This study constructs and empirically validates a Creative Activity Chain (CCA) structure model tailored for innovation in sustainable infrastructure development. In today’s competitive environment, fostering innovation is crucial for maintaining the relevance and effectiveness of infrastructure projects. The research underscores that a significant portion of a project’s long-term value is established during its initial concept and planning stages, highlighting the critical role of creativity in infrastructure development. The CCA model is developed through theoretical frameworks and empirical data, encompassing three key dimensions: creative subject chain, creative action chain, and creative operation chain. The model’s validity is tested with data from five large infrastructure development firms in China, involving 768 R&D staff as respondents. Rigorous statistical methods, including exploratory factor analysis (EFA), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), structural equation modeling (SEM), and regression analysis, confirm the model’s robustness. The findings reveal significant positive correlations between the creative activity chain’s dimensions and the successful development of sustainable infrastructure projects. Additionally, the study examines the mediating effect of link strength within the creative activity chain, demonstrating its substantial impact on project outcomes. Implications for management include promoting diverse creative teams, systematic process management, and leveraging varied operational tools to enhance creativity in infrastructure development. This research contributes to the literature by introducing an integrated model for managing creative activities in sustainable infrastructure development, offering practical insights for improving innovation processes.

Armstrong, J. S., Darby, M. R., & Zucker, L. G. (2003). Commercializing knowledge: university science, knowledge capture and firm performance in biotechnology. Management Science, 48(1), 138–153. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.48.1.138.14274

Allen, T. J. (1977). Managing the flow of technology: technology transfer and the dissemination of technological information within the R&D organization. MIT Press.

Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. In: Cummings, B. S. (editor). Research in organizational behavior. Greenwich: JAI Press. pp. 123–167.

Amabile, T. M., Steven, J., & Kramer. Z. (2016). Motivation: Igniting passion and creativity at work with small successes.

Electronic Industry Press.

Bao, Q., Faas, D., & Yang, M. (2018). Interplay of sketching & prototyping in early stage product design. International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation, 6(3–4), 146–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/21650349.2018.1429318

Basadur, M. (2004). Leading others to think innovatively together: Creative leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 15(1), 103–121.

Belkin, N. J., Cooke, K. L., & Duff, P. (2015). The influence of selection criteria on the outcomes of idea generation sessions. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 24(5), 380–390.

Boeddrich, H. J. (2004). Ideas in the workplace-A new approach towards organizing the fuzzy front end of the innovation process. Creativity and Innovation Management, 13(4), 274–285.

Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Chang, S., Chen, C., & Wey, S., (2007). Conceptualizing, assessing, and managing front-end fuzziness in innovation/NPD projects, R&D Management, 37(5), 469–478.

Chrysanthou, E. G., Amaratunga, D., & Global, M. (2011). Co-creating new product concepts with customers in the context of new product development. Journal of Business Research, 64(2), 155–163.

Cooper, R. G. (1988). Pre-development Activities Determine New Product Success, Industrial Marketing Management, 17, 237–247.

Cochran, W. G. (1963). Sampling Techniques, 2nd ed. John Wiley and Sons Inc.

Crawford, C. M., & Benedetto, D. (2003). New products management. New York: Mc Graw Hill.

Dean, D. L., Hender, J. M., Rodgers, T. L., & Santanen, E. (2006). Identifying good ideas: constructs and scales for idea evaluation, Journal of Association for Information Systems, 7(10), 646–699.

Doyle, S., & Piggott, J. (1999). Mandatory annuity design: a preliminary study. Sydney: Retirement Economics Group, Centre for Applied Economic Research, University of New South Wales.

Dyne, L.V., & Lepine, J. A. (1998). Helping and voice extra-role behaviors: evidence of construct and predictive validity. Academy of Management Journal, 41(1), 108–119.

Engeström, Y. (2015). Learning by Expanding: An Activity-Theoretical Approach to Developmental Research. Cambridge University Press.

