No less than 60% of timber production in Peru’s natural forests is the result of informal or illegal extractive activities that, by definition, are not sustainable. This article aims to demonstrate that even legitimate timber, such as timber harvested in more than 6 million hectares of forest concessions, does not meet the basic requirements of sustainable forest management. Forestry legislation itself, which does not emphasize forest management, institutional weaknesses and the socioeconomic environment are the main causes. In addition, the cutting cycles and the authorized minimum diameters, among other practices, do not allow the renewal of the resource and increase its degradation.

1. Contreras-Hermosilla A. Law Compliance in the Forestry Sector: An overview. 2002. p. 48. Available from: http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/232581468763471728/pd-fZ286170Law0Forestry0WBI0WPpdf.

2. Blaser J. Forest law compliance and governance in tropical countries: A region-by-region assessment of the status of forest law compliance and governance in the tropics, and recommendations for improvement [Internet]. FAO & The International Tropical Timber Organization (ITTO); 2010. Available from: http://www.fao.org/3/al044s/al044s00.pdf.

3. Blaser J, Zabel A. Forest crime in the tropics. In: Pancel L, Kohl M (editors). Tropical forestry handbook. 2nd ed. New York: Springer; 2016. p. 3525–3558. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-54601-3302.

4. Arce Baca JF. Estudio crítico sobre el cumplimiento de la ley forestal (Spanish) [Critical study on forestry law enforcement]. Lima: UNALM; 1987. p. 250.

5. Pautra L, Lucich I. Análisis preliminar sobre gobernabilidad y cumplimiento de la legislación del sector forestal en el Perú: resumen ejecutivo (Spanish) [Preliminary analysis on governance and law enforcement in the forestry sector in Peru: Executive summary]. Washington: World Bank Group; 2006. p. 93.

6. Sabogal C, Nalvarte J, Colán V. Análisis del marco legal para el manejo forestal por pequeños productores en la Amazonia peruana (Spanish) [Analysis on the legal framework of forest management for small producers in the Amazon basin of Peru]. Lima: CIFOR; 2008. p. 159.

7. Dourojeanni MJ. Analisis critico de la ley forestal peruana (Spanish) [Critical analysis of the Peruvian forestry law]. Agenda Ambiental 2013; 2(4): 20–32.

8. Urrunaga JM, Johnson A, Orbegozo ID, et al. La máquina lavadora: cómo el fraude y la corrupción en el sistema de concesiones están destruyendo el futuro de los bosques de Perú (Spanish) [The washing machine: How fraud and corruption in the concession system are destroying the future of Peru’s forests]. Environmental Investigation Agency. 2012. p. 72.

9. Finer M, Jenkins CN, Sky MAB, et al. Logging concessions enable illegal logging crisis in the Peruvian Amazon. Scientific Reports 2014; 4(srep04719): 1–6. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep04719.

10. Solis D. Impacto de la supervisión de las concesiones forestales maderables en el cumplimiento de la Ley Forestal en el Perú (Spanish) [Impact of timber forest concession monitoring on compliance with the Forestry Law in Peru]. Economía y Sociedad 2016; (89): 49–60.

11. Forest Management Assemblies. Estimando la legalidad de la madera en el Perú (Spanish) [Estimating timber legitimacy in Peru]. 2019. Available from: https://fbrest.pe/experiencia/esti-mando-la-legalidad-de-la-madera-en-el-peru.

12. Global Witness. El justiciero forestal: Por qué se debe devolver la independencia a Osinfor y expandir sus poderes (Spanish) [Forest vigilante: Why must we restore independence and expand its power] [Internet]. 2019. Available from: https://www.globalwitness.org/en/campaigns/fbrests/el-justiciero-fbrestal/.

13. Rosales S. Tala ilegal: Una polémica sobre cómo detectar origen ilícito de madera (Spanish) [Illegal logging: How to find the source of illegal timber] [Internet]. 2019. Available from: https://gestion.pe/economia/tala-ilegal-polemi-ca-norma-abre-discusion-detect-origen-il-icito-madera-262872-noticia/.

