This study presents a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of the literature on public financial management (PFM), aiming to identify key trends, influential publications, and emerging themes. Using data from Web of Science and Scopus, the study examines the evolution of PFM research from 1977 to 2024. The findings reveal a significant increase in PFM research output, particularly after 2010, with countries like the United States, the United Kingdom, and China contributing the most publications. Central themes such as financial management, transparency, and accountability remain prominent while emerging topics like gender budgeting, health insurance, and blockchain technology reflect shifting priorities in the field. The study employed performance analysis and science mapping techniques to assess the structure and dynamics of PFM research. The analysis highlights key focus areas, including fiscal decentralization and sector-specific management, and identifies gaps in the existing literature, particularly regarding interdisciplinary and international collaboration. The results suggest that while PFM remains rooted in traditional governance and financial control, there is a growing emphasis on modern, innovative solutions to address contemporary challenges. This study’s insights provide a roadmap for future research, emphasizing the importance of transparency, technological integration, and inclusive financial policies. In conclusion, this bibliometric analysis contributes to understanding PFM’s evolving landscape, offering scholars and policymakers a clearer perspective on current trends and future directions in the field. Future research should focus on expanding interdisciplinary approaches and exploring the practical impacts of emerging PFM trends across different regions.

1. Aguillo, I. F. (2012). Is Google Scholar useful for bibliometrics? A webometric analysis. Scientometrics, 91(2), 343–351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0582-8
2. Alan, W., Steiss, Emeka, O., Nwagwu. (2001). Financial planning and management in public organizations.New York . Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781482270938
3. Alshubiri, F. N. (2019). Public finance indicators and the value of investment project development: a comparative study of GCC countries. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 20(6), 1143–1167. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARA-06-2023-0155
4. Andrés, J., Doménech, R., and Fatás, A. (2008). The stabilizing role of government size. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 32(2), 571–593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jedc.2007.02.006
5. Andrews, M. (2010). Good government means different things in different countries. Governance, 23(1), 7–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2009.01465.x
6. Andrews, M. (2012). The logical limits of best practice administrative solutions in developing countries. Public Administration and Development, 32(2), 137–153. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.622
7. Andrews, M. (2014). Why Distributed End Users Often Limit Public Financial Management Reform Success. CID Working Paper Series
8. Aria, M., and Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-Tool for Comprehensive Science Mapping Analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4): 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
9. Ball, I. (2020). Reflections on public financial management in the Covid-19 pandemic. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 16(4), 655–662. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAOC-10-2020-0160
10. Broadbent, J., and Laughlin, R. (2005). The role of PFI in the UK government’s modernisation agenda. Financial Accountability & Management, 21(1), 75–97. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0267-4424.2005.00210.x
11. Buch, C., Doepke, J., and Pierdzioch, C. (2005). Financial openness and business cycle volatility. Journal of International Money and Finance, 24(5), 744–765. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2005.04.002
12. Carlin, T., and Guthrie, J. (2003). Accrual output based budgeting systems in Australia The rhetoric-reality gap. Public Management Review, 5(2), 145–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461667032000066372
13. Chornovol, A., Tabenska, J., Tomniuk, T., and Prostebi, L. (2020). Public finance management system in modern conditions. Investment Management & Financial Innovations, 17(4), 402. http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.17(4).2020.34
14. De Bruijn, R., Kox, H., and Lejour, A. (2008). Economic benefits of an integrated European market for services. Journal of Policy Modeling, 30(2), 301–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2007.02.003
15. de Oliveira, O. J., da Silva, F. F., Juliani, F., Barbosa, L. C. F. M., and Nunhes, T. V. (2019). Bibliometric Method for Mapping the State-of-the-Art and Identifying Research Gaps and Trends in Literature: An Essential Instrument to Support the Development of Scientific Projects. Scientometrics Recent Advances, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.85856
16. De Renzio, P. (2006). Aid, budgets and accountability: A survey article. Development Policy Review, 24(6), 627–645. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7679.2006.00351.x
17. Demianyshyn, V. (2021). MODERN VECTORS OF REFORMING PUBLIC FINANCE MANAGEMENT IN THE CONTEXT OF MODERNIZATION OF THE FINANCIAL MECHANISM AND FINANCIAL SYSTEM OF UKRAINE. WORLD OF FINANCE. 2(67), 51–65. https://doi.org/10.35774/sf2021.02.051
18. Demianyshyn, V., Kostetskyі, V., and Demianyshyn, V. (2023). MODERNIZATION OF ACCOUNTING OF FINANCIAL RESOURCES IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR UNDER THE CONDITIONS OF THE REFORM OF THE PUBLIC FINANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND STRENGTHENING OF FINANCIAL SECURITY. WORLD OF FINANCE. 4(73), 22–44. https://doi.org/10.35774/sf2022.04.022
19. Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., and Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
20. García-León, R. A., Martínez-Trinidad, J., and Campos-Silva, I. (2021). Historical Review on the Boriding Process using Bibliometric Analysis. Transactions of the Indian Institute of Metals, 74(3), 541–557. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-020-02174-6
21. Gasanov, S. (2023). International standards of public debt statistics and their implementation in the public finance management system of Ukraine. Fìnansi Ukraïni. 7–21. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4468347
22. Gaviria-Marin, M., Merigó, J. M., and Baier-Fuentes, H. (2019). Knowledge management: A global examination based on bibliometric analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 140: 194–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.006
23. Griffith, B. C., Small, H., Stonehill, J. A., and Dey, S. (1974). The structure of scientific literatures II: Toward a macroand microstructure for science. Science Studies, 4(4), 339–365. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631277400400402
24. Jamshed, S., and Majeed, N. (2022). Framing evolution and knowledge domain visualization of business ethics research (1975–2019): A large-scale scientometric analysis. Quality & Quantity, 56(6), 4269–4294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-022-01315-x
25. Kioko, M. N. (2018). Factors influencing community participation in public finance management: a case of Makueni county, Kenya (Doctoral dissertation, University of Nairobi)
26. Lawson, A. (2015). Public Financial Management. GSDRC Professional Development Reading Pack no. 6. Birmingham, UK: GSDRC, University of Birmingham.
27. Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J. et al. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. Annals of internal medicine, 151(4), W-65. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00136
28. Lusha, A., Mziu, X., and Brahimi, F. (2015). FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR. European scientific journal, 11 (7), 186–197. Retrieved from https://eujournal.org/index.php/esj/article/view/5315
29. Marhasova, V., Ruzhytskyi, I., Tkalenko, N., Shestakovska, T., and Mykhailovska, O.V. (2021). CURRENT ISSUES OF PUBLIC FINANCE MANAGEMENT IN UKRAINE. Financial and credit activity: problems of theory and practice. 40, 135–144. https://doi.org/10.18371/fcaptp.v5i40.244915
30. Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D.G. (2009), Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
31. Mongeon, P., Paul-Hus, A. (2016), The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: A comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 106(1), 213–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1765-5
32. Muzurura, J., and Mutambara, E. (2022). Effective Supreme Auditing Institutions, Sound Public Finance Management and National Development: Lessons for Zimbabwe’s Office of Auditor General. Humanities and Social Sciences Letters. 10(3), 223–237.
33. Nitiwatthana, K., and Prabpala, S. (2024). A bibliometric analysis of gender inequality: Trends, themes, and emerging areas of research. Sociolytics Journal, 1(1), 12–20. https://www.sociolytics.huso-kku.org/index.php/journal/article/view/3
34. Olson, O., Humphrey, C., and Guthrie, J. (2001). Caught in an evaluatory trap: a dilemma for public services under NPFM. European Accounting Review, 10(3), 505–522. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180126799
35. Oosthuizen, R., and Pretorius, L. (2020). A Bibliometric Method for Analysis of Systems Engineering Research. INCOSE International Symposium, 30(1), 1637–1651. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2334-5837.2020.00809.x
36. Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M. et al. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. bmj, 372. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
37. Pierson, K., Hand, M. L., and Thompson, F. (2015). The government finance database: A common resource for quantitative research in public financial analysis. PloS one, 10(6), e0130119. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130119
38. Ridder, H. G., Bruns, H. J., and Spier, F. (2005). Analysis of public management change processes: the case of local government accounting reforms in Germany. Public administration, 83(2), 443–471. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0033-3298.2005.00457.x
39. Rukina, S.N., Gerasimova, K.A., Takmazyan, A.S., and Samoylova, K.N. (2022). Budgetary instruments of public finance management. Vestnik Universiteta. 10(2022), 205–214. https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2022-10-205-214
40. Saputra, K.A. (2021). THE EFFECT OF SOUND GOVERNANCE AND PUBLIC FINANCE MANAGEMENT ON THE PERFORMANCE OF LOCAL GOVERNMENTS. Russian Journal of Agricultural and Socio-Economic Sciences. 10(118), 32–43. https://doi.org/10.18551/rjoas.2021-10.04
41. Schmidthuber, L., Hilgers, D., and Hofmann, S. (2022). International Public Sector Accounting Standards (IPSASs): A systematic literature review and future research agenda. Financial Accountability & Management, 38(1), 119–142. https://doi.org/10.1111/faam.12265
42. Shpektorenko, I. V., Vasylevska, T. E., Bashtannyk, A. H., Piatkivskyi, R. O., Palamarchuk, T. P., Akimov, O. O. and Акімов, О. О. (2021). LEGAL BASES AND FEATURES OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION IN THE BUDGET SPHERE IN UKRAINE AND FOREIGN COUNTRIES. AD ALTA: Journal of interdisciplinary research. 11(1), 76–81.
43. Tolikova, E. E., Chernyavskaya, E. V., Koltyshev, V. V., Gvozdev, M. D., and Solomatina, T. B. (2022). Best practices in public finance management. In P. V. Trifonov & M. V. Charaeva (Eds.), Strategies and trends in organizational and project management (DITEM 2021) (Vol. 380, Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94245-8_80
44. Van Eck, N. J., Waltman, L., Dekker, R., and Van den Berg, J. (2010). A comparison of two techniques for bibliometric mapping: Multidimensional scaling and VOS. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(12), 2405–2416. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21421
45. Wang, J., Wang, X., Yang, Y., Zhang, H., and Fang, B. (2020). A Review of Data Cleaning Methods for Web Information System. Computers, Materials & Continua, 62(3), 1053–1075. https://doi.org/10.32604/cmc.2020.08675
46. Wishnia, J., and Goudge, J. (2021). Strengthening public financial management in the health sector: a qualitative case study from South Africa. BMJ Global Health, 6(11), e006911. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-006911
47. Zupic, I., and Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric Methods in Management and Organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629