In marginalized ecosystem-dependent rural communities, access to ecosystem services plays a crucial role in achieving sustainable livelihoods. This study was conducted to find out the influence of various livelihood capital components on the access mechanism for forest-based Provisioning Services (PS) in some selected villages of the Gosaba Block on the fringes of the Sundarban. The contribution of the livelihood capitals to gain access to Provisioning Services (PS) was identified using factor analysis on 160 households, selected through cluster random sampling. The sustainability levels of livelihood capitals were analyzed using the Prescott-Allen method (2001). The natural, financial, social, and physical capitals were significantly below average, while the human capital was close to average. Enhancement of human, physical, financial, and social capital, ease in issuing Biometric Fisherman cards for entering forests, flexibility in borrowing loans, and ecotourism by involving local villagers must be encouraged to enhance forest-based provisioning services in the near future.

1. Chambers R, Conway G. Sustainable Rural Livelihoods: Practical Concepts for the 21st Century. Institute of Development Studies; 1992.

2. Serrat O. The sustainable livelihoods approach. In: Knowledge Solutions. Springer Singapore; 2008.

3. UN. General Assembly. Programme for the further implementation of agenda 21: Resolution/adopted by the general assembly; 23–27 June 1997; New York, USA.

4. Tavakoli M, Ahmadi S, Fazelniya G. Analysis of factors affecting rural livelihoods (the case study: Villages of Sardasht township). Journal of Geography and Planning 2017; 58: 63–81.

5. Jiao X, Pouliot M, Walelign SZ. Livelihood strategies and dynamics in rural cambodia. World Development 2017; 97: 266–278. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.04.019

6. Kelly PM, Adger WN. Theory and practice in assessing vulnerability to climate change and facilitating adaptation. Climatic Change 2000; 47: 325–352. doi: 10.1023/A:1005627828199

7. International Institute for Sustainable Development, International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources, Stockholm Environment Institute. Livelihoods and Climate Change: Combining disaster risk reduction, natural resource management and climate change adaptation in a new approach to the reduction of vulnerability and poverty. International Institute for Sustainable Development; 2003.

8. Scoones I. Climate change and the challenge of non-equilibrium thinking. IDS Bulletin 2004; 35: 11–15. doi: 10.190881968-2020.116

9. Weldegebrial Gebru G, Beyene F. Rural household livelihood strategies in drought-prone areas: A case of Gulomekeda District, eastern zone of Tigray National Regional State, Ethiopia. Journal of Development and Agricultural Economics 2012; 4(6): 158–168. doi: 10.5897/JDAE12.126

10. Knutsson P, Ostwald M. A process-oriented sustainable livelihoods approach—A tool for increased understanding of vulnerability, adaptation and resilience. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 2006; 28: 1–20. doi: 10.1007/s11027-006-4421-9

11. Pindyck RS, Rubinfeld DL. Microeconomics. Prentice Hall International; 2001.

12. Scoones I. Sustainable Rural Livelihoods: A Framework for Analysis. Institute of Development Studies; 1998.

13. Barimani F, Rasti H, Raisi A, Mohammadzadeh M. Analyzing the geographical factors affecting household livelihood in rural settlements (case study in QasrGhand city). Journal of Geography and Urban-Regional Projecting 2016; 6(18): 85–96.

14. Dehghani Pour M, Barati AA, Azadi H, Scheffran J. Revealing the role of livelihood assets in livelihood strategies: Towards enhancing conservation and livelihood development in the Hara Biosphere Reserve, Iran. Ecological Indicators 2018; 94: 336–347. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.05.074

15. Forouzani M, Yazdanpanah M, Taheri F. Analyzing the factors affecting optimal management of saline water by application of sustainable livelihoods framework. Rural Development Strategies 2017; 3(3): 317–334. doi: 10.22048/rdsj.2017.36638.1455

16. Udoh EJ, Akpan SB, Uko EF. Assessment of sustainable livelihood assets of farming households in Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria. Journal of Sustainable Development 2017; 10(4): 83–96. doi: 10.5539/jsd.v10n4p83

17. Nourozi M, Hayati D. Factors affecting sustainable rural livelihoods as perceived by farmers in Kermanshah province. Iranian Agricultural Extension and Education Journal 2015; 11(1): 127–143.

