An insight of undergraduate students’ attitude and satisfaction with online home-based learning system

Ling Chai Wong, Bee Lian Song, Bee Wah Ooi, Ming Fook Lim, Poh Kiong Tee

Article ID: 9062
Vol 8, Issue 12, 2024

VIEWS - 20 (Abstract) 4 (PDF)

Abstract


The purpose of this study is to investigate different factors associated with remote online home-based learning (thereafter named OHL), including technical system quality, perceived quality of contents, perceived ease of use, and perceived usefulness in relation to the satisfaction of undergraduate students following the post-COVID-19 pandemic in Malaysia. Additionally, the mediating roles of attitude are also investigated. Two hundred questionnaires were distributed using judgmental sampling method and 156 completed responses were collected. The data were subsequently analyzed using PLS-SEM. The findings imply that the OHL system is an effective method although it is challenging to operate. In terms of perceived technical system quality, OHL is currently more gratifying for students; however, some have reported that the quality of the content delivered via the remote system is still unsatisfactory. Moreover, the study found that attitude is a significant determinant of undergraduates’ satisfaction with OHL. This study contributes to the advancement of current knowledge by inspecting the factors of the Undergraduate Level OHL System using the mediating roles of attitude. In terms of underpinning theories, Technology Acceptance Model and Information System Model were employed as the guiding principles of the current study.


Keywords


online home-based learning; technology acceptance model; perceived technical system quality; perceived quality of contents; attitude; students’ satisfaction

Full Text:

PDF


References


Abu Sneineh, W., & Zairi, M. (2010). An Evaluation Framework for E-Learning Effectiveness in The Arab World. International Encyclopedia of Education, 521-535. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-044894-7.01708-5

Abu-Rumman, A., & Qawasmeh, R. (2022). Assessing international students’ satisfaction of a Jordanian university using the service quality model. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 14(4), 1742-1760. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-05-2021-0166

Alshare, K. A., Freeze, R. D., Lane, P. L., et al. (2011). The impacts of system and human factors on online learning systems use and learner satisfaction. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 9(3), 437-461. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4609.2011.00321.x

Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411-423. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411

Bilton, I. (2018). Women are Outnumbering Men at a Record High in Universities Worldwide. Available online: https://www.studyinternational.com/ news/record-high-numbers-women-outnumbering-men-university-globally/ (accessed on 7 July 2023).

Boonchutima, S., Lertjaruphatthra, R., Ukoskit, S., et al. (2021). Promoting Upcycling Fashion through DIY Tutorials amongst Thai Generation Z. Fashion, Style & Popular Culture, 8(2-3), 2-3. https://doi.org/10.1386/fspc_00091_1

Casaló, L. V., Flavián, C., & Ibáñez-Sánchez, S. (2017). Understanding Consumer Interaction on Instagram: The Role of Satisfaction, Hedonism, and Content Characteristics. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 20(6), 369-375. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2016.0360

Chang, S. ‐C., & Tung, F. ‐C. (2008). An Empirical Investigation of Students’ Behavioural Intentions to Use the Online Learning Course Websites. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(1), 71-83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00742.x

Choi, S. Y. (2022). A Case Study on the ‘Theory of Home Economics Education’ Using Online Problem-Based Learning. Human Ecology Research, 60(2), 187-209. https://doi.org/10.6115/fer.2022.013

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1992). Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace 1. Journal of applied social psychology, 22(14), 1111-1132. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1992.tb00945.x

DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (1992). Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable. Information Systems Research, 3(1), 60-95. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.3.1.60

Doll, W. J., & Torkzadeh, G. (1998). Developing A Multidimensional Measure of System-Use in An Organizational Contex. Information and Management, 33(4), 171-185. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(98)00028-7

Erdfelder, E., Faul, F., & Buchner, A. (1996). GPOWER: A general power analysis program. Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers, 28, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03203630

Finneran, C. M., & Zhang, P. (2003). A Person–Artefact–Task (PAT) Model of Flow Antecedents in Computer-Mediated Environments. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 59(4), 475-496. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1071-5819(03)00112-5

Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1977). Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Addison-Wesley.

Franke, G., & Sarstedt, M. (2019). Heuristics versus statistics in discriminant validity testing: a comparison of four procedures. Internet Research, 29(3), 430-447. https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-12-2017-0515

Fricker, R. D. (2008). Sampling methods for web and e-mail surveys. The SAGE handbook of online research methods. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.

G Power Analysis. (2018). Allgemeine Psychologie und Arbeitspsychologie. Available online: http://www.gpower.hhu.de/ (accesse on 10 February 2024).