14. Sierra Y. Perú: Informe revela altos índices de ilegalidad en la extracción de madera (Spanish) [Peru: Report reveals high rates of illegitimacy in timber extraction] [Internet]. 2019. Available from: https://es.mongabay.com/2019/01/peru-in- fbrme-ilegalidad-extraccion-madera/.

15. Garcia E. Perú: Tráfico de madera no se detiene con la pandemia (Spanish) [Peru: Timber trafficking does not stop with pandemic] [Internet]. 2020. Available from: https://es,mongabaycom/2020/08/peru-trafico-madera-amazo-nia-pandemia/?mccid=13cf68b6e8&mc ei-d=3df⅛574eba.

16. CITEmadera (Center for Productive Innovation and Technology Transfer of Wood, Peru). La Industria de la Madera en el Perú (Spanish) [The timber industry in Peru]. Lima; 2018. p. 178.

17. Osinfor (Organismo de Supervisión de los Recursos Forestales y de Fauna Silvestre, Peru). Osinfor en cifras: Reporte estadístico IV trimestre—2019 (Spanish) [Data source: Statistical report of the fourth quarter of 2019]. Lima; 2020. p. 74.

18. Malleux R. Tenencia de los bosques en el Perú (Spanish) [Forest tenure in Peru] [Internet]. 2013. p. 27. Available from: http://infbbosques.com/portal/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Co-py-of-Per%C3%BA-pdfpdf.

19. Forestry and Wildlife Law No. 29763. El Peruano (Spanish) [Peruvian]. Peru; 2011 Jul 22.

20. Supreme Decree No. 018-2015-MINAGRI. Decreto supremo que aprueba el reglamento para la gestión forestal (Spanish) [Supreme decree approving the regulations for forest management]. Peru: El Peruano; 2015.

21. Executive board resolution 046-2016-SERFOR-DE. Lineamientos para la elaboración del plan general de manejo forestal para concesiones forestales con fines maderables (Spanish) [Guidelines for the development of a forest management master plan for logging concessions]. El Peruano. 2016.

22. Osinfor (Organismo de Supervisión de los Recursos Forestales y de Fauna Silvestre, Peru). Manual de supervisión de concesiones forestales maderables (Spanish) [Timber forestry concession supervision manual]. Lima; 2013. p. 61.

23. Young R. Introduction to forest science. California: John Wiley & Sons; 1982. p. 586.

24. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Italy). Natural forest management: Sustainable forest management [Internet]. 2020. Available from: http://www.fao.org/fbrest-ry/sfm/en/.

25. Anderson C, Asner GR, Llactayo W, et al. Overlapping land allocations reduce deforestation in Peru. Land Use Policy 2018; 79: 174–178. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.08.002.

26. Poore D, Burgess P, Palmer J, et al. No timber without trees: Sustainability in the tropical forest. London: Earthscan; 1989. p. 252.

27. Goodland RJA, Asibey EOA, Post JC, et al. Tropical moist forest management: The urgency of transition to sustainability. Environmental Conservation 1990; 17(4): 303–318. doi: 10.1017/S0376892900032756.

28. Johnson N, Cabarle B. Surviving the cut: Natural forest management in the humid tropics. Washington: World Resources Institute; 1993. p. 71.

29. Louman B, Stoian D. Manejo forestal sostenible en América Latina: ¿Económicamente viable o una utopía? (Spanish) [Sustainable forest management in Latin America: Economically viable or a utopia?]. Central American Forestry Journal 2002; (39): 25–32.

30. Putz FE, Zuidema PA, Synnott T, et al. Sustaining conservation values in selectively logged tropical forests: The attained and the attainable. Conservation Letters 2012; 5(4): 296–303. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-263X.2012.00242.x.

31. Zimmerman BL, Kormos CF. Prospects for sustainable logging in tropical forests. BioScience 2012; 62(5): 479–487. doi: 10.1525/bio.2012.62.5.9.

32. Moore T. Nueva legislación forestal: ¿Manejo de bosques o de capitales? (Spanish) [New forestry legislation: Forest or capital management?]. Debate Agrario 1992; (15): 15–35.

33. Galarza E, La Serna K. Forest concessions in Peru: How to make them sustainable? In: Barrantes R (editor). La política forestal en la Amazonía andina (Spanish) [Forest policy in the Andean Amazon]. Lima: CIES; 2005. p. 445–562.