18. Adams WM. The value of valuing nature. Science 2014; 346(6209): 549–551.

19. Redford KH, Adams WM. Payment for ecosystem services and the challenge of saving nature. Conservation Biology 2009; 23(4): 785–787. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01271.x

20. Ribot JC, Peluso NL. A theory of access*. Rural Sociology 2003; 68(2): 153–181. doi: 10.1111/j.1549-0831.2003.tb00133.x

21. Beitl CM. Shifting policies, access, and the tragedy of enclosures in Ecuadorian mangrove fisheries: Towards a political ecology of the commons. Journal of Political Ecology 2012; 19(1): 94–113. doi: 10.2458/v19i1.21719

22. Ribot J. Authority over forests: Empowerment and subordination in Senegal’s democratic decentralization. Development and Change 2009; 40: 105–129. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7660.2009.01507.x

23. Chen H, Zhu T, Krott M, et al. Measurement and evaluation of livelihood assets in sustainable forest commons governance. Land Use Policy 2013; 30(1): 908–914. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.06.009

24. Kibria ASMG, Costanza R, Groves C, Behie AM. The interactions between livelihood capitals and access of local communities to the forest provisioning services of the Sundarbans Mangrove Forest, Bangladesh. Ecosystem Services 2018; 32: 41–49. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.05.003

25. Robertson AI, Duke NC. Recruitment, growth and residence time of fishes in a tropical Australian mangrove system. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 1990; 31(5): 723–743. doi: 10.1016/0272-7714(90)90022-J

26. Ogden JC. Ecosystem interactions in the tropical coastal seascape. In: Birkeland C. (editor). Life and Death of Coral Reefs. Springer; 1997. pp. 288–297.

27. Crona BI, Ronnback P. Community structure and temporal variability of juvenile fish assemblages in natural and replanted mangroves, Sonneratia alba Sm., of Gazi Bay, Kenya. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 2007; 74(1–2): 44–52. doi: 10.1016/j.ecss.2007.03.023

28. Mandal RN, Das CS, Naskar KR. Dwindling Indian Sundarban mangrove: The way out. Scientific Culture 2010; 76(7–8): 275–282.

29. Pramanik SK, Nandi NC. Socio economic status and dependency ratio of the rural population on the fishery resources of Sundarbans mangal. In: Guha-Bakshi DN, Sanyal P, Naskar KR (editors). Sundarbans Mangal. Naya Prakash; 1999. pp. 707–711.

30. Das CS, Mandal RN. Coastal people and mangroves ecosystem resources vis-à-vis management strategies in Indian Sundarban. Ocean & Coastal Management 2016; 134: 1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2016.09.025

31. Costanza R, de Groot R, Sutton P, et al. Changes in the global value of ecosystem services. Global Environmental Change 2014; 26: 152–158. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.002

32. Fisher JA, Patenaude G, Giri K, et al. Understanding the relationships between ecosystem services and poverty alleviation: A conceptual framework. Ecosystem Services 2014; 7: 34–45. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.08.002

33. Bhandari PB. Rural livelihood change? Household capital, community resources and livelihood transition. Journal of Rural Studies 2013; 32: 126–136. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2013.05.001

34. Kibria ASMG, Jashimuddin M, Makoto I. Effects of participatory forest management on livelihood capitals of the community in Cox’s Bazar, Bangladesh. Journal of Forest Research 2014; 19: 42–51. doi: 10.1007/s10310-013-0403-4

35. Rakodi C. A capital assets framework for analysing household livelihood strategies: Implications for policy. Development Policy Review 1999; 17: 315–342. doi: 10.1111/1467-7679.00090

