[Objective] To understand the relationship between species diversity and tree growth in natural secondary forests in Northeast China, to determine the reasonable size of species diversity, and to carry out appropriate nurturing harvesting and artificial replanting, so as to provide a scientific and theoretical basis for secondary forest management and management. [Methods] A total of 123 sample plots were set up in the Xiaoxinganling (XXAL), Zhangguangcailing (ZGCL), Laojialing (LYL), Changbai Mountain (CBS), Hadaling (HDL) and Longgang Mountain (LGS) areas in Northeast China, they were used to investigate the species composition, importance value, diversity and tree growth in each area. [Results] A total of 48 species belonging to 17 families and 31 genera were investigated in all the sample plots, among which the sample plots in Longgang Mountain contained the largest number of families, genera and species, followed by Hada Ling, Changbai Mountain, Laoyaling, Zhangguangcai Mountain and Xiaoxinganling. The α-diversity index of species in the sample sites was the largest in Changbai Mountain and the smallest in Xiaoxinganling, and the difference between them was significant (P < 0.05), while the richness index was the largest in Longgang Mountain and the smallest in Xiaoxinganling. The difference between them was significant (P < 0.05), while the greater the difference in latitude between the regions, the more obvious the difference in β-diversity index of species in the sample sites, and the fewer species shared between the two regions. The higher the rate of community succession, the higher the average diameter at breast height and the average tree height in each region were CBS > LYL > LGS > ZGCL > HDL > XXAL. The largest breast tree species in each region was Mongolian oak in Changbai Mountain with a diameter at breast height of 64.8 cm, and the smallest breast tree species in each region was Tyrannus sylvestris in Longgang Mountain with a diameter at breast height of 4.0 cm. The highest tree species in each region was Liriodendron sylvestris in Longgang Mountain with a height of 28.9 m, and the smallest species is yellow pineapple with a height of 1.3 m in Longgang Mountain. [Conclusion] Within a certain range, species diversity has a facilitating effect on the average diameter at breast height and average tree height of species within a stand. Therefore, during the management of secondary forests, appropriate nurturing harvesting and artificial replanting should be adopted to ensure reasonable species diversity in the stands and provide optimal space for the growth of natural secondary forests.

1. Zhang X, Zhang H, Lu J, et al. Early effects of crop tree release tending on growth of natural secondary Quercus mongolica forest. Scientia Silvae Sinicae 2020; 56(10): 83–92.

2. Zhu J, Li X, Liu Z, et al. Factors affecting the snow and wind induced damage of a montane secondary forest in northeastern China. Silva Fennica 2006; 40(1): 37–51.

3. Bonino E, Araujo P. Structural differences between a primary and a secondary forest in the Argentine Dry Chaco and management implications. Forest Ecology and Management 2005; 206(1): 407–412.

4. Ma S, Wang Q, Cui D, et al. Effect of thinning on stand structure and plant species diversity in natural Fraxinus mandschurica forest stands. Journal of Northeast Forestry University 2019; 47(2): 1–7.

5. Wang Y, Li S, Miao N, et al. Analysis of plant diversity of five typical forests in mountain areas around Sichuan basin. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology 2020; 40(7): 89–98.

6. Liang S, Peng S, Chen Y. Responses of productivity of typical natural secondary forests and plantations to climate change in Shaanxi province, China. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology 2019; 30(9): 2892–2902.

7. Whittaker RJ. Meta-analyses and mega-mistakes: Calling time on meta-analysis of the species richness-productivity relationship. Ecology 2010; 91(9): 2522–2533.

8. Gillman LN, Wright SD. The influence of productivity on the species richness of plants: A critical assessmentc. Ecology 2006; 87(5): 1234–1243.

9. Cusens J, Wright SD, Mcbride PD, et al. What is the form of the productivity-animal-species-richness relationship? A critical review and meta-analysis. Ecology 2012; 93(10): 2241–2252.

10. Liu X, Shi Z, Yang D, et al. Advances in study on changes of biodiversity and productivity along elevational gradient in mountainous plant communities. World Forestry Research 2005; 18(4): 27–34.

11. Zhang L, Qi J, Li T, et al. Effects of stand density on understory plant diversity and biomass in a Pinus massoniana plantation in Wenfeng mountain, Xinjin county. Acta Ecologica Sinica 2019; 39(15): 5709–5717.

