Over several centuries, the native vegetation of the flat part of the Bogotá Savanna has been almost completely replaced by crops, pastures and urbanization. The last remnant of this vegetation is a small forest (10 hm²), located at Hacienda Las Mercedes on the northern edge of the city of Bogotá. The reduced size and isolation of the forest, aggravated by the uncontrolled growth of invasive vegetation (lianas and wild blackberry) has resulted in the loss of many species. However, in recent years the forest has been subject to rehabilitation actions and currently the area is immersed in a reserve where more extensive restoration programs are planned. In order to evaluate changes in the bird community to estimate the effects of restoration actions, the avifauna present in 2001–2002 and in 2014 was recorded by visual and auditory records at fixed points in the forest. Twenty-seven forest species were found in the first census and 30 in the second, and the relative abundances of at least a third of them also increased over the 13 years, indicating a positive result in the recovery of the forest. The results highlight the recovery capacity of the degraded ecosystems and the importance of continuing with restoration actions in the reserve area.

1. Laurance WF. Habitat destruction: death by a thousand cuts. In: Sodhi NS, Erlich PR (editors). Conservation Biology for All. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2010. p. 73–87.

2. Gómez Mora AM, Anaya JA, Álvarez Dávila E. Análisis de fragmentación de los ecosistemas boscosos en una región de la cordillera central de los andes colombianos (Spanish) [Fragmentation analysis of forest ecosystems in a region of the central mountain range of the Colombian Andes]. Revista Ingenierías Universidad de Medellín 2005; 4(7): 13–27.

3. Ricketts T, Imhoff M. Biodiversity, urban areas, and agriculture: Locating priority ecoregions for conservation. Conservation Ecology 2003; 8(2): 1.

4. McKinney ML. Urbanization, biodiversity and conservation. BioScience 2002; 52(10): 883–890.

5.

6. Pineda-López R, Febvre N, Martínez M. Importancia de proteger pequeñas áreas periurbanas por su riqueza avifaunística: El caso de Mompaní, Querétaro, México (Spanish) [Importance of protecting small peri-urban areas due to their birdlife richness: The case of Mompaní, Querétaro, Mexico]. Huitzil 2010; 11(2): 69–80.

7. CAR (Corporación Autónoma Regional de Cundinamarca). Acuerdo 11 de 2011 “Por medio del cual se declara la Reserva Forestal Regional Productora del Norte de Bogotá D.C. “Thomas van der Hammen”, se adoptan unas determinantes ambientales para su manejo, y se dictan otras disposiciones. Bogotá; 2011. p. 23.

8. CAR (Corporación Autónoma Regional de Cundinamarca). Plan de manejo ambiental de la reserva forestal regional productora del norte de Bogotá D.C. “Thomas van der Hammen” (Spanish) [Environmental management plan for the regional producer forest reserve of the north of Bogotá D.C. Thomas van der Hammen]. Bogotá; 2014. p. 50.

9. Cortés SP. Capítulo 4 Cobertura Vegetal. In: Ardila G (editor). Proyecto Corredor Borde Norte de Bogotá Fase I. Convenio Interadministrativo de Asociación No. 748 de 2009. Bogotá: Instituto de Estudios Urbanos Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Corporación Autónoma Regional de Cundinamarca, CAR; 2010. p. 61–145.

10. Peña-Barrera CR. Índice de urbanización municipal: Una aplicación a Bogotá y su teórica “Área Metropolitana” (Spanish) [Municipal urbanization index: An application to Bogotá and its theoretical “Metropolitan Area”]. Territorios 2010; 23: 33–57.

11. DANE (Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística). Proyecciones nacionales y departamentales de población 2005–2020 (Spanish) [National and departmental population projections 2005–2020]. Estudios Postcensales 7. DANE. Bogotá, Colombia. 2009. Available from: https://www.dane.gov.co/files/investigaciones/poblacion/proyepobla06_20/7Proyecciones_poblacion. pdf.

12. El Tiempo. Las claves para entender la discusión sobre la reserva Van der Hammen (Spanish) [The keys to understanding the discussion about the Van der Hammen reserve]. Available from: http://www.eltiempo.com/bogota/reserva-forestal-thomas-van-derhammen/16508936.

13. BirdLife International. Endemic Bird Area factsheet: Colombian East Andes. 2016. Available from: http://www.birdlife.org.

14. Carignan V, Villard MA. Selecting indicator species to monitor ecological integrity: A review. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 2002; 78: 45–61.

15. Gregory R. Birds as biodiversity indicators for Europe. Significance 2006; 3(3): 106–110.

16. Stiles FG. La avifauna de la Universidad de Costa Rica y sus alrededores a través de veinte años (1968–1989) (Spanish) [The avifauna of the University of Costa Rica and its surroundings through twenty years (1968-1989)]. Revista de Biología Tropical 1990; 38(3B): 361–381.

17. Forero-González E. Estudio fitosociológico de un bosque subclimácico en el altiplano de Bogotá, Colombia (Spanish) [Phytosociological study of a subclimatic forest in the highlands of Bogotá, Colombia] [PhD thesis]. Bogotá: National University of Colombia; 1965.