34. Salo M, Toivonen T. Tropical timber rush in Peruvian Amazonia: Spatial allocation of forest concessions in an uninventoried frontier. Environmental Management 2009; 44(4): 609–623. doi: 10.1007/s00267-009-9343-3.

35. Dourojeanni MJ. Manejo de bosques naturales en el tropico americano: Situacion y perspectivas (Spanish) [Management of natural forests in the American tropics: Situation and perspectives]. Revista Forestal del Peru 1987; 14(1): 1–14.

36. Dourojeanni MJ. The Future of the Latin American natural forests. In: Keipi K (editor). Forest resource policy in Latin America. Washington D.C.: IDB; 1999. p. 79–92.

37. Dourojeanni MJ. Exchanging experiences on sustainable forest management. ITTO Tropical Forest Update 2008; 18(1): 12–15.

38. Arce Baca JF. Avances hacia un manejo forestal sostenible en concesiones con fines maderables: Estudio de caso en el departamento de Ucayali, Amazonía Peruana (Spanish) [Advances towards sustainable forest management in timber concessions: A case study in the department of Ucayali, Peruvian Amazon] [MSc thesis]. Turrialba, Catie; 2006.

39. Kometter R. Estudio de condiciones habilitantesde la opción de mitigación del sector forestall: Manejo forestal sostenible en concesiones forestales maderables (Spanish) [Study of enabling conditions for forest sector mitigation option: Sustainable forest management in timber forest concessions] [Internet]. 2016. p. 47. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320206341_Condiciones_habilitantes_de_la_opcion_de_mitigacion_del_sector_forestal_Manejo_Forestal_Sostenible_en_Concesiones_Forestales_Maderables.

40. Kometter R. Evaluación del modelo de concesiones forestales con fines maderables en el Perú, que compila los análisis (Spanish) [Evaluation of Peru’s timber forest concession model, compilation and analysis]. 2019. p. 86. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/341342819.

41. Dupuy B, Maιtre HF, Amsallem I. The state of tropical forest management: Management for sustainable wood production. In: Tropical forest management techniques: A review of the sustainability of forest management practices in tropical countries. Italy: FAO; 1999.

42. de Camino R. Desafiando convenciones: Innovación en el manejo de bosques tropicales (Spanish) [Challenging conventions: Innovation in tropical forest management] [Internet]. 2017. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/333582249_Desafiando_convenciones_innovacion_en_el_manejo_de_bisques_naturales.

43. Bruenig EF, Poker J. Management of tropical rainforests: Utopia or chance of survival? Proceedings of an International Symposium; 1989; Feldafing. p. 112.

44. Nasi R, Frost PGH. Sustainable forest management in the tropics: Is everything in order but the patient still dying? Ecology and Society 2009; 14(2): 40.

45. Wood P. Sustainability of commercial forest management in tropical rainforest [Internet]. 2018. Available from: https://d5i6is0eze552.cloudfront.net/documents/RF_report_0919_print.pdf?mtime=20190920102251.

46. Carvalho WD, Mustin K, Hilário RR, et al. Deforestation control in the Brazilian Amazon: A conservation struggle being lost as agreements and regulations are subverted and bypassed. Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation 2019; 17(3): 122–130. doi: 10.1016/j.pecon.2019.06.002.

47. Vergara R. Apoyo para la sistematización de información técnica para el análisis del funcionamiento del modelo de concesiones maderables (Spanish) [Support for the systematization of technical information for the analysis of the operation of the timber concession model]. Lima: USAID-US Forest Project; 2019. p. 47.

48. Dawkins HC. The management of natural tropical high-forest with special reference to Uganda. Oxford, UK: Imperial Forestry Institute; 1958. p. 165.

49. Lamprecht H. Silviculture in the tropics: Tropical forest ecosystems and their tree species possibilities and methods for their long-term utilization. Eschborn: GTZ; 1990. p. 296.

50. Contreras-Hermosilla A. Towards sustainable forest management an examination of the technical, economic and institutional feasibility of improving management of the global forest estate [Internet]. 1999. p. 66. Available from: http://www.fao.org/3/X4107E/X4107E03.htm.

