Compare the teaching effectiveness and student satisfaction between native Japanese language teachers and non-native Japanese language teachers

Junchao Luo

Article ID: 9090
Vol 8, Issue 11, 2024

VIEWS - 819 (Abstract)

Abstract


This study examines the comparative teaching effectiveness and student satisfaction between native Japanese language teachers (NJLTs) and non-native Japanese language teachers (NNJLTs). Utilizing a sample of 740 students from various educational institutions in Japan, the research employs a quantitative design, including structured questionnaires adapted from established scales. Advanced statistical methods, including factor analysis and multiple regression, were used to analyze the data. The findings reveal no significant differences in student satisfaction and language proficiency between students taught by NJLTs and NNJLTs. Additionally, regression analysis showed that cultural relatability and empathy were not significant predictors of teaching effectiveness, suggesting that factors beyond nativeness influence student outcomes. These results challenge the native-speakerism ideology, highlighting the importance of pedagogical skills, teacher-student rapport, and effective teaching strategies. The study underscores the need for inclusive hiring practices, comprehensive teacher training programs, and collaborative teaching models that leverage the strengths of both NJLTs and NNJLTs. Implications for educational policy, curriculum design, and teacher professional development are discussed, advocating for a balanced approach that values the contributions of both native and non-native teachers. Limitations include the reliance on self-reported data and the specific cultural context of Japan. Future research should explore additional variables, employ longitudinal designs, and utilize mixed-methods approaches to provide a more nuanced understanding of language teaching effectiveness.


Keywords


Japanese language education; native-speakerism; teaching effectiveness; student satisfaction

Full Text:

PDF


References

  1. Chen, L. (2020). Innovative strategies in non-native language instruction. Journal of Modern Language Teaching, 15(3), 201-215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmlt.2020.03.005
  2. Hiratsuka, T., Nall, C., & Castellano, R. (2023). Native-speakerism and trans-speakerism in language teaching. Language Teaching Research, 27(2), 123-141. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688221091234
  3. Hobbs, M., Matsuo, A., & Payne, J. (2010). Comprehension and retention challenges for students in native-taught classes. Journal of Language Teaching, 45(1), 45-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langteach.2010.02.003
  4. Kadowaki, Y. (2018). Collaborative teaching strategies in Japanese language education. Journal of Educational Development, 30(4), 329-345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jedudev.2018.01.010
  5. Lai, C. (1999). Sociopolitical influences on native and non-native teacher programs. Journal of International Education Policy, 12(3), 275-289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiep.1999.05.007
  6. Lee, S. (2022). Pedagogical skills over nativeness in language teaching. International Journal of Language Education, 38(2), 145-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijle.2022.04.010
  7. Matsumoto, K. (2017). Empathy and support in non-native Japanese language teachers. International Journal of Language Teaching, 55(3), 289-303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlt.2017.05.004
  8. Matsumura, S. (2021). Self-efficacy among non-specialist language teachers. Language Education Research, 18(2), 112-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langedures.2021.03.006
  9. Rao, P., & Yu, L. (2021). Team teaching effectiveness in language learning. Journal of Collaborative Teaching, 44(2), 201-215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jct.2021.02.012
  10. Saito, Y., & Ebsworth, M. E. (2004). Student preferences for native and non-native language teachers. Language Learning Journal, 29(1), 89-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langlearnj.2004.04.003
  11. Sutherland, J. (2012). Teaching strategies of non-native language instructors. Language Teaching Studies, 40(2), 156-172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lts.2012.03.005
  12. Tajino, A., & Tajino, Y. (2000). Collaborative teaching in Japanese language education. Journal of Language Teaching, 44(3), 192-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langteach.2000.06.007
  13. Tanaka, H. (2021). Adaptability in language education: A new paradigm. Language Learning Research, 27(4), 333-350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langres.2021.07.008
  14. Üstünlüoğlu, E. (2007). Student perceptions of native and non-native teachers in Turkey. Journal of Educational Research, 50(2), 120-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jedures.2007.02.004
  15. Yu, Z. (2022). Intelligent multimedia teaching systems in language instruction. Journal of Educational Technology, 35(4), 287-302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jedutech.2022.01.009
  16. Zhang, H., & Zhang, L. (2021). Learner perceptions of teacher competence and motivation. Journal of Language and Education, 45(2), 211-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langed.2021.03.010


DOI: https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i11.9090

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Junchao Luo

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.