12. Fridley JD, Grime JP, Huston MA, et al. Comment on “Productivity is a poor predictor of plant species richness”. Science 2012; 335(6075): 1441.

13. Adler PB, Seabloom EW, Borer ET, et al. Productivity is a poor predictor of plant species richness. Science 2011; 333(6050): 1750–1753.

14. Jin H, Zhao Y, Zhao W, et al. Elevational changes in species diversity and similarity analysis of a Rhododendron chrysanthum community on Changbai mountain. Acta Ecologica Sinica 2015; 35(1): 125–133.

15. Liu Z, Li Q, Chen D, et al. Patterns of plant species diversity along an altitudinal gradient and its effect on above-ground biomass in alpine meadows in Qinghai-Tibet plateau. Biodiversity Science 2015; 23(4): 451–462.

16. Kong B, Wei X, Du J, et al. Effects of clipping and fertilization on the temporal dynamics of species diversity and functional diversity and their relationships in an alpine meadow. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology 2016; 40(3): 187–199.

17. Hao J, Li Y, Qi J, et al. Effects of anthropogenic disturbances on the species diversity and niche of the dominant populations in a Castanopsis fargesii secondary forest community in Bifengxia, Sichuan. Acta Ecologica Sinica 2016; 36(23): 7678–7688.

18. Wu A, Deng X, Ren X, et al. Biogeographic patterns and influencing factors of the species diversity of tree layer community in typical forest ecosystems in China. Acta Ecologica Sinica 2018; 38(21): 7727–7738.

19. Zhang Y, Chen H. Individual size inequality links forest diversity and above-ground biomass. Journal of Ecology 2015; 103(5): 1245–1252.

20. Nadrowski K, Wirth C, Scherer-lorenzen M. Is forest diversity driving ecosystem function and service? Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 2010; 2(1): 75–79.

21. Ma KP. Measuring method of biocommunity diversityⅠ: measuring method ofαdiversity (Part 1). Chinese Biodiversity 199; (3): 162–168.

22. Qu Y, Li Q, Duan R, et al. Effects of grazing methods on community characteristics and alpha diversity of Stipa breviflora in warm-temperate steppe. Chinese Journal of Grassland 2019; 41(4): 87–93.

23. Weng C, Zhang T, Wu D, et al. Drivers and patterns of α- and β-diversity in ten main forest community types in Gutianshan, eastern China. Biodiversity Science 2019; 27(1): 33–41.

24. Zheng Y, Ji N, Wu B, et al. Climatic factors have unexpectedly strong impacts on soil bacterial β-diversity in 12 forest ecosystems. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 2020; 142: 1–9.

25. Kahmen A, Jorg P, Audorff V, et al. Effects of plant diversity, community composition and environmental parameters on productivity in montane European grasslands. Oecologia 2005; 142(4): 606–615.

26. Li L, Wei S, Lian J, et al. Distributional regularity of species diversity in plant communities at different latitudes in subtropics. Acta Ecologica Sinica 2020; 40(4): 1–9.

27. Chen S, Ouyang Z, Zheng H, et al. Latitudinal gradient in beta diversity of forest communities in America. Acta Ecologica Sinica 2011; 31(5): 1334–1340.

28. Liu X, Yang F, Zhang M, et al. Plant diversity and productivity of grassland communities at different altitudes of Jiucaiping mountain, Guizhou. Chinese Journal of Applied & Environmental Biology 2018; 24(2): 207–213.

29. Sklenar P, Balslev H. Superpáramo plant species diversity and phytogeography in Ecuador. Flora 2004; 200(5): 416–433.

30. Zhang Y, Chen HYH, Reich PB. Forest productivity increases with evenness, species richness and trait variation: A global meta- analysis. Journal of Ecology 2012; 100(3): 742–749.

31. Symstad AJ, Stuart CF, Wall DH, et al. Long-term and large-scale perspectives on the relationship between biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. Bioscience 2003; 53(1): 89–98.

32. Vila M, Carrillo-Gavilan A, Vayreda J, et al. Disentangling biodiversity and climatic determinants of wood production. Plos ONE 2013; 8(2): 1–9.

33. Thompson K, Askew AP, Grime JP, et al. Biodiversity, ecosystem function and plant traits in mature and immature plant communities. Functional Ecology 2005; 19(2): 355–358.

34. Grace JB, Anderson TM, Smith MD, et al. Does species diversity limit productivity in natural grassland communities? Ecology Letters 2007; 10(8): 680–689.