The Debate on the Spread of ‘Literariness’ in Chinese Academic Circles
Vol 7, Issue 4, 2024
VIEWS - 24 (Abstract) 8 (PDF)
Abstract
is spreading to other areas, while opponents argue that “literariness” has not really spread. The two sides have the same path in the purpose
of maintaining the status of literature, but there are differences on the definition and scope of “literariness”. Proponents try to maintain the
academic value of literary studies through literary sexual spread, while opponents try to maintain the purity of literature. This paper reviews
the Russian formalism literary theory, and analyzes the situation of literature in the image era, in order to judge whether the “literariness” is
spreading.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
1. [1] Zana Minz, Yi, former editor of Chernov, translator of Wang Weisheng. Selection of Russian formalism [M]. Zhengzhou University
2. Press, 2005:320-321.
3. [2] Hu Tao. “Literariness” study [D]. Central China Normal University, 2013.
4. [3] Zhang Jiaxiang. The spread and development of the concept of “literary nature” in the 40 years of reform and opening up [D]. Zhejiang Gongshang University, 2023.
5. [4] Victor Erlich,Russian Formalism:History-Doctrine,4th,Hague:Mouton Publishers, 1980,p.172.
6. [5] Hu Jingli, Zhang Premiere. The selection of western twentieth-century literary theory. Volume 2, Works System [M]. China SocialSciences Press, 1989:307-328.
7. [6] Yu Hong, Yang Hengda, Yang Huilin. question. NO.1[M]. Central Compilation and Translation Press, 2003:143
8. [7] Xu Zhiqiang. —— Take the “posttheory” of David Simpson and Jonathan Kallal as an example [J]. Learning and Exploration, 2013
9. (4): 4.
10. [8] Culler J D .The literary in theory[M].Stanford University Press,2006:5.
11. [9] Wang Yuechuan. Postmodern symptoms of “literary” resolution [J]. Zhejiang Academic Journal, 2004, (03): 11-19.
12. [10] Wu Zilin. On the “literary expansion” question [J]. Literary and artistic contention, 2005, (03): 75-79.
13. [11] Wei Zhang. From literariness to interliterature —— On aesthetic disenchantment and value reconstruction of literariness in the era
14. of consumption [J]. Social Sciences in Beijing, 2015, (02): 47-52.
15. [12] Zhang Kaiyan. Is literature really expanding wildly?—— Discuss with Professor Tao Dongfeng [J]. Literary contention, 2006, (03):
16. 35-40.
17. [13] Shi Zhongyi. My view of the definition of “literary nature” [J]. Chinese Comparative Literature, 2000 (03): 124-130.
18. [14] Zhou Xiaoyi. literariness [J]. Foreign Literature, 2003 (05): 51-63.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18686/ijmss.v7i4.5516
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.