18. Bibby CJ, Burgess ND, Hill DA. Bird census techniques. 1sted. USA: Academic Press; 1992. p. 91.

19. Krebs CJ. Ecological methodology. 2nd ed. California: Addison Wesley Educational Publishers Inc.; 1999. p. 390.

20. Hammer Ø, Harper DAT, Ryan PD. PAST: Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica 2001; 4(1): 9.

21. Agudelo-Alvarez LG. Evaluación del Canal Molinos como un corredor para las aves de la ciudad de Bogotá (Spanish) [Evaluation of Canal Molinos as a corridor for birds in the city of Bogotá] [PhD thesis]. Bogotá: Pontifical Xavierian University; 2007.

22. Sandstrom UG, Angelstam P, Mikusinski G. Ecological diversity of birds in relation to the structure of urban green space. Landscape and Urban Planning 2006; 77: 39–53. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.01.004.

23. Ortega-Álvarez R, MacGregor-Fors I. Dusting-off the file: A review of knowledge on urban ornithology in Latin America. Landscape and Urban Planning 2011; 101: 1–10.

24. Rosselli L. Factores ambientales relacionados con la presencia y abundancia de las aves de los humedales de la Sabana de Bogotá (Spanish) [Environmental factors related to the presence and abundance of birds in the wetlands of the Sabana de Bogotá] [PhD thesis]. Bogotá: National University of Colombia; 2011. p. 90.

25. Rivera-Gutiérrez HF. Composición y estructura de una comunidad de aves en un área suburbana en el suroccidente colombiano (Spanish) [Composition and structure of a bird community in a suburban area in southwestern Colombia]. Ornitología Colombiana 2006; 4: 28–38.

26. Manhães MA, Loures-Ribeiro A. Spatial distribution and diversity of bird community in an urban area of Southeast Brazil. Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology 2005; 48: 285–294.

27. Renjifo LM. Efecto de las matrices naturales y antropogénicas del paisaje en la abundancia de especies de aves subandina (Spanish) [Effect of natural and anthropogenic landscape matrices on the abundance of sub-Andean bird species]. Ecological Applications 2001; 11(1): 14–31.

28. Husté A, Selmi S, Boulinier T. Bird communities in suburban patches near Paris: determinants of local richness in a highly fragmented landscape. Ecoscience 2006; 13: 249–257.

29. Saenz JC, Villatoro F, Ibrahim M, et al. Relación entre las comunidades de aves y la vegetación en agro paisajes dominados por la ganadería en Costa Rica, Nicaragua y Colombia (Spanish) [Relationship between bird communities and vegetation in agro-landscapes dominated by cattle ranching in Costa Rica, Nicaragua and Colombia]. Agroforestería en las Américas 2006; 45: 37–48.

30. Leveau LM, Leveau CM. Bird communities in an urban gradient of the city of Mar del Plata, Argentina (Spanish) [Comunidades de aves en un gradiente urbano de la ciudad de Mar del Plata, Argentina]. Hornero 2004; 19: 13–21.

31. ABO–Asociación Bogotana De Ornitología. Aves de la Sabana de Bogotá, guía de campo (Spanish) [Birds of the Bogotá Savannah, field guide]. Bogotá: ABO, CAR; 2000. p. 88–242.

32. Fernández-Juricic E, Jokimäki J. A habitat island approach to conserving birds in urban landscapes: case studies from southern and northern Europe. Biodivers Conserv 2001; 10: 2023–2043. doi: 10.1023/A:1013133308987.

33. El Tiempo. En la sabana es mejor sembrar edificios. La Sabana de Bogotá va rumbo a quedarse sin agricultura y ganadería (Spanish) [In the savannah it is better to plant buildings. The Sabana de Bogotá is heading to run out of agriculture and livestock]. 1996. Available from: http://www.eltiempo.com/archivo/documento/MAM-475106.

34. Şekercioğlu CH, Schneider SH, Fay JP, et al. Climate change, elevational range shifts, and bird extinctions. Conservation Biology 2008; 22(1): 140–150. doi: 10.1111/j.1523- 1739.2007.00852.x.

35. Forero-Medina G, Terborgh J, Socolar SJ, et al. Elevational ranges of birds on a tropical montane gradient lag behind warming temperatures. PLOS ONE 2011; 6(12): e28535. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0028535.

36. Olivares A. Birds of Cundinamarca. Bogotá: National University of Colombia, Dirección de Divulgación Cultural; 1969.

37. Pedroza Guimarães D, Gomes de Lima AC, Pedroza D. New record and geographic expansion of Vanellus chilensis in the state of Amazonas, Brazil. Atualidades Ornitológicas 2016; 190: 24.

38. Echeverry-Galvis MA, Córdoba-Córdoba S. Una visión general de la reproducción y muda de aves en el neotrópico (Spanish) [An overview of breeding and molting of birds in the neotropics]. Ornitología Neotropical 2008; 19(Suppl.): 197–205.

39. Lindenmayer DB. Future directions for biodiversity conservation in managed forests: Indicator species, impact studies and monitoring programs. Forest Ecology and Management 1999; 115: 277–287.

40. Milesi FA, Marone L, Lopez deCasenave J, et al. Gremios de manejo como indicadores de las condiciones del ambiente: un estudio de caso con aves y perturbaciones del hábitat en el Monte central, Argentina (Spanish) [Management guilds as indicators of environmental conditions: a case study with birds and habitat disturbances in the central Monte, Argentina]. Ecología Austral 2002; 12: 149–161.