Gold, A. H., Malhotra, A., & Segars, A. H. (2001). Knowledge management: an organizational capabilities perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(1), 185–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2001.11045669

Goldstein, R. (1989). Power and sample size via MS/PC-DOS computers. The American Statistician, 43(4), 253-260. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.1989.10475670

Hair Jr, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., et al. (2014). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM): An Emerging Tool in Business Research. European Business Review. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-10-2013-0128

Hair, J., Risher, J., Sarstedt, M., et al. (2019), When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2-24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203

Henseler, J., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A New Criterion for Assessing Discriminant Validity in Variance-based Structural Equation Modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115-135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8

Jayawardena, C., Ahmad, A., Valeri, M., et al. (2023). Technology acceptance antecedents in digital transformation in hospitality industry. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 108, 103350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2022.103350

Kashive, N., & Mohite, S. (2023). Use of Gamification to Enhance E-learning Experience. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 20(4), 554-575. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-05-2022-0058

Khlaif, Z. N., Salha, S., & Kouraichi, B. (2021). Emergency remote learning during COVID-19 crisis: Students’ engagement. Education and information technologies, 26(6), 7033-7055. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10566-4

Khusanov, K., Khusanova, G., & Khusanova, M. (2022). Compulsory distance learning in Uzbekistan during the COVID-19 era: the case of public and senior secondary vocational education systems. IGI global.

Kim, E. J., Kim, J. J., & Han, S. H. (2021). Understanding student acceptance of online learning systems in higher education: Application of social psychology theories with consideration of user innovativeness. Sustainability, 13(2), 896-910. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020896

Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling, 4th ed. New York: Guilford Press.

Kock, N., & Lynn, G. S. (2012). Lateral collinearity and misleading results in variance-based SEM: An illustration and recommendations. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 13(7), 546-580.

Lee, J. -K., & Lee, W. -K. (2008). The Relationship of E-Learner’s Self-Regulatory Efficacy and Perception of E-Learning Environmental Quality. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(1), 32-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2006.12.001

Li, Y., Chen, X., Liu, S., et al. (2022). Exploring middle school students’ attitudes and satisfaction about home-based online education during the COVID-19 epidemic and the influential variables. Educational Studies, 58(2), 177-199. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131946.2021.2010080

Lin, J. C. -C., & Lu, H. (2000). Towards an understanding of the behavioral intention to use a web site. International Journal of Information Management, 20(3), 197-208. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0268-4012(00)00005-0

Lin, W. -S., & Wang, C. -H. (2012). Antecedences to Continued Intentions of Adopting E-Learning System in Blended Learning Instruction: A Contingency Framework Based on Models of Information System Success and Task-Technology Fit. Computers and Education, 58(1), 88-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.07.008

Liu, H. H., Ye, Y. C., & Jiang, H. L. (2021). Self-Efficacy in Home-Based Online Learning Environments. Journal of Internet Technology, 22(3), 557–567. https://doi.org/10.3966/160792642021052203006

Liu, R. (2023). Analysis of multimedia technology and mobile learning in English teaching in colleges and universities. Nonlinear Engineering, 12(1), 20220300. https://doi.org/10.1515/nleng-2022-0300

Londa, D. R., Worang, F. G., & Arie, F. V. (2022). The Influence of Perceived Credibility, Perceived Ease of Use, and Perceived Usefulness toward Customer Satisfaction in Using BSGtouch. Jurnal EMBA: Jurnal Riset Ekonomi, Manajemen, Bisnis dan Akuntansi, 10(4), 934-945. https://doi.org/10.35794/emba.v10i4.43902

Mailizar, M., Almanthari, A., & Maulina, S. (2021a). Examining teachers’ behavioral intention to use E-learning in teaching of mathematics: an extended TAM model. Contemporary educational technology, 13(2), 298-314. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/9709

Mailizar, M., Burg, D., & Maulina, S. (2021b). Examining university students’ behavioural intention to use e-learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: An extended TAM model. Education and Information Technologies, 26(6), 7057-7077. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10557-5

Mangiò, F., Andreini, D., & Pedeliento, G. (2020). Hands off my data: Users’ security concerns and intention to adopt privacy enhancing technologies. Italian Journal of Marketing, 309-342. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43039-020-00017-2

Maqableh, M., & Alia, M. (2021). Evaluation online learning of undergraduate students under lockdown amidst COVID-19 Pandemic: The online learning experience and students’ satisfaction. Children and Youth Services Review, 128, 106160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2021.106160

McGill, T., Hobbs, V., & Klobas, J. (2003). User Developed Applications and Information Systems Success: A Test of DeLone and McLean’s Model. Information Resources Management Journal (IRMJ), 16(1), 24-45. https://doi.org/10.4018/irmj.2003010103

Mohammadi, H. (2015). Social and individual antecedents of m-learning adoption in Iran. Computers in Human Behavior, 49, 191-207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.006

Muhuri, S., & Mukhopadhyay, D. (2022). Extracting the relationships among students based on accessing pattern of digital learning attributes. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 15(6), 747-756. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2022.3166537

Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS Procedures for Estimating Indirect Effects in Simple Mediation Models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36(4), 717-731. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206553

Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and Resampling Strategies for Assessing and Comparing Indirect Effects in Multiple Mediator Models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879-891. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.879

Qashou, A. (2021). Influencing factors in M-learning adoption in higher education. Education and information technologies, 26(2), 1755-1785. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10323-z

Rabaai, A. (2009). Assessing Information Systems Success Models: Empirical Comparison (Research in Progress). In: Proceedings of the 20th Australasian Conference on Information Systems. 447-455.

