as peatland restoration efforts in Central Kalimantan, Indonesia. IOP Confer-ence Series: Earth and Environmental Science 2021; 694(1): 012016. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/694/1/012016.

48. Tata HL. Mixed farming systems on peatlands in Jambi and Central Kalimantan provinces, Indo-nesia: Should they be described as paludiculture? Mires and Peat 2019; 25(8): 1–17. doi: 10.19189/MaP.2018.KHR.360.

49. Harni R, Taufiq E, Martono B. Resistance of Li-berica coffee parent trees to leaf rust disease (Hemileia vastatrix B. Et Br.) in Meranti Islands (Indonesian). Jurnal Tanaman Industri Dan Penyegar 2015; 2(1): 35. doi: 10.21082/jtidp.v2n1.2015.p35-42.

50. Nugraha D. Cultivation of Liberika coffee (Coffea Liberica var Liberica) in West Tanjung Jabung regency. Warta Pusat Penelitian Kopi Dan Kakao Indonesia 2015; 27(1): 1–8.

51. Budiningsih K, Effendi R. Financial analysis of Dyera polyphylla plantation in Central Kaliman-tan. Jurnal Penelitian Hutan Tanaman 2013; 10(1): 17–23. doi: 10.20886/jpht.2013.10.1.17-23.

52. Tata HL, Bastono, Sofiyuddin M, et al. Jelutung Swamp: Cultivation techniques and economic prospects (Indonesian). Nairobi: World Agrofor-estry Centre; 2015.

53. Annisa W, Susilawati A, Fahmi A, et al. Potential of agroforestry system on peat land to enhance food security and environmental sustainability. E3S Web of Conferences 2021; 305: 05005. doi: 10.1051/e3sconf/202130505005.

54. Lestari Y, Mukhlis. Peatland water conservation by agroforestry system. E3S Web of Conferences 2021; 305: 03004. doi: 10.1051/e3sconf/202130503004.

55. Wahyunto W, Supriatna W, Agus F. Land use change and recommendation for sustainable de-velopment of peatland for agriculture: Case study at Kubu Raya and Pontianak districts, West Ka-limantan. Indonesian Journal of Agricultural Science 2010; 11(1): 32–40. doi: 10.21082/ijas.v11n1.2010.p32-40.

56. Lestari S, Winarno B. Development of agrofor-estry products in supporting peatland restoration and food security: A lesson from South Sumatra, Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and En-vironmental Science 2022; 1107: 012095. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/1107/1/012095