Faas, D., Bao, Q., & Yang, M. C. (2014). Preliminary Sketching and Prototyping: Comparisons in Exploratory Design-and-Build Activities. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Biennial International Conference on Dynamics for Design; 26th International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology. https://doi.org/10.1115/detc2014-34928

Feng, M., Fu, M. H., & Yin, M. X. (2007). Research on the competency of the manufacturing industry management based on the industry characteristics. Science, science and science and technology management.

Fornell, C., & Larcker, F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 18(1), 39–50.

Frishammar, J., Lichtenthaler, U., & Richtn, R. A. (2013). Managing Process Development: Key Issues and Dimensions in the Front End. R&D Management, 43, 213–26.

Gorsuch, R. L. (1983). Factor Analysis. In: Handbook of Psychology. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12541-6_8

Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5(9), 444–454.

Guilford, J. P. (1967). Creativity: Yesterday, today and tomorrow. Journal of Creative Behavior, 1(1), 3–14.

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., & Ringle, C. M. (2017). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling. Thousand Oaks: SAGE. p. 154.

Hoever, I. J., van Knippenberg, D., van Ginkel, W. P., & Barkema, H. G. (2012). Fostering team creativity: Perspective taking as key to unlocking diversity’s potential. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(5), 982–996.

Hsu, W., & Liu, B. (2000). Conceptual design: issues and challenges. Computer-Aided Design, 32, 849–850. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-4485(00)00074-9

Khurana, A., & Rosenthal, S. R. (1998). Towards holistic “front end” in new product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 15(1), 57–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5885.1510057

Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and practices of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford Press. pp. 112–118.

Koen, P., Ajamian, G., & Burkart, R. (2001). Providing clarity and a common language to the fuzzy front end. Research Technology Management, 44(2), 46–55.

Koenemann, S., O’Connor, G., & Vijayakumar, N. (2017). What makes an idea a breakthrough? The role of the front end of the innovation process. Journal of Business Research, 76, 133–141.

Lemos, M., & Liberali, F. (2019). The creative chain of activities towards educational management transformation: Findings from an intravention case study. International Journal of Educational Management, 33(7), 1718–1732.

Li, H. M., Song, J. L., Yang, Y. (2010). Analyzing product conceptual design and user research (Chinese). Science & Technology Information, 28, 476.

Li, S. M., Chan, F. T. S., Tsang, Y. P., & Lam, H. Y. (2021). New Product Idea Selection in the Fuzzy Front End of Innovation: A Fuzzy Best-Worst Method and Group Decision-Making Process. Mathematics, 1(9), 337.

Li, Z. D., & Jin, H. (2016). Firm Product Innovation and Network Embedding—The Mediating Role of Organizational Learning (Chinese). Management Review, 28(1), 62–72.

Liberali, F. C. (2009). Creative Chain in the Process of Becoming a Totality. Bakhtiniana Journal of Discourse Studies, 1(2),

Lukes, M., & Stephan, U. (2017). Measuring employee innovation. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 23(1), 136–158. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijebr-11-2015-0262100–124.

Muhammed, S. A., & Sathyapriya, J. (2019). Effect of entrepreneurship education on MBA students in Kerala on their entrepreneurial intent with special reference to the students of Mahatma Gandhi University, Kottayam, Kerala. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 8(2S4). https://doi.org/10.35940/ijrte.B1076.0782S419

Murphy, S. A., & Kumar, V. (1997). The front end of new product development: a Canadian survey. R&D Management, 27(1), 5–15.

Mumford, M. D. (2003). Where Have We Been, Where Are We Going? Taking Stock in Creativity Research. Creativity Research Journal, 15(2), 107–120.

Newman, A., Thanacoody, R., & Hui, W. (2012). The effects of perceived organizational support, perceived supervisor support and intra-organizational network resources on turnover intentions: a study of Chinese employees in multinational enterprises. Personnel Review, 41(1), 56–72.

