The frontiers of ecological art research: A multidimensional analysis based on bibliometrics and machine learning predictions

Zexi Liu, Jin Ho Im, Yujia Chen, Xiaoyang Qiao, Wenliang Ye

Article ID: 9931
Vol 8, Issue 16, 2024

(Abstract)

Abstract


With the advancement of technology, human impact on the natural world has progressively intensified, leading to an increased frequency and expanded scope of environmental issues. Ecological art integrates natural and human environments, aiming to restore damaged ecosystems through artistic expression while reflecting artists’ understanding and concerns about nature. As an emerging interdisciplinary art form, ecological art has garnered significant attention; however, systematic research in this field remains insufficient. This study combines bibliometric analysis with machine learning techniques to examine ecological art literature indexed in the WOS Core Collection between 2004 and 2024, uncovering research trends, core themes, and future directions. In the bibliometric analysis, tools such as VOSviewer, CiteSpace, Bibliometrix, Pajek, and HistCite were utilized to systematically analyze co-occurrence networks, research hotspots, and their evolutionary pathways. For machine learning analysis, comparative experiments were conducted using Random Forest, Support Vector Machines (SVM), k-Nearest Neighbors (k-NN), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), and LightGBM models. Ultimately, Random Forest was selected for predicting citation rates and interpreting influential factors. The findings indicate that machine learning techniques quantitatively reveal the centrality of “Ecological Design” and “Sustainability” as core themes in ecological art while highlighting the emergence of new topics such as “Urban Greenspace” and “Eco-Art Education” in recent years. The publication year was identified as the most critical factor influencing citation rates, followed by the number of authors and keywords. The first author’s affiliation country also significantly impacted citation performance. This study, through the integration of bibliometric and machine learning approaches, provides a novel methodological perspective for identifying research frontiers in ecological art, predicting academic influence, and guiding future scholarly and practical applications.


Keywords


ecological art; bibliometrics; machine learning; sustainability

Full Text:

PDF


References


Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of informetrics, 11(4), 959-975.

Brady, E., & Prior, J. (2020). Environmental aesthetics: A synthetic review. People and Nature, 2(2), 254-266.

Breiman, L. (2001). Random forests. Machine learning, 45, 5-32.

Brunner, C., Nigro, R., & Raunig, G. (2013). Post-media activism, social ecology and eco-art. Third Text, 27(1), 10-16.

Chen, C. (2006). CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature. Journal of the American Society for information Science and Technology, 57(3), 359-377.

Chen, C., Ibekwe‐SanJuan, F., & Hou, J. (2010). The structure and dynamics of cocitation clusters: A multiple‐perspective cocitation analysis. Journal of the American Society for information Science and Technology, 61(7), 1386-1409.

Cortes, C., & Vapnik, V. (1995). Support vector machine. Machine learning, 20(3), 273-297.

Cucuzzella, C. (2021). Making the invisible visible: Eco-art and design against the Anthropocene. Sustainability, 13(7), 3747.

Fix, E. (1985). Discriminatory analysis: nonparametric discrimination, consistency properties (Vol. 1). USAF school of Aviation Medicine.

Freilich, S., Kreimer, A., Meilijson, I., Gophna, U., Sharan, R., & Ruppin, E. (2010). The large-scale organization of the bacterial network of ecological co-occurrence interactions. Nucleic acids research, 38(12), 3857-3868.

Goralnik, L., Nelson, M. P., Gosnell, H., & Leigh, M. B. (2017). Arts and humanities inquiry in the long-term ecological research network: Empathy, relationships, and interdisciplinary collaborations. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 7, 361-373.

Guy, S., Henshaw, V., & Heidrich, O. (2015). Climate change, adaptation and eco-art in Singapore. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 58(1), 39-54.

Hassan-Montero, Y., De-Moya-Anegón, F., & Guerrero-Bote, V. P. (2022). SCImago Graphica: a new tool for exploring and visually communicating data. Profesional de la información, 31(5).

Ison, M., & Bramwell-Lalor, S. (2023). The arts in environmental education: connecting learners with their talents and nature. Environmental Education Research, 29(7), 964-979.

