Analysis of the synergistic mechanism of forest eco-economic system

Guangju Wang, Hongyi Ruan, Jianzhou Yang

Article ID: 1625
Vol 5, Issue 2, 2022, Article identifier:18-27

VIEWS - 248 (Abstract) 103 (PDF)


Based on the collective forest with common use rights, the social-ecological system analysis framework and autonomous governance theory proposed by Elinor Ostrom are introduced in the forest eco-economic system to analyze the interaction logic among the first-level subsystems and the secondary variables of the forest eco-economic system and the variables related to the autonomous governance of the system to explore the synergistic mechanisms affecting the forest eco-economic system. The results show that: in the case of information asymmetry, collective actions of governmental and non-governmental organizations will aggravate the dilemma of forest eco-economic synergistic development; actors extract forest resource units from the forest resource system to achieve economic benefits; and renewable resources of forest ecosystems can be sustained in the long term when the average extraction rate of humans from forest ecosystems does not exceed the average replenishment rate.


Forest Eco-economic System; Sustainability; Autonomous Governance; Interaction Analysis

Full Text:



Zhang J. Discuss on the harmony development of the forest ecology and economy. Forestry Economic Issues 2002; 22(6): 311–312, 326.

Norgaard RB. Herman Daly Edward Elgar ecological economics and sustainable development: Selected Essays of Herman Daly. Ecological Economics 2008; 67(3): 514–515.

Costanza R. Ecosystem services: Multiple classification systems are needed. Biological Conservation 2008; 141(2): 350–352.

Kolinjivadi V, Charre S, Adamowski J, et al. Economic experiments for collective action in the Kyrgyz Republic: Lessons for payments for ecosystem services. Ecological Economics 2016; 6(29): 1–10.

Ostrom E. A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science 2009; 325(24): 419–422.

Mcginnis MD, Ostrom E. Social-ecological system framework: Initial changes and continuing challenges. Ecology and Society 2014; 19(2): 1–12.

Xie C, Zhang K, Wang J. Astrom’s common-pool resources governance theory and its implication for forestry reform in China. Forestry Economics 2017; 39(5): 3–10, 18.

Wang P, Wang X. Reference and verification on the theory of common-pool resources self-governance —From perspective of research and practice of forest management in China. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology (Social Sciences Edition) 2015; 17(3): 23–32.

Ren J. Xitong ouhe zai danongye zhong de zhanlue yiyi (Chinese) [The strategic significance of system coupling in large agriculture]. Science 1999; 51(6): 12–14.

Lv J, Zhao W. Study on the virtuous cycle mechanism of the forest eco-economic system. China Forestry Economics 2011; (2): 5–7, 17.

Tian S, Li Y, Dong W, et al. Exploration on connotation evolution, development path and practice mode of forestry ecological economy in China. Forestry Economics 2017; 39(8): 71–76.

Wang J, Yang J. Dynamic coupling analysis of forest ecological economic system in Fujian province. Journal of Quanzhou Normal University 2017; 35(6): 100–106.

Xu D. On the coupled system of forest ecology economic—Based on the perspective of evolutionary economics [MSc thesis]. Fuzhou: Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University; 2014. p. 1–57.

Wu Y, Zhang Y. Analyzing coupled regional economic growth and environmental conservation in China. Resources Science 2008; (1): 25–30.

Cao K, Zhu H. Jiyu ouhe guanxi de tudi liyong xiaoyi pingjia: Yi Guangzhou he Shenzhen weili (Chinese) [Evaluation of land use efficiency based on coupling relationship: Guangzhou and Shenzhen as examples]. Chinese Rural Economy 2010; (8): 58–66, 79.

Wang Y, Tao Y, Kang J. Influencing factors of irrigation governance in China’s rural areas. Resources Science 2019; 41(10): 1769–1779.

Cai J, Tan J. Analysis on the willingness to participate in the redemption policy of commodity forest from the perspective of social-ecological system. Issues of Forestry Economics 2020; 40(3): 302–311.

Cai J, Mao S. Adaptive governance for the “complex social-ecological systems”: Expand the horizons of China’s collective forest tenure reform. Issues in Agricultural Economy 2011; 32(6): 82–88, 112.

Hardin G. The tragedy of the commons. Science 1968; (162): 1243–1248.

Olson M. The logic of collective action. Boston: Harvard University Press; 1971. p. 360–363.

Cai J. Zhenduan shehui-shengtai xitong: Elinor Ostrom de xintansuo (Chinese) [Diagnosing social-ecological systems: Eleanor Ostrom’s new quest]. Economic Perspectives 2012; (8): 106–113.

Tan J, Cai J, Zhang M. Polycentric transformation in open common pool resources—A case study of Nanxi River in the Zhejiang province. Journal of Public Management 2018; 15(3): 102–116, 158–159.

Zhang J, Zhi L. Current situation and prospects of forestry cooperative economic organization. World Forestry Research 2010; 23(2): 65–68.

Zhang J, Liu D, Feng J, et al. Zhongguo jiti linquan zhidu gaige (Chinese) [Reform of China’s collective forest rights system]. Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House; 2018. p. 1–527.

Ostrom E. Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Yu X, Chen X (translators). Shanghai: Shanghai Translation Publishing House; 2012. p. 1–277.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2022 Guangju Wang, Hongyi Ruan, Jianzhou Yang

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License

This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.