36. Wunder S. Poverty alleviation and tropical forests—What scope for synergies? World Development 2001; 29(11): 1817–1833. doi: 10.1016/S0305-750X(01)00070-5

37. Angelsen A, Jagger P, Babigumira R, et al. Environmental income and rural livelihoods: A global-comparative analysis. World Development 2014; 64(Supplement 1): S12–S28. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.03.006

38. Naidu SC. Access to benefits from forest commons in the Western Himalayas. Ecological Economics 2011; 71: 202–210. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.09.007

39. Vedeld P, Angelsen A, Bojö J, et al. Forest environmental incomes and the rural poor. Forest Policy and Economics 2007; 9(7): 869–879. doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2006.05.008

40. Berbés-Blázquez M, Bunch MJ, Mulvihill PR, et al. Understanding how access shapes the transformation of ecosystem services to human well-being with an example from Costa Rica. Ecosystem Services 2017; 28: 320–327. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.09.010

41. Hicks CC, Cinner JE. Social, institutional, and knowledge mechanisms mediate diverse ecosystem service benefits from coral reefs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2014; 111(50): 17791–17796. doi:10.1073/pnas.1413473111

42. Lakerveld RP, Lele S, Crane TA, et al. The social distribution of provisioning forest ecosystem services: Evidence and insights from Odisha, India. Ecosystem Services 2015; 14: 56–66. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.04.001

43. Wieland R, Ravensbergen S, Gregr EJ, et al. Debunking trickle-down ecosystem services: The fallacy of omnipotent, homogeneous beneficiaries. Ecological Economics 2016; 121: 175–180. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.11.007

44. Cinner JE, Daw T, McClanahan TR. Socioeconomic factors that affect artisanal fishers’ readiness to exit a declining fishery. Conservation Biology 2009; 23(1): 124–130. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01041.x

45. Hua X, Yan J, Zhang Y. Evaluating the role of livelihood assets in suitable livelihood strategies: Protocol for anti-poverty policy in the Eastern Tibetan Plateau, China. Ecological Indicators 2017; 78: 62–74. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.03.009

46. Liu Z, Liu L. Characteristics and driving factors of rural livelihood transition in the east coastal region of China: A case study of suburban Shanghai. Journal of Rural Studies 2016; 43: 145–158. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.12.008

47. Ghosh S, Mistri B. Geo-historical appraisal of embankment breaching and its management on active tidal land of Sundarban: A case study in Gosaba Island, South 24 Parganas, West Bengal. Space and Culture, India 2020; 7(4): 166–180. doi: 10.20896/saci.v7i4.587

48. Census. Complete village directoy. Available online: https://data.gov.in/Catalog/Complete-Villages-directory-indiastatedistrictsub-district-level-Census2011/ (accessed on 17 December 2018).

49. Abdullah ANM, Stacey N, Garnett ST, Myers B. Economic dependence on mangrove forest resources for livelihoods in the Sundarbans, Bangladesh. Forest Policy and Economics 2016; 64: 15–24. doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2015.12.009

50. Craney TA, Surles JG. Model-dependent variance inflation factor cutoff values. Quality Engineering 2002; 14(3): 391–403. doi: 10.1081/QEN-120001878

51. Rogerson PA. Statistical Methods for Geography. SAGE Publications Ltd; 2001.

52. Slinker BK, Glantz SA. Multiple regression for physiological data analysis: The problem of multicollinearity. American Journal of Physiology. Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology 1985; 249: R1–R12. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.1985.249.1.R1

53. Vu DH, Muttaqi KM, Agalgaonkar AP. A variance inflation factor and backward elimination based robust regression model for forecasting monthly electricity demand using climatic variables. Applied Energy 2015; 140: 385–394. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.12.011

54. Gunter TD. Four methods for combining dependent effects from studies reporting regression analysis. Available online: http://purl.flvc.org/fsu/fd/FSU_2015fall_Gunter_fsu_0071E_12829 (accessed on 1 September 2023).

