STI or DUI modes of innovation: Evidence from comprehensive evaluation of four cities in China
Vol 8, Issue 13, 2024
VIEWS - 63 (Abstract) 4 (PDF)
Abstract
The Science and Technology Innovation Center holds a pivotal position in the national science and technology innovation system, and a scientific evaluation of the “Sci-tech Innovation Center” will guide its construction direction. This study found the advantages and disadvantages of the four cities through comparison; Hence improvement suggestions were proposed for the weaknesses of the four cities. There are two main paths for the government to drive technology innovation: STI (Science and Technology Innovation) mode and DUI (Doing, Using, Interacting) mode. With the aid of the evaluation index system of the Sci-tech Innovation Center, this article uses fuzzy sets, rough sets and fuzzy dynamic clustering methods to comprehensively evaluate the effects of driving technology innovation in the four cities of Beijing, Shanghai, Shenzhen and Guangzhou. The results found that Shenzhen has a significant effect in DUI, and Beijing has a significant effect in STI. The choice of path is related to the abundance of innovation resources.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Anonymous. Global Science and Technology Innovation Center Index 2020 launched in Zhongguancun Forum. (downloaded on 28 January 2022 from https://chuangxin.chinadaily.com.cn/a/202009/22/WS5f6aa127a3101e7ce9725f2a.html.)
Aschhoff, B., and Sofka, W., 2009. ‘Innovation on Demand–Can Public Procurement Drive Market Success of Innovations’, Research Policy, 38(08):1235–47.
Bronzini, R., and Piselli, P., 2016. ‘The Impact of R&D Subsidies on Firm Innovation’, Research Policy, 45(02): 442–57.
Chen B., 2016. A Preliminary study on Evaluation Index System of Global Science and Technology Innovation Center. Scientific Research Management, 37(S1):289-295. DOI:10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2016.s1.042.
Chen T., 2018. Analysis on the boosting effect of Foreign R&D Center on the construction of Shanghai Science and Innovation Center. Statistical Theory and Practice, (07):25-28.
Cheng H., et al. 2020. “Different Policy Instruments and the Threshold Effects on Collaboration Efficiency in China.” Science & Public Policy (SPP) 47(03): 348–359, https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scaa016.
Daniela M. Santos, Sara M. Gonçalves，Manuel Laranja，2022. Drivers, Processes, and Outcomes of the STI and DUI Modes of Innovation: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Innovation and Technology ManagementVol. 19, No. 03, 2140015 (2022)
Deng D. Q., et al. 2019. Evaluation index System of global Sci-tech innovation Center: Empirical analysis based on entropy weight TOPSIS. Science and Technology Management Research, 39 (14): 48-56.
Dimos, C., and Pugh, G., 2016. ‘The Effectiveness of R&D Subsidies: A Meta-Regression Analysis of the Evaluation Literature’, Research Policy, 45(04): 797-815.
Ding B., et al. 2008. Research on Supplier Risk Assessment Method based on Rough Set and Unascertained Model. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 16(S1):507-513. DOI:10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2008.s1.064.
Du D. B, He S. H., 2016. The connotation, function and organization structure of global Science and technology innovation Center. Forum on Science and Technology in China, (02):10-15. DOI:10.13580/j.cnki.fstc.2016.02.003.
Geenhuizen. M. V, Soetanto. D. P., 2008. science parks：what they are and how they need to be evaluated．International Journal of Foresight＆Innovation Policy. 4(1/2): 90-111.
Huang C, Feng H., 2018. Research on influencing factors of the formation of science and technology innovation Center. Beijing Jiaotong University (Social Sciences),17(03):41-49. DOI:10.16797/j.cnki.11-5224/c.20180711.014.
Huang G. M, Zhang W., 2004. Research on Comprehensive evaluation method based on Rough Set. Computer Engineering and Applications, (02):36-38+59.
Jin Y. Z. Top 100 global science and technology innovation center: Shanghai for the first time in the top 10. (Downloaded on 28 January 2022. https://www.yicai.com/news/101035316.html.)
Li B. C., et al. 2019. The Development of Innovative Cities in Europe, America and Asia and its enlightenment to our country: Analysis of the Top 100 Innovative Cities in the World. Science & Technology Progress and policy, 36(15):43-48.
Li X. Q, Luo H., 2021. The Strategic Study of Constructing Sci-Tech Innovation Center -- the Enlightenment based on the Development Law of the World-Famous Sci-tech Innovation Center. Global Science technology and economy Outlook, 36(07):9-14.
Pawlak Z. 1982. Rough sets. International Journal of Computer and Information Sciences, 11(05):341-356.
Ritala P., et al. 2015. Knowledge sharing, knowledge leaking and relative innovation performance: An empirical study. Technovation, 2015, 35: 22-31.
Song Y. X., 2010. Rough Set Rule Extraction by Dynamic Clustering Method. Computer Engineering and Design, 31(13):3054-3056.DOI:10.16208/j.issn1000-7024.2010.13.051.
Sui J. G., 2020. Enlightenment to China from the construction experience of global Science and Technology innovation Center. Frontiers, (06):16-22. DOI:10.16619/j.cnki.rmltxsqy.2020.06.002.
Wang R. W, Wu M. Z., 2016. From Silicon Valley to Zhangjiang -- A Visit to the Global Science and Technology Innovation Center. Shanghai Lexicographical Publishing House, Shanghai.
Xiong H. R., 2015. Formation and development of global Science and technology innovation Center. study and Exploration, (09): 112-116.
Zadeh. L.A., 1965. Fuzzy sets, Information and Control, 8(03): 338-353.
Zhang S. Y., 2017. Research on the construction path of Science and Technology Innovation Center. Sci-tech in China, (10):49-51.
Zhang S. Y., et al. 2018. Research on Function and evaluation of Science and Technology Innovation Center. World Sci-Tech R&D, 40(01):61-70. DOI:10.16507/j.issn.1006-6055.2018.02.005.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd9748
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Honghui Deng, Bo Chen
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.