Today’s automation of the audit process increasingly relies on electronic auditing, especially computer-assisted audit techniques (CAATs), and has become a global necessity. Therefore, this study aims to explore the influence of technological, organizational, and environmental (TOE) factors on audit firms’ adoption of CAATs in developing countries, focusing on Ethiopia. The research employed a quantitative approach and gathered 113 valid responses from certified external auditors in Ethiopian audit firms. The data was then analyzed through the Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) method. The findings show that relative advantage and compatibility are the significant technological attributes influencing CAAT adoption in Ethiopian audit firms. Besides, auditors’ information technology (IT) competency was a significant organizational attribute influencing CAAT adoption. Environmental attributes such as the complexity of the client’s accounting information system (AIS) and the professional body support significantly impact the adoption of CAATs. Additionally, the size of an audit firm reduces the impact of clients’ AIS complexity on the adoption of CAATs in Ethiopian audit firms. The findings underscore the significance of CAAT adoption in audit firms and offer valuable insights for policymakers and standard setters in crafting legislation for the Ethiopian audit industry. This study represents the first scholarly effort to provide evidence of CAAT adoption in audit firms in developing countries like Ethiopia.

1. AABE. (2022). Audit firms Established under Proclamation 847/2006. Accounting and Auditing Board of Ethiopia.
2. Abed, S. (2020). Social commerce adoption using TOE framework: An empirical investigation of Saudi Arabian SMEs. International Journal of Information Management, 53(102118). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102118
3. Ahmi, A., & Kent, S. (2012). The utilisation of generalized audit software (GAS) by external auditors. Managerial Auditing Journal, 28(2), 88–113. https://doi.org/10.1108/02686901311284522
4. AICPA. (2008). International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS)—and AICPA Backgrounder. American Institute of Certified Public.
5. Al-Hiyari, A., Said, N. A., & Hattab, E. (2019). Factors that influence the use of computer-assisted audit techniques (CAATs) by internal auditors in Jordan. Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal, 23(3), 1–15.
6. Al-Okaily, M., Alqudah, H. M., Al-Qudah, A. A., et al. (2022). Examining the critical factors of computer-assisted audit tools and techniques adoption in the post-COVID-19 period: internal auditors perspective. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 54(5), 1062–1091. https://doi.org/10.1108/vjikms-12-2021-0311
7. Al-Qudah, A. A., Al-Okaily, M., & Alqudah, H. (2021). The relationship between social entrepreneurship and sustainable development from economic growth perspective: 15 ‘RCEP’ countries. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 12(1), 44–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2021.1880219
8. Awuah, B., Onumah, J. M., & Duho, K. C. T. (2021). Determinants of adoption of computer‐assisted audit tools and techniques among internal audit units in Ghana. THE ELECTRONIC JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES, 88(2). Portico. https://doi.org/10.1002/isd2.12203
9. Axelsen, M., Green, P., & Ridley, G. (2017). Explaining the information systems auditor role in the public sector financial audit. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 24, 15–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accinf.2016.12.003
10. Bertrand, J. T. (2004). Diffusion of Innovations and HIV/AIDS. Journal of Health Communication, 9, 113–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730490271575
11. Braun, R., & Davis, H. (2003). Computer-assisted audit tools and techniques: analysis and perspectives. Managerial Auditing Journal, 18(9), 725–731. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/02686900310500488
12. Chandra, S., & Kumar, K. N. (2018). Exploring Factors Influencing Organizational Adoption of Augmented Reality in E-Commerce: Empirical Analysis Using Technology-Organization-Environment Model. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 19(3), 237–265.
13. Chang, H. -J., Eckman, M., & Yan, R. -N. (2011). Application of the Stimulus-Organism-Response Model to the Retail Environment: The Role of Hedonic Motivation in Impulse Buying Behavior. The International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research, 21(3), 233–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593969.2011.578798
14. Chiu, C. -Y., Chen, S., & Chen, C. -L. (2017). An Integrated Perspective of TOE Framework and Innovation Diffusion in Broadband Mobile Applications Adoption by Enterprises. International Journal of Management, Economics and Social Sciences, 6(1), 14–39.
