Developing the concept of praxeological managerial activity
Vol 8, Issue 15, 2024
VIEWS - 122 (Abstract) 19 (PDF)
Abstract
Praxeology is the study of practice, i.e., human activity, primarily in the context of its rationality. The study of manager’s praxeological activity from the point of view of management theory is an important direction of modern science, since it contributes not only to improving the management effectiveness in an organization, but also to the development of new managerial concepts and techniques. In the article, the authors’ concept of praxeological managerial activity is proposed based on the analysis of existing scientific approaches to praxeology. An extended list of criteria for the manager’s praxeological activity efficiency was developed. These criteria include performance, productivity, accuracy of the decisions taken, purposefulness, reliability, innovativeness, quality, and ethics. The authors’ model of the manager’s praxeological activity includes the following elements: a subject (a manager), an object (a company, its staff and activities, etc.), motives (success, growth, profit, etc.), the goal (to ensure the effectiveness of the company’s activities), methods and tools (analysis, planning, organization, motivation, and control), process (praxeological activity), result (efficiency improvement), and reflexivity, correction and iteration. Within the framework of the model of praxeological managerial activity, the manager’s ability to influence the managed object (an organization, employees or the manager’s activities) is particularized. This influence should result in an increase in the employees’ performance, an increase in the managers’ performance, and an increase in the performance of the organization as a whole. The article will be of interest to specialists in the field of management, and corporate governance, as well as for anyone interested in the problems of effective management.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Avilov, A. V. (2011). Management as creativity. Some categories of praxiology (Russian). Economics and Management in the 21st century: Development Trends, 1, 8-19.
Berling, T. V., & Bueger, C. (2017). Expertise in the age of post-factual politics: An outline of reflexive strategies. Geoforum, 84, 332–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.05.008.
Bourdeau, L. (1882). Théorie des sciences: Plan de Science intégrale. Lilliad; Université de Lille; Sciences et Technologies. Tome Second. р. 463.
Bredillet, C. N. (2008). Learning and acting in project situations through a meta-method (MAP) a case study: Contextual and situational approach for project management governance in management education. International Journal of Project Management, 26(3), 238–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2008.01.002.
Buzni, A. N. (2016a). Praxiology of marketing (Russian). In: International Innovation Research: Collection of Articles by the Winners of the 4th International Scientific and Practical Conference; 17 October 2016; Penza. pp. 10-21.
Buzni, A. N. (2016b). Praxiology of marketing in the post-Soviet economy. East European Scientific Journal, 8(1), 38-45.
Buzni, A. N. (2018). Praxiology of game, animation and gamification in tourist services (Russian). In: Days of Science of V.I. Vernadsky KFU: Collection of Theses of Participants of the 4th Scientific and Practical Conference of Faculty, Postgraduates, Students and Young Scientists; Volume 4; 12–17 October 2018; Simferopol. pp. 384–386.
Castrillón, J., Cabeza, L., & Lombana, J. (2015). Competencias más importantes para la disciplina administrativa en Colombia. Contaduría y Administración, 60(4), 776–795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cya.2015.07.009.
Chipman, J. S. (2004). Slutsky’s praxeology and his critique of Böhm-Bawerk. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 15(3), 345–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2003.11.002.
Dolyatovsky, V. A. (2020). Reflexive management and praxeology in modern management (Russian). In: Economic Problems of Russia and the Region: Scientific Notes; Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation; Rostov State University of Economics (RINH); Issue 25. pp. 152–163.
Gallistl, V. (2018). The emergence of the creative ager – On subject cultures of late-life creativity. Journal of Aging Studies, 46, 93–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2018.07.002.
Heijman Wim, J. M., & Leen Auke, R. (2004). On Austrian regional economics. Papers in Regional Science, 83(2), 487–493. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1435-5597.2004.tb01919.x.
Hoffman, A. A., & Tymoshchuk, A. S. (2021). Digital praxiology (Russian). Eurasian Law Journal, 9(160), 461–463.
Kanchukoev, V. O. (2021). Relevant accounting trends and basic principles of praxeology of agrarian economics in 1st–2nd decades of the 21st century (Russian). In: Science, education and business: a new look or strategy of integration interaction: Collection of Scientific Papers Based on the Materials of the International Scientific and Practical Conference Dedicated to the 80th Anniversary of the First President of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic V. M. Kokov; Part 1; Nalchik, 14–15 October; Nalchik. pp. 82–88.
