An Analysis of the Inefficiency and Immorality of Sanctions in the Current Anti-Doping System and the Need for Fundamental Reform
Vol 6, Issue 4, 2023
VIEWS - 554 (Abstract) 73 (PDF)
Abstract
Doping by athletes is a serious problem plaguing competitive sports around the world. Reviewing history, the traditional British endurance race is the source of doping in modern sports. Science and technology is the main driving force of social development. The competitive level of human beings has reached the height close to the limit of human potential, and it is difficult to improve sports performance by using conventional training methods, which makes athletes seek external and powerful means to improve their performance, and the achievements of natural science just meet this demand. This has also become a seemingly unavoidable phenomenon. On the one hand, this practice has been condemned by the public, on the other hand, it has become a serious problem in sports.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
1. Beamish R. and Ritchie I. (2006) “Fastest, highest, strongest.”
2. Chambers D. (2009) Race against me: My story. Morpeth: Libros International.
3. Dasgupta L. (2019) “The anti-doping narrative,” The World Anti-Doping Code, pp. 1–25.
4. Duke K. (2012) “From crime to recovery,” Journal of Drug Issues, 43(1), pp. 39–55.
5. Efverström A. et al. (2016) “Anti-doping and legitimacy: An international survey of elite athletes’ perceptions,” International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 8(3), pp. 491–514.
6. Gleaves J. and Christiansen A.V. (2019) “Athletes’ perspectives on Wada and the code: A review and analysis,” International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 11(2), pp. 341–353.
7. Hoberman J. (2002) “Sports physicians and the doping crisis in Elite Sport,” Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine, 12(4), pp. 203–208.
8. Hoberman JM. and Møller V. (2004) Doping and public policy. Odense: University Press of Southern Denmark.
9. Hon O.de and Bottenburg M.van (2016) Striking the right balance: Effectiveness of anti-doping policies = Zoeken naar Het juiste evenwicht: Effectiviteit van het anti-dopingbeleid. thesis.
10. Houlihan B. (2014) “Achieving compliance in international anti-doping policy: An analysis of the 2009 World Anti-Doping Code,” Sport Management Review, 17(3), pp. 265–276.
11. Jedlicka SR. and Hunt TM. (2013) “The International Anti-Doping Movement and UNESCO: A historical case study,” The International Journal of the History of Sport, 30(13), pp. 1523–1535.
12. Modahl D. (1995) The Diane Modahl story: Going the distance, the heartbreaking truth behind the headlines. London, Britain: Hodder & Stoughton.
13. Overbye M. (2016) “Doping control in sport: An investigation of how elite athletes perceive and trust the functioning of the doping testing system in their sport,” Sport Management Review, 19(1), pp. 6–22.
14. Rider TC. and Witherspoon KB. (2018) Defending the American way of life: Sport, culture, and the Cold War. Chicago: University of Arkansas Press.
15. Sandvik MR. (2019) “Anti-doping ironism,” Sport in Society, 24(4), pp. 646–658.
16. Savulescu J. (2004) “Why we should allow performance enhancing drugs in Sport,” British Journal of Sports Medicine, 38(6), pp. 666–670.
17. Ulrich R. et al. (2017) “Doping in two elite athletics competitions assessed by randomized-response surveys,” Sports Medicine, 48(1), pp. 211–219.
18. Waddington I. and Møller V. (2019) “Wada at twenty: Old problems and old thinking?,” International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 11(2), pp. 219–231.
19. Williams JM. and Krane V. (2015) Applied Sport Psychology: Personal Growth To Peak Performance. New York: McGraw-Hill Education.
20. Young K. (2004) Sporting bodies, damaged selves: Sociological studies of sports-related injury. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24294/ijmss.v6i4.3216
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.