15. Curtis, M. B., & Payne, E. A. (2008). An Examination of Contextual Factors and Individual Characteristics Affecting Technology Implementation Decisions in Auditing. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 9, 104–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accinf.2007.10.002
16. Daoud, L. (2023). Predictors of Auditors’ Usage of CAATs: The Role of Top Management Support and Trust. Information Sciences Letters, 12(5), 1841–1850. http://doi.org/10.18576/isl/120528
17. Daoud, L., Marei, A., Al-Jabaly, S. M., et al. (2021). Moderating the Role of Top Management Commitment in Usage of Computer-Assisted Auditing Techniques. Accounting, 7, 457–468. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ac.2020.11.005
18. Davidson, R. A. (1993). A Note on the Association between Audit Firm Size and Audit Quality. Contemporary Accounting Research, 9(2), 479–488. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.1993.tb00893.x
19. Debreceny, R., Lee, S.‐L., Neo, W., et al. (2005). Employing Generalized Audit Software in the Financial Services Sector: Challenges and Opportunities. Managerial Auditing Journal, 20(6), 605–18. https://doi.org/10.1108/02686900510606092
20. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., et al. (2009). Statistical Power Analyses Using G*Power 3.1: Tests for Correlation and Regression Analyses. Behaviour Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
21. Fornell, V., & Larcker, C. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with observable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
22. Francis, J. R., & Yu, M. D. (2009). Big 4 Office Size and Audit Quality. Accounting Review, 84(5), 1521–1552.
23. Ghobakhloo, M., Arias‐Aranda, D., & Benitez‐Amado, J. (2011). Adoption of E-commerce Applications in SMEs. Industrial Management Data Systems, 111(8), 1238–1269. https://doi.org/10.1108/02635571111170785
24. Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., et al. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
25. Hair, J., Hult, G., Ringle, C., et al. (2017). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Los Angeles, California: Sage Publication.
26. Hameed, M. A., & Counsell, S. (2014). Establishing Relationships between Innovation Characteristics and Innovation Adoption in Organizations: A Meta-Analysis Approach. International Journal of Innovation Management, 18(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919614500078
27. Henseler, J., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modelling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
28. Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53–60. https://doi.org/10.21427/D7CF7R
29. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Sensitivity to under parameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3(4), 424–453. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.3.4.424
30. Ismail, I., Haron, H., Ibrahim, D. N., et al. (2006). Service Quality, Client Satisfaction and Loyalty towards Audit Firms: Perceptions of Malaysian Public Listed Companies. Managerial Auditing Journal, 21(7), 738–756. https://doi.org/10.1108/02686900610680521
31. Janvrin, D., Bierstaker, J., & Lowe, D. J. (2008). An Examination of Audit Information Technology Use and Perceived Importance. Accounting Horizons, 22(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch.2008.22.1.1
32. Kee, P. L., Kok, C. H., Lau, A., et al. (2013). Internet Technologies Usage by Audit Firms in Malaysia. Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting and Finance, 9(1), 47–66.
33. Kothari, C. R. (2004). Research Methodology: Methods and Techniques. Daryaganj, New Delhi: New Age International (P) Limited Publishers.
34. Lefebvre, L., Lefebvre, E., Elia, E., et al. (2005). Exploring B-to-B e-commerce adoption trajectories in manufacturing SMEs. Technovation, 25(12), 1443–1456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2005.06.011
35. Lestari, D., Mardian, S., & Firman, M. A. (2020). Why Don’t Auditors Use Computer-Assisted Audit Techniques? A Study at Small Public Accounting Firms. The Indonesian Accounting Review, 10(2), 105–116. https://doi.org/10.14414/tiar.v10i2.1974
36. Lia, H., Daia, J., Gershbergb, T., et al. (2018). Understanding Usage and Value of Audit Analytics for Internal Auditors: An Organizational Approach. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 28, 59–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accinf.2017.12.005
37. Lowe, D., Bierstaker, J. L., Janvrin, D. J., et al. (2017). Information Technology in an Audit Context: Have the Big 4 Lost Their Advantage? Journal of Information Systems, 32(1), 87–107. https://doi.org/10.2308/isys-51794
38. Lutfi, A., & Alqudah, H. (2023). The Influence of Technological Factors on the Computer-Assisted Audit Tools and Techniques Usage during COVID-19. Sustainability, 15(7704), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15097704
39. Mahzan, N., & Lymer, A. (2009). Examining Motivations to adopt Computer Assisted Audit Tools and Techniques (CAATTs): Cases of UK Internal Auditors. In: Proceedings of the International Business Information Management Conference (12th IBIMA). pp. 871–881.
40. Mao, H., Liu, S., Zhang, J., et al. (2016). Information Technology Resource, Knowledge Management Capability, and Competitive Advantage: The Moderating Role of Resource Commitment. International Journal of Information Management, 36(6), 1062–1074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.07.001
41. Marei, D. A., & Iskandar, P. E. (2020). The Impact of Computer Assisted Auditing Techniques (CAATs) on Development of Audit Process: An Assessment of Performance Expectancy of By the Auditors. International Journal of Management and Commerce Innovations, 7(2), 1199–1205.
