This systematic literature review examines data saturation in qualitative research within the context of entrepreneurship studies from 2004 to 2024. Data saturation, a critical concept in ensuring the rigor of qualitative research, remains inadequately defined in terms of sample size and assessment criteria across various studies. This review synthesizes 11 empirical studies, focusing on strategies such as stopping criterion, code frequency counts, and comparative methods for determining saturation. It identifies sample sizes ranging from 7 to 39 interviews, with an average saturation occurring between 10 and 12 interviews. Furthermore, the study explores the influence of different sampling methods and homogeneity of study populations on saturation outcomes. Despite the reliability of existing methods, the findings underscore the need for greater transparency and consistency in reporting saturation criteria. The review offers valuable insights for entrepreneurial researchers aiming to design qualitative studies, emphasizing the importance of tailored saturation standards based on research objectives and methodologies. This research contributes to a clearer understanding of data saturation in entrepreneurial studies and highlights the necessity for further empirical investigation into saturation across diverse qualitative methods.

Ashworth, C. J. (2012). Marketing and organisational development in e-SMEs: understanding survival and sustainability in growth-oriented and comfort-zone pure-play enterprises in the fashion retail industry. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 8(2), 165–201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-011-0171-6

Bathaei, A., & Štreimikienė, D. (2023). Renewable Energy and Sustainable Agriculture: Review of Indicators. Sustainability, 15(19), 14307. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151914307

Booth, A., Sutton, An., & Papaioannou, D. (2016). Systematic Approaches to a Successful Literature Review. In Journal of the Canadian Health Libraries Association / Journal de l’Association des bibliothèques de la santé du Canada (Second Edi, Vol. 34). SAGE Publications. https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/systematic-approaches-to-a-successful-literature-review/book270933

Calheiros-Lobo, N., Palma-Moreira, A., Au-Yong-Oliveira, M., & Ferreira, J. V. (2024). Internationalization of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises: Best Practices and the Emerging Concept of Foreign Champion, an Empirical Investigation. Administrative Sciences, 14(8), 159. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci14080159

Carlsen, B., & Glenton, C. (2011). What about N? A methodological study of sample-size reporting in focus group studies. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 11(1), 26. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-11-26

Che Nawi, N. R., Arshad, M. M., Krauss, S. E., & Ismail, I. A. (2022). Challenges faced by youth social entrepreneurs in Malaysia: career transition to become a social entrepreneur. European Journal of Training and Development, 46(3/4), 317–336. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJTD-02-2020-0021

Cresswell, A. M., Pardo, T. A., & Canestraro, D. S. (2006). Digital capability assessment for eGovernment: A multi-dimensional approach. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 4084 LNCS, 293–304. https://doi.org/10.1007/11823100_26

Echchakoui, S. (2020). Why and how to merge Scopus and Web of Science during bibliometric analysis: the case of sales force literature from 1912 to 2019. Journal of Marketing Analytics, 8(3), 165–184. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41270-020-00081-9

Fallah, M. R., & Soori, M. (2023). Presenting a framework for the successful entry of women entrepreneurs into green entrepreneurship. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, 14(3), 467–486. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTPM-03-2021-0041

Francis, J. J., Johnston, M., Robertson, C., Glidewell, L., Entwistle, V., Eccles, M. P., & Grimshaw, J. M. (2010). What is an adequate sample size? Operationalising data saturation for theory-based interview studies. Psychology & Health, 25(10), 1229–1245. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870440903194015

Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). Discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine Transaction.

Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How Many Interviews Are Enough? Field Methods, 18(1), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903

Hennink, M. M., Kaiser, B. N., & Marconi, V. C. (2017). Code Saturation Versus Meaning Saturation. Qualitative Health Research, 27(4), 591–608. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732316665344

Hennink, M., & Kaiser, B. N. (2022). Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: A systematic review of empirical tests. Social Science & Medicine, 292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114523

Howard, S., Alston, S., Brown, M., & Bost, A. (2023). Literature Review on Regulatory Frameworks for Addressing Discrimination in Clinical Supervision. Research on Social Work Practice, 33(1), 84–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/10497315221121827

Irani, S., Modarresi, M., & Moghaddam, A. (2024). Unveiling the Drive to Create: Exploring the Motivation of Lifestyle Entrepreneurs in Iran. Interdisciplinary Journal of Management Studies, 17(2), 669–684. https://doi.org/10.22059/ijms.2023.350858.675491

Jackson, M., Harrison, P., Swinburn, B., & Lawrence, M. (2015). Using a Qualitative Vignette to Explore a Complex Public Health Issue. Qualitative Health Research, 25(10), 1395–1409. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315570119

