What is the involution effect? The evolution of the concept in China

YangCui Weng

Article ID: 8571
Vol 7, Issue 8, 2024

VIEWS - 1330 (Abstract)

Abstract


The concept of involution has been widely used in the analysis of complex issues in Chinese society in the last two years, but the concept implied by this term has been far from its original meaning, and even in different fields the meaning of the concept is slightly different. This paper analyzes how the concept of involution has changed in different application scenarios since its introduction into economics discussions, highlighting the key connotation of “development without growth” in the concept of involution and how it has changed in terms of expression and causation.

Keywords


Involution Concept; Evolution; Development without Growth

Full Text:

PDF


References

[1]Chen, C., & Yu, RuiMiao. (2017). Research on the Internalization Problem of Allocation of Poverty-Alleviation Resource: Review,

Evaluation and Prospect. SOCIAL CONSTRUCTION.

[2]Elson, R. E. (2007). Clifford Geertz, 1926–2006: meaning, method and Indonesian economic history. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 43(2), 251-264.

[3]Fang, J. (2014). The Involution Dilemma and Governance of Rural Poverty Reduction in China. SOCIAL CONSTRUCTION(2),

84-94.

[4]Geertz, C. (1956). Religious belief and economic behavior in a central Javanese town: some preliminary considerations. Economic

development and cultural change, 4(2), 134-158.

[5]Guo, J. (2007). A New Interpretation of the Concept of Involution. Sociological Studies(3), 194-208.

[6]He, X. (2019). Governing Via Top-down Regulations and Grassroots Governance Internalization: Dialectics of Grassroots Governance. Journal of Social Sciences(4), 64-70.

[7]Huang, P. (1985). The peasant economy and social change in North China: Stanford University Press.

[8]Huang, P. (2020). The Theory of Peasant Economy and Involution and De-Involution. Rural China, 17(2), 173-193.

[9]Kahn, J. S. (2016). Indonesia after the Demise of Involution: Critique of a Debate. In Critical Anthropology (pp. 119-148): Routledge.

[10]Kant, I. (2008). Critique of judgment: Newcomb Livraria Press.

[11]Li, Z. (2017). The Reflection of Involution Phenomenon in Rural Governance. China Rural Survey.

[12]Liu, S., & Qiu, Z. (2004). Conceptualization of “involution”. Sociological Review of China(5), 96-110.

[13]Lu, X. (2021). Involution from a multidimensional perspective: research status and concept combining. J Huazhong Univ Sci Technol, 6, 130-136.

[14]Ma, W. (2016). Rethinking Involution: the Explanation of Growth without Development Phenomenon in Grassroots Governance.

Chinese Public Administration(5), 26-31.

[15]Prasenjit, D. (1991). Culture, Power, and the State: Rural North China, 1900-1942 (Vol. 27): Stanford University Press.

[16]Su, Z., & Xu, W. (2020). Shaping Farmer Subjectivity: Pathways out of the Poverty Alleviation “ Involution” Dilemma after 2020.

Modern Economic Research(8), 29-35. doi:10.13891/j.cnki.mer.2020.08.006

[17]White, B. (1983). Agricultural involution and its critics: twenty years after Clifford Geertz. ISS Working Paper Series/General Series, 6, 1-39.

[18]Xing, C. (2015). Analysis of“Involution”to Poverty Alleviation Project Target Deviation from Perspective of Village. Jianghan Academic, 34(5), 18-26.

[19]Xu, Y. (2021). Digital Fetishism : The Essence of Involution. Exploration and Free Views, 3, 57-65.



DOI: https://doi.org/10.18686/ijmss.v7i8.8571

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License

This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.