Comparison and research for blended teaching and traditional teaching based on AHP—Using basic course of management as an example

Baoyin Liu, Dhakir Abbas Ali

Article ID: 9961
Vol 8, Issue 15, 2024

VIEWS - 18 (Abstract) 11 (PDF)

Abstract


With the advancement and progress of information and internet technology, blended learning has garnered increased attention from both students and teachers. By utilizing the Analytic Hierarchy Process and integrating feedback from questionnaires, this study constructs an evaluation index to compare the effectiveness of blended learning with traditional teaching methods. The relative weight or criteria of each index is calculated, enabling a comprehensive analysis of the teaching outcomes between these two approaches. The findings indicate that Blended teaching stimulates student interest and enhances learning abilities, while traditional teaching excels in fostering teacher-student interaction. Based on these results, suggestions are provided to guide instructional strategies for teachers and learning approaches for students. According to a study. This study also focuses on the moderating role of smart technologies between the Knowledge management process and employee performance in the case of the Hail health cluster.


Keywords


AHP; blended teaching; traditional teaching; comparative study; learning interest; digital literacy; learning effect

Full Text:

PDF


References


Alshammary, F. M., and Ali, D. A. (2024). Role of Knowledge Management Process in Fostering Employee Performance: Assessing the Moderating Effect of Smart Technologies. International Journal of Religion, 5(3), 111–127.

Cevikbas, M., Kaiser, G. (2022). Promoting Personalized Learning in Flipped Classrooms: A Systematic Review Study, Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 18, p. 11393, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su141811393

Chen, J., and Zhang, W. (2022). Hierarchical Analysis in Educational Research: Methodology and Applications. Journal of Educational Measurement and Evaluation, 23(1), 21–37. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12144-024-05865-1

Ellis, R. A., Steed, A. F., Applebee, A. C. (2006). Teacher conceptions of blended learning, blended teaching and associations with approaches to design, Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 22, no. 3, doi: https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1289

Garg, S. (2020). Impacts of the Covid-19 pandemic on higher education: A reflection on learning practices. Journal of Education Technology Systems, 49(2), 211–227. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/20427530221103915

Ghorbanzadeh, O., Moslem, R., Blaschke, T., and Duleba, S. (2021). Sustainable urban transport planning considering different stakeholder groups by an interval AHP decision support model. Sustainability, 13(14), 8056.

Graham, C. R. (2019). Blended teaching approaches: Integrating traditional face-to-face instruction with online learning activities and resources. In Hand book of Blended Learning (pp.54–68).

Graham, C. R., and Robison, R. (2023). Blended learning strategies in management education: Innovations and challenges. Management Learning, 54(1), 34–50. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11528-021-00626-4

Jing, T., and Ali, D. A. (2024). The application of motivational theories of management to teaching and learning in education. International Journal of Innovation Studies, 8(1), 397–403.

Kim, M. (2018). Critical Reflection on Instantiating Foreign Theory in the Korean History Teacher Community, The SNU Journal of Education Research, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 1–17, doi: https://doi.org/11-2704001

Li, L., Ali, D. A., and Hu, Q. (2023). The Effect of Proactive Health Awareness on Health Behaviors of College Students in Higher Education. In United Frontiers Conference Proceedings (UFCP) (Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 9–9).

Li, W. X., and He, T. T. (2022). Blended classroom teaching equalizes educational inequality, Education and Information Technologies, vol. 28, no. 4, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11332-w

Major, L., Warwick, P., Rasmussen, I., Ludvigsen, S., Cook, V. (2018). Classroom dialogue and digital technologies: A scoping review, Education and Information Technologies, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 1995–2028, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9701-y.

McNicol, S. (2008). Blended learning: Tools for teaching and training, no. 5/6. Facet Publishing. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/03074800810873641

Pape, L. (2010). Blended teaching and learning, The Education Digest, vol. 76, no. 2.

Saad, A. S., Ali, D. A., Hashim, S. R., Maram, M. A., and Muthusamy, R. G. (2022). Role of self-efficacy in the relationship of training and employee performance. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 6(10), 3347–3352.

Sadeghi, M. (2019). A Shift from Classroom to Distance Learning: Advantages and Limitations, International Journal of Research in English Education, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 80–88, doi: https://doi.org/10.29252/ijree.4.1.80

Sarmento, T. S., Gomes, A. S., Moreira, F. (2018). Classroom Adaptations for Blended Learning Practices, Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality, vol. 10, pp. 723–728, doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/3284179.3284296

Silva, E., and Oliveira, J. (2021). Multi-criteria decision analysis in healthcare: A systematic review of analytic hierarchy process applications. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 21(1), 123.

Solimeno, A., Mebane, M. E., Tomai, M., Francescato, D. (2008). The influence of students and teachers characteristics on the efficacy of face-to-face and computer supported collaborative learning, Computers & Education, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 109–128, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.04.003

Strambi, A., Bouvet, E. J. (2003). Flexibility and Interaction at a Distance: A Mixed-Mode Environment for Language Learning, Sep.

Stronge, J. H. (2018). Qualities of effective teachers, 3rd ed. Alexandria, Virginia: Ascd.

U.S. Department of Education. (2020). Future Ready Schools. Retrieved from U.S. Department of Education Website.https://www2.ed.gov/about/reports/annual/index.html

Vernadakis, N., Giannousi, M., Derri, V., Michalopoulos, M., Kioumourtzoglou, E. (2012). The impact of blended and traditional instruction in students’ performance, Procedia Technology, vol. 1, pp. 439–443, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.protcy.2012.02.098

Wang, S. (2024). Online vs Face-to-Face Course Delivery: Comparing motivation, learning strategies and perceived academic performance of postgraduate diploma students, Handle.net, doi: https://hdl.handle.net/2292/68806.

Wang, X., and Ali, D. A. (2024). Research on the Construction of Makerspace Ecosystem in Applied Universities from the Perspective of Full-Chain Incubation: Reflections Based on the Practice of Eagle Makerspace at Pingdingshan University in China. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 30(7), 893–902.

Wei, Y., Shi, Y., Yang, H. H., Liu, J. (2017). Blended Learning versus Traditional Learning: A Study on Students’ Learning Achievements and Academic Press, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/iset.2017.57




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd9961

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Baoyin Liu, Dhakir Abbas Ali

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.