Khadaroo, I., & Abdullah, A. (2018). Interests in the field of public private partnership: insights from Bourdieu’s social praxeology. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Management, 17(1), 3–25.
Klein, L., Biesenthal, C., & Dehlin, E. (2015). Improvisation in project management: A praxeology. International Journal of Project Management, 33(2), 267–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.01.011.
Kochetkov, S. V., & Kochetkova, O. V. (2023). Economic assessment of innovative development: doctrine, methodology, praxeology. Part 1: On a new method of assessing the innovative development of the economy (Russian). Bulletin of Omsk University. Series: Economics, 21(4), 26–35. https://doi.org/10.24147/1812-3988.2023.21(4).26-35.
Kochetkov, S. V., & Kochetkova, O. V. (2024). Economic assessment of innovative development: doctrine, methodology, praxeology. Part 2: methodology for calculating the tessitura of innovative economic development (Russian). Bulletin of Omsk University. Series: Economics, 22(1), 27–34. https://doi.org/10.24147/1812-3988.2024.22(1) .27-34.
Kotarbinski, T. (1975). A treatise on good work (Russian). Moscow: Economics, p. 272.
Kurochkin, A. V. (2021). What is useful in economic praxiology for the interpretation of correlations (Russian). Bulletin of Education and Development of Science of the Russian Academy of Natural Sciences, 1, 57–63. https://doi.org/10.26163/RAEN.2021.88.76.009.
Mises, L. von (1957). Psychology and Thymology. Theory and History. p. 272.
Nicolini, D., & Monteiro, P. (2016). The Practice Approach: For a Praxeology of Organisational and Management Studies.
Ostrowski, J. J. (1967). Notes biographiques et bibliographiques sur Alfred Espinas. Review Philosophique de la France et de l’Etranger, 3, 385–391.
Ramirez, A. F. Z., & Romero, C. A. R. (2019). Scientific Knowledge in Management and its Praxeology. J. Mgt. Mkt. Review, 4(2), 126–132. https://doi.org/10.35609/jmmr.2019.4.2(4).
Rothbard, M. (2009). Praxiology, value judgments and public policy (Russian). Economic Policy, 3, 186–201.
Rothbard, M. N. (1976). Praxeology, value judgments, and public policy. The Foundations of Modern Austrian Economics.
Safonov, K. B. (2019). Professional culture of a manager: from axiology to praxeology (Russian). Decision, 1, 212–213.
Shirshin, G. A. (2014). Incompleteness of epistemology and praxiology in the creation of the theory of joint development of science and practice (Russian). In: From Crisis to Modernization: World Experience and Russian Practice of Fundamental and Applied Scientific Developments in Economics, Project Management, Education, Law, Linguistics, Cultural Studies, Ecology, Zoology, Chemistry, Biology, Medicine, Psychology, Political Science, Philology, Philosophy, Sociology, Urban Planning, Computer Science, Engineering, Mathematics, Physics, History, and Crop Production: Collection of Scientific Articles Based on the Results of the International Scientific and Practical Conference; 27–28 June 2014; St. Petersburg. p. 158.
Theofanides, S. (1988). The metamorphosis of development economics. World Development, 16(12), 1455–1463. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(88)90219-7.
Timpler, C. (1608). Philosophiae practicae systema methodicum. Libris IV pertractatam. Hanoviae: Apud Gulielmum Antonio. р. 388.
Vasilenko, V. A. (2020). Management in economics: postulates, distortions, praxiology (Russian). Moscow-Berlin: Directmedia Publishing LLC. p. 403
Wojciechowski, S. N. (2016a). On the development of the provisions of economic praxeology (Russian). New University. Series: Economics and Law, 9(67), 5–9. https://doi.org/10.15350/2221-7347.2016.9.
Wojciechowski, S. N. (2016b). The concept and varieties of praxeology (Russian). Journal of Scientific and Applied Research, 8, 46–50.
Wojciechowski, S. N. (2021). An essay on the philosophy of science. Chapter 1. Philosophical foundations of praxeology and the development of sciences (Russian). Young Scientist, 19(361), 316–320.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd9939
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Yelena Petrenko, Elena Drobot, Ľudovít Hajduk, Stanislav Bencic
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.