Rhema, A., & Miliszewska, I. (2014). Analysis of Student Attitudes towards E-learning: The Case of Engineering Students in Libya. Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, 11, 169-190.

Sahin, I., & Shelley, M. (2008). Considering Students’ Perceptions: The Distance Education Student Satisfaction Model. International Forum of Educational Technology and Society, 11(3), 216-223.

Saif, N., Khan, S. U., Shaheen, I., et al. (2024). Chat-GPT; validating Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) in education sector via ubiquitous learning mechanism. Computers in Human Behavior, 154, 108097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.108097

Seddon, P. B. (1997). A Respecification and Extension of the DeLone and McLean Model of IS Success. Information systems research, 8(3), 240-253. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.8.3.240

Selim, H. M. (2007). Critical Success Factors for E-Learning Acceptance: Confirmatory Factor Models. Computers and Education, 49(2), 396-413.

Seo, K., Tang, J., Roll, I., et al. (2021). The impact of artificial intelligence on learner–instructor interaction in online learning. International journal of educational technology in higher education, 18, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00292-9

Suprihartini, R., & Novianto, V. (2022). Efektivitas Pembelajaran Daring, SwayVS Form SD Negeri Kedunggubah. Proceedings Series on Social Sciences & Humanities, 3, 569-573. https://doi.org/10.30595/pssh.v3i.334

Tee, P.K., Vashu, D., Wong, L. C., et al. (2023). Customer Engagement in Instagram: The Mediating Role of Perceived Advertising Value. In: Al-Sharafi, M.A., Al-Emran, M., Al-Kabi, M.N., et al. (editors). In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Intelligent Systems. ICETIS 2022. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-25274-7_25

Tran, M. N. (2023). A holistic success model for sustainable e-learning based on the stakeholder approach: Case of Vietnamese students during the COVID-19 pandemic. Cogent Business & Management, 10(2), 2236298. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2236298

Upadhyay, S. (2020, March 30). What Will COVID-19 Mean for Teaching and Learning? Available online: https://www.policyforum.net/the-opportunities-and-risks-of-taking-education-online/ (accessed on 23 July 2024).

Vanve, A., Gaikwad, R., & Shelar, K. (2016). A New Trend E-Learning in Education System. International Researh Journal of Engineering and Technologies, 4(3), 2395-2456.

Venkatesh, V. (2000). Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model. Information Systems Research, 11(4), 342-365. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.11.4.342.11872

Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186-204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926

Wickersham, L. E., & McGee, P. (2008). Perceptions of Satisfaction and Deeper Learning in An Online Course. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 9(1), 73.

Wong, L. C., Tiong, Y. Y., Tee, P. K., et al. (2023a). Exploring A Tricomponent Attitude Model for the Application of “Forced” Online Learning in the Post-Covid Era. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 20(2), 233–266. https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2023.20.2.2

Wong, L.C., Suki, N. M., Suki, N. M., et al. (2023b). Consumers’ Green Smartphone Practices Concerned with Power Consumption Optimization. Cleaner and Responsible Consumption. 10, 100129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clrc.2023.100129

Wong, L.C., Tee, P.K., Cham, TH., et al. (2023c). Online Learning During Covid-19 Pandemic: A View of Undergraduate Student Perspective in Malaysia. In: Al-Emran, M., Al-Sharafi, M.A., Shaalan, K. (editors). International Conference on Information Systems and Intelligent Applications. ICISIA 2022. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16865-9_32

Wong, L.C., Tee, P.K., Yap, C.K., et al. (2023d). Examining Intentions to Use Mobile Check-In for Airlines Services: A View from East Malaysia Consumers. In: Al-Emran, M., Al-Sharafi, M.A., Shaalan, K. (editors). International Conference on Information Systems and Intelligent Applications. ICISIA 2022. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16865-9_13

Woodrow, J. E. (1990). Locus of Control and Student Teacher Computer Attitudes. Computers and Education, 14(5), 421-432. https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-1315(90)90036-7

Yukselturk, E., & Yildirim, Z. (2008). Investigation of Interaction, Online Support, Course Structure and Flexibility as the Contributing Factors to Students’ Satisfaction in an Online Certificate Program. Journal of Educational Technology and Society, 11(4), 51-65.

Zhao, X., Lynch Jr, J. G., et al. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and Truths about Mediation Analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(2), 197-206. https://doi.org/10.1086/651257

Zhou, R., Wang, X., Shi, Y., et al. (2019). Measuring E-Service Quality and its Importance to Customer Satisfaction and Loyalty: An Empirical Study in a Telecom Setting. Electronic Commerce Research, 19(3), 477-499. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-018-9301-3

Zhu, W., Liu, Q., & Hong, X. (2022). Implementation and challenges of online education during the COVID-19 outbreak: A national survey of children and parents in China. Early childhood research quarterly, 61, 209-219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2022.07.004




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i12.9062

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Ling Chai Wong, Bee Lian Song, Bee Wah Ooi, Ming Fook Lim, Poh Kiong Tee

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.