55. Hedges LV, Olkin I. Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis. Academic Press; 2014.

56. Song MK, Lin FC, Ward SE, Fine JP. Composite variables: When and how. Nursing Research 2013; 62: 45–49. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0b013e3182741948

57. RoknodinEftekhari AR, Mahdavi D, Pour Taheri M. Sustainability assessment of tourism in cultural-historical villages of Iran with an emphasis on sustainable tourism development paradigm. Tourism Management Studies 2011; 5(14): 1–39.

58. Hajra R, Ghosh A, Ghosh T. Micro level vulnerability assessment of Estuarine islands: A case study from Indian Sundarban. In: Babel M, Haarstrick A, Ribbe L, et al. (editors). Water Security in Asia. Springer Cham; 2021. pp. 135–153.

59. Santiphop T, Shrestha RP, Hazarika MK. An analysis of factors affecting agricultural land use patterns and livelihood strategies of farm households in Kanchanaburi province, Thailand. Journal of Land Use Science 2011; 7(3): 331–348. doi: 10.1080/1747423X.2011.587208

60. Cherni JA, Hill Y. Energy and policy providing for sustainable rural livelihoods in remote locations—The case of Cuba. Geoforum 2009; 40(4): 645–654. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2009.04.001

61. Pandey R, Jha SK, Alatalo JM, et al. Sustainable livelihood framework-based indicators for assessing climate change vulnerability and adaptation for Himalayan communities. Ecological Indicators 2017; 79: 338–346. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.03.047

62. Ghosh P. Subsistence and Biodiversity Conservation in the Sundarban Biosphere Reserve, West Bengal, India [PhD thesis]. University of Kentucky; 2014.

63. Danda AA. Surviving in the Sundarbans: Threats and Responses—An Analytical Description of Life in an Indian Riparian Commons [PhD thesis]. University of Twente; 2007.

64. Jalais A. Forest of Tigers: People, Politics and Environment in the Sundarbans. Routledge; 2010.

65. Ghosh A. Sustainability Conflicts in Coastal India: Hazards, Changing Climate and Development Discourses in the Sundarbans. Springer International Publishing; 2017.

66. Das S. Socio-economic and livelihood vulnerability in view of climate resilience: A case study of selected blocks of Sundarban, India. In: Chatterjee U, Shaw R, Bhunia GS, et al. (editors). Climate Change, Community Response and Resilience. Elsevier; 2023. Volume 6. pp. 57–72.

67. Tschakert P. From impacts to embodied experiences: Tracing political ecology in climate change research. Geografisk Tidsskrift-Danish Journal of Geography 2012; 112: 144–158. doi: 10.1080/00167223.2012.741889

68. Das CS. Tiger straying incidents in Indian Sundarban: Statistical analysis of case studies as well as depredation caused by conflict. European Journal of Wildlife Research 2012; 58(1): 205–214. doi: 10.1007/s10344-011-0565-3

69. Matta JR. Rebuilding rural India: Potential for further investments in forestry and green jobs. Unasylva 2009; 233(60): 36–41.

70. Chaturvedi RK, Kattumuri R, Ravindranath D. Mainstreaming adaptation to climate change in Indian policy planning. International Journal of Applied Economics and Econometrics 2014; 22(1): 23–56.

71. Rudra K. Changing river courses in the western part of the Ganga-Brahmaputra delta. Geomorphology 2014; 227: 87–100. doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2014.05.013

72. Barua P, Chakraborty S, Das J, Sen S. Fishing industry and fisher folk existence through microcredit services for India and Bangladesh. Bangladesh Research Publications Journal 2012; 7(1): 36–45.

73. Pretty J, Smith D. Social capital in biodiversity conservation and management. Conservation Biology 2004; 18(3): 631–638. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00126.x

74. D’Souza R. Capitalism’s ecological crisis. Available online: http://www.india-seminar.com/2002/516/516%20rohan%20d'souza.htm (accessed on 1 September 2023).