Jekanyika Matanda, M. (2012). Internationalization of established small manufacturers in a developing economy: A case study of Kenyan SMEs. Thunderbird International Business Review, 54(4), 509–519. https://doi.org/10.1002/tie.21480

Kerr, C., Nixon, A., & Wild, D. (2010). Assessing and demonstrating data saturation in qualitative inquiry supporting patient-reported outcomes research. Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research, 10(3), 269–281. https://doi.org/10.1586/erp.10.30

Mariani, M. M., Al-Sultan, K., & De Massis, A. (2023). Corporate social responsibility in family firms: A systematic literature review. Journal of Small Business Management, 61(3), 1192–1246. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472778.2021.1955122

Marshall, B., Cardon, P., Poddar, A., & Fontenot, R. (2013). Does Sample Size Matter in Qualitative Research? A Review of Qualitative Interviews in is Research. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 54(1), 11–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2013.11645667

Molly, V., Arijs, D., & Lambrecht, J. (2018). Building and maintaining the family business-private equity relationship. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 25(1), 41–63. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-02-2017-0051

Morse, J. M. (2015). “Data Were Saturated.” Qualitative Health Research, 25(5), 587–588. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315576699

Movahedi, R., & Farani, A. Y. (2012). Analysis of the barriers and limitations for the development of rural women’s entrepreneurship. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 15(4), 469. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJESB.2012.046476

Orobia, L. A., Byabashaija, W., Munene, J. C., Sejjaaka, S. K., & Musinguzi, D. (2013). How do small business owners manage working capital in an emerging economy? Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 10(2), 127–143. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRAM-02-2012-0008

Pan, J., & Lin, J. (2019). CONSTRUCTION OF NETWORK ENTREPRENEURIAL PLATFORM LEADERSHIP CHARACTERISTICS MODEL: BASED ON THE GROUNDED THEORY. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 20(5), 958–978. https://doi.org/10.3846/jbem.2019.10618

Samer Ali, A.-S., & Rashid, A. A. (2024). The influencing factors of personality that affect entrepreneurship development among people with disabilities. Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, 18(3), 576–600. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEC-09-2022-0138

Sandelowski, M. (1995). Sample size in qualitative research. Research in Nursing & Health, 18(2), 179–183. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.4770180211

Saunders, B., Sim, J., Kingstone, T., Baker, S., Waterfield, J., Bartlam, B., Burroughs, H., & Jinks, C. (2018). Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Quality & Quantity, 52(4), 1893–1907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8

Siksnelyte-Butkiene, I., Streimikiene, D., Balezentis, T., & Skulskis, V. (2021). A Systematic Literature Review of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods for Sustainable Selection of Insulation Materials in Buildings. Sustainability, 13(2), 737. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020737

Siksnelyte-Butkiene, I., Streimikiene, D., Lekavicius, V., & Balezentis, T. (2021). Energy poverty indicators: A systematic literature review and comprehensive analysis of integrity. Sustainable Cities and Society, 67, 102756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.102756

Sim, J., Saunders, B., Waterfield, J., & Kingstone, T. (2018). Can sample size in qualitative research be determined a priori? International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 21(5), 619–634. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2018.1454643

Suddaby, R. (2006). From the Editors: What Grounded Theory is Not. Academy of Management Journal, 49(4), 633–642. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2006.22083020

Trotter, R. T. (2012). Qualitative research sample design and sample size: Resolving and unresolved issues and inferential imperatives. Preventive Medicine, 55(5), 398–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2012.07.003

van Rijnsoever, F. J. (2017). (I Can’t Get No) Saturation: A simulation and guidelines for sample sizes in qualitative research. PLOS ONE, 12(7), e0181689. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0181689

Vasileiou, K., Barnett, J., Thorpe, S., & Young, T. (2018). Characterising and justifying sample size sufficiency in interview-based studies: systematic analysis of qualitative health research over a 15-year period. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18(1), 148. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0594-7

Vera-Baceta, M.-A., Thelwall, M., & Kousha, K. (2019). Web of Science and Scopus language coverage. Scientometrics, 121(3), 1803–1813. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03264-z

Ying, L., Fitzpatrick, J. M., Philippou, J., Huang, W., & Rafferty, A. M. (2021). The organisational context of nursing practice in hospitals in China and its relationship with quality of care, and patient and nurse outcomes: A mixed‐methods review. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 30(1–2), 3–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15486

Yonge, O., & Stewin, L. (1988). Reliability and validity: misnomers for qualitative research. In The Canadian journal of nursing research = Revue canadienne de recherche en sciences infirmieres (Vol. 20, Issue 2, pp. 61–67).