A topic of current interest in forestry science concerns the regeneration of degraded forests and areas. Within this topic, an important aspect refers to the time that different forests take to recover their original levels of diversity and other characteristics that are key to resume their functioning as ecosystems. The present work focuses on the premontane rainforests of the central Peruvian rainforest, in the Chanchamayo valley, Junín, between 1,000 and 1,500 masl. A total of 19 Gentry Transects of 2 × 500 m, including all woody plants ≥2.5 cm diameter at breast height were established in areas of mature forests, and forests of different ages after clear-cutting without burning. Five forest ages were considered, 5-10, 20, 30, 40 and ≥50 years. The alpha-diversity and composition of the tree flora under each of these conditions was compared and analyzed. It was observed that, from 40 years of age, Fisher’s alpha-diversity index becomes quite similar to that characterizing mature forests; from 30 years of age, the taxonomic composition by species reached a similarity of 69–73%, like those occurring in mature forests. The characteristic botanical families, genera and species at each of the ages were compared, specifying that as the age of the forest increases, there are fewer shared species with a high number of individuals. Early forests, up to 20 years of age, are characterized by the presence of Piperaceae; after 30 years of age, they are characterized by the Moraceae family.

1. Vásquez R, Rojas R, Monteagudo A, et al. Flora Vascular de la selva central del Perú: Una aproximación de la composición florística de tres Áreas Naturales Protegidas (Spanish) [Vascular of the central jungle of Peru: An approximation of the floristic composition of three Protected Natural Areas]. Arnaldoa 2005; 12(1-2): 112–125.

2. Monteagudo A, Huamán M. Catalog of woody plants trees in the Selva Central of Peru. Arnaldoa 2010; 17(2): 203–242.

3. Marcelo J, Reynel C. Diversity patterns and floristic composition of permanent evaluative plots in the peruvian central forest. Rodriguesia 2014; 65(1): 35–47.

4. Antón D, Reynel C (editors). Relictos de bosques de excepcional diversidad en los andes centrales del Perú (Spanish) [Exceptionally diverse forest relicts in the central Andes of Peru]. Lima, Perú: Herbario de la Facultad de Ciencias Forestales, Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina; 2004.

5. Cáceres P, Reynel C. Los árboles de Ficus (“Ojé”) del valle de Chanchamayo, Dpto. Junín, Perú (800–2500 msnm) (Spanish) [The Ficus (“Ojé”) trees of the Chanchamayo Valley, Department of Junín, Peru (800 – 2,500 masl)]. Lima, Perú: Asociación Peruana para la Promoción del Desarrollo Sostenible (APRODES); 2010.

6. Aguilar M, Reynel C. Dinámica forestal y regeneración en un bosque montano nublado de la selva central del Perú (Spanish) [Forest dynamics and regeneration in a montane cloud forest of the central jungle of Peru]. Lima, Perú: Herbario de la Facultad de Ciencias Forestales, Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina; 2011.

7. Palacios S, Reynel C. Una formación vegetal subxerófila en el valle de Chanchamayo, Dp. de Junín (Spanish) [A sub xerophytic plant formation in the Chanchamayo valley, Department of Junín]. Lima, Perú: Herbario de la Facultad de Ciencias Forestales, Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina; 2011.

8. Buttgenbach H, Vargas C, Reynel C. Dinámica forestal en un bosque premontano del valle de Chanchamayo (Dp. de Junín, 1,200 msnm) (Spanish) [Forest dynamics in a premontane forest of the Chanchamayo valley (Department of Junín, 1,200 masl)]. Lima, Perú: Herbario de la Facultad de Ciencias Forestales, Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina; 2012.

9. Reynel C. Flora y fauna del bosque montano nublado Puyu Sacha, valle de Chanchamayo, Dp. Junín (1,800–3,200 msnm) (Spanish) [Flora and fauna of the cloudy montane forest Puyu Sacha, Chanchamayo valley, Department of Junín (1,800 – 3,200 masl)]. Lima, Perú: Asociación Peruana para la Promoción del Desarrollo Sostenible (APRODES); 2012.

10. Honorio E, Reynel C. Vacíos en la colección de la flora de los Bosques Húmedos del Perú (Spanish) [Gaps in the collection of the flora of the Humid Forests of Peru]. Lima, Perú: Herbario de la Facultad de Ciencias Forestales, Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina; 2003.

11. Reynel C, León J. Especies forestales comunes de los bosques secundarios de Chanchamayo, Perú (Spanish) [Common forest species of the secondary forests of Chanchamayo, Peru]. Lima, Perú: Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina, Facultad de Ciencias Forestales Proyecto Utilización de Bosques Secundarios en el Trópico Húmedo Peruano; 1989.

12. Phillips O, Baker T, Feldpausch T, et al. RAINFOR Manual de campo para la remedición y establecimiento de parcelas permanentes (Spanish) [RAINFOR Field manual for the remediation and establishment of permanent plots]. Brazil: FORESTPLOTS; 2009.