51. Smith J, Colan V, Sabogal C, et al. Why policy reforms fail to improve logging practices: The role of governance and norms in Peru. Forest Policy and Economics 2006; 8(4): 458–469. doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2005.08.001.

52. Malleux J. Manejo forestl, problema structural (Spanish) [Forest management, structural problem]. Lima: Unalm; 2014. p. 3.

53. Tuss MM. Concesiones forestales en el Perú: avances y limitaciones (Spanish) [Forest concessions in Peru: Advances and limitations]. Lima: UNALM; 2017. p. 61.

54. Dourojeanni MJ. Esbozo de una nueva política forestal peruana (Spanish) [Outline of a new Peruvian forest policy]. Revista Forestal del Peru 2019; 34(1): 4–20. doi: org/10.21704/rfp.v34i1.1244.

55. Dourojeanni MJ. Bosques nacionales en el Peru: De importantes centros de investigacion a zonas deforestadas (Spanish) [National forests in Peru: From important research centers to deforested areas] [Internet]. 2017. Available from: https://www.actualidadambiental.pe/bosques-naciona-les-en-el-peru-de-importantes-centros-de-in-vestigacion-a-zonas-defbrestadas/.

56. Dourojeanni MJ. José Prato Mathews, pionero del manejo forestal en el Perú (Spanish) [José Prato Mathews, pioneer of forest management in Peru]. Revista Forestal del Peru 2019; 34(2): 102–112.

57. a)doi: 10.21704/rfp.v34i2.1321.

58. Keipi K (editor). Forest resource policy in Latin America. Washington: IDB; 1999. p. 293.

59. Blaser J, Poore D; Chandrasekaran C, et al. Status of tropical forest management 2005: Summary report. International Forestry Review 2006; 8(3): 372–374. doi: 10.1505/ifor.8.3.372.

60. ITTO (International Tropical Timber Organization, Japan). Status of tropical forest management 2005: Summary report. Yokohama; 2005. p. 36.

61. Rametsteiner E, Simula M. Forest certification—An instrument to promote sustainable forest management? Journal of Environmental Management 2003; 67(1): 87–98. doi: 10.1016/S0301-4797(02)00191-3.

62. Putz FE, Sist P, Fredericksen T, et al. Reduced-impact logging: Challenges and opportunities. Forest Ecology and Management 2008; 256(7): 1427–1433. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2008.03.036.

63. ITTO (International Tropical Timber Organization, Japan). Criterios e indicadores para la ordenación y el manejo sostenible de los bosques tropicales (Spanish) [Criteria and indicators for sustainable management and management of tropical forests]. Yokohama; 2016. p. 84.

64. Linser S, Wolfslehner B, Asmar F, et al. 25 years of criteria and indicators for sustainable forest management: Why some intergovernmental C&I processes flourished while others faded. Forests 2018; 9(9): 515–577. doi: 10.3390/f9090515.

65. Mirowski L, Smith A, Hunt M, et al. A review of systems and technologies for timber traceability. Tasmania: NCFFI; 2013. p. 66.

66. Servindi. Brasil: Identifican tala ilegal de madera en territorio de indígenas aislados de Perú (Spanish) [Brazil: Illegal logging identified in isolated indigenous territory of Peru] [Internet]. 2006. Available from: https://www.servindi.org/actualidad/322.

67. Abreu F. A terceira margem do rio: Extração ilegal de madeira na fronteira do Brasil com o Peru (Portuguese) [The third bank of the river: Illegal logging on the border between Brazil and Peru]. Horizonte Geográfico 2014; (152): 48–57.

68. Hardner J, Rice R. Rethinking forest concession policies. In: Keipi K (editor). Forest resource policy in Latin America. Washington: IDB; 1999. p. 162–193.

69. Sist P, Pacheco P, Nasi R, et al. Management of natural tropical forests in the past and present and projections for the future. In: Katila P, Galloway G, de Jong W, et al. (editors). Forests under pressure—Local responses to global issues. Vantaa: IUFRO; 2014. p. 497–511.

70. Blaser J, Gregersen H. Forests in the next 300 years. Unasylva 2013; 64(240): 61–73.