Jiang, Q., Wang, Z., Yu, K., Dou, Y., Fu, H., & Liang, X. (2023). The influence of urbanization on local perception of the effect of traditional landscapes on human wellbeing: A case study of a pondscape in Chongqing, China. Ecosystem Services, 60, 101521.

Ke, G., Meng, Q., Finley, T., Wang, T., Chen, W., Ma, W., ... & Liu, T. Y. (2017). Lightgbm: A highly efficient gradient boosting decision tree. Advances in neural information processing systems, 30.

Lazăr, S., Dobrotă, D., Breaz, R. E., & Racz, S. G. (2023). Eco-Design of Polymer Matrix Composite Parts: A Review. Polymers, 15(17), 3634.

Leydesdorff, L., & Vaughan, L. (2006). Co‐occurrence matrices and their applications in information science: Extending ACA to the Web environment. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(12), 1616-1628.

Lundberg, S. (2017). A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. arXiv preprint arXiv:1705.07874.

Moral-Muñoz, J. A., Herrera-Viedma, E., Santisteban-Espejo, A., & Cobo, M. J. (2020). Software tools for conducting bibliometric analysis in science: An up-to-date review. Profesional de la Información, 29(1).

Nassauer, J. I., Wang, Z., & Dayrell, E. (2009). What will the neighbors think? Cultural norms and ecological design. Landscape and Urban Planning, 92(3-4), 282-292.

Pan, X., Yan, E., Cui, M., & Hua, W. (2018). Examining the usage, citation, and diffusion patterns of bibliometric mapping software: A comparative study of three tools. Journal of informetrics, 12(2), 481-493.

Parsa, A. B., Movahedi, A., Taghipour, H., Derrible, S., & Mohammadian, A. K. (2020). Toward safer highways, application of XGBoost and SHAP for real-time accident detection and feature analysis. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 136, 105405.

Prášek, P. (2024). In What Sense Can Art Be Ecological? Art as an Event Flash of Nature According to Henri Maldiney. Filozofia, 79(4).

Samworth, R. J. (2012). Optimal weighted nearest neighbour classifiers.

Shapley, L. S. (1953). A value for n‐person games. Contribution to the Theory of Games, 2.

Shapshay, S., Tenen, L., & Carlson, A. (2018). Environmental aesthetics, ethics, and ecoaesthetics. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 76(4), 399-410.

Silva, T. C., Braz, T., & Tabak, B. M. (2024). Mapping the landscape of energy markets research: A bibliometric analysis and predictive assessment using machine learning. Energy Economics, 136, 107698.

Simon, S. (2006). Systemic educational approaches to environmental issues: the contribution of ecological art. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 19(2), 143-157.

Song, Y. I. K. (2009). Community participatory ecological art and education. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 28(1), 4-13.

Tsevreni, I. (2022). Encounters among Environmental Education and Eco‐Art in the Anthropocene. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 41(3), 482-495.

Van Eck, N., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523-538.

Walshe, N., Bungay, H., & Dadswell, A. (2023). Sustainable Outdoor Education: Organisations Connecting Children and Young People with Nature through the Arts. Sustainability, 15, 3941.

Weder, F., & Voci, D. (2021). From ignorance to resonance: analysis of the transformative potential of dissensus and agonistic deliberation in sustainability communication. International Journal of Communication, 15, 24.

Wu, D., & Ning, S. (2018). Dynamic assessment of urban economy-environment-energy system using system dynamics model: A case study in Beijing. Environmental research, 164, 70-84.

Wu, S., Chen, B., Webster, C., Xu, B., & Gong, P. (2023). Improved human greenspace exposure equality during 21st century urbanization. Nature Communications, 14(1), 6460.

Xie, H., Zhang, Y., Wu, Z., & Lv, T. (2020). A bibliometric analysis on land degradation: Current status, development, and future directions. Land, 9(1), 28.

Yuan, J., & Kim, C. S. (2024). The Ecological Design of Marine Urban Green Space Plant Landscaping Based on the Concept of Sustainability. Plants, 13(7), 923.

Zou, H., & Hastie, T. (2005). Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology, 67(2), 301-320.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd9931

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Zexi Liu, Jin Ho Im, Yujia Chen, Xiaoyang Qiao, Wenliang Ye

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.