13. Giacomotti J, Reynel C. Tree mortality and recruitment in a late secondary forest of the Chanchamayo valley, Peru. Revista Forestal del Perú 2018; 33(1): 42–51.

14. Echía E, Reynel C, Manta I. 2019. The woody flora established after burning in the Chanchamayo Valley–Rainforest of central Peru. Revista Forestal del Perú 2019; 34(1): 83–101.

15. Almeyda A. Diversidad y composición de la flora arbórea en un área de bosque secundario tardío: Fundo Génova-UNALM, valle de Chanchamayo, 1,000–1,500 msnm (Spanish) [Diversity and composition of the arboreal flora in a late secondary forest area: Fundo Génova-UNALM, Chanchamayo valley, 1,000–1,500 masl]. In: Antón D, Reynel C (editors). Relictos de bosques de excepcional diversidad en los andes centrales del Perú. Lima, Perú: Herbario de la Facultad de Ciencias Forestales, Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina; 2004. p. 263–302.

16. Reynel C, Antón D. Diversidad y composición de la flora arbórea en un área de cumbre de colinas en bosque premontano: Fundo Génova-UNALM, valle de Chanchamayo, 1,000–1,500 msnm (Spanish) [Diversity and composition of tree flora in a hilltop area in premontane forest: Fundo Génova-UNALM, Chanchamayo valley, 1,000–1,500 masl]. In: Antón D, Reynel C. (editors). Lima, Perú: Relictos de bosques de excepcional diversidad en los andes centrales del Perú; 2004. p. 143–186.

17. Pipoly III JJ. New species of Geissanthus (Myrsinaceae) from the Hylaea/Andean interface of Ecuador and Peru. SIDA, Contributions of Botany; 1996; 17(2): 459–470.

18. Arroyo F. A new species of Magnolia (Magnoliaceae) from central Peru. Phytotaxa 2014; 167(2): 220–222.

19. Berg CC, Ulloa C. Two new species of Coussapoa (Urticaceae, Cecropieae). Novon: A Journal for Botanical Nomenclature 2014; 23(1): 14–17.

20. Phillips O, Miller J. Global patterns of plant diversity: Alwyn H. Gentry’s forest transect data set. MSB (Monographs in Systematic Botany). Missouri Botanical Garden Press 2002; 89: 1–319.

21. Palacios-Ramos S, Montenegro R., Linares-Palomino RL, et al. Forest dynamics of a sub-xeophylous vegetation formation in central Peru–Chanchamayo valley, Peru. Revista Árvore 2018; 42(6): e420603.

22.

23. Fisher RA, Corbet AS, Williams CB. The relation between the number of species and the number of individuals in a random sample of an animal population. The Journal of Animal Ecology 1943; 12(1): 42–58.

24. Rosenzweig ML. Species diversity in space and time. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1995.

25. Condit R, Hubbell SP, Lafrankie JV, et al. Species-area and species-individual relationships for tropical trees: A comparison of three 50-ha plots. Journal of Ecology 1996; 84(4): 549–562.

26. Berry PE, Guariguata MR, Kattan GH. Diversidad y endemismo en los bosques neotropicales de bajura (Spanish) [Diversity and endemism in neotropical lowland forests]. In: Guariguata MR, Kattan GH (editors). Ecología y conservación de bosques neotropicales. Cartago, Costa Rica: Editorial Tecnológica; 2002. p. 83–96.

27. Hammer Ø, Harper DAT, Ryan PD. PAST: Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Paleontología Electrónica 2001; 4(1): 1–9.

28. Dice LR. Measures of the amount of ecologic association between species. Ecology 1945; 26(3): 297–302.

29. Crausbay SH, Martin P. Natural disturbance, vegetation patterns and ecological dynamics in tropical montane forests. Journal of Tropical Ecology 2016; 32(5): 384–403.

30. Bueno A, Llambí L. Facilitation and edge effects influence vegetation regeneration in old-fields at the tropical Andean forest line. Applied Vegetation Science 2015; 18(4): 613–623.

31. Chadzon R. Tropical forest recovery: Legacies of human impact and natural disturbances. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics a)2003; 6(12): 51–71.

32. Rozendaal DM, Bongers F, Mitchell Aide T, et al. Biodiversity recovery of Neotropical secondary forests. Science Advances 2019; 5(3): eaau3114.

33.

34. Gentry A, Ortiz R. Patrones de composición florística en la Amazonia peruana (Spanish) [Patterns of floristic composition in the Peruvian Amazon]. In: Kalliola R, Puhakka M, Danjoy W (editors). Amazonia peruana, vegetación húmeda tropical en el llano subandino. Lima, Perú: Proyecto Amazonia, Universidad de Tu (PAUT) and Oficina Nacional de Evaluación de Recursos Naturales (ONERN); 1993. p. 155–166.