Neeley, W. L., Lim, K., & Zhu, A. (2013). Building Fast to Think Faster: Exploiting Rapid Prototyping to Accelerate Ideation During Early Stage Design. In: Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology; Power Transmission and Gearing Conference (ASME 2013). https://doi.org/10.1115/detc2013-12635

Ng, T. W. H., & Lucianetti, L. (2015). Within-individual increases in innovative behavior and creative, persuasion, and change self-efficacy over time: a social–cognitive theory perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(1), 14–34.

Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1991). The Knowledge-Creating Company. Harvard Business Review.

Orihata, M., & Watanabe, C. (2000). The interaction between product concept and institutional inducement: A new driver of product. Technovation, 20(1), 11–23.

Paulus, P. B., & Brown, V. R. (2003). Enhancing ideational creativity in groups: Lessons from research on brainstorming. In: Paulus, P. B., Nijstad, B. A. (editors). Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration. Oxford University Press. pp. 110–136. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195147308.003.0006

Schapper-Santos, I. (2010). Playing meaning flow in the creative chain: argumentation and researchers and teachers education (Portuguese) [PhD thesis]. Pontifical Catholic University of São Paulo.

Schön, D. A., & Wiggins, G. (1992). Kinds of seeing and their functions in designing. Design studies, 12(2), 22.

Shin, S. J., Kim, T. Y., & Lee, J. Y. (2012). Cognitive team diversity and individual team member creativity: A cross-level interaction. Academy of Management Journal, 55(1), 197–212. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0270

Stephen, J. K. (1985). Innovation Is Not a Linear Process. Research Management, 28(4), 36–45.

Thompson, L. L. (2011). Making the team: a guide for managers. Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.

Vidal, R., Mulet, E., & Gómez-Senent, E. (2004). Effectiveness of the means of expression in creative problem-solving in design groups. Journal of Engineering Design, 15(3), 285–298.

Viswanathan, V. K., & Linsey, J. S. (2013). The role of sunk cost in engineering idea generation: An experimental investigation. Journal of Mechanical Design, 135(12), 121002. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4025290

Wallas, G. (1926). The Art of Thought. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace and Company.

Wu, M. L. (2010). Statistical analysis of questionnaires: SPSS operations and applications. Chongqing University Press.

Xie, X. M., & Wang, L. J. (2019). The Mechanism of User Participation on the Performance of New Product Development in Enterprises: An Online Community Perspective (Chinese). Nankai Business Review, 22(3): 12.

Yang, K., Fujisaki, I., & Ueda, K. (2021). Cooperation patterns of members in networks during co-creation. Scientific reports, 11, 11588. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-90974-1

Zhao, F. (2005). Knowledge acquisition from generalized experts in product creative design. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 15(9), 1684–1689.

Zhao, J. J., & Peng, R. D. (2015). The time process, industry characteristics and location distribution of overseas mergers and acquisitions of Chinese manufacturing enterprises. Commercial Research.

Zhang, F., & Yang, J. J. (2016). The Effect of Majority Shareholder Engagement Behavior on Firms’ Innovation Performance from a Shareholder Activism Perspective—The Mediating Role of Risk Taking (Chinese). Nankai Business Review, (4),4–12.

Zhang, H. Q., Shang, T. T., & Shao, Y. F. (2016). The Impact of Embedded Relationships on Knowledge Internalization and Competitive Mode Selection in Innovation Networks (Chinese). Chinese Journal of Management, 13(4), 605–612.

Zhang, Q., & Doll, W. (2001). The fuzzy front end and success of new product development: a causal model. European Journal of Innovation Management, 4(2), 95–112. https://doi.org/10.1108/14601060110390602

Zhen, M. R., Peng, J. S., & Yang, J. Z. (2012). The Influence of Organizational Innovation Climate on Employees’ Innovation Behavior—An Analysis Based on Individual Goal Orientation. Psychological Capital, 25(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1003-7691.2012.01.018

Zhang, Z. G., Yu, C. P., & Li, Y. J. (2016). A Study of the Relationship between Proactive Personality, Knowledge Sharing and Employee Innovation Behavior (Chinese). Management Review, 28(4), 123–133.