42. Maroufkhani, P., Tseng, M., Iranmanesh, M., et al. (2020). Big data analytics adoption: Determinants and performances among small to medium-sized enterprises. International Journal of Information Management, 54(102190). https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102190
43. Martínez, H., Skournetou, D., Hyppölä, J., et al. (2014). Drivers and Bottlenecks in the Adoption of Augmented Reality Applications. Journal of Multimedia Theory and Application, 1, 27–44. https://doi.org/10.11159/jmta.2014.004
44. Oliveira, T., & Martins, M. F. (2011). Literature Review of Information Technology Adoption Models at Firm Level. The Electronic Journal Information Systems Evaluation, 14(1), 110–121.
45. Pedrosa, I., Costa, C. J., & Aparicio, M. (2020). Determinants Adoption of Computer-Assisted Auditing Tools (CAATs). Cognition Technology and Work, 22(3), 565–583. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-019-00581-4
46. Purnamasari, P., Amran, N. A., & Hartanto, R. (2022). Modeling computer-assisted audit techniques (CAATs) in enhancing the Indonesian public sector. F1000Research, 11(559), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.121674.2
47. Rahi, S., Ghani, M., Alnaser, F., et al. (2018). Investigating the role of a unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) in Internet banking adoption context. Management Science Letters, 8(3), 173–186. https://doi.org/10.5267/J.MSL.2018.1.001
48. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations, 5th ed. New York, United States: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign’s Academy for Entrepreneurial Leadership Historical Research Reference in Entrepreneurship.
49. Rosli, K., Yeow, P. H., & Siew, E.-G. (2013). Adoption of Audit Technology in Audit Firms. In: Proceedings of the 24th Australasian Conference on Information Systems.
50. Sabherwal, R., Jeyaraj, A., & Chowa, C. (2006). Information System Success: Individual and Organizational Determinants. Management Science, 52(12), 1849–1864. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0583
51. Sagar, A., & Ramanathan, K. (2022). Factors that Play a Role in Improving the Efficiency of Continuous Audits Using Computer Assisted Audit Techniques in Enterprises Including Healthcare Units. Cardiometry, (24), 385–392. https://doi.org/10.18137/cardiometry.2022.24.385392
52. Samagaio, A., & Diogo, T. A. (2022). Effect of Computer Assisted Audit Tools on Corporate Sustainability. Sustainability, 705, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14020705
53. Siew, E.-G., Rosli, K., & Yeowa, P. H. (2020). Organizational and Environmental Influences in the Adoption of Computer-Assisted Audit Tools and Techniques (CAATTs) by Audit Firms in Malaysia. International Journal of Accounting Information, 36, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accinf.2019.100
54. Skousen, C. J., & Wright, C. J. (2006). Contemporaneous Risk Factors and the Prediction of Financial Statement Fraud. SSRN. http://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.938736
55. Smidt, L., Steenkamp, L., Ahmi, A., et al. (2021). Assessment of the Purpose of the Use of GAS: A Perspective of Internal Audit Functions in Australia. International Journal of Information Systems in the Service Sector, 65–82. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJISSS.2021040105
56. Tan, K. S., Chong, S. C., Lin, B., et al. (2009). Internet-Based ICT Adoption: Evidence from Malaysian SMEs. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 109(2), 224–244. https://doi.org/10.1108/02635570910930118
57. Thong, J. Y. (1999). An Integrated Model of Information Systems Adoption in Small Businesses. Journal of Management Information Systems, 15(4), 187–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.1999.11518227
58. Tornatzky, L. G., & Fleischer, M. (1990). The Processes of Technological Innovation. Lexington, Massachusetts: Lexington Books.
59. Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2012). Adoption and Impacts of Interorganizational Business Process Standards: Role of Partnering Synergy. Information Systems Research, 23(4), 1131–1157. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1110.0404
60. Widuri, R., & Gautama, Y. (2020). Computer-Assisted Audit Techniques (CAATs) for Financial Fraud Detection: A Qualitative Approach. In: Proceeding of the 2020 International Conference on Information Management and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIMTech50083.2020.9211280
61. Zhu, K., & Kraemer, K. L. (2005). Post-Adoption Variations in Usage and Value of E-Business by Organizations: Cross-Country Evidence from the Retail Industry. Information Systems Research, 16(1), 61–84. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1050.0045