Impact of CoI Framework on Online Student Engagement

Fang Zhao

Article ID: 2658
Vol 6, Issue 3, 2023

VIEWS - 694 (Abstract) 68 (PDF)

Abstract


This study explores the experiences and perceptions of Chinese postgraduate students in the UK regarding online learning, focusing on the Community of Inquiry (CoI) framework. Semi-structured interviews were used to collect qualitative data, which were analyzed thematically. The findings reveal positive perceptions of online learning, challenges related to technology and infrastructure, the significance of social interaction and collaboration, and the limited impact of teaching quality on student satisfaction. The study emphasizes the importance of the CoI framework in designing effective online learning environments. Limitations include a small sample size and potential bias. Future research should involve larger and more diverse samples, investigate different teaching strategies, and enhance student agency and self-regulated learning in online education. Overall, this study contributes to understanding the applicability of the CoI framework and its potential for improving online learning experiences.


Keywords


CoI Framework; Online Learning; Chinese Postgraduate Students

Full Text:

PDF


References


1. Bolliger, D.U. and Halupa C, Online student perceptions of engagement, transactional distance, and outcomes. Distance Education, 2018. 39(3): p. 299-316.

2. Shelton, B.E., Hung JL, and Lowenthal PR, Predicting student success by modeling student interaction in asynchronous online courses. Distance Education, 2017. 38(1): p. 59-69.

3. Fiock, H., Designing a Community of Inquiry in Online Courses. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 2020. 21(1): p. 134-152.

4. Wu, Y., Study Abroad Experience and Career Decision-Making: A Qualitative Study of Chinese Students. Frontiers of Education in China, 2020. 15(2): p. 313-331.

5. Arthur, N., Using critical incidents to investigate cross-cultural transitions. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 2001. 25(1): p. 41-53.

6. G, P.A., Theories and Frameworks for Online Education: Seeking an Integrated Model. Online Learning, 2017. 21(3).

7. Demuyakor, J., Coronavirus (COVID-19) and Online Learning in Higher Institutions of Education: A Survey of the Perceptions of Ghanaian International Students in China. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 2020. 10(3).

8. Martin, F., et al., A Meta-Analysis on the Community of Inquiry Presences and Learning Outcomes in Online and Blended Learning Environments. Online Learning, 2022. 26(1).

9. Garrison, D.R.A.T.A.W., Critical Inquiry in a Text-Based Environment: Computer Conferencing in Higher Education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2000. 2(2-3): p. 87-105.

10. Szeto, E., Community of Inquiry as an instructional approach: What effects of teaching, social and cognitive presences are there in blended synchronous learning and teaching? Computers & Education, 2015. 81: p. 191-201.

11. Moskal, P., C. Dziuban, and J. Hartman, Blended learning: A dangerous idea? The Internet and Higher Education, 2013. 18: p. 15-23.

12. Garrison, D.R., T. Anderson, and W. Archer, The first decade of the community of inquiry framework: A retrospective. The Internet and Higher Education, 2010. 13(1): p. 5-9.

13. Kallio, H., Pietilä, AM, Johnson, M., & Kangasniemi, M.(2016). Systematic methodological review: Developing a framework for a qualitative semi-structured interview guide. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 72(12): p. 2954-2965.

14. Majid, A. and O. MA, M., Mohamad, SF, Lim, SAH, and Yusof, A.(2017)‘Piloting for interviews in qualitative research: Operationalization and lesson learnt’. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences. 7(4).

15. Braun, V. and V. Clarke, Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 2006. 3(2): p. 77-101.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24294/ijmss.